|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 17:56:02 GMT -5
Post by sinatrafonzarelli on Jul 17, 2005 17:56:02 GMT -5
You guys are really weird. In a good way though.
|
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 18:11:20 GMT -5
Post by JoJo on Jul 17, 2005 18:11:20 GMT -5
You guys are really weird. In a good way though. Heh ok, well I'll take that as a compliment I guess.. Welcome!  |
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 18:56:07 GMT -5
Post by sinatrafonzarelli on Jul 17, 2005 18:56:07 GMT -5
Thanks!
While I don't think the whole Paul is Dead thing stands up to strong scrutiny, it fascinates and disturbs me on a sub-conciously level, because The Beatles were my childhood heroes and this sort of makes them out to be kind of sinister.
Even if it was true, it wouldn't matter that much to me, though. I never was that big of a fan of anything they did before "Help!", so if anything it's just kind of fun.
|
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 18:59:33 GMT -5
Post by pennylane on Jul 17, 2005 18:59:33 GMT -5
Paul was still around for Help, Rubber Soul, Revolver.. and part of peppers...
anyways welcome ;D
|
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 19:16:36 GMT -5
Post by sinatrafonzarelli on Jul 17, 2005 19:16:36 GMT -5
That seems to be the consensus, although there's a smaller group of people who think it stared with the Butcher cover.
|
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 20:01:23 GMT -5
Post by xpt626 on Jul 17, 2005 20:01:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Omg new
Jul 17, 2005 21:04:17 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 17, 2005 21:04:17 GMT -5
Thanks! While I don't think the whole Paul is Dead thing stands up to strong scrutiny, it fascinates and disturbs me on a sub-conciously level, because The Beatles were my childhood heroes and this sort of makes them out to be kind of sinister. Well, actually it does stand up to plenty of scrutiny. The more time spent on this, the more you can see the pieces of the puzzle fall into place. Beatle history doesn't really make sense without figuring in some sort of major devistating event around JPM in late 66. But of course the most obvious thing that you'll notice over time is that Bill doesn't look like JPM or sound like him.... especially during 1967. There was a time a year or 2 later when they had Bill lookin' pretty close to JPM, but they never did get it just right. So anyway... welcome! Poke around & check out all the stuff posted & feel free to ask questions anytime ;D |
|
