LENNON OR CHOPIN

[bandi]

Was it jarvitronics's posts that many Beatles hits were actually derived from classical compositions from a century or more ago ?

When I read those posts about this I couldn't grasp whether he/she was right or not. Now I know jarv was 100% correct and proven here by Dr. Mark Mitchell D.M.A., from Quebec, Canada.



Have a listen, then read the text (or vice a versa---listen then read):

www.markmitchell-music.com/writings/

Click on 'Read the essay' (short 5 minute read);

Then click on: 'Audio Demo with Voice Over'


Maybe 'doc' from the forum can weigh in on this. He's a real pro and surely can evaluate what the good Dr. Mitchell is presenting to us.

When I listened to the 'Audio Demo with Voice Over', I had a kind of epiphany. And this epiphany came at the speed of light. And, what it said to me was these 4 'lads' were nothing but mildly talented actors in a well rehearsed play. It almost hurts me to realize how hard I've been f*cked by this gigantic octopus. WOW. Yeah, yeah yeah.

[bandi]

There's a very interesting portion of a video out there regarding George Martin's wife's lovely, black, 2 door Rolls-Royce. The very interesting part of this video is a short interview with the what I think is the Director of a famous
British car museum and some other guy. I can't remember the guy's name or the museum's name but it was something that was right at the tail end of a Mike William's video.

What this 30 second or so part of the video showed was this white haired, bad teethed, museum Director talking about George Martin's wife's black 2 door Rolls Royce that she had commissioned. What the commissioned customizing of the Rolls Royce was about, was an embroidered or hand stamped copper plate (it was shown on screen too fast and spoken of not very clearly as to which it was, but it was shown visually in the video). This embroidered?/copper plate? (in bas relief type work--raised or depressed letters) had the names of the songs written on it that GEORGE MARTIN WROTE (possibly 25 maybe more mega hit Beatles songs). The plate with the names was maybe 6"-8" by 10"-12" and it was possibly positioned in the dashboard or on the upper back section of the back seat. This part of the vid wasn't very well made visually so it was a bit difficult to see exactly where this thing was attached inside the car. The museum guy said this thing was done in copper, then also called it 'interior embroidery' so I don't know which it is. But I think I'll go with a copper plate done in reversed, recessed bas-relief.

What it is though is the titles of ALL THE SONGS THE BEATLES MADE FAMOUS, but it is actually of songs that GM WROTE. The vid may have been pulled by Mike Williams because he posted it earlier then pulled it then re posted it again. His reasoning was there was no one that could verify this as true, but there was the actual plaque shown in the vid installed inside the car along with the director guy giving out this information about the 'interior decoration work' of the black Rolls. Seems like the plaque was the 'decoration work'.

I think the plaque was like a celebration, finally, a celebration of the work that her husband created, and it honors him in a way that won't be hidden any longer. It's positioned where someone (other than Mrs. GM) can 'see' the work GM did and get it out of the never-to-be-spoken-of drawer of the hidden, or occult type info regarding the Beatles lies we've all be handed for so long. Just aboot made me cry when it all hit me, with the Lennon/Chopin comparison in the good Canadian Dr.'s work above.

It just makes sense to me, that GM actually wrote these hits (surely with input equally injected into this topic by Adorno).
When you listen to the above Dr. Mitchell's genius in the 2 minute audio comparison of the 'Lennon song' 'Because' and the Chopin work, 'Fantaisie Impromptu in C-sharp minor', it all comes into clear focus for me how deeply and successfully we've been lied to.

GOD have mercy on these bastards. All of them.

[ramone]

The Chopin comparison is spot on (from that link)

Haven't seen Doc on lately but, yes, I think his input would be valuable.

"Question: Paul, many of the top artists in the pop field have said that The Beatles have been a major influence on their music. Are there any artists who have had an important influence on you?

Paul McCartney: Oh yes, nearly everyone. We pinch as much from other people as much as they pinch from us."

(24 Aug, 1966 interview)

[bandi]

In the Dr. Mark Mitchell D.M.A. essay at the link given above, the monumental liars John Lennon as well as Yoko, both give their versions of how the song 'Because' was derived by Lennon as he listened to Yoko play Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata's chords in reverse.

He's lying as gigantically as the current guy that plays the part of JPM.

Either he's a degenerate liar or he was 'brainwashed' to an unmatched degree by the filth. Probably both.

[ramone]

Another example:
"When Lennon played an early version of “Come Together” for the other Beatles, McCartney pointed out that it was very similar to Chuck Berry’s 1956 single “You Can’t Catch Me.” McCartney said, “John acknowledged it was rather close to it, so I said, ‘Well, anything you can do to get away from that.'” So they slowed it down and McCartney added a “swampy” bass line.

The lyrics, however, included “Here come old flat-top/He come groovin’ up slowly,” a fairly direct lift of Berry’s “Here come a flat-top/He was movin’ up with me.” In an interview, Lennon acknowledged the song’s source, which proved inconvenient when Morris Levy, music-world heavy and publisher of “You Can’t Catch Me,” sued Lennon in 1973."

www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/beatles-5-boldest-rip-offs-54145/

1.05:

[joseph]

TOTAL THEFT! Never heard that before and Chuck Berry looks different there. I think there's even a line that's the same or similar to one in Come Together in that song. I'm going to have to compare the lyrics.

If Chuck Berry has been replaced then perhaps the replacement would have been less inclined to sue Fohn Lennon than the original would, although that shouldn't stop the record company who released the original from getting some cash out of the Lennon estate.

Edit: oh you said it in the second paragraph.