|
Post by il ras on Jan 2, 2006 14:07:38 GMT -5
Big version: images.picpile.com/uploads/112898661.jpgWhen i saw the post about The Faul's head in Abbey Road's cover ( invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Clues&thread=1129746108&page=1 ) i was really surprised of the fact that it has been for 35 years under our eyes and we didn't notice that strange hair shape. But still something looked strange to me in that head, even if in a first moment I wasn't able to understand what it was. Then i realized that the face (nose, mouth, eyes..) were a little smaller than it were supposed to be, comparing it with the rest of the head and of the body. Really not much but the difference was there (3/4%). So, with the help of my bro, we zoomed on the head and, first of all, noticed that there wasn't hairline at all in those areas of the head (so the wind wasn't a sufficient explanation) Then we noticed that a strange line was crossing his front as it was an hairnet (it can be also the sign of a photomontage) Also the shape of the forelock is strange: if there was wind, why it doesn't move? As i said before i don't think the shape of the hair was due to the wind: in this case it seems to me more a strand of hair falling on the eyes There is also another thing we found (hope you didn't get bored yet): the shadow in the face is not gradual, it goes directly from dark to bright ( proof of a photomontage? btw the rays of the sun should come from that direction....) So: in a first moment for us the face was smaller than it was supposed to be, then we noticed the things I mentioned above, so we start to wonder if it was all a big photomontage and how could the head look like if we removed all the excess hair. that's the result (excuse us if the line is not very accurate). After that u see it for the first time, it will always pop out... Big Version: images.picpile.com/uploads/603373678.gifNow, looking at all this things, at the profile of the guy and at the photos from the same session (in which the face is different, "bigger") ... ... we start to suppose... Could it be Paul's face (with hair falling!) on the Abbey Road cover?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jan 2, 2006 15:15:03 GMT -5
Can't see any of your pics, Geocities says "bandwidth exceded" for the day... You might want to open a Photobucket account, it works better for posting pics.
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Jan 2, 2006 15:23:19 GMT -5
i'll upload it there asap
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Jan 2, 2006 19:06:54 GMT -5
It was taking too long to enter there so i found www.picpile.com/ and used that. Hope it has the same features...
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 2, 2006 19:29:46 GMT -5
Not sure what to make of it yet ilras but thanks for pointing all that out!
I'll have to muse over it the next day or so and see if i can come up with anything!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jan 2, 2006 19:46:44 GMT -5
I'm sorry that I edited your post IlRas, but 1600 pixel wide images make the post run way off to the side of the screen. (many find it makes the post difficult to read) I hosted smaller versions of the big ones, and left the links for the big versions. Interesting idea, I'll have to think it over as well.
|
|
madtitan125
For Sale
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 99
|
Post by madtitan125 on Jan 3, 2006 2:45:27 GMT -5
It does seem that Paul's death photo is morphed into Faul's face on the cover.
This is how you can decipher the image. Using the enlarged photo of profile, you can actually see where the pics are merged by looking at the skin color. If you remove the Faul portion (the darker flesh colored part of the morph), it appears that James Paul's profile (lighter toned flesh color) is morphed onto pic.
I believe the entire head is JPM, with Faul's face (the inside part of the face, minus the very outline of the profile). Hope that isn't too confusing.
The outline of the profile (JPM) doesn't look alive, either. And this explains the hairline. Poor JPM's head appears to be busted.
If someone more proficient with graphics could excise these portions of the photo, I believe we would see James Paul in death, unfortunately.
This is another example of hiding the truth in plain sight. The Let It Be cover being another example of combining pics of Paul and Faul.
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Jan 3, 2006 10:52:22 GMT -5
I don't know if the face is Paul's or Faul's. But, if I compare the cover with these other photos from the same session, it seems to me that, in these last two, the face is more portionate to the head and the rest of the body...
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jan 3, 2006 11:05:56 GMT -5
ilras, those last two photos are Bill. I have a photo somewhere that I want to share with everyone here. I will look for it now. I found it. I have no idea where this photo came from. I do think that it's interesting, though:
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Jan 3, 2006 11:32:30 GMT -5
lili, that's what I think: they put Paul's face (and may be his hairless head) on Bill's one
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jan 3, 2006 11:44:39 GMT -5
I think that you're most likely spot on, ilras
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jan 3, 2006 12:08:38 GMT -5
Very good work. It does look like JPM's smaller, perhaps dead, face pasted onto the photo of the faul guy's big fat head.
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Jan 3, 2006 12:21:13 GMT -5
His eyes seem closed.... as this should represent a funeral, putting his face on the cover, may be they wanted to give him their last farewell
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jan 3, 2006 12:24:39 GMT -5
That could very well be. I read somewhere that Abbey Road was supposed to be their final album. After it was completed, Bill was supposed to give up the travesty that was his life.
;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Jan 3, 2006 14:09:45 GMT -5
ilras, those last two photos are Bill. I have a photo somewhere that I want to share with everyone here. I will look for it now. I found it. I have no idea where this photo came from. I do think that it's interesting, though: Interesting find. Composite Man strikes again! Bill's body, and a mutated image of JPM's head. That is JPM's profile.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jan 3, 2006 14:15:26 GMT -5
Very interesting indeed
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jan 3, 2006 17:03:43 GMT -5
Thought I'd seen that some place before.. But this one takes it to a whole 'nother level. (just something I found in my travels)
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 3, 2006 19:29:34 GMT -5
This is another example of hiding the truth in plain sight. The Let It Be cover being another example of combining pics of Paul and Faul. I am very interested in that myself, people oft claim that it's the beard covering his face (ie. hiding the differences) that gives him the JPM look but i'm not convinced.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 5, 2006 2:17:38 GMT -5
The evidence strongly suggests JPM was bald or balding; some photos of him give that impression and he was always wearing a wig, unlike the other Beatles, who let their natural hair grow long. He also said in a joking way "I'm bald"in the 1964 Playboy interview of all the Beatles.
The Abbey Road cover, if it is in fact showing a paste of JPM's profile, may have the weird patches of hair as a clue to the physical differences between Faul and JPM.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 5, 2006 2:31:27 GMT -5
This is another example of hiding the truth in plain sight. The Let It Be cover being another example of combining pics of Paul and Faul. I am very interested in that myself, people oft claim that it's the beard covering his face (ie. hiding the differences) that gives him the JPM look but i'm not convinced. The Faul picture on the cover of "Let It Be" looks like a composite, doctored photo. It makes Faul look much more like JPM with a (fake?) beard and it does not match the other photos of Faul in the Let It Be shoots where he looks distinctly different from JPM.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Jan 5, 2006 12:18:09 GMT -5
You've made some valid points, Beatlies. Jo, where did you get that ? The head over the headless body is definitely Paul's ! Why would someone take off the composite head & put a head of the REAL James Paul McCartney in it's place ? Unless, they knew the truth of course. Hey Rita, they put "Faulenstein " on the billboard ! Goober & a bluebird on a wire. What could it mean ? That is some find, Jo !
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 5, 2006 20:27:42 GMT -5
Why would someone take off the composite head & put a head of the REAL James Paul McCartney in it's place ? Unless, they knew the truth of course. Exactly! This must be a known fact among many famous people. Yeah, great find JoJo.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Jan 6, 2006 21:49:59 GMT -5
We know Goober and Faulenstein.. but who's the man in the bottom left hand corner. At a glimpse it looks like Brian Boitano, the figure skater. The masked man with a gun the Green Hornet? And the dude next to Faulenstein....have no clue... Now George Goober Lindsey may know something if Don Knotts replaced Brian, maybe he knew why. And if Goober knows, does Gomer know too?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jan 6, 2006 22:54:43 GMT -5
. but who's the man in the bottom left hand corner. Pretty sure that's "Q" from Star Trek, first made his appearance on the Next Generation series. From Wiki: In the Star Trek fictional universe, the Q are a race of omnipotent, immortal and omniscient god-like beings from a parallel existence called the Q Continuum. ("I have complete control over space, matter and time" -Q2). They are largely indifferent to the affairs of the non-Q beings living in normal space, with a few exceptions.Well, he was my favorite character.. Perhaps we should ask Q?
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 7, 2006 1:54:29 GMT -5
Here's a thread on JPM being bald and wearing wigs:
[ftp]http://60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=Essential&action=display&thread=1088065816[/ftp]
|
|