|
|
Post by Red Lion on May 25, 2008 13:04:56 GMT -5
 The two black and whites are 64 and 65, the top left color is 68 and the bottom color 69. Keep in mind that Paul chipped his left front tooth AFTER these B&W were taken, anything interesting? |
|
|
|
Post by thespacebetween on May 25, 2008 14:10:51 GMT -5
I've noticed that Paul's original unchipped tooth was twisted..   Post pepper pics show an untwisted tooth. Any big smile pics post chippage but pre pepper? |
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 25, 2008 19:04:01 GMT -5
The two black and whites are 64 and 65, the top left color is 68 and the bottom color 69. Keep in mind that Paul chipped his left front tooth AFTER these B&W were taken, anything interesting? Yeah, his front teeth are different lengths in one (big pic) and same length in bottom left. A little playing around with that one I would think. |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on May 25, 2008 19:56:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 28, 2008 5:05:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on May 28, 2008 6:03:59 GMT -5
GN, in these photos, the one you call bill looks like paul, while paul looks like bill.  i can post some pictures that show that his teeth are the same before and after 66. but i don't. look at my avatare!  |
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 28, 2008 7:48:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on May 28, 2008 7:54:35 GMT -5
actually: no.
it is one regular paul photo (pre-66) and one photo from 1967, from the "valid 67 pics" thread here at NIR.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on May 28, 2008 8:22:13 GMT -5
actually: no. it is one regular paul photo (pre-66) and one photo from 1967, from the "valid 67 pics" thread here at NIR. Those pics were provided by "Valis", (a member here) from his collection. |
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on May 28, 2008 9:51:26 GMT -5
actually: no. it is one regular paul photo (pre-66) and one photo from 1967, from the "valid 67 pics" thread here at NIR. Those pics were provided by "Valis", (a member here) from his collection. I see!  valis, not valid! I am sorry my english is not the best! still, GNs argument is that the pictures are manipulated? here they are:   here is the animation from diablo (that is my avatar)  |
|
|
|
Post by thisone on May 29, 2008 0:15:22 GMT -5
This is the exact same photgraph for god sake! Somebody's been busy re-working foul photographs of faul. |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on May 29, 2008 9:04:13 GMT -5
This is the exact same photgraph for god sake! Somebody's been busy re-working foul photographs of faul. I thought that was the intention, to show that they altered photographs during the 60s. The 'fake moustaches' pictures, like the one that was recently posted of George Harrison shaving while looking into a mirror. |
|
|
|
Post by thisone on May 30, 2008 1:30:20 GMT -5
This is the exact same photgraph for god sake! Somebody's been busy re-working foul photographs of faul. I thought that was the intention, to show that they altered photographs during the 60s. The 'fake moustaches' pictures, like the one that was recently posted of George Harrison shaving while looking into a mirror. Sorry sky, that's what I get for trawling the 100 most recent. I agree there has been a lot of doctoring of photgraphs. |
|
frozensquirrel
Hard Day's Night 
With our love, we could save the world. If the only knew!
Posts: 37
|
Post by frozensquirrel on Jun 8, 2008 20:44:25 GMT -5
His teeth are identical from before and after he "died."
|
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jun 10, 2008 20:16:10 GMT -5
You know what..............photos have certainly been retouched after 40 years. Teeth and whatever, have been corrected in photographs to make them look identical. I CAN see the difference in the teeth in the top 4 pictures in the first post. If the teeth are an EXACT match, then I'm certain that corrections have been done already to the photographs found on the Internet.
|
|
valis, not valid! I am sorry my english is not the best! 
