Who sang here there and everywhere

[Rubber Soul]

It sounds more like fauls upper registe! But this was mid 1966

[linus]

Here is a video that presents both Paul's and John's extraordinary ability to sing both very high and low throughout their entire Beatles catalog.




And here is a great one spanning Paul's entire career.




These videos are very interesting for many reasons. One being that many PIDers claim Paul could not hit high notes but was good with low notes. And that Faul could hit high notes, but was unable to hit low notes.

[Rubber Soul]

Jan 12, 2014 17:28:44 GMT -5 linus said:

Here is a video that presents both Paul's and John's extraordinary ability to sing both very high and low throughout their entire Beatles catalog.




And here is a great one spanning Paul's entire career.




These videos are very interesting for many reasons. One being that many PIDers claim Paul could not hit high notes but was good with low notes. And that Faul could hit high notes, but was unable to hit low notes.

thanks

[Jai Guru Deva]

Jan 12, 2014 17:28:44 GMT -5 linus said:

These videos are very interesting for many reasons. One being that many PIDers claim Paul could not hit high notes but was good with low notes. And that Faul could hit high notes, but was unable to hit low notes.

Linus, who died and made you the authority on all things PID? Every single time you open your big mouth and say something to the effect of

"Most PIDers claim..." you are absolutely, undeniably, completely 100% wrong all the time!

Paul McCartney had a natural, gifted ability to hit low and high notes, and all the notes in between.
He sounds like he might be a Spinto Tenor which has the brightness and height of a lyric tenor, but with a heavier vocal weight
enabling the voice to be "pushed" to dramatic climaxes with less strain than the lighter-voice counterparts.

Faul's vocal range is more limited in comparison to Paul; he seems to strain about as much with low notes as he does with high notes.
He sounds like he might be a "Leggero Tenor" who's voice is typically light, bright and agile.

Think for yourself Linus!
How about if I made this statement:
Most Multiple-Paulers claim everyone from Jim Nabors (aka Gomer Pyle) to Tiny Tim have substituted for Paul in public, if not in studio,
which explains Paul McCartney's broad vocal range as a performer!

Look, I chalk up Paul's vocal range to natural ability; not multiple replacements from Jim Nabors to Tiny Tim and anyone in between!

To answer Jakes question, I'm pretty sure Paul sang "Here, There, And Everywhere."

[linus]

As a member of the old Miss Him forum (now private) for two years, I saw that was one of their bigger ongoing, and mutually agreed upon claims. I see it in Youtube comments often, as well. I didn't say all say that, I said many.
The majority of the PIDers I've read, that have mentioned his vocal range, have stated that. Actually, I think you may be one of the first PIDer I've seen say that Paul could hit all those notes with ease.
Perhaps that has been echoed by others on this forum years ago, but I haven't come across it.

It wouldn't matter to me if anyone said most multiples-ers claim this or that. Especially if what they said was something that most, or even some, multiples-ers actually claim.
And if I didn't claim those things, I would say so, and show why I believe what I do.




B said, "Edited for clarity and civility"
Yikes, can only imagine it before.
Think for yourself? Who is someone to say that to another?
Oh yeah, the '65 Beatles.

[linus]

It would take weeks to find all the instances where I’ve seen that claim made.
But with about 10 minutes of searching, I was able to find these five instances.


stargods.org/Paul.html



www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=102300&page=195



www.davidicke.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-30205-p-8.html



60if.proboards.com/thread/1698/music-clues-request?page=2



only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=lyrics&action=display&thread=1052&page=2



This was a belief I came across time after time when I would read PID boards in 2011/12.
Or, perhaps I'm absolutely, undeniably, completely 100% wrong.



In my experience, and I'm just stating what I've read over the years at PID sites, is that each individual PIDer seems to have his/her own criteria for identifying 'the real Paul', and rarely do any two completely overlap. Some even contradict themselves (i.e. saying 'the real Paul' had a cleft chin, then posting an image of him w/out a cleft chin).
I often see they even have different change-over dates, some going as far back as 1964. Some even say 'Faul' was being used off & on before 1967, and some say Paul shows up off & on after 1966.
And as we see in this thread, there are disagreements as to pre-67 vocal abilities.

I'm not saying any one person is wrong or right, I'm not even saying the videos I posted need to be taken as gospel. I'm saying I see a wide variation in criterion and perceptions. I'm saying, look at what this guys says in contrast to what this guy says. When each is viewed individually on it's own it makes sense, but when cross-comparing all them, there are discrepancies. And each seem to be one part of a bigger picture.

If it were as easy as there being one Paul up to a certain point, then he was replaced by an impostor, there shouldn’t be this much variation from PIDer to PIDer.
If one’s explanation is doctoring, I ask; why aren’t they all made to be the same? I see more than just two kinds of every feature going back to the early-60s. Same goes with vocal styles and even playing styles which can’t be doctored.
And why leave clues then doctor stuff? Why leave a trail of crumbs and cover one's tracks at the same time?

[Deleted]

linus said:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrato

lol

[iameye]

Each one believing that love never dies.

[Deleted]

Here.....
Changing my life with the wave of her hand
Nobody can deny that there's something there

lol