ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:04:13 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Oct 16, 2006 19:04:13 GMT -5
You realize there's a difference between doctored and stretched? Nope. That stretched picture was used in an overlay, atop someone whose face bears a resemblance but is proportionally longer. The simplest of doctoring, and the most common where this is concerned. I'm surprised at you PIAers though, as you can't seem to decide if JPM is supposed to have a round face or a longish one.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:07:43 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 16, 2006 19:07:43 GMT -5
Nope. That stretched picture was used in an overlay, atop someone whose face bears a resemblance but is proportionally longer. The simplest of doctoring, and the most common where this is concerned. He obviously took it from a website where the proportions were already off.
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:15:18 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Oct 16, 2006 19:15:18 GMT -5
Nope. That stretched picture was used in an overlay, atop someone whose face bears a resemblance but is proportionally longer. The simplest of doctoring, and the most common where this is concerned. He obviously took it from a website where the proportions were already off. Yep, quite a lot of that going on. Simple but effective. Funny you didn't say anything till called on it.
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:19:28 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Oct 16, 2006 19:19:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:21:58 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 16, 2006 19:21:58 GMT -5
He obviously took it from a website where the proportions were already off. Yep, quite a lot of that going on. Simple but effective. Well then we didn't "doctor" anything, did we? I don't compare other PIAers' pics to the ones that I have. If we did, wouldn't it seem like we're suspicious of each other?
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 19:23:41 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 16, 2006 19:23:41 GMT -5
Well aren't you clever?
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 20:51:49 GMT -5
Post by revolver on Oct 16, 2006 20:51:49 GMT -5
We also know that Paul's head was smaller than Bill's (see signature) We're waiting for you in the MF PID board, there's a new rebuttal for that. That photo was taken with a wide-angle lens and obviously at a tilt downward (you can see the tops of his shoes), which gives it that distorted effect on head size. The photos used in the stance comparison show no similar distortions due to lens or camera angle. The building lines behind Bill are parallel to each other, showing that the camera was held level. Both of their shoes look to be taken from the same camera angle. Since both photos were taken from approximately the same camera angle, the comparision is valid.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 21:48:22 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Oct 16, 2006 21:48:22 GMT -5
Who is that in the first photo? Is John Goodman from "Rosanne" playing Faul now?
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 21:53:37 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Oct 16, 2006 21:53:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 22:04:32 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 16, 2006 22:04:32 GMT -5
It's proof that he's squinting the entire interview.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 16, 2006 23:15:12 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Oct 16, 2006 23:15:12 GMT -5
It's proof that he's squinting the entire interview. Because unknown to the naive and sleeping world, he has pale green eyes, not brown, and as such, he is a victim of "Photic Sneeze Syndrome" (as am I), and that would give it all away if he sneezed, so he HAD to SQUINT to avoid sneezing, as open eyes would risk permitting a damning dose of sneeze-stimulating sunlight to enter the sensitive retinal conflagration, resulting in a nasal spooge blast the likes of which would arouse high suspicions that this man has light colored eyes.............posing a question......were JPM's eyes ever brown? As I look up into bright, full mid-day sunlight, I share his pain and suffering in this way as I spew copious globular spoonfuls of Sneeze Whiz all over the Great Sunny Outdoors. See article below by a person, coincidentally from Atlanta. domesticat.net/entry/906A kindred spirit. Oh, dear, my heart reaches out. With a Kleenex. I always sneeze when coming out of the Krispy Kreme during bright sunlight with a bagful of doughnuts, and their missing holes. I used to think it was in anticipation of the sinful calories I was about to ingest. Now I know the truth, the hole truth, and it makes me sneeze.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 0:13:26 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Oct 17, 2006 0:13:26 GMT -5
You realize there's a difference between doctored and stretched? Yes, doctoring is the art of enhancing an image using a number of techniques, is that not correct? A professional photographer knows numerous tricks. Also, the picture can be affected one small area at a time, as opposed to "globally". I have assumed (correct me if Iam wrong), than stretching or even condensing is a "gross" (meaning overall, global) aspect that usually has the effect of changing the height to width aspect ratio in the image. Everything either gets skinnier, or fatter. Conversely, if you only stretched one element in a picture, you would be left with holes, areas that would require filler or some kind of smeared attempt at camouflaging where the edges of the background (for instance) lack continuity with the stretched foreground image. For example, if you stretched Jimmy Durantes face tallways, in profile, in the silhouette of his nose would change and subsequently, edges around his nose would be left black, or have some apparent but indistinct artifacts "feathering" about the newly lengthened, but made less protruding, nose. These might appear as visual "garbage", vaguely waving changes in hue (or gray in grayscale), which would be less noticeable at smaller sizes but more evident in higher resolution. i.e. "What are these blobs in the space around his nose? Has he just sneezed, or is it is aura showing?"
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 0:42:09 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Oct 17, 2006 0:42:09 GMT -5
You realize there's a difference between doctored and stretched? Nope. That stretched picture was used in an overlay, atop someone whose face bears a resemblance but is proportionally longer. The simplest of doctoring, and the most common where this is concerned. I'm surprised at you PIAers though, as you can't seem to decide if JPM is supposed to have a round face or a longish one. I think (as a PWR'er) half-way in between. In the middle. If JPM had been a real cantaloupe head, they would have had to cast a real melon-head i the part. instead, they got Bill.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 6:48:14 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 17, 2006 6:48:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 7:43:54 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 17, 2006 7:43:54 GMT -5
What difference does that make FP? It's OBVIOUSLY 2 different men... flipped or not. Anybody with eyes can see that.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 9:37:28 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 17, 2006 9:37:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 10:08:26 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 17, 2006 10:08:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 15:40:15 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 17, 2006 15:40:15 GMT -5
What difference does that make FP? A pretty big one; his face is very asymmetrical.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 18:57:07 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 17, 2006 18:57:07 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if they're flipped or flopped or color or B&W, big or small... it's obviously 2 VERY different men.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 19:58:48 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 17, 2006 19:58:48 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if they're flipped or flopped or color or B&W, big or small... it's obviously 2 VERY different men. It doesn't matter if they're flipped or flopped or color or B&W, big or small... it's obviously one man. I guess our points cancel each other out now?
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 20:17:25 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Oct 17, 2006 20:17:25 GMT -5
Yep, quite a lot of that going on. Simple but effective. Well then we didn't "doctor" anything, did we? You're saying you'll use it until called on it. You should be.
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 21:09:27 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Oct 17, 2006 21:09:27 GMT -5
I just pointed out a fact regarding your comparison and somehow it's my problem.... Do tell. What's the difference exactly? "It works for us, therefore, it's not doctoring" is about all I'm seeing here.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 17, 2006 22:21:58 GMT -5
Post by FP on Oct 17, 2006 22:21:58 GMT -5
I don't compare other PIAers' pics to the ones that I have. If we did, wouldn't it seem like we're suspicious of each other? You should be.[/quote] I know these people a lot better than you do. They believe PIA just as strongly as me, and I'm sure they're not working for the illuminati.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 18, 2006 3:12:25 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Oct 18, 2006 3:12:25 GMT -5
I don't compare other PIAers' pics to the ones that I have. If we did, wouldn't it seem like we're suspicious of each other? You should be. FP wrote: They may believe PWNR as strongly as you, and may also consistently replace the term PWNR with the term "PIA" as you do, but that still begs the question as to whether you really believe this. I was extremely doubtful myself when I first heard about this being taken seriously, but when I saw the visual proof, I realized that there can be no doubt, scientifcally, and that we have to start seriously questioning our conception of what the media is really about.
|
|
|
jpm.org
Oct 18, 2006 7:43:32 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 18, 2006 7:43:32 GMT -5
I was extremely doubtful myself when I first heard about this being taken seriously, but when I saw the visual proof, I realized that there can be no doubt, scientifcally, and that we have to start seriously questioning our conception of what the media is really about. Take This, Brother, May It Serve You Well The TKIN-60IF Code When you read it, you read it so that history is truth, so while you read the universe is distorted and begun to look itself like which you read. Briefly, during the days that you read it , The TKIN-60IF Code was truth for you: And you believed everything of it. That's how this fiction works. The TKIN-60IF Code is a concealed history in that murders are interlaced, persecutions, mysteries, assassins and people replacements, you were in a vortex of events in which conscientiously nobody would wish to fall. It could nevertheless hurt certain susceptibilities. Some points of view could seem extreme and offensive, nevertheless it is a conception different from totally uncertain history and without bases, it is not a recommendable book widely. Typically commercial, of the affability of the yellow magazines.
|
|