|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 3, 2006 19:23:08 GMT -5
Williams to tackle McCartney on Larry King Live
Canadian Press
St. John's — Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams will appear on television Friday to debate the seal hunt with former Beatle Paul McCartney.
Mr. Williams has been invited as a guest on CNN's Larry King Live, to debate the issue with Paul McCartney and his wife Heather Mills McCartney.
Elizabeth Matthews, a spokeswoman for the Premier, said Mr. Williams will tape his appearance from St. John's Friday afternoon.
Ms. Matthews says the Premier's goal is to educate people about the seal hunt and counter a campaign of misinformation by well-funded groups that have a ”huge communications machinery.
Mr. McCartney is calling on the Canadian government to end the annual seal hunt off the East Coast.
The former Beatle and his wife rolled around on an ice floe in the Gulf of St. Lawrence on Thursday, posing with white seal pups as part of a high-profile protest mounted with the U.S. Humane Society.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 3, 2006 19:29:29 GMT -5
MORE: www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=bff37d9d-7328-4f2e-8a71-a39e63eef3ec&k=71818After the hour-long debate, Williams said Heather Mills McCartney had attempted to interrupt him a number of times, and King had to act as referee. "But there's a point where people who don't respect Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, and who don't treat us with respect, will get it back in spades from me," he said. "I certainly wasn't going to allow the McCartneys to dominate that interview." Williams suggested the pop icon duo were misinformed, noting that Paul McCartney had thought his protest trip Thursday had taken him to Newfoundland, when in fact he was in Prince Edward Island and later Quebec. "They target us because we're a smaller province and it's a smaller industry," the premier said after he emerged from a TV studio in St. John's. "They're not going to take on the beef industry. A seal pup makes a great photo op. "They're not going to get their photo taken with a chicken. It's just not a good photo op." However, Jack Troake, a Newfoundland sealer with 55 years experience, admitted that the arrival of the McCartneys on the protest scene is a concern. Troake has seen his share of protesters - from fur-clad B-movie stars to radical vegans - but the McCartneys are in a class of their own when it comes to star power. ... Newfoundland musician Alan Doyle of Great Big Sea added his voice to the hunt debate in a journal entry from the group's current tour. Doyle said the McCartneys photo op on the ice is misleading to the public and unfair to sealers. "There has not been a cute and cuddly baby seal hunt in a long, long time," Doyle said, pointing out that Canada has banned the killing of newborn, whitecoat pups. "Older harp seals are what the sealers are after, but I'll bet these much uglier dudes won't make the final photo." --------------------------- pic - a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/media.canada.com/canwest/111/bc_cp_sealprotest2_030206.jpg |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 3, 2006 22:22:42 GMT -5
Well, I think the McCartney's won that debate. IMO.
We all saw the footage of the seals. Some people see it and think it's ok. I looked at it and was mortified.
When North America was a frontier, things might have been condusive for some of this in order for the survival of colonists, or Vikings, early settlers. The native population probably never
was so aggressive in this regard. It is 2006. We live in a different time. How many million seals are killed each hunt? IMO, I think it is time for this practice to stop.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenmac on Mar 3, 2006 23:13:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Mar 3, 2006 23:17:47 GMT -5
 [/quote] While defending the lives of baby seals, how many plastic surgeons had to die trying to make this man look like Paul Mc Cartney? |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 3, 2006 23:47:02 GMT -5
Well, I think the McCartney's won that debate. IMO. We all saw the footage of the seals. Some people see it and think it's ok. I looked at it and was mortified. When North America was a frontier, things might have been condusive for some of this in order for the survival of colonists, or Vikings, early settlers. The native population probably never was so aggressive in this regard. It is 2006. We live in a different time. How many million seals are killed each hunt? IMO, I think it is time for this practice to stop. I felt a little bad for Danny, because he has an impossible task, defending something like this. Newfoundland is by far the most financially strapped province, and he has no choice but to fight his way out of it somehow. It didn't help matters by saying that 90% are now killed with a bullet. (implying that 10% are still clubbed) |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 4, 2006 0:04:55 GMT -5
Well, I think the McCartney's won that debate. IMO.
We all saw the footage of the seals.
I didn't see any McCartneys on this program. . .
The two representatives of the Crown had nothing to rely on but their manipulative images. Did you notice that one the first things Lady Pegleg said was to admit that none of the seals hunted were as young as the cute furry ones they made a point to pose with?
This war on rural life is part and parcel of their puppetmasters' agenda of course. Mustn't have the serfs living off the land; they should all be in the urban death pens.
I think a lot of this creepy animal obsession arises from their loathing of people that can be so easily manipulated. Why aren't these two clowns flying to Iraq to protest the continuing story of hundreds of thousands of HUMANS being killed and tens of millions poisoned? Oh, right, it's Her Fukking Majesty doing the slaughter there; and Sir and Lady mayn't criticize!
|
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Mar 4, 2006 2:08:44 GMT -5
Well, just my opinion, but just because Sir Paul isn't protesting the Iraq war doesn't mean he's not standing up for a noble cause here. Why must we tear down something positive by comparing it to other things he could be doing? I see this a lot when it comes to celebrities and, while I certainly roll my eyes at plenty of them, there's definitely a history here.
He's been involved with animal rights since the '70s. That's his pet issue. Him not being Paul McCartney doesn't make this any less of who he is.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 4, 2006 2:24:42 GMT -5
Sir Doppelganger's "cause" isn't particularly noble at all, for the reasons I explained. It's not about clubbing or not clubbing baby seals, it's about an purging man from the ecosystem & part of the Crown's anti-human agenda.
We live in a different time. How many million seals are killed each hunt? IMO, I think it is time for this practice to stop.
So you'd force these people off the land, let the seals run wild until Bob Barker castrates them all? Were I a seal I'd rather take my chances in the hunt than risk my nuts in Barker's showcase showdown.
I was amused, or disgusted, or both, when Lady Pegleg urged a boycott of the lower-middle class sealhunters, urging us to buy pleather pants made from Her Majesty's oil instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 4, 2006 2:33:29 GMT -5
90% are now killed with a bullet. (implying that 10% are still clubbed)
He said 99%. The activists are using manipulative, misrepresentative images to close down all seal hunting. It's a different issue than animal cruelty, which can be criminalized without stopping hunts..
|
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Mar 4, 2006 3:56:15 GMT -5
 Poor seal, to have to suffer the indignity that is Sir McWannabe and his wife. Geez, Faul looks terrible, old, leathery skin, and sagging jowels... That nose is so out of place, especially compared to hers. |
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 4, 2006 8:56:01 GMT -5
"They target us because we're a smaller province and it's a smaller industry," the premier said after he emerged from a TV studio in St. John's. "They're not going to take on the beef industry. A seal pup makes a great photo op. "They're not going to get their photo taken with a chicken. It's just not a good photo op." Such a good point. Millions of chickens, cows, sheep, etc are 'grown' (this is the term farmers use) in the most appalling conditions in the UK every year and then slaughtered so why do the 'McCartneys' travel thousands of miles to another country to protest the mistreatment of animals? I smell an agenda. I'm sure many of you remember this story from a few months ago when the 'McCartneys' were attacking China for their mistreatments of dogs and cats. Why attack China? Again in the story and the video clip he makes no mention of the Chinese governments appalling human rights abuses and actually states that if China stopes their dog and cat fur trade then he'll change his attitude towards boycotting them. What about all the other animals Chinese industry is killing 'Paul'? And what about the people of Tibet and China 'Paul'? Does he not believe in boycotting China for human rights abuses? He mentions apartheid South Africa in the interview but the communist dictarorship that runs China apparently doesn't bother him. I've been a vegetarian for almost tens years and I strongly believe that animals should have the right to live just as we do but the imposter and his wife are full of shit. |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 4, 2006 12:02:42 GMT -5
Such a good point. Millions of chickens, cows, sheep, etc are 'grown' (this is the term farmers use) in the most appalling conditions in the UK every year and then slaughtered so why do the 'McCartneys' travel thousands of miles to another country to protest the mistreatment of animals? I smell an agenda. I'm sure many of you remember this story from a few months ago when the 'McCartneys' were attacking China for their mistreatments of dogs and cats. Why attack China? Again in the story and the video clip he makes no mention of the Chinese governments appalling human rights abuses and actually states that if China stopes their dog and cat fur trade then he'll change his attitude towards boycotting them. What about all the other animals Chinese industry is killing 'Paul'? And what about the people of Tibet and China 'Paul'? Does he not believe in boycotting China for human rights abuses? He mentions apartheid South Africa in the interview but the communist dictarorship that runs China apparently doesn't bother him. I've been a vegetarian for almost tens years and I strongly believe that animals should have the right to live just as we do but the imposter and his wife are full of shit. Good point, if one is not a vegetarian, and if you are honest with yourself, it's difficult to reconcile, how killing one animal is OK (chicken/cow farms) and one is not. The fishing industry is dead in Newfoundland, and while Danny was correct in stating that foreign fishermen were responsible for trawling (strip mining) the fish in the Great Banks, that practice stopped in the 1970's when Canada extended its fishing limit to 200 miles. However, Canadians themselves subsequently took up the practice, and without any intervention or regulation from the Canadian government. Well, whether this is the root cause, or whether it's the cooling of the waters, (perhaps caused by a slowing gulf stream) the fishing industry (which is how many Newfies made their living) is done. Unlike here in the US, (because fishermen are considered self employed) the Canadian govt. has been giving assistance checks, but that's not much consolation to people who pride themselves on being self sufficient. In the long run, a seal hunt doesn't help much, they need all those fish back.. That's the reality. |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 4, 2006 12:25:10 GMT -5
Good point JoJo about the fish. I think this is a terrible practice no matter how you justify it.
Btw, did anyone notice that Bill is involved in this cause and it deals with Canada, his probable home country?
|
|
|
|
Post by lili on Mar 4, 2006 14:06:13 GMT -5
I did. I noticed that he made like he didn't know where he was. That Bill is a sly one, alright  |
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Mar 4, 2006 16:35:01 GMT -5
The first thing that struck me, while you are talking about his animal rights activism, I noticed that Sir Bill's ear, (his left and what looked right to us) was crooked compared to the other ear. My sister also noticed that it was "off". While saving baby seals, did his old fake ear freeze off?
As for his animal rights business, funny how he was "vegetarian" after the "Faul" of 1966. There was no mention of vegetarianism or animal rights when he was still a Beatle.
I think it's all a political and masonic plot to distract the sheeple (people who follow the leader like sheep).
While it's a noble cause to save baby seals......what about baby humans? Perhaps Sir Bill could best use his position to save his own race......
|
|
|
|
Post by lili on Mar 5, 2006 13:54:36 GMT -5
That's an interesting observation, Rita.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 5, 2006 20:34:33 GMT -5
Keep The Seal Cull - Ban Heather Mills McCartney www.halifaxlive.com/content/view/569/32/ Written by D.L. McCracken Saturday, 04 March 2006 It's that time of year again boys and girls. As February bids its final adieu to winter-weary Canadians from coast to coast, the month of March debuts with either the heart of a lion or the gentleness of a lamb. Either way, March brings the first promise of Spring to the people north of the 49th parallel and for that reason alone, the month of March is welcomed with open arms from the craggy shores of Newfoundland/Labrador to the more temperate Pacific shores of British Columbia. But March brings something else into our lives, an event that has divided a country and subsequently the whole world is suddenly watching Canada in horror, disgust and sanctimonious indignation. What could it be? What could the Great White North be doing once a year that attracks the attention and the scorn of world renowned aging Hollywood movie stars and equally aging musicians and their much younger wives? It's the annual seal cull. March is the month that the industrialized fisherpeople of Newfoundland/Labrador head out to the ice floes in the Gulf of St. Lawrence for the sole purpose of slaughtering as many young seals as they can muster. The floes are suddenly awash in the red blood of the kill and the anguished cries of the seal mothers who hover helplessly nearby as their babies are viciously mutilated and skinned. And those are the images that are shown around the world to a shocked and sickened and irate audience. The images are always accompanied with a pharisaic voice-over that insists upon further describing the scene in as much detail as possible - ice floes turned red with blood, cruel men raising their clubs high in the air and swiftly coming down on the unsuspecting head of the cutest, whitest little seal pup one could imagine. You've seen those horrific images, haven't you? Those are the images that have become ingrained on so many people's minds. Those cute little innocent baby seals....the thing is though that the cute little pups called the whitecoats haven't been bludgeoned since 1987. The Canadian government banned the cull of the whitecoats but those are the images that continue to make their way around the world and into the livingrooms of offended celebrities. Celebrities like Sir Paul and Lady Heather McCartney. Paul, the "cute one" from The Beatles. Heather, the second wife. The super-couple were this year's representatives of the United States Humane Society's annual campaign to abolish the Canadian seal cull. The McCartneys traveled to the Canadian Maritimes last week in a very well publicized and obviously staged sequence of events to remind the world of the atrocities going on in Canada and to demand that Canadian prime minister "Steve" Harper ban the practice. Note to Sir Paul - it's Stephen Harper. Our prime minister is not the "Steve" type and I doubt his own wife would get away with calling him that. Your usage of the familiar "Steve" in your impassioned speeches would lead the less well informed to believe that you enjoyed a close personal relationship with Prime Minister Harper. Now I'm not going to deny that I am against the annual cull. I do not agree with it and I consider the cull tactics cruel. But this article is not about my personal opinions. This article is being written because even though I am personally offended by the cull, I am even more offended by the actions and words of Sir Paul and Heather McCartney. Fast forward to the photo shoot on the ice floe. Paul and Heather were warm and cuddly in their orange snowsuits, wolly toques and spiffy shades and there they were, lying prone on their bellies watching with unmitigated wonder a seriously cute whitecoat seal. I would assume that some basic rules were laid down beforehand regarding strict federal regulations that forbid human contact with marine animals - in other words we are not allowed to touch them. So imagine my surprise when Heather's hand came out and she began stroking the whitecoat's hindquarters. At that moment I was one of many Atlantic Canadians who were sitting in front of our television screens and rooting for the seal to turn around and take a chunk out of her. Alas, the seal displayed more manners than I and merely growled its displeasure. Fastforward yet again to Friday night's installment of CNN's Larry King Live. At first we were told that only the McCartneys would be interviwed by Mr. King so most of us here in Atlantic Canada shrugged our shoulders and checked the telecaster for alternative programming. But then it was announced that the premier of Newfoundland/Labrador, Danny Williams was also scheduled to make an appearance on the show. Suddenly Larry King Live became must-see-TV, at least for us here on the east coast. The first thirty minutes of the one-hour show was devoted to the McCartneys and they were given plenty of time to express ad nauseam how very dismayed and saddened they were by the "barbaric...and really brutal" practice. Heather went on to say that she understood that this is a livelihood for some of the people in Newfoundland/Labrador so they "really researched" the cull. She went on to say, "we did not want to come out here and start...cuddling up to seal pups and saying 'It's terrible that you do this' if people are totally surviving on this." Earth To Heather - that's exactly what you did. But really I wasn't listening intently at that point. I was waiting impatiently for Premier Danny Williams. Mr. King finally introduced the premier half way through the show. (Note to Larry King - it's NewFOUNDland, not NewFINDland.) As Mr. King was introducing the premier he explained to his audience that Mr. Williams was appearing not only to expose the inaccuracies and falsehoods associated with the seal cull but that Mr. Williams was representing the prime minister of Canada as well. I mention this because from that point forward I and many of my colleagues were flabbergasted to see Heather McCartney treat the premier (and hence the prime minister) with blatant disrespect. She stopped just short of accusing the premier of being a liar. Several times. Williams was attempting to explain that the vast majority of seals are shot, not bludgeoned. At that point a sneering Heather retorted to Williams, "Well, it's just not true. It's complete and absolute rubbish. It's just not true." And, "Let's forget that you don't care about the humanity." Heather McCartney's performance on the Larry King show did manage to change my mind about a few things but perhaps not what she and her husband intended. I was under the obviously false impression that the McCartneys are basically down-to-earth people who conducted their various activist campaigns with grace and intelligence. I was wrong. Heather McCartney proved to be crude, impolite, disrespectful to government and world leaders, a woman who loves the sound of her own voice and refuses to listen to any opinion that differs from her own. It astounds me to think that Heather McCartney believes that browbeating disrespect will win friends and influence people. Finally, a note to Sir Paul - the next time you decide to come to Canada, do us all a favour please and leave the little woman at home. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 5, 2006 23:23:49 GMT -5
McCartneys won't be charged Singer and wife illegally touched harp seal pup www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=3822bca5-58ba-45f6-91f6-d77fe99291c0Graeme Hamilton, National Post Published: Saturday, March 04, 2006 Federal fisheries officers have decided against charging former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney and his wife even though their petting and poking of a seal pup off the Magdalen Islands on Thursday was technically illegal. Canada's Marine Mammal Regulations state: "No person shall disturb a marine mammal except when fishing for marine mammals under the authority of these regulations." Photographs show Sir Paul and his wife, Heather, patting a white-coated seal pup as they visited the ice floes to protest against the Canadian seal hunt. At one point, the pup took exception to Mrs. McCartney's caresses and snapped at her. Roger Simon, area director for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans in the Magdalen Islands, said the offence was so minor it does not warrant taking the couple to court. "It's almost like saying you're going 51 kilometres in a 50-kilometre zone," Mr. Simon said. "If a fishery officer had been present, something like a warning would have probably been issued, saying, 'Well, if these pups are still nursing, we suggest that you don't pet them -- just watch them.' " A court would have to be shown that the seal had been harmed by the pop star and his wife, Mr. Simon said, and research has shown casual interaction with humans does no lasting damage to young seals. "She may have bothered [the pup] but I don't think she harmed him," he said, adding that Canada has better uses of its tax dollars than a McCartney trial. "When disturbance is of such a minor nature, you wouldn't bring someone to court on something like this," he said. "Somebody would say that the Canadian government and the Canadian taxpayers must have better things to do than haul Paul McCartney into court because he touched a seal." Mr. Simon said Mrs. McCartney was fortunate it was a harp seal pup she stroked and not a grey seal. "The pup you saw yesterday that snapped doesn't even have any teeth," he said. "A grey seal would probably still be grabbing on to her nose. They're a bigger, more vicious animal." After 20 years working with seals, Mr. Simon has seen a lot of celebrities come and go. "Last year we had MacGyver [televison actor Richard Dean Anderson], we had Loretta Swift [Hot Lips Houlihan from television's M*A*S*H*] one year. One year we had Bobby Kennedy, Jr.," he said. But he was particularly unimpressed with Sir Paul's understanding of the seal hunt. He expected the ex-Beatle would be out of his league in his televised debate with Danny Williams, the Newfoundland Premier. "Poor Paul, in a debate, would be hard-pressed because he doesn't know very much about the subject," Mr. Simon said. As an example, he noted that Sir Paul suggested to local reporters that the seal hunt be replaced by whale-watching tours. "We're surrounded by ice, and this isn't a whale area. This is where whales pass but never stop, so it wasn't very well-documented or researched," Mr. Simon said. He called Sir Paul's seal-hunt knowledge "a crash-course, HSUS brainwashing thing." The HSUS is the Humane Society of the United States, which organized the McCartneys' visit. FISHERIES ACT Prohibitions (7) No person shall disturb a marine mammal except when fishing for marine mammals under the authority of these regulations. |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 6, 2006 1:12:22 GMT -5
OK, so:
So, here we have a law protecting the seals from human interaction.
Protecting the seals from humans? Really? Human interaction poses a threat to the seals?
But, no law protecting the seals from licensed hunters, licensed by the government.
Oh, yea. The hunt poses no threat to the seals.
Let's see. Bullets and beatings------no threat to seals.
Petting and caressing-----possible threat to seals.
But, if Heather and Paul decided to obtain a hunting license, they could (theoretically) pet and caress these creatures for a little while before they would have to kill the little darlings. But getting a permiit now? I don't suppose they would be able to get one after this high profile flap; I guess they award permits to experienced hunters who'll get the job done without
grousing.
But imagine---IF Paul and Heather could get a license to hunt them,THEN they would be in a position to kill. The irony: Would this position preclude the priviledge of petting the seals kindly beforehand? Is there a legally available petting license?
Hmmm. Why would we ever need permission from any government to manifest common, centuries old, natural human behaviors when we are "out in nature?" Are we school children to whom the government says "look, but don't touch, admire, or express affection?"
Do we have no business in nature? Is the common man no longer welcome in the domains of the wild, the frontiers, the outbacks? Will we soon need licenses to visit National Forests and Parks, to see and relate to creatures in the wilderness? Are we being seperated from our roots as man and women living in nature? Are we to be wards in virtual custody who are only welcome in asphalt cities and urban plantations?
Maybe there are no legal provisions for petting creatures in the wilderness.
That's really nice to know, because then at least we know that the seals WON'T be harmed by human interaction just before they get shot.
OK, we recognize there is a difference between domesticated pets and creatures in the wild. It's about demeanor and response. Maybe these seals are prone to bite at people, whoever comes too close.
That's nature; that is just their sense of self-preservation at work.
I don't think a small nibble or bite on a finger would make either Heather or Paul decide these creatures were vicious and not worth protecting. That was such a stupid, lame point I can't even bear to address it further.
The protesters of the hunt, and Paul, and Heather, all they want to do is to foster the humane and kind treatment of animals. And this position is an offense to some. It is a question of how prolonged and intense is the period of agony that we humans decide is fair to mete out to other creatures.
They feel pain as keenly as we would. If that could be remembered in this equation, there might be more understanding of the protesters' position.
I say shorten and minimize the discomfort and pain involved in the deaths of any game or livestock--eliminate it if possible!
Otherwise, what is the difference between gaming and animal cruelty to say, dogs and cats?
At the very least, the "one bullet" practice, and the endless clubbing have to stop. If the actual hunt isn't ended, it needs to be altered to favor humane treatment to the animal, not fashion industries hunger for perfect pelts.
At least a blemished plet with a bullet defect or two might tell the owner of the seal skin jacket that the seal from which it came died quickly........
Otherwise, wearing a perfect seal pelt may as well be a trophy proclaiming the extended suffering of the animal(s) that wrought it.
When gentility and kindness towards animals become crimes...........humans are next............
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 6, 2006 1:33:01 GMT -5
Paul,
... is dead.
and Heather, all they want is to foster the humane and kind treatment of animals.
This is simply incorrect. This is not their position, this is not "all they want." Their position is that the seal cull be ended entirely. Two different propositions.
if Linda and Paul decided to obtain a hunting license
Both dead!
THEN they would be legally allowed to touch them.
They still couldn't touch the kind of seal that Mills was photo-opping with and generally annoying -- those are illegal to hunt.
But regardless, not to worry -- the laws of the Commonwealth don't apply to faithful agents of the Crown -- just the little people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 6, 2006 1:59:30 GMT -5
Paul,... is dead. and Heather, all they want is to foster the humane and kind treatment of animals. This is simply incorrect. This is not their position, this is not "all they want." Their position is that the seal cull be ended entirely. Two different propositions. if Linda and Paul decided to obtain a hunting license Both dead! THEN they would be legally allowed to touch them.They still couldn't touch the kind of seal that Mills was photo-opping with and generally annoying -- those are illegal to hunt. But regardless, not to worry -- the laws of the Commonwealth don't apply to faithful agents of the Crown -- just the little people. OK, I fixed my Linda to Heather, and thanks for the info that certain seals are unlawful to hunt, I did not know that. Still, can't we use more bullets to end the life of the seal quicker? If the hunt goes on, can't it mean less extended agony for these creatures? |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 6, 2006 2:35:48 GMT -5
certain seals are unlawful to hunt, I did not know that.
It's illegal to hunt the baby ones with the cute white coat which they were posing with. It was a baldly manipualtive enterprise.
Still, can't we use more bullets to end the life of the seal quicker? If the hunt goes on, can't it mean less extended agony for these creatures?
There's probably a case to be made there, but Mills et al aren't making it.
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Mar 6, 2006 22:29:19 GMT -5
I've noticed Lady Heather before she was a lady on Larry King, some years ago when she was only dating Sir Paul. I thought her "pet project" was land mines and how people were maimed because of them. Being "maimed" herself from an accident,she was supposedly sympathetic to victims of land mines.
Not that people cannot have different "causes" they are behind, but it seems strange that every once in a while they re emerge with some new "cause". What's next, saving the dolphins from tuna nets?
|
|
