Making Holes in the Sky

[Doc]

www.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=1

Well, we have one planet to live on---no, not actually, we have roughly one quarter OF THE SURFACE of a planet to live on. Maybe less, if you factor in the difficult to live in places such as: deserts, ice packs, extreme elevations, and sections of Detroit.

We have a breathable bubble only a few miles high, covered by an invisible canopy of protective particles and radiation fields. It's all we have. Tearing holes in it and experimentally infusing it with new elements and energies sounds a little dicey to me.

I don't know. Maybe the scientific community will find a way to terraform the moon, giving it water, an atmosphere, and it's own radiation shield.
Maybe in the end, the scientific pursuits of our times will carry us up and out or our world of origin.

Better that than they f*** up the only functional one we have at the moment.

Imagine an authoritative voice from "heaven" to earth, saying, "Don't make me come down there next week with another planet..."
Imagine the scene of thousands of flying craft, thousands of spacecraft, filled like lifeboats for a sinking planet, blasting off from earth carrying humanity to another world capable of sustaining human life----at the dawn of the deluge of electromagnetic fire that comes ripping thru the fabric of the firmanent and wiping out the 2/3 who remain--a guess------

Talk about Exodus--through the midst of the RAD sea.......

www.unitedafa.org/cmt/shs/rad/radiation.asp

Sorry to be Debby Downer. Perhaps global awareness and wisdom will increase and we, mankind, will stop our scientific selves from going too far in these stratospheric plunderings.

[JoJo]

Thanks for that, didn't know some of those projects went back so far.

From this article it seems like it's all in the name of finding a bigger and better way of killing the enemy. (nothing new under the sun)

[Jai Guru Deva]

Asteroid Strikes 10 Times More Likely Than Previously Thought

By Makiko Kitamura - Nov 7, 2013 6:17 AM CT .
Bloomberg News

Asteroid strikes similar in size to the explosion over Russia in February may be 10 times more likely than previously thought, according to a paper published in the journal Nature.

Using infrasonic detectors that can identify smaller bodies missed by telescopes, strikes from impactors between 10 and 50 meters in diameter may occur every 20 or even 10 years, compared with an earlier estimate of once a century, according to research led by Peter Brown at the University of Western Ontario in Canada.

The meteor that exploded in the skies above Russia’s Urals region was about 19 meters in diameter and emitted energy equivalent to about 500 kilotons of TNT, Brown said in the paper. Asteroids of that size are now detectable by measuring infrasound, which is at a low frequency that isn’t audible to humans and can be detected when they enter the earth’s atmosphere, said Jiri Borovicka, one of the co-authors.

“When they travel by supersonic speed, they produce these sonic waves during their flight,” Borovicka said in a telephone interview. With telescopes, “we can only see smaller asteroids if they are relatively close to the Earth. It’s still a matter of luck to observe.”

The burst in Russia sent shock waves that smashed windows and injured more than 725 people in the city of Chelyabinsk. The Tunguska event, in which a asteroid or comet caused the most powerful natural explosion in recent history, leveled 800 square miles (2,100 square kilometers) of forest in Siberia in 1908, releasing energy of about 5 to 15 megatons.

To contact the reporter on this story: Makiko Kitamura in London at [e-mail]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Phil Serafino at [e-mail]