|
Post by KHAN on Apr 2, 2006 10:17:25 GMT -5
Hello everyone. I have made a point staying away from posting anything against the PID/PWR theories here for a while now. But since I was mentioned by name on this thread: invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=paul&thread=1143932837&page=1I figured a response was appropriate. (Don't worry, I have no intention of making a habit of it.) This is indeed an aged photo of JPM that I made using the link that JoJo provided a while back. The thing is, seeing the face of a 60 year old man in a 1960's mop top hair style is not really going to look very realistic. So I have created a few examples of what the aged JPM pic and a recent Sir Paul pic look like in the same hair style, therefore removing the unrealistic factors. I think the aging program works surprisingly well.
|
|
|
Post by KHAN on Apr 2, 2006 15:29:34 GMT -5
A couple more:
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 2, 2006 17:39:56 GMT -5
I think the original pre-PID vs. the original post-PID look the best.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Apr 2, 2006 22:06:00 GMT -5
Sir Paul has no upper lip....
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Apr 2, 2006 23:15:27 GMT -5
I don't see the point of those "potato" photos. They have different head shapes for one thing, so it's not an accurate depiction. But to me aged Sir Paul's (SP) face still looks like SP, and aged Paul's face still looks like Paul regardless of which head they're put on.
|
|
|
Post by KHAN on Apr 3, 2006 9:28:00 GMT -5
Alrighty then.
|
|
|
Post by mysteryboy on Apr 3, 2006 10:26:52 GMT -5
The softwae sux. It is highly inaccurate. Try it on a photo of yourself and have it regress you to your younger years . Apologies if you wrote the software, Khan. It does have potential.
|
|