|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 28, 2011 1:22:11 GMT -5
I can't help but think that the controversy over Barack Obama's birthplace in some ways was similar to the controversy over the identity of Sir Paul McCartney and the fate -- if there was a "fate" -- as to James Paul McCartney.
And yet enough pressure was brought to bear upon Obama that he was forced to release his long-form birth certificate.
This would be an opportune moment for pressure to be brought to bear on Sir Paul McCartney to -- to do what? Submit to a fingerprint comparison? A DNA swab?
But the moment will undoubtedly pass. Sir Paul has not been subject to the crescendo of pressure that Obama has been subject to over the last three years or so -- so it's unlikely that it could be manufactured over a 48-hour window period/news cycle that might exist now.
Just food for thought.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 28, 2011 6:08:17 GMT -5
For the Sake of Convenience, I've taped my birth certificate to the outside window of Air Force One.
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 28, 2011 11:01:26 GMT -5
'Paul' could manufacture 'evidence' just like the Obama admin did.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 28, 2011 11:44:04 GMT -5
'Paul' could manufacture 'evidence' just like the Obama admin did. Well, in this case, he manufactured himself a birth certificate written on a White stone. Way to go, Macca! lol
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 28, 2011 17:45:37 GMT -5
According to Karl Denninger of Tickerforum, it's not a simple picture of the book with birth certificates opened up to the correct page.. What was presented at the White House web site was "manufactured". youtu.be/2eOfYwYyS_c
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 28, 2011 17:53:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Apr 28, 2011 19:06:51 GMT -5
|
|