|
Faul
Mar 7, 2011 6:40:26 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 7, 2011 6:40:26 GMT -5
Nope, I'm still laughing for two reasons: 1. Left and right pics are taken from completely different angles. This "round faced" Paul you guys keep talking about is based on pictures from the exact same angle: a straight on shot of Paul's head tilted upward. Usually if Paul's head is tilted downward or even sideways it looks like "Faul" to you guys. That is just silly! it doesn't matter what angle, the heads never match up properly. here, I have used pictures where the heads are at the same angle - since you want to be picky. They still don't match up, and i have abided by your rule. So where does that leave your theory now? Faul has a bigger head and there is no use waffling about angles because i have proved it using forensic photo proof.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 6, 2011 19:27:56 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 6, 2011 19:27:56 GMT -5
Haha, The original poster doesn't think the original picture of Paul is Paul, and Letter B thought the pic with "Faul's" face pasted over was the original. Even someone who believes PWR can see the humor in this. ;D It's not funny. This is serious. And I have proof that the tampered photo is not Paul. clearly the first 2 pictures are of Faul. The chins and eyes line up perfectly. The last photo is clearly Paul. Not laughing now, are you?
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 6, 2011 18:48:09 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 6, 2011 18:48:09 GMT -5
Where is that tampered photo from? I don't know. Where did you find it? That's not Paul either. Wrong head shape. Paul had a round head.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 5, 2011 18:37:30 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 5, 2011 18:37:30 GMT -5
what do you mean? That's clearly Faul. Don't you believe Paul was replaced? i can tell the difference.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 5, 2011 10:59:19 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 5, 2011 10:59:19 GMT -5
lol. How can anyone think that is Paul?
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Mar 5, 2011 10:43:26 GMT -5
I don't get it.
|
|