|
Post by blackbird on Feb 21, 2008 8:58:29 GMT -5
No, Iamaphoney is no fraud. Just a feeling I have.
And I am having trouble even starting to believe that Mal had anything to do with Paul's death/murder. That one would have to be REALLY proven to me!
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 9:07:56 GMT -5
You have to know who 'iamaphoney' are, to understand how IT (not: who) is a fraud.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 21, 2008 9:13:55 GMT -5
i am still a noob here. I myself don't believe commentatore or iaap. Nice to see a newbie with a fully functional BS meter. Welcome! Once again I find myself wondering how many, if any, of the Rotten Apple series you've watched.
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 21, 2008 9:43:24 GMT -5
You have to know who 'iamaphoney' are, to understand how IT (not: who) is a fraud. OK. Who am the phoneys?
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 21, 2008 9:46:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 9:52:27 GMT -5
You have to know who 'iamaphoney' are, to understand how IT (not: who) is a fraud. Are you going to tell us that "it" is a part of the Tavistock Institute, as was suggested by another member (or a similar organization)?
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 21, 2008 9:59:46 GMT -5
Why do people always turn up and start talking in riddles or claim they know something but don't let on, I mean what is the point? I guess it means they know nothing, because if they did, they would surely be well known by now.... Iamaphoney could be a fraud, true, however at least if he is, he's a very entertaining fraud that's not afraid to spend money for an elaborate con with fantastic audio and visual production... Rant over... ...for now
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 10:04:54 GMT -5
commendatore, charrigan, or anyone else who claims to know who or whom IAAP is, why all the secrecy? You're basically anonymous on this forum, why not just tell all?
...
Oh, wait a sec...I know why...
...
It's all BS.
...
Prove me wrong. I challenge any of you who make such claims to put your money where your mouth is. Post something, anything tangible to validate your claims.
...
At this point in the PID/PWR game we've all seen enough cryptic hints with little to no substance to last a life time.
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 10:06:46 GMT -5
PP...too funny! You were posting as I was formulating the above. I just took the more aggressive stance.
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:07:58 GMT -5
I'm not gone. And, No, I didn't mean the Tavistock Institute. The only organization these persons have is their friendship (that I know of.)
And, I wasn't talking in "riddles" about Sussex. I wasn't talking about the Vale of White Horse in Oxford, I was being sarcastic - "It's not under the Vale (of Sussex) that's for sure."
What they claim to be in a suitcase, was removed from Peasmarsh not so long ago, along with paintings and photographs. The reason claimed, is because of a lack of trust in security.
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:09:40 GMT -5
They will expose themselves, they can not do what they've planned without some EXPOSURE.
Of course, their own music SUCKS - so I can understand why they would want to ride McCartney's coat-tails ..... dead or alive.
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Feb 21, 2008 10:09:50 GMT -5
You have to know who 'iamaphoney' are, to understand how IT (not: who) is a fraud. I'm willing to bear with you, then. I think you may have something more to say. . . .
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:17:03 GMT -5
It's really easy when there is more than one person working on such a project. That way, one can be in Denmark (let's say) recording a song "in the lab," while there is another in L.A. or in England (let's say.) And it's real easy for them to leave very few traces, as the one seen in the Rotten Apple Series (let's say) is not the same one heard in the Series.
Do you want names? Web Pages? Phone Numbers?
If I have this information, and I worked "like a dog" to find it, tell me one good reason why you shouldn't have to work to find it as well. That's what they want. So go get 'em tiger.
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 10:18:17 GMT -5
What they claim to be in a suitcase, was removed from Peasmarsh not so long ago, along with paintings and photographs. The reason claimed, is because of a lack of trust in security. 1. What exactly do "they" claim is in the suitcase? 2. Of what relevance to this are these paintings and photographs you describe and what do they contain? 3. What security do you speak of? Where is/was this security that they claim to "have a lack of trust in?" ... Take me up, give us a few SPECIFICS. Why should your claims be taken more seriously?
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:23:37 GMT -5
1. The "Mal Evans Archive" - or at least a portion. 2. No relevance. 3. Estate Security.
Take me seriously or not, it's up to you. I've given enough info about iamaphoney, already, that any one here should be able to find them. The primary reason I'm out to snuff their agenda, is because it's fraud (for personal gain)... and don't get me wrong, you can believe "Paul is Dead" if you want to. But remember, American's have been doing that for 40 years without documentaries.
|
|
|
Post by commendatore on Feb 21, 2008 10:24:07 GMT -5
Am I a fraud? Well, actually, yes. I was just bored and wanted to stir a little exitement around here. That, and bringing some good culture here. But I don't believe that iaap is a fraud. I hope you all can take a joke!
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 10:26:35 GMT -5
If I have this information, and I worked "like a dog" to find it, tell me one good reason why you shouldn't have to work to find it as well. That's what they want. So go get 'em tiger. Well, now you're getting the recognition YOU want. ... And you even throw in all the "let's say" and "if" jargon. You won't validate anything you say. Remember, YOU'RE the one making claims, the onus is on YOU to back them up, not us. ... In fact, how ridiculous is it that you would like us to back up your claims! You've got big balls my friend... ... (And everyone else, I do apologize for my tone if it causes offense, please know I'm done subjecting you all to my attitude until hopefully one of them can actually back up what they claim)
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:29:44 GMT -5
Back them up for yourself, if you are willing, yes. I'm not going to give out names and phone numbers to those who aren't paying me for the information. That wouldn't be fair to those who are paying me.
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Feb 21, 2008 10:32:29 GMT -5
Am I a fraud? Well, actually, yes. I was just bored and wanted to stir a little exitement around here. That, and bringing some good culture here. But I don't believe that iaap is a fraud. I hope you all can take a joke! I'm smiling
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:32:30 GMT -5
Can you tell me, if I seem so wrong to you, which is iamaphoney's name? > Martin Lind, Ian Martin, or Billy ?
"He" has used all three.
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 21, 2008 10:33:34 GMT -5
(Takes the bait) So how much is Faul paying you?
|
|
|
Post by fireman on Feb 21, 2008 10:37:36 GMT -5
(Takes the bait) So how much is Faul paying you? ;D
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:39:33 GMT -5
I'll answer that, after you've answered my question about iamaphoney's name. Of course, you don't have to answer.
|
|
|
Post by charrigan on Feb 21, 2008 10:43:37 GMT -5
I shouldn't be so mean spirited, should I?
Tell me; have any of you saw the "Who Buried Paul McCartney" documentary?
|
|
|
Post by iburiedpaul on Feb 21, 2008 10:52:24 GMT -5
I don't think your comment is mean spirited. Your information is worth a lot. How much do you want?
|
|