|
|
Post by willcambell26 on Jan 27, 2009 18:48:32 GMT -5
Now, if paul did die when belived, this photo would be the first realised. What the heack is wrong with his face??? also, look at a flipped image of the leader of s.p. coincidence? [/url]  Plus, compare it to the original william picture in the white albumb.  also, look at these 2 photos of before and after 1966 notice head lenghths.  |
|
|
|
Post by randomnutta on Jul 18, 2009 13:06:08 GMT -5
There's a big difference with ear size in the last two pictures also.
|
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 18, 2009 13:49:08 GMT -5
And this the first pic is heavily doctored. It's been proven a million times, so it does not count. And the last picture he is MUCH closer to the camera and it looks longer because of the lens, the eyebrows not being in thier "standard" position and the forhead being much more exposed.
|
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jul 18, 2009 14:46:25 GMT -5
There's a big difference with ear size in the last two pictures also. There are so many differences it's unreal. But who tunes into it? Not many. Including most of us - going back to some point. And even after a lot of looking some don't trust their own eyes and won't see the differences. The value of things like il ras' thread and info can really help. |
|
|
|
Post by Connor Terru on Jul 18, 2009 19:40:19 GMT -5
And this the first pic is heavily doctored. It's been proven a million times, so it does not count. And the last picture he is MUCH closer to the camera and it looks longer because of the lens, the eyebrows not being in thier "standard" position and the forhead being much more exposed. I agree. The first pic is heavily tampered with, and many things can explain the size difference between the face (ex: type of camera) |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 18, 2009 22:26:16 GMT -5
 Just to illustrate, I made a frame from the video the "heavily doctored" pic is from. (don't know if I got the exact frame) It is flipped horizontally from the original video, and it's unclear why why whoever made the still chose to further distort it. I suppose the Sgt looks a bit like he's made of clay, perhaps trying to match the look? You don't need to doctor it to watch the video and wonder who the hell is impersonating Paul.. (and wonder why Mal Evans is hovering over him/hanging on his every word) |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jul 18, 2009 22:56:29 GMT -5
Just to illustrate, I made a frame from the video the "heavily doctored" pic is from. (don't know if I got the exact frame) It is flipped horizontally from the original video, and it's unclear why why whoever made the still chose to further distort it. I suppose the Sgt looks a bit like he's made of clay, perhaps trying to match the look? You don't need to doctor it to watch the video and wonder who the hell is impersonating Paul.. (and wonder why Mal Evans is hovering over him/hanging on his every word) You know, this might be one of those times where Pearl actually did impersonate Paul. Nah, I don't think so... The turtleneck really stands out in the video, too, it looks like it's meant to conceal something; along with the moustache and the bangs/hair style. It was all just very odd. |
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 19, 2009 14:22:24 GMT -5
Just to illustrate, I made a frame from the video the "heavily doctored" pic is from. (don't know if I got the exact frame) It is flipped horizontally from the original video, and it's unclear why why whoever made the still chose to further distort it. I suppose the Sgt looks a bit like he's made of clay, perhaps trying to match the look? You don't need to doctor it to watch the video and wonder who the hell is impersonating Paul.. (and wonder why Mal Evans is hovering over him/hanging on his every word) You know, this might be one of those times where Pearl actually did impersonate Paul. Nah, I don't think so... The turtleneck really stands out in the video, too, it looks like it's meant to conceal something; along with the moustache and the bangs/hair style. It was all just very odd. Yeah the turtle neck tried to conceal something. Just like it did when PAUL used to wear one all the time  |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jul 19, 2009 15:59:37 GMT -5
Yeah the turtle neck tried to conceal something. Just like it did when PAUL used to wear one all the time Ursäkt. I wasn't aware of his daily style choices. I'm just talking about in this moment, all things considered, the turtle-neck attracts my attention. |
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 19, 2009 16:51:12 GMT -5
Yeah the turtle neck tried to conceal something. Just like it did when PAUL used to wear one all the time Ursäkt. I wasn't aware of his daily style choices. I'm just talking about in this moment, all things considered, the turtle-neck attracts my attention. "Ursäkt" Swe? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 19, 2009 19:05:36 GMT -5
He probably had a hickey....  |
|
|
|
Post by FP on Jul 19, 2009 19:21:30 GMT -5
If these are two different people, then why are you guys saying "it's so obvious in this comparison"? It should be obvious in every single comparison, but it isn't. I can find pics where Paul's head looks taller than "Faul's". But of course I know what you'd say about that. |
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 19, 2009 19:31:01 GMT -5
Yeah not the same guy. NOT IN A MILLION YEARS!  Oops... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Jul 19, 2009 22:05:59 GMT -5
you used 2 heavily doctored pics.^
|
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 19, 2009 22:34:13 GMT -5
you used 2 heavily doctored pics.^ Have any proof of that? and btw I didn't make that, credits go to diabolo at MaccaFunHouse ;D |
|
|
|
Post by FP on Jul 20, 2009 0:03:33 GMT -5
you used 2 heavily doctored pics.^ No he didn't. You see, I can also make statements without backing myself up!  |
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 20, 2009 1:14:39 GMT -5
you used 2 heavily doctored pics.^ No he didn't. You see, I can also make statements without backing myself up! ;D Good one "bbbchords" |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 20, 2009 1:53:37 GMT -5
If these are two different people, then why are you guys saying "it's so obvious in this comparison"? It should be obvious in every single comparison, but it isn't. He looks different in the majority of the photos compared from pre-1967 to August 1966 and before. Obviously, because of photography, some pics happen where Faul looks more like Paul and where Paul doesn't look as much like himself and Faul doesn't look as much like himself. But the key is the big difference in late 1966, everything else being equal. |
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 20, 2009 2:14:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 20, 2009 2:18:58 GMT -5
And yeah he looked SOOOOOOOOO different in 1967, I agree.  oops... how did that get in here? ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 20, 2009 4:43:44 GMT -5
When I see someone posting a bunch of fades, I see a poster who is getting ready to pack his bags from NIR... Capiche?
If you want to look at fades, go back to the beginning of the forum, they're still here.
|
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 20, 2009 6:02:02 GMT -5
When I see someone posting a bunch of fades, I see a poster who is getting ready to pack his bags from NIR... Capiche? If you want to look at fades, go back to the beginning of the forum, they're still here. I'm sorry  I was just defending our cause. |
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jul 20, 2009 7:55:04 GMT -5
When I see someone posting a bunch of fades, I see a poster who is getting ready to pack his bags from NIR... Capiche? If you want to look at fades, go back to the beginning of the forum, they're still here. Now here is some angry admin!  Lol, funny, it's ok to post heavily doctored sidebyside comparisons, but it's not ok to post fades! but i understand that. if you would allow that, you could just close the forum down, bc it's obvious that paUL never died... :-) i like comming here, logic and rules are always twisted here and can change so easily. like in alices wonderland! |
|
|
|
Post by Connor Terru on Jul 20, 2009 8:35:15 GMT -5
I'll post the first fade I ever did. This should prove they're not the same guy (yeah right).   desipite angle difference. Those two match up! Any PIDers want to say something about this? I respect your opinion, but please remember this fade isn't the best in the world to prove PIA. |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 20, 2009 12:17:01 GMT -5
When I see someone posting a bunch of fades, I see a poster who is getting ready to pack his bags from NIR... Capiche? If you want to look at fades, go back to the beginning of the forum, they're still here. Now here is some angry admin! Lol, funny, it's ok to post heavily doctored sidebyside comparisons, but it's not ok to post fades! but i understand that. if you would allow that, you could just close the forum down, bc it's obvious that paUL never died... :-) i like comming here, logic and rules are always twisted here and can change so easily. like in alices wonderland! If you don't like listening to what an admin says, then you can post on another forum. It's as simple as that. |
|
You're absolutely right ;D 
I was just defending our cause. 
desipite angle difference. Those two match up! Any PIDers want to say something about this? I respect your opinion, but please remember this fade isn't the best in the world to prove PIA.