|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Oct 16, 2009 11:53:04 GMT -5
"I've only been there about 30 years in Paul's life and it's like now he wants to write with me..."
Ironically, this excerpt from a 1988 interview is from a video made by felipegcs, who I believe is PID.
felipegcs's objective was to show the tension that came to exist in the relationship between George and the supposed false Paul.
But, of course, what this particular statement strongly suggests is that George understands the Paul that he met in 1958 to be the same Paul that he knows now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 17, 2009 3:44:34 GMT -5
"I've only been there about 30 years in Paul's life and it's like now he wants to write with me..." Ironically, this excerpt from a 1988 interview is from a video made by felipegcs, who I believe is PID. felipegcs's objective was to show the tension that came to exist in the relationship between George and the supposed false Paul. But, of course, what this particular statement strongly suggests is that George understands the Paul that he met in 1958 to be the same Paul that he knows now. So, are you saying the he is saying that the same Paul that he knows now is the one we think we know as Bill, or is he implying (sub rosa) that he knows possibly TWO Paul's now, the one he met in 1958, and the one that came along in 1966? |
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Oct 17, 2009 4:36:10 GMT -5
"I've only been there about 30 years in Paul's life and it's like now he wants to write with me..." Ironically, this excerpt from a 1988 interview is from a video made by felipegcs, who I believe is PID. felipegcs's objective was to show the tension that came to exist in the relationship between George and the supposed false Paul. But, of course, what this particular statement strongly suggests is that George understands the Paul that he met in 1958 to be the same Paul that he knows now. So, are you saying the he is saying that the same Paul that he knows now is the one we think we know as Bill Yes. He is saying that he only knows of one Paul or at least that is what follows from what he is saying. He is saying that Paul 1958 plus 30 years equals the same individual as Paul 1988. Of course he isn't implying that. Otherwise, he would say, "I've only been there about 22 years in Paul's life." |
|
felipegcs
Hard Day's Night 
fdiario.blogspot.com Paul is Dead in Spanish!
Posts: 21
|
Post by felipegcs on Oct 21, 2009 12:56:38 GMT -5
Hi guys!
I just uploaded a lot of PID-like videos that i had downloaded from the internet. At the beggining i didn't even had the intention of making my own videos.
To be honest, i do not consider myself a true PIDer (although i was a PIDer). I'd say that i'm a "it seems that PIA, but..."
cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Oct 21, 2009 13:09:01 GMT -5
Hi guys! I just uploaded a lot of PID-like videos that i had downloaded from the internet. At the beggining i didn't even had the intention of making my own videos. To be honest, i do not consider myself a true PIDer (although i was a PIDer). I'd say that i'm a "it seems that PIA, but..." cheers! Thank you for clarifying that. That's about where I am too. It seems as though PIA and yet...and yet... The fact that George says in 1988 that he's known Paul for 30 years is one reason why it seems that PIA. |
|
