|
Post by lili on Feb 10, 2006 12:25:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 17, 2006 19:15:04 GMT -5
Bumping this for the baldness talk. I just got a scanner and found a pic that I felt very much illustrated the possibility of JPM being bald. What do we think?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 17, 2006 22:28:34 GMT -5
Bumping this for the baldness talk. I just got a scanner and found a pic that I felt very much illustrated the possibility of JPM being bald. What do we think? Ringo sang, "You were in a car crash, and you lost all your hair." Temporary wigs until it grew back in?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 17, 2006 22:45:51 GMT -5
From earlier in this thread: Bill Bill: Provocative. Hard to evaluate. Small, blurry, distant. Yet possibly these pics suggest a second person.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jun 18, 2006 6:22:23 GMT -5
Of course they do, Doc. I can immediately see that Paul's head was somehow put into that photo !
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 18, 2006 9:34:02 GMT -5
What's obvious about the Abbey Road shot that many of us have forgotten is that the profile of Bill has been morphed with a profile of JPM. Look at the difference in the two side shots of Bill that lili posted. What a difference! The Abbey Road final shot looks a lot more like JPM, ears, cheeks, nose, jawline, shape, etc. and we know this was done on purpose. Bill
|
|
|
Post by luvleerita on Jun 18, 2006 20:57:37 GMT -5
That a is dirty trick. It does look like JPM, where the pic from Lili's post shows that Bill's profile shows a shorter jawline. Bill's profile, from the nose to chin, recedes. Whereas the JPM-ish pic the nose, lips and chin come straight down.
THey had to morph JPM's image as well as they could with the technology of that time, to keep any suspicion with Bill's looks. Alot of morphing and doctored photos and it's disgusting. Even if there are other "Fauls" used in the process in various ways, that is a JPM image overset on Bill. And who would be suspicious at that time? The Paul is Dead hype at that time had been played down and this album came out about the time of all the hoax hoopla. So most people brushed it off as a hoax. Unfortunately many still think it's a hoax. That's the really sad part.
And the picture of JPM posted with the "balding" look, the nose, mouth and chin looks doctored to me. Almost to make that picture look like a little bit of JPM and a little bit of Bill. If you would look at the pic of the top of the head and eyes, it looks like JPM, but the bottom half of the face looks like Bill. Cover each part and see if it does to you as well. That's what it looks like to me.
Now if JPM had been bald or going bald before his death, being in a car crash would not have caused hair loss. Something about that idea of baldness during the Beatles before his death is a little strange to me. Maybe because of the cause of his death and the alleged amount of time from the death until his body was found may have given a strange balding look, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jun 20, 2006 7:14:17 GMT -5
Paul's dad was balding at a pretty young age. However, I thought that the bald gene runs on the mother's side: Paul looked like he was getting a little bald on top. I honestly don't see what that has to do with his dying. I know that there's that line'" you were in a car crash & you lost your hair ". I'm still not convinced that Ringo was singing about Paul, but it is a possibility. There are people at TKIN who take something that is totally iincidental & try to turn it into this big "thing" !
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 23, 2006 10:26:37 GMT -5
. but who's the man in the bottom left hand corner. Pretty sure that's "Q" from Star Trek, first made his appearance on the Next Generation series. From Wiki: In the Star Trek fictional universe, the Q are a race of omnipotent, immortal and omniscient god-like beings from a parallel existence called the Q Continuum. ("I have complete control over space, matter and time" -Q2). They are largely indifferent to the affairs of the non-Q beings living in normal space, with a few exceptions.Well, he was my favorite character.. Perhaps we should ask Q? Time to revisit this photo in light of the Star Trek thread and Charlie Brill discovery. "Q" is based on a character in the original series played by WILLIAM CAMPBELL, Trelaine the "Squire of Gothos." There was a similar character in an earlier episode, an immature teenager with omnipotent powers, named "Charlie X" ( the "Charlie X"-titledepisode). He turns an Enterprise crew member into a lizard, and wipes all the features off the face of another, woman crew member, turning her face into a blank sheet of skin. The bluebird suggests Sylvie Vartan or "MK BLUEBIRD". Gomer is Mayberry-Maybe Don Knotts-Frian.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 24, 2006 13:24:39 GMT -5
Having a blank sheet of skin ...wiping off faces....
Art imitating life?......
rather disturbing when you think about it....
Deliberate govt/military/medical operation.....
Sometimes I think that the "art" released, whether it by music, movies, tv, novels...is a deviate way of revealing some truth, heavily disguised....and the general public wouldn't pick up on it.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 24, 2006 13:38:51 GMT -5
Sometimes I think that the "art" released, whether it by music, movies, tv, novels...is a deviate way of revealing some truth, heavily disguised....and the general public wouldn't pick up on it.
No doubt that this is being done now and has been done for a long time. I read recently that the Nazis developed the use of advertisements in Germany for the purpose of delivering military and government messages.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 24, 2006 15:06:21 GMT -5
No doubt that this is being done now and has been done for a long time. I read recently that the Nazis developed the use of advertisements in Germany for the purpose of delivering military and government messages. This is true, I found a book in the library a while back dedicated to the subject, full of color plates. (I was looking for something else in the art section, but this caught my eye) Really crude and in your face, working too much at the conscious level. That would never go over too well today..
|
|
|
Post by lili on Sept 26, 2006 11:16:10 GMT -5
That might very well be true, Jo. However, who knows what they were putting across at the sub-conscious level. Very much like WAG THE DOG. Look over here, look at what I'm doing. Meanwhile in another direction, evil nasty things are taking place !
|
|
Blll
Help!
Posts: 48
|
Post by Blll on Sept 27, 2006 13:21:08 GMT -5
it is almost like the whole Paul Is Dead thing also involves travelling in time!!!
I am serios.!!
It is like everything is revealing in front of our eyes.
by the way:
Paul is dead-and I really want it out!!!
It is there if you reverse "why dont we do it in the road!!"
TRY :-)
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 27, 2006 14:37:04 GMT -5
Well, it's being revealed, although it takes a little work..
I'll try that reversal, sounds worth a try.
Welcome, I assume you are the guy on TKIN who is making a documentary?
|
|
Blll
Help!
Posts: 48
|
Post by Blll on Sept 27, 2006 16:40:23 GMT -5
thank you.. Is there any evidence on the fact that manson and mccartney meet in 1968 in the wilson house... anybody heard anything? Here is another clue for you all: I crypted this...i distorted it in all posible ways,so that you guys couldnt track it down...or maybe you can?? but this is actually Bill telling asking us:Do you figure i am a phony through (I hope) an unbreakable filter:-) www.megaupload.com/?d=5VZYKDQY
|
|
Blll
Help!
Posts: 48
|
Post by Blll on Sept 27, 2006 16:41:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 27, 2006 17:33:28 GMT -5
A couple of things: You uploaded in AIF format, which is fine for me, cause I use a Macintosh, but most people here are probably Windows users and will have a problem. The other thing is that the WDWDITR file has the AIF extension truncated for some reason. You can type it in, but until you do, it looks like an executable (.exe) and I thought (just for a second, until I was able to open it) that you had uploaded a virus... It ISN'T one, just to make that clear..
I can make out "I want to get it out" vaguely, not real sure about the "Paul is dead" part. As for the other one, in spite of the distortion, it's possible. Must be another backwards masking deal? The word "phony" sounds too unnatural in the pronouciation to be forwards. As for where it's from, I guess that's your secret.. I don't have the time to hunt it down.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 27, 2006 21:08:09 GMT -5
Yes, I can hear it, but more like "Paul is really dead, I really want it out."
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Sept 27, 2006 22:07:35 GMT -5
Who is really singing on this? Faul? Lennon imitating someone else? Did we never hear Faul's rendition before Anthology?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Sept 27, 2006 22:44:31 GMT -5
good find, iaap!
could this fall under the category of "reverse speech"?
|
|
Blll
Help!
Posts: 48
|
Post by Blll on Sept 28, 2006 5:13:49 GMT -5
Are you serios about Neil Aspinall being Paul?Or that there was a Frian? I sounds TOO farout to me. We still miss the evidence of WHO is the guy that claims to be Paul McCartney! It is not Neil!!!It couldnt be,really!
|
|
|
Post by lili on Sept 28, 2006 12:02:51 GMT -5
I believe that Neil Aspinall was one of the 1st people they attempted to turn into Paul McCartney. For some reason, he didn't work out. Most likely because he was too close to Paul & he couldn't stomach doing it. I also believe that the person who is Neil Aspinall now is not the original Neil. What happened to Neil Aspinall once it was decided that his replacement of Paul wouldn't work out ? I shudder to think.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 28, 2006 20:46:30 GMT -5
it is almost like the whole Paul Is Dead thing also involves travelling in time!!! I am serios.!! It is like everything is revealing in front of our eyes. I noticed you have expanded on this idea a bit at TKIN, asking if anyone remembers the drumskin mirror bit before 2001. I like to imagine the possibilities, but on the other hand, I am also practical, do see both sides here. The drumskin was always there, just no one bothered to "work it" before, perhaps to the chagrin of those who went to all the hard work of putting it there in the first place, as someone has hinted at..
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 28, 2006 22:04:34 GMT -5
I believe that Neil Aspinall was one of the 1st people they attempted to turn into Paul McCartney. For some reason, he didn't work out. Most likely because he was too close to Paul & he couldn't stomach doing it. I also believe that the person who is Neil Aspinall now is not the original Neil. What happened to Neil Aspinall once it was decided that his replacement of Paul wouldn't work out ? I shudder to think. One would wonder what really happened to him or any of them that didn't "take" or didn't cooperate. Especially if the guy went through a series of surgeries or time spent in learning the sounds and tones of JPM's voice and mannerisms...and he would have known that something happened to the real JPM...maybe all of the operation... It is a creepy thing to think of the possibilities..
|
|