Post by 65if2007 on Feb 24, 2008 0:12:13 GMT -5
This cartoon has a scene in it that very much calls to mind one of the car crash scenarios.
Girl throws her arms around Paul causing him to lose control of the car that he's driving and crash it.
Of course, in the cartoon universe, this doesn't even injure him, let alone kill him. No cartoon character was ever even permanently disabled -- let alone killed -- as a result of impact or explosion. But still, it's a cartoon depiction of Paul in a car crash caused by a woman's amorous advances.
In the story, this is taking place on a movie set so it's not clear whether or not her passion is real.
It must have been in production for weeks or months before it finally aired, but the initial air date for this cartoon was September 10, 1966.
forum.tntvillage.org/tntforum/?showtopic=77092
Ordinary coincidence? Proof of synchronocity? Proof of conspiracy? Or fodder for a hoax?
Girl throws her arms around Paul causing him to lose control of the car that he's driving and crash it.
Of course, in the cartoon universe, this doesn't even injure him, let alone kill him. No cartoon character was ever even permanently disabled -- let alone killed -- as a result of impact or explosion. But still, it's a cartoon depiction of Paul in a car crash caused by a woman's amorous advances.
In the story, this is taking place on a movie set so it's not clear whether or not her passion is real.
It must have been in production for weeks or months before it finally aired, but the initial air date for this cartoon was September 10, 1966.
forum.tntvillage.org/tntforum/?showtopic=77092
Ordinary coincidence? Proof of synchronocity? Proof of conspiracy? Or fodder for a hoax?
