|
Post by B on Jul 18, 2021 12:15:47 GMT -5
There's something just a little bit different about these lyrics. They're not the same. Compare and contrast: ------- Mandella Effect, perhaps? Who knows, but there's something new to be gleaned from this song. Stay Tuned!
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 18, 2021 12:47:04 GMT -5
---------
from Lyrics Freak
The Rolling Stones – We Love You Lyrics
We don't care if you only love "we" We don't care if you only love "we" We love you. We love you, and we hope that you will love "we" too
We love "they". We love "they", and we want you to love "they" too Ah
(door slams)
We don't care if you hound "we" and lock the doors around "we" Love can't get our minds off We love you, we love you
You will never win "we" Your uniforms don't fit "we" We forget the place we're in --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You're dead and then we're in 'Cause we love you We love you. Of course, we do
I love you. I love you And I hope that you won't prove wrong are goovin' too We love you. We love you. We do. We love you. We do. Ah... -------------------
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 18, 2021 13:24:26 GMT -5
a bit of contexten.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Love_You""We Love You" is a song by the English rock band the Rolling Stones that was written by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. It was first released as a single on 18 August 1967, with "Dandelion" as the B-side. The song peaked at number eight in Britain and number 50 in the United States, where "Dandelion" was promoted as the A-side and peaked at number 14. The recording features a Mellotron part played by Brian Jones and backing vocals by John Lennon and Paul McCartney of the Beatles. The single's two tracks were the final Stones recordings receiving a production credit for band manager Andrew Loog Oldham. The recording session represented Oldham's last work with the band before resigning as their producer. The promotional film for the single was directed by Peter Whitehead. It included footage from recording sessions along with segments that re-enacted the 1895 trial of Oscar Wilde, with Jagger, Richards and Marianne Faithfull respectively portraying Wilde, Marquess of Queensberry, and Lord Alfred Douglas. Footage also appears of Brian Jones, apparently high on drugs..... "Written in the aftermath of the drugs arrests faced by Jagger and Keith Richards at the Redlands country home of the latter in Sussex that year, "We Love You" opens with the sounds of entry into jail, and a cell door clanging shut. The draconian nature of the sentences handed down to the two Stones relative to the charges prompted a stern editorial in The Times on 1 July 1967, titled "Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?", in protest. The song's lyrics appear to be "a spoof" of the Lennon–McCartney song "All You Need Is Love", which the Beatles performed on the Our World satellite broadcast on 25 June. "
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jul 18, 2021 14:02:24 GMT -5
If someone said 'this is off a klaatu album' I'd probably think - 'yeah, sounds like it could be'.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 19, 2021 19:35:48 GMT -5
You will never win "we" Your uniforms don't fit "we" We forget the place we're in --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You're dead and then we're in 'Cause we love you We love you. Of course, we do -------------------- It sounds to me like "You're dead and then we're in" in both versions to me, but it may be that the "official" lyrics are "We forget the place we're in, cause we love you" to make it seem that they (The Rolling Stones) are singing about their arrest and incarceration, when in fact they may be singing about something bigger. What if the "uniforms (that) don't fit "we"" is a reference to the Sgt. Pepper uniforms, and they are saying that they are not on board with the William Shepherd Beatle plans (You will never win "we")? In that context, "You're dead and then we're in" could refer to how the story of Paul being dead suggested by the Sgt Pepper cover, along with its "Welcome the Rolling Stones" doll on its cover basically drafts the Stones into the picture, but possibly without their consent. This would seem to be born out in their "Let It Bleed" album in response to the Beatles' "Let It Be" album. The Stones rebelling, as it were, to being the Beatles' "bitches". Or more of the play where the Beatles represent the powers of goodness, and the Stones the friends of Lucifer. Of course, you might well ask why "Paul" would be singing in the chorus of a song challenging his Beatles saga. I don't have a good answer for that, but we may be missing something. Your comments are welcome!
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jul 21, 2021 3:56:53 GMT -5
Anyone hoping to become a rock and roll star since the birth of rock and roll would soon realise that it's a military/police/spy counter-intelligence program. As part of the COINTELPRO they would have been given licence to write rebellious sounding lyrics like "Your uniforms don't fit"
The question I'm always asking is "Who knew?" Certainly The Who with their "parting on the left is now a parting on the right" lyrics. What would the Stones have known? Especially when you consider Kieth is a 100% doppelgänger replacement and I'm 90% sure Mick is too.
Their answer to Sgt Pepper's was Their Satanic Majesties Request which is a lot darker. Were The Stones all up in the OTO when The Beatles were replaced? Were The Who? The "clues" are so ambiguous- I mean if I was writing pop hits at the time my first release would be, "Hey The Beatles Were Replaced With Doppelgängers" from the album of the same name.
I was more of a Stones fan than a Beatles fan. One of the first albums I ever bought was Rolled Gold from Britannia music club in the mid-80s. I also bought Their Satanic Majesties in my Madchester acid days. It wasn't until 1994 that I actually sat down and listened to someone's copy of Sgt Pepper's.
I like the Let It Bleed/Let It Be clue - didn't do them any good though. I think the original Beatles were innocents and replaced in 64 - The Stones and The Who got all into that satanism and were thus compromised to the point where they could only publish "revelation of the method" material - ambiguous clues etc.
|
|