|
Post by superman on Dec 25, 2008 20:48:15 GMT -5
Danny Williams a 21-year-old Harvard dropout who had recently moved to Manhattan, worked as a film editor on What's Happening! The Beatles in the USA in 1964. Other than that, there isn’t much known about the young man who, in 1966, borrowed his mother's car for a drive to the ocean ... and disappeared.
He’s “known” (sort of) to be “that nameless guy in the pictures next to Andy Warhol”. The guy no one seems to remember. Or, more than likely, the guy everyone wants to forget? The recent revelations about how some footage of the Beatles in the U.S. had been creatively edited to manipulate what people were seeing comes immediately to my mind. There were also rumors that someone else was responsible for many of Warhol’s most famous works, and that Warhol was famous for taking both the credit and the money for this person’s ideas … which kind of makes me think of Mal Evans. Twenty of Danny’s films that he made have recently been discovered, but have yet to be made available to the public.This mysterious young guy, who edited the Beatles footage in America, simply vanishes in 1966. There is no death certificate available for poor ole Danny. His car was found on the edge of a cliff leading out to sea, but no body was ever found on the rocks below it, or even in washed up from the surf.
Maybe he’s still alive and living beneath the waves …
Danny Williams’ neice made a documentary about her mysterious uncle called A Walk into the Sea
www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=festivals&jump=review&id=2478&reviewid=VE1117932762&cs=1
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 26, 2008 9:29:54 GMT -5
Hmm. He doesn't look like Paul McCartney, but I'm sure someone is about to say that he does and post a comparison/fade animation.
|
|
|
Post by eyeseeyou on Dec 26, 2008 15:18:35 GMT -5
I like to be under the sea.......
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 26, 2008 18:56:46 GMT -5
The Factory keeps darting in and out of discussions of the PID/PWR discussion, particularly as it relates to "Maxwell's Silver Hammer". The producer of the film, Williams' neice, is named Esther Robinson, which may connect with the "Mrs. Robinson" of the Simon and Garfunkel song. Shayla(Blondie) www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOYAwMfGNI0Shayla worked in a factory She wasn't history. She's just a number One day she gets her final pay And she goes far away Green trees call to me I am free but life is so cheap Scenery is still outside of me All alone, trapped by its beauty Shayla turned to run away To leave in peace and end her stay Years of fear were in her way Lost in space and down she came Suddenly some subtle entity Some cosmic energy brushed her like shadows Down here we stop to wonder Cars on the freeway. Bright lights and thunder ------------------------------------ I know this post makes no sense. It's all PID, imo. Shayla may be Paul. Febbie turns me off.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 26, 2008 19:10:21 GMT -5
Letter B, I hope that you don't take this the wrong way. But, can you PLEASE stop trying to insinuate that Paul became a woman ? You have NO proof of it, and it seems that you're reaching further & further and really stretching it to make this point.
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Dec 26, 2008 19:16:49 GMT -5
^ Paul becoming a woman is pretty unrealistic.
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 26, 2008 19:22:57 GMT -5
Sorry mommybird, that's where the song clues go. He did for a while, most likely as a disguise to get away. I can't ignore one hint after another. I realize that "Shayla" may not be about Paul, and I may "be stretching it" in this case, but what part of:
"I used to be a woman, you know" do you not understand?
That's a line from Neil Young's "Last Trip to Tulsa", and Neil never "used to be a woman". True, it may mean that in a previous life he was a woman, or something, whether it's about Neil or Paul, but for some reason the woman thing seems to be a big deal. You can't tell me that cross-dressing isn't suggested in Obladi Obladah, or that "Polythene Pam" isn't about a man being a woman. Beatle Paul even pointed out that the writing "Fool on the Hill" in the MMT cartoons is meant to look like a female oriface. Whether Paul ever attempted to be a transvestite or not, the fact is that it seems to be a big part of whatever the clues are about. I refuse to ignore that. If you tell me "it's Bill/Faul", then that may also be true, but I feel that one, or both, were involved.
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Dec 26, 2008 20:14:03 GMT -5
"If you tell me "it's Bill/Faul", then that may also be true..."
Whether it's true about Bill/Faul, I don't know. I firmly believe it is not true about Paul, though. There is no indication whatsoever that he had those tendencies.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 26, 2008 21:24:23 GMT -5
But, can you PLEASE stop trying to insinuate that Paul became a woman ? You have NO proof of it
It's no different than saying Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Post by Girl on Dec 26, 2008 22:12:34 GMT -5
Interesting... this thread caused me to remember something I witnessed in my family's photo collection...
upon further investigation of Masonic cross-dressing, I uncovered this bit in blog: "...In the later development of Europe, early alchemists borrowed from pre-Christian spirituality at times, and some of these mystics created the concept of the "chemical wedding," a merger of male and female spiritual attributes to achieve perfection. Some alchemists saw this as a chemical concept that would lead to the process of transmuting lead into gold, while others touted that this was more of a personal, spiritual transformation. While much of this was later absorbed into secret societies such as the Freemasons and Rosicrucians, the belief hints at transformative and bigender-conscious reverence..."
Also read about similiar goings-on in a description of the Burning Man festival in Black Rock Desert. So perhaps it's not all that much of a stretch... symbolic rather than literal?
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Dec 26, 2008 22:51:41 GMT -5
^ Androgyny is supposedly the perfect balance of masculine & feminine energies.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 27, 2008 21:14:39 GMT -5
The thing is, the song clues concerning this all came about AFTER Paul's death. I believe that they are meant to be about Faul, not Paul. Any literary observations concerning "Paul's" "bi-sexuality" were caused by incidents that took place post Sept., 1966. Gossip concerning Mick Jagger/ David Bowie having "slept" with "Paul McCartney" immediately comes to mind. As far as lyrics in other people's songs, it's really hard to determine what they're writing about. It could very well be about incidents in their own lives or those close to them. Unless there's a definite connection between the author/s & Paul ( or the other Beatles/beatles ) it's rarely clear that it's definitely about him. I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree about this point. Well, for all we know, he might very well not be ( at least not anymore). Anyone for reincarnation ? It's really big in India. ;D
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Dec 27, 2008 22:04:04 GMT -5
"The thing is, the song clues concerning this all came about AFTER Paul's death."
That's exactly what I was thinking. Besides, after watching tons of videos of Paul, he does not strike me as having feminine tendencies at all. Faul, on the other hand, .... well, that's open to debate :-)
It is true that there really is no such thing as "death."
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 29, 2008 21:22:51 GMT -5
It's like that message on White Album: "Paul grew some titties, MISS HIM MISS MISS HIM." But, can you PLEASE stop trying to insinuate that Paul became a woman ? You have NO proof of itIt's no different than saying Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 30, 2008 9:57:37 GMT -5
Total, it's so good to see your humorous side ! ;D
|
|