Ever Present Past Clue

[JoJo]

From Solesgirlrachel:

Ever Present Past

[B]

Well...OK, it was interesting. But I can't grant it a pass.
The trouble with applying reverse-speech protocols to musically sung passages is that the music
itself tends to dictate enunciation and how the words sound.
So this is a kind of situation where you have to decide where to set the bar.
It could be that everything that is shown as being said in reverse in the video is, in fact, actually
being said on some level, but I can't accept that as accurate, myself. Or perhaps I should say,
I myself may not be sufficiently perceptive to evaluate every vibration that is encoded into
the words spoken and the music sung.
Someone here once wrote something along the lines of:
"Somewhere there's moss growing on the side of a tree that proves that Paul is dead."
and that may be true, but I'm not fine-tuned enough to determine that, and that is how
I feel watching what's shown in this video.
I say "Keep up the good work." But there's need for refinement for us to relate to this in a way
that is truly viable.
In the meantime, look at what's being said in the forward mode.
He "didn't understand a word that they were saying" because "It went by in a flash". But what was "it"?
A memory of a childhood in ancient Egypt, I would guess, if we are to believe that he was cloned
from a mummy! So how about them apples? I mean, the guy is spelling it all out for those with
ears to hear. Why complicate the matter by trying to assess what's being said in reverse?
Not that there's anything wrong with that, but when you plan a trip to Cleveland, do you look at
a map, or do you access the wear and tear on your tires and try to determine where you might
end up going based on that?
So, as I said. OK, so far so good...but....

[tygrefyfe]

May 10, 2008 23:06:54 GMT -5 B said:

Well...OK, it was interesting. But I can't grant it a pass.
The trouble with applying reverse-speech protocols to musically sung passages is that the music
itself tends to dictate enunciation and how the words sound.
So this is a kind of situation where you have to decide where to set the bar.
It could be that everything that is shown as being said in reverse in the video is, in fact, actually
being said on some level, but I can't accept that as accurate, myself. Or perhaps I should say,
I myself may not be sufficiently perceptive to evaluate every vibration that is encoded into
the words spoken and the music sung.
Someone here once wrote something along the lines of:
"Somewhere there's moss growing on the side of a tree that proves that Paul is dead."
and that may be true, but I'm not fine-tuned enough to determine that, and that is how
I feel watching what's shown in this video.
I say "Keep up the good work." But there's need for refinement for us to relate to this in a way
that is truly viable.
In the meantime, look at what's being said in the forward mode.
He "didn't understand a word that they were saying" because "It went by in a flash". But what was "it"?
A memory of a childhood in ancient Egypt, I would guess, if we are to believe that he was cloned
from a mummy! So how about them apples? I mean, the guy is spelling it all out for those with
ears to hear. Why complicate the matter by trying to assess what's being said in reverse?
Not that there's anything wrong with that, but when you plan a trip to Cleveland, do you look at
a map, or do you access the wear and tear on your tires and try to determine where you might
end up going based on that?
So, as I said. OK, so far so good...but....

Understandable, B but the whole purpose of reverse speech is the subconscious telling it all. Whether it being sung or spoken, I commend SolesGirl for doing this and this is one of her vids I found very interesting. Whether it means Paul is Dead or not, the reversals here mean a lot and can be connected to the 'story'. Besides, some of the very first clues to the PID theory are songs, forwards and reversed! So we shouldn't discount nor discredit it.

[MikeNL]

May 11, 2008 11:37:19 GMT -5 tygrefyfe said:

May 10, 2008 23:06:54 GMT -5 B said:

Well...OK, it was interesting. But I can't grant it a pass.
The trouble with applying reverse-speech protocols to musically sung passages is that the music
itself tends to dictate enunciation and how the words sound.
So this is a kind of situation where you have to decide where to set the bar.
It could be that everything that is shown as being said in reverse in the video is, in fact, actually
being said on some level, but I can't accept that as accurate, myself. Or perhaps I should say,
I myself may not be sufficiently perceptive to evaluate every vibration that is encoded into
the words spoken and the music sung.
Someone here once wrote something along the lines of:
"Somewhere there's moss growing on the side of a tree that proves that Paul is dead."
and that may be true, but I'm not fine-tuned enough to determine that, and that is how
I feel watching what's shown in this video.
I say "Keep up the good work." But there's need for refinement for us to relate to this in a way
that is truly viable.
In the meantime, look at what's being said in the forward mode.
He "didn't understand a word that they were saying" because "It went by in a flash". But what was "it"?
A memory of a childhood in ancient Egypt, I would guess, if we are to believe that he was cloned
from a mummy! So how about them apples? I mean, the guy is spelling it all out for those with
ears to hear. Why complicate the matter by trying to assess what's being said in reverse?
Not that there's anything wrong with that, but when you plan a trip to Cleveland, do you look at
a map, or do you access the wear and tear on your tires and try to determine where you might
end up going based on that?
So, as I said. OK, so far so good...but....

Understandable, B but the whole purpose of reverse speech is the subconscious telling it all. Whether it being sung or spoken, I commend SolesGirl for doing this and this is one of her vids I found very interesting. Whether it means Paul is Dead or not, the reversals here mean a lot and can be connected to the 'story'. Besides, some of the very first clues to the PID theory are songs, forwards and reversed! So we shouldn't discount nor discredit it.

ok, maybe, but you can hear backwards messaging everywhere (i've seen lots of videos on youtube with backwards lyrics with them) and some songs like strawberry fields forever, that pikachu guy who makes them has a whole other interpretation to the song (something with a moose, while we can clearly hear PID related stuff.)

[Jai Guru Deva]

I've listen to it several times and maybe I'll listen to it over again... Anyway, I'm hearing something a little different.

1. "Half you certainly am"
2. "Have you thought that I('d) mastered"
3. "Half those thoughts that I'd mastered off me chefs"
? ("Here you should see leave moi")--'moi' is french for 'me'
4. "Among this used the evil, that's not my rose."

When trying to decifer reverse speech, there is always a tendency to want to make sense of the words you are hearing. You might hear something abstract and want to write it down as logical, coherent sentence.