|
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 17:05:05 GMT -5
Lunar gravity made his hair regrowth
|
|
|
Faul
Jun 18, 2011 7:49:10 GMT -5
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 7:49:10 GMT -5
For that Cacca truthseeker the real Paul is that on the right. No, dear - Lol at GN contradicting his own claims. If you are going to post photo comps as evidence of an impostor, you can't then try and ridicule other people's comps and claim perspective and lenses disort the features of their comps, but not yours! GOTCHA! lol!!! You have serious problem in your glasses. Those comparisons tell that eyes distance and nose length DONT' CHANGE even with different camera lenses. You are just a very poor quality hoaxer
|
|
|
Faul
Jun 18, 2011 7:43:54 GMT -5
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 7:43:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faul
Jun 18, 2011 3:42:31 GMT -5
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 3:42:31 GMT -5
If a double died ( as Cacca truthseeker tells ) they NEVER needed that photo tampering crap
|
|
|
Faul
Jun 18, 2011 3:23:25 GMT -5
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 3:23:25 GMT -5
No fifty's style hairstyle in sight, and yet the head shapes are still different, lol!!! you really didn't get it did you? CAN'T TELL the exact shape of a head (that is not a skin-head) unless you are VERY intimate with the man - as in, you are his doctor, or if you are stroking his private parts right now. other than that, it's two completely different pictures from the first set of pictures. These COULD be different people - but not the early photos, and here is NO WAY Paul was replaced so early. other than that - you know, people do gain/loose weight, including in the face - they get chubby/skinny....especially if the weight change has come about by different drugs you use - the change can come about pretty quick by 67 McCartney was into coke. NOT the soft drink. The right answer was easier. Old TKIN members have not missed the exhaustive scientific discussion of early times.
|
|
|
Faul
Jun 18, 2011 2:21:20 GMT -5
Post by GN on Jun 18, 2011 2:21:20 GMT -5
if there is a faul and a paul, they are merely distinguishable. some times pauls face looks round, sometimes wide and narrow, sometimes the earlobe appears attached, sometimes detached. i do not believe in the "paul looks like this and faul looks like this" thing most of the times. There are some really weird looking pics of faul/paul, i think thats an imposter. but i see Paul mostly. For that Cacca truthseeker the real Paul is that on the right.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 16, 2011 14:20:25 GMT -5
Read her lips
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 5, 2011 3:25:26 GMT -5
See my avatar
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 21, 2011 3:29:07 GMT -5
Looks like: Not so much like: Am I right, or am I right? YOU ARE RIGHT
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:17:47 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 30, 2011 10:17:47 GMT -5
... and so Mr. Baby Fox News? And so Mr Pic Doctorer? We can see that your original pics were doctored. Using one of the pics you just posted and comparing it with one of your other, doctored, pics, your fraud is easily exposed - - We can all see you've stretched the pic and changed the colour! It's time you came clean and apologised for your dishonesty GN. By denying it you are only making a bigger fool of yourself. Dear Joseph McCarthy, here is the pictures you say: here is my original post about in this forum: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=guests1&action=display&thread=6086&page=4here is the ORIGINAL YouTube Address where those frames where taken: Unfortunately it works no more but there others on YouTube of the same "quality" like this: and this: Please read the written: it was about False Paul mouth corners. Face dimensions were not impotant for that subject and GN doctored nothing.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 28, 2011 19:35:34 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 28, 2011 19:35:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 28, 2011 8:59:44 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 28, 2011 8:59:44 GMT -5
Reference: They are still frames from timing at 0:06/:7:13 and at 0:15/7:13 Anyone can verify that no frame was doctored by GN Just to tell friends here ...
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 28, 2011 6:34:16 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 28, 2011 6:34:16 GMT -5
You added Crossover False Paul among Paul photos. Why? You blind?! That's Paul, not your Crosseyed False Paul or whatever you call him. That first pic isn't Paul. You can tell easily because the face shape is different and he has a beaky nose - Why have you doctored the face of Doubleback Fake Paul? This proves you want to discredit the fact that Doubleback Fake Paul is the real impostor in order to further your aims of making people believe in your made up Crossover False Paul! And Doubleback Fake Paul never wore a mask. That's just plain silly, and further proof that you want to discredit him. Well, you have been exposed by your photo doctoring GN! Crossover False Paul can't exist because you claim it's him when it is actually Paul. The only real impostor is Doubleback Fake Paul because he only appears when it's not Paul. He started before '66 - and impersonated Paul a few times and then Paul reappeared again. Fake Paul then came back (hence the name Doubleback - see?) a few more times before permanently replacing Paul after 67. I have been researching him for a long time so I know what I'm talking about. Different headshapes: In the above pic, we can see that Doubleback Fake Paul has a rounder shaped head than real Paul. So your photo doctoring of the Hey Jude pics of Doubleback Fake Paul can be clearly seen as an attempt to try and fool people into believing in your Crossover False Paul with a thin face. The impostor didn't have a thinner face, as the above pics prove. Which proves Crossover False Paul doesn't exist and Doubleback Fake Paul does. Please apologise GN for doctoring those pics. I'm keeping my eye on you. Dear, please see: Again it was NOT ME who faked something ...
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 28, 2011 6:11:03 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 28, 2011 6:11:03 GMT -5
I see GN seems to have run away with his tail between his legs after I exposed his fraud. More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - I am here and enjoying your very funny posts
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 26, 2011 6:03:46 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 26, 2011 6:03:46 GMT -5
You added Crossover False Paul among Paul photos. Why? AGAIN: Here is the REAL Paul McCartney: and this is "YOUR" "Paul": "Your" "Paul" is nothing like the TRUE PAUL
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 24, 2011 11:01:34 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 24, 2011 11:01:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by GN on Apr 19, 2011 2:54:51 GMT -5
just saw this, and got the shivers for a number of reasons. I would love some explanations, but all i got is This for those that don't know who was Lew GradeWhat was he doing there? Here it is:
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 13, 2011 19:22:32 GMT -5
Post by GN on Mar 13, 2011 19:22:32 GMT -5
if those are: then those are too: sorry sorry
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 13, 2011 19:13:33 GMT -5
Post by GN on Mar 13, 2011 19:13:33 GMT -5
Yes but I don't think you pointed out how EARLY it happened: Dunnow, seem to be the same dude. Yes Michelle. George Harrison's double has just another chin shape and other different features (nose, eyebrows ...) I can see that George's double from White Album Poster era
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 8, 2011 3:51:02 GMT -5
Post by GN on Mar 8, 2011 3:51:02 GMT -5
If you need two photos to match up perfectly in order for them to be the same person, I can prove that anyone was replaced. According to your standards, these are definitely two different people. Yes they are. Yiou mean anyone of the Beatles ... yes Very old news FP, very old news ...
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 7, 2011 13:43:41 GMT -5
Post by GN on Mar 7, 2011 13:43:41 GMT -5
Where is that tampered photo from? I don't know. Where did you find it? That's not Paul either. Wrong head shape. Paul had a round head. it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PaulMcCartney60s.jpgOh well that seems to be the WIKI official image for Paul McCartney AT LAST! I consider myself as a winner.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Mar 5, 2011 19:14:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 5, 2011 18:53:03 GMT -5
Post by GN on Mar 5, 2011 18:53:03 GMT -5
lol. How can anyone think that is Paul? Where is that tampered photo from?
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 14, 2011 4:11:03 GMT -5
Same guy (Paul). Same guy (Bill).
|
|
|
Post by GN on Oct 27, 2010 12:55:17 GMT -5
Who is the man at the beginning of the video? Vivian Stanshall?
|
|