Which theory do you think is true?

[keithm0on]

There's so many different theories is to what happened to Paul nowadays. I'm interested in seeing in what the majority of people people believe in.

Vanilla: Paul was killed sometime around 1966, and Bill has been pretending to be him ever since.

A Sick Joke: Paul became physically or mentally ill, and the Beatles hired a lookalike to keep going.

Tag-Team: Paul left the Beatles for a period of time, but came back after a while. Him and Bill may be trading places occasionally ever since.

Nothing is Real: "Paul McCartney" never actually existed. He has been played by various people throughout the years.

The Featles: Paul wasn't the only Beatle who was replaced. The entire band may have been replaced at one time.

Alisiter Crowler: PID is just one part of a massive conspiracy involving the Illuminati, Aleister Crowley, and more...

I think that's all of them. I'll add more if I've forgotten any.

Personally, I'm pretty vanilla about the whole thing. I believe the phrase "All evidence equal, the simplest theory is the best" applies here. Besides, the more complicated it is, the harder it would be to keep a lid on the whole thing.

But enough about me, what does NIR believe?

[hotman637]

I think the whole thing is a Psy-Op. A Psy-Op is an operation to fool and mislead the public.There are layers and layers of lies and deceptions we may NEVER uncover.The basic facts are usually simple, "Paul" either died or retired.These layers of lies are there to distract from the basic facts.

[knowthe411]

It's Tag Team with three Pauls (JPM, Aleister Crowley (Faul) and Phil Ackrill) but it's also the Featles. They all have or had replacements.

It's also a massive PsyOp. Paul took a back seat to his two doubles so he and John could form Apple. They did copious amounts of clue-planting and back-masking that tell people what's going on in Beatles (not The Beatles) from 1966 to 1970. Then they did Klaatu in the 1970s to push an ET and environmental agenda.

[paperbackwriter]

"There is nothing to fear except the persistent refusal to find out the truth, the persistent refusal to analyze the causes of happenings." Dorothy Thompson, American journalist (1893-1961)"
Excellent quote.
For those who still haven't read Dr. John Coleman's "Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300", esp. 4th Ed. the whole Replacement thing may forever remain a mystery, despite all the proof brought to light on the thousands of posts and websites dealing with James Paul McCartney.
I started off believing that JPM was indeed killed and replaced to further The Agenda, but as evidence mounts up, I'm beginning to think that he was alive and assisted the Replacement Program and may still be alive as we speak.
I will post some extracts from the book if anyone is interested?
paperbackwriter

[P(D)enny La(i)ne]

May 5, 2010 5:58:17 GMT -5 paperbackwriter said:

"There is nothing to fear except the persistent refusal to find out the truth, the persistent refusal to analyze the causes of happenings." Dorothy Thompson, American journalist (1893-1961)"
Excellent quote.
For those who still haven't read Dr. John Coleman's "Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300", esp. 4th Ed. the whole Replacement thing may forever remain a mystery, despite all the proof brought to light on the thousands of posts and websites dealing with James Paul McCartney.
I started off believing that JPM was indeed killed and replaced to further The Agenda, but as evidence mounts up, I'm beginning to think that he was alive and assisted the Replacement Program and may still be alive as we speak.
I will post some extracts from the book if anyone is interested?
paperbackwriter

I've read parts of the Coleman book online, but I don't recall anything specifically regarding replacements.

Please post relevant extracts.

Thanks,

P(D)

[paperbackwriter]

Thanks for the interest P(D) & I'll post those extracts soon as I get some time, not that you can expect a specific ref. to this topic, but more so, that on reading the whole book, you'll grasp the magnitude of the powers that put The Beatles there in the first place and their ability to persist with Their Agenda by having used & abused them (and other bands), inter alia, to cause a rebellion against Society, family break-ups, drug addiction, esp. LSD, coke & hemp abuse, all in order to fragment families & destroy societal values, just to replace these older values with the new value system The Order/NWO/whatever name one chooses for these cats, want to rule with. Also have a look at Coleman's book: The Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations_Dr John Coleman. paperbackwriter

[paperbackwriter]

Hi P (D) hope these extracts are of assistance in your search and like most things, reading out of context can be a waste of time, so, IMO tackle the whole book. But first I quote JPM’s song:
Paperback Writer
Dear Sir or Madam, will you read my book?
It took me years to write, will you take a look?
Based on a novel by a man named Lear
And I need a job, so I want to be a paperback writer,
Paperback writer.
It’s the dirty story of a dirty man
And his clinging wife doesn’t understand.
His son is working for the Daily Mail,
It’s a steady job but he wants to be a paperback writer,
Paperback writer.
Paperback writer
It’s a thousand pages, give or take a few,
I’ll be writing more in a week or two.
I can make it longer if you like the style,
I can change it round and I want to be a paperback writer,
Paperback writer.
If you really like it you can have the rights,
It could make a million for you overnight.
If you must return it, you can send it here
But I need a break and I want to be a paperback writer,
Paperback writer.
Paperback writer
Paperback writer - paperback writer
Paperback writer - paperback writer

Conspirator’s Hierarchy:
The Story of the Committee of 300
By Dr. John Coleman
1992_4th ed. Electronic.
P 84:
“An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment, which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware. When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489) 2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report prepared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director, and Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by a conspiratorial body, which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will. New words and new phrases—prepared by Tavistock were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations…
P 85:
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words, which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new breakaway largely young population group, which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America…
P 86:
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"—code words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"—more Tavistock jargon—and as such it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage), which upset the older generation, as was intended. This was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action.
…Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music."… Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from mainstream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.
P 87:
The newly created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and later
Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergot amine, a powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it”. Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.
P 90:
…Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage, the hippy-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground; it would have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging guitars, silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given saturation coverage by the media, the United States has suffered one cultural shock after another.
P 91:
The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names and faces are still not known to but a few people, made sure that the press played its part. Conversely, the media's important role in not exposing the power behind the future cultural shocks made certain that the source of the crisis was never identified. Thus was our society driven mad through psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's training manual. From its modest beginnings in 1921, Tavistock was ready in 1966 to launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which has not yet ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.
Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of drugs, which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts of money to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy. The proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title given to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the first of several such institutions set up by Tavistock.
"Future shocks" is described as a series of events, which come so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I said earlier, science has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the amount of changes and the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After continuous shocks, the large targeted population group discovers that it does not want to make choices any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless violence such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial killers, rapists and child kidnapers. "Future shocks," says SPRU, "is defined as physical and psychological distress arising from the excess load on the decision making mechanism of the human mind." That is Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals—
P 92:
What started with the Beatles and sample packages of LSD has grown into a flood tide of drug usage, which is swamping America.
In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The "Beatles" to popularize "social drugs" with the youth of America and The Hollywood "in-crowd." Ed Sullivan was sent to England To become acquainted with the first Tavistock Institute "rock group" to hit the shores of the United States. Sullivan then returned to the United States to draft the strategy for the electronic media on how to package and sell the group. Without the full cooperation of the electronic media and Ed Sullivan, in particular, "The Beatles" and their "music" would have died on the vine. Instead, our national life and the character of the United States was (sic) forever changed.
P 93:
Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the "Beatles" campaign to proliferate the use of drugs became. The fact that "The Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view. The prime function to "The Beatles" was to be discovered by teenagers, who where then subjected to a non-stop barrage of "Beatle music" until they became convinced that they liked the sound and adopted it, along with all that accompanied it. The Liverpool group performed up to expectations, and with "a little help from their friends," i.e., illegal substances we call drugs created a whole new class to young Americans in the precise mold ordained by the Tavistock Institute.
Tavistock had created a highly visible "new type" to act as their drug-runners. "New type" is social-science scientist jargon; what it meant was that the Beatles created new social patterns, first and foremost being to normalize and popularize the use of drugs, new tastes in clothes and hair styles which really distinguished them from the older generation as was intended by Tavistock.
It is important to note the deliberate fragmentation inducing language used by Tavistock. The "teenagers" never once dreamed that all the "different" things they aspired to were the product of older scientists working in think tanks in England and Stanford Research. How mortified they would have been if they
had discovered that most of their "cool" habits and expressions were deliberately created for their use by a group of older social science scientists!
The role of the media was, and remains, very important in promoting the use of drugs on a nation-wide scale. When coverage of the street warfare gangs was abruptly terminated by the media, they became "burned out" as a social phenomena; the "new age" of drugs followed. The media has always served as a catalyst and has always pushed "new causes" and now media attention was focused on drug usage and its supporters, the "beat generation," yet another phrase fashioned at Tavistock, in its determined efforts to bring about social changes in The United States.
Drug usage now became an accepted part of everyday life in America. This Tavistock-designed program took in millions of American youth, and the older generation began to believe that America was undergoing a natural social revolution, failing all the while to realize that what was happening to their children was not a spontaneous movement, but a highly artificial creation designed to force changes in America's social and political life.
P 94:
The purpose of the Beatles had become abundantly clear… With the coming of "rock"… a tremendous increase in the use of social drugs, especially marijuana, was observed. The entire dope business was expanded under the control and direction of the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU).
P 105:
"The Beatles" could not have done a better job. (In both cases the trade was
sanctioned by the British royal family, who openly supported the Beatles.)
P 243:
BIBLIOGRAPHY, SUMMARIES AND NOTES
INTRODUCTION TO THE SOCIOLOGY OF MUSIC, Adorno, Theo. Adorno was kicked out of Germany by Hitler because of his Cult of Dionysus music experiments. He was moved to England by the Oppenheimers where the British royal family gave him facilities at Gordonstoun School and their support. It was here that Adorno perfected “Beatlemusic Rock,” “Punk Rock” “Heavy Metal Rock” and all of the decadent clamor that passes for music today. It is worthy of note that the name “The Beatles” was chosen to show a connection between modern rock, the Isis cult and the Scarab Beatle, a religious symbol of ancient Egypt.

The Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations:
Shaping The Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political & Economic Decline Of The United States of America. Electronic Edition.
By John Coleman


P.158
Tavistock's new science scientists were confident that we would not apply the principle "for every effect there must be a cause"— and they were right. For instance we meekly accepted the "Beatles" and their "novel music" and lyrics-if one dare call it music and lyrics, having been told, that the group wrote it all themselves. Actually Tavistock graduate Theo Adorno, whose 12-atonal discords were scientifically pitched to create mass "environmental social turbulences" all across America, wrote the music. None of the Beatles could read music. Nevertheless, they were "puffed" day and night without ceasing until everything about them, - lies and all, was accepted as truth.

P.192
Because of Tavistock-created and supported programs, we in the United States have suffered a terrible degradation of our moral life, our religious life; debasement of music through the aberration of rock and roll "music," which became progressively worse following a relatively tame introduction by The Beatles followed by Rap and Hip-Hop; destruction of art, as we see pushed by PBS in the Mapplethorpe degenerate objects of derision. We have seen a proliferation of the drug culture and an intensified worship of the Golden Calf. The lust for money has never been higher in any civilization than the current one.

P. 244
Turning now to another area of expertise in which Tavistock initiates its graduates, we refer to the assassination of politicians of importance who cannot be bought, and who has to be silenced. The murders of U.S. Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, and Kennedy are all linked to British Intelligence MI6, and since 1923, associated with the Tavistock Institute.
Pres. Kennedy proved to be impervious to mind control by Tavistock, so was chosen for public execution as a warning to those who would aspire to power, that none was higher than the Committee of 300. The grisly spectacle of the public execution of Kennedy was a message to the American people, one which they may not, even now, be aware of. Perhaps the Tavistock Institute provided the blueprint for Kennedy's execution. Perhaps it also carefully selected each and every participant, starting with the obviously mind-controlled Lee Harvey Oswald, and to the not so obvious Lyndon Johnson. Those who would not comply, or who sought to bring out the truth, suffered a variety of punishment, from disgrace, hounding from public life, and even death.
We leave Tavistock's control of U.S. Presidents, past, and future, and turn our attention to the music and entertainment industry. Nowhere is mind control "brainwashing" of huge segments of the American public so noticeable, as it is in the music and entertainment industry. Decades later, misguided, uninitiated people still get angry with me over my exposure of the "Beatles" as a Tavistock project. Now, I fully expect the same people who tell me that they know all about the history of the "Beatles"; that they are musicians and I am not, to question the following:
Did you know that so-called "Rap" music is another Tavistock program? So is "Hip-Hop."…these words have been crafted by the technician in mind control and behavior modification, so that they would fit in and became an integral part of Tavistock's gang wars program for America's major cities. The chief purveyors of this "music" and indeed all so-called "Rock" and "Pop" music… are:
TimeWarner/Sony/Bertelsman/EMI/TheCapitalGroup/Seagram/Canada/PhilipsElectronic/TheIndies.

P.248
SONY.
Sony's revenues in 1999 were estimated at $48.7 billion. It is the largest electronics company in the world. Its music division control Rock/Rap/Pop;
Sony owns all of Michael Jackson's "songs" and nearly the entire range of the
"Beatles."

Now P(D), consider the obvious: Had JPM foolishly refused to “get with the Program”, surely THEY would have “taken care” of him, but, the question is, if he did refuse to go along with the (DRUG-related) Program, did they offer him an alternative, that is, to step back and allow a William/Billy Campbell/Shears to do the dirty work (Faul having publicly admitted in word and song that he was bad and George Harrison having stated that “Paul” set the world on to the road of drugs with his 1969 LSD interview…)?

[B]

quote from article above
"The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489) 2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74."

How very interesting. The Beatles had come and gone by 1974.

Much of what John Coleman has written is sloppy and erroneous.
He actually does a disservice to the point he is trying to make by being so careless and overtly innaccurate.
Statements such as:

"Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene,
courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations"

are patently absurd. It was used all the time.
"Beatniks" is a term from the 1950s, and is not of Tavistock origin, to the best of my knowledge,
but hey, why let that get in the way of a good bullshirt saga?

"It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair."

No it didn't. Really, it didn't. Ever.

And even if it had, what has that got to do with The Beatles?
I get very tired of reading this revisionist bullshirt version of Beatle "history".
We who actually lived through that era had to listen to "Beatle Bull Shirt" from their detractors then,
and even now,it seems, we never hear the end of the "blame the Beatles for everything" mantra,
but we knew back then that it was largely bull shirt, and guess what: it still is.

I am not saying that the Tavistock Institute had nothing to do with the Beatles. I am not saying
that there weren't song writers behind the scenes, including, POSSIBLY Theo Adorno, but
smug statements like:

"The fact that "The Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno..."

are not proven, and may not be "fact" at all.

Condescending statements like:

"The Beatles" and their "music" would have died on the vine."

don't hold up.
Their "music" has lasted about as well as anyone else's "music", I would say. Hasn't died yet.
And the author's snooty application of quotes to the word "music" betray his conceit.

Enough of this!
Welcome to the board, paperbackwriter, but don't let the Beatle bashers get the better of you.
Their songs were their message, and that message goes deeper than "do drugs". It always did.

Remember, "they don't like him, the fool", and they never did. 'They' like John Coleman even now.
The Beatles were a project all right, - for better or worse - but they weren't the evil group they
get blamed for being. And "just maybe" they were a force for the good, inspite of what you may
have read. Just maybe. (cough cough)

[il ras]

I read the aquarian conspiracy some year ago (4\5) and personally think that could be somehow right...
Remember the famous show presented by Dick Clarck?

www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/dickclarka.mpg

[The Deceptionist]

May 6, 2010 21:36:48 GMT -5 B said:

Much of what John Coleman has written is sloppy and erroneous.
He actually does a disservice to the point he is trying to make by being so careless and overtly innaccurate.

Agreed. Which is a pity, because a lot of it seems to have at least some basis in truth. Its just in cognito and smothered in lies.

As far as I know the DEA was created during Nixon's reign, post '66 (when LSD became criminalised), so that may answer Coleman's question on 'where were the DEA?' ... they simply didn't exist.

This type of writing annoys me, because just as it starts to get interesting you end up coming across a blatant lie or severe stretch of the truth.

I remember being chided a while back by Letter B after contemplating a similar article to this. Whats Coleman's agenda I wonder??

[P(D)enny La(i)ne]

Thanks for the response, paperbackwriter, but I'm familiar with all of the information that you posted.

You had given me the impression, however, that the Coleman book addressed the specific topic of replacements, and that is what I was seeking clarification on.

Failing that, I agree with most of letter b's assessment of the book's assertions regarding the Beatles.

The Beatles most likely were, initially, assisted tremendously by the media/intelligence nexus. That's what this scene in A Hard Day's Night was really about.



I also believe that they were controlled, to some extent, even beyond the early years. In fact, I believe that Yoko was Lennon's handler, and that she was brought into the picture at the time that she was because Lennon was beginning to wake up to what the Beatles actually were. She was able to put him back to sleep (heroin), and then to channel his anger and charisma in ways (baggism, bed ins, etc) that discredited his message while allowing him to feel as though he was making a difference.

Having said all of that, however, they were also extremely talented and charismatic. Did they get some "help from their friends?" Probably, yes, especially in the beginning. Bernard Purdie claims to have played drums on a lot of their recordings, and I believe him, but they also grew into amazing song writers themselves.

www.jimvallance.com/03-projects-folder/purdie-project-folder/pg-purdie.html

I DO believe that there's something to the notion of the Aquarian Conspiracy, and that McCartney has been HEAVILY wrapped up in it since "God" died and was resurrected in late 1966.





However, I believe that the Aquarian Conspiracy that the Beatles, and specifically Paul, has been involved in, has more to do with a prophetic warning about the cyclical nature of our existence than anything else.



Welcome to the board.

P(D)

[paperbackwriter]

Aw, now I feel truly welcomed...thanks LetterB, but hey, don't let the bullshirt get you down. Let's rather face the truth that every talented singer, actor, poet, etc. is a target from the Illuminati viewpoint and that everyone who refuses to "get with The Program" is expendable (George was told that very clearly on the HD'sN film set), like our JPM, who, for the best part, was the heart and soul and driving power of The Beatles (my all time fav. group - and I know LetterB may say: good way to show it publicly by quoting Coleman...). Getting to JPM would have been THEIR the main consideration then and my thinking is that he was just too decent to go with the drug-related program and backed out, either willingly or "with a little help", either way, he was removed and his life may have been spared. The Coleman quotes were given in order to demonstrate the immense wealth, combined with immense power of persuasion that the TPTB yield to bring about change the way THEY deem fit for all of us. So, by process of deductive reasoning, it should be clear the THEY probably removed & replaced JPM when he didn't "get with it" and simply used Billy-boy to do the work instead and what a "good boy" he's proved to be. The old geezer is still trotting out there, acting like a teenager.

[65if2007]

Shouldn't the "Vanilla" option be something more along the lines of official Beatles history?

Something to the effect of, neither Paul nor anyone else was ever replaced and the whole thing was just college kids on acid seeing and hearing what they wanted to see and hear in the records and albums?

I checked "Other", by the way, because I just don't know.

[monodrack]

I Love Klaatu... But It's Impossible to know wich one is the true...

[1billyshears1]

I think vanilla is perfect for me at this time. I really think most of the huge connections involving conspiracies and the NWO are far-fetched and are connected by very thin lines. And i could believe in the tag team option but i really don't see why Paul and Bill would want to switch in and out. Stress of the job maybe? I really don't know what to believe! I think im in No Man's Land between being a PIAer and a PIDer

[B]

Wasn't vanilla 'iced'?

[65if2007]

Mar 31, 2011 23:13:46 GMT -5 1billyshears1 said:

I think vanilla is perfect for me at this time. I really think most of the huge connections involving conspiracies and the NWO are far-fetched and are connected by very thin lines. And i could believe in the tag team option but i really don't see why Paul and Bill would want to switch in and out. Stress of the job maybe? I really don't know what to believe! I think im in No Man's Land between being a PIAer and a PIDer

Shakes 1billyshears1's hand.