Post by toodamnloud on Nov 15, 2016 17:43:52 GMT -5
Okay, I'll admit there are some strange happenings around the period late 1966 in relation to Paul. Some leave me almost believing the conspiracy.
But (and here's the real problem) people scrutinise minute details and clues, and as they add up, the bigger picture takes on less significance.
And that is the fact that an individual had the same musical genius to go on to write songs like "Maybe I'm Amazed" and countless other pop gems.
Now let's add the impostor also had to play bass in a uniquely inventive way "and" play left handed (something that is in no way the norm).
He also had to have a voice that was a convincing replica. He did. It's a fact that nobody said "what's wrong with Paul's voice" on the following four Beatles albums.
At this time Paul came to dominate the band. Would this be the behaviour of a nobody plucked from obscurity and put on the world stage with the greatest band on earth?
And while on the subject of imposters, there are endless numbers of tribute bands and club singers making a career with a Michael Jackson show (for example) -
some even have surgical procedures to enhance their careers. But in every case, it is obvious it is not the original performer. Nor do they have the innate talent
to take their mimicry on to create new music in the exact style of the original. Paul/Faul did just that. So many times he displayed his ability to create great melodies,
but average lyrics. Like he had always done. John was the wordsmith.
And if it is, in fact, the mythical William Sheares, a man of amazing talent, where is his background?
How did he acquire such talent in a vacuum where nobody noticed this brilliant musician in their midst around 1966?
And let's not forget to apply the laws that should be applied to all good conspiracies....
How many people are keeping this secret for so many years and for what purpose now? If Paul/Faul said "My name is William; I am not Paul",
I dare say it would get less coverage in today's culture than what Kim Kardashian is wearing.
I think more focus needs to be given to the career of Paul "after his death" and less worrying about his earlobes.
But (and here's the real problem) people scrutinise minute details and clues, and as they add up, the bigger picture takes on less significance.
And that is the fact that an individual had the same musical genius to go on to write songs like "Maybe I'm Amazed" and countless other pop gems.
Now let's add the impostor also had to play bass in a uniquely inventive way "and" play left handed (something that is in no way the norm).
He also had to have a voice that was a convincing replica. He did. It's a fact that nobody said "what's wrong with Paul's voice" on the following four Beatles albums.
At this time Paul came to dominate the band. Would this be the behaviour of a nobody plucked from obscurity and put on the world stage with the greatest band on earth?
And while on the subject of imposters, there are endless numbers of tribute bands and club singers making a career with a Michael Jackson show (for example) -
some even have surgical procedures to enhance their careers. But in every case, it is obvious it is not the original performer. Nor do they have the innate talent
to take their mimicry on to create new music in the exact style of the original. Paul/Faul did just that. So many times he displayed his ability to create great melodies,
but average lyrics. Like he had always done. John was the wordsmith.
And if it is, in fact, the mythical William Sheares, a man of amazing talent, where is his background?
How did he acquire such talent in a vacuum where nobody noticed this brilliant musician in their midst around 1966?
And let's not forget to apply the laws that should be applied to all good conspiracies....
How many people are keeping this secret for so many years and for what purpose now? If Paul/Faul said "My name is William; I am not Paul",
I dare say it would get less coverage in today's culture than what Kim Kardashian is wearing.
I think more focus needs to be given to the career of Paul "after his death" and less worrying about his earlobes.