|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 17, 2009 23:11:44 GMT -5
Since the first forum formed in 2003, the amount of members on the Paul is Dead/Paul was Replaced forums has grown exponentially. The growing interest in this subject has taken the form of members joining the forums to discuss this topic and some have formed their own forums. No doubt this topic is becoming more and more popular. At present, the list of Paul is Dead/Paul was Replaced forums and their numbers are:
The King is Naked................................. 631 members
Paul is Dead - Miss Him, Miss Him.......... 172 members
The Rotten Apple................................... 78 members
Nothing Is Real - Paul Was Replaced........ 558 members
Paul is Dead.......................................... 261 members
Doppelganger Research Society.............. 49 members
Plus, there are huge Paul is dead threads at the Above Top Secret and David Icke forums!
Maccafunhouse........................................ 133 members
It's not even close!
|
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Aug 17, 2009 23:41:08 GMT -5
Thanks for the info DH.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Aug 18, 2009 6:11:51 GMT -5
Plus, there are huge Paul is dead threads at the Above Top Secret I know, I've seen PID threads there before but they disappear very quickly. However, this one, thanks in no small part to faulconandsnowjob amongst others, just keeps on going and always seems to be in the most recent posts section. www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread195888/pg1 |
|
JS2
For Sale 
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Aug 19, 2009 6:04:27 GMT -5
Not taking into account that Mommybird's forum is just somewhere in the region of 3 actual people  |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 19, 2009 15:40:45 GMT -5
Well, you know that's not true.
And might I add that that forum has grown tremendously over the last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 19, 2009 15:51:04 GMT -5
tafultong's lamaphoney blog - billions and growing[/b] ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by keithm0on on Aug 20, 2009 17:27:32 GMT -5
Um, don't mean to be a downer, but what does this prove? The amount of people that believe in something doesn't change reality. Maccafunhouse has craploads of pics that are pretty convincing, and we've got a bunch of people changing the story when they hear one abstract lyric, and posting huge confusing stories that link the Beatles with long dead poets that doesn't really do anything except confuse us.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 20, 2009 18:01:38 GMT -5
Um, don't mean to be a downer, but what does this prove? The amount of people that believe in something doesn't change reality. To show that it's not a subject that only a few, crazy people are interested in. I disagree. What do you mean? What is your viewpoint, PIA or PID/PWR? |
|
|
|
Post by keithm0on on Aug 22, 2009 22:03:15 GMT -5
Um, don't mean to be a downer, but what does this prove? The amount of people that believe in something doesn't change reality. To show that it's not a subject that only a few, crazy people are interested in. I disagree. What do you mean? What is your viewpoint, PIA or PID/PWR? I believe Paul may have been replaced. I can't really explain it, but I just don't see the same guy in the interviews/pics after 1966. Still, the point I'm trying to make is that we ought to be focusing on proving this with empirical evidence, not crap like "OK SUN KING IS A SONG BY THE BEATLES SO THAT MEANS THE LONG DEAD KING OF FRANCE MADE A DEAL WITH THE TEMPLARS OR SOMETHING AND ALESITER CROWLER IS PAULS REAL DAD AND JOHN IS SITLL ALIVE" all based off of one song lyric or album cover detail someone saw. Also, numbers don't really make a difference was what I was saying. I thought the point of this topic was that more people = truth, but you said it's not, so just nevermind that. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on Aug 23, 2009 0:27:28 GMT -5
Maccafunhouse is a small community of Beatles fans that got started by people who have been around from the beginning our 60IF world - it's not a research oriented forum like NIR. So the amount of members has nothing to do with who's winning. Who's winning this debate is in the eye of the beholder.
I bet you an "Elvis is Alive" forum would get more members than a "Nope, Elvis is Dead" forum. Why? Because "Elvis is Dead" is already the norm! There would be almost nothing to discuss. Does that mean "Elvis is Alive" is winning? Of course not. Hate to burst your bubble.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 23, 2009 0:52:32 GMT -5
Still, the point I'm trying to make is that we ought to be focusing on proving this with empirical evidence, not crap like "OK SUN KING IS A SONG BY THE BEATLES SO THAT MEANS THE LONG DEAD KING OF FRANCE MADE A DEAL WITH THE TEMPLARS OR SOMETHING AND ALESITER CROWLER IS PAULS REAL DAD AND JOHN IS SITLL ALIVE" all based off of one song lyric or album cover detail someone saw. Point taken, but sometimes song lyrics are all we have in certain instances. That's why there's so much left open as to what happened to Paul in 1966. |
|
