|
Faul
May 29, 2011 14:07:13 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 14:07:13 GMT -5
so then who the heck is this? doubleback?? Yes, that's Doubleback Fake Paul. Don't confuse him with Crossover False Paul, because he's not the real impostor but the fake impostor. Crossover False Paul doesn't exist. The real Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 13:42:34 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 13:42:34 GMT -5
You can see I know what I'm talking about.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 9:14:07 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 9:14:07 GMT -5
D is correctIt is disturbing to me that so many people can't see the obvious differences between real Paul and the impostor. You can also see that Doubleback Fake Paul has a rounder face. How many more proofs do you need?
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 18:14:42 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 18:14:42 GMT -5
What does comp stand for, compost? lol. It stands for comparison. You're obviously a newbie. Go to Pid miss him forum and you'll learn a lot. Then you'll see what I'm teaching you is true. lol. Typical newbie answer. Ask for something which is impossible to provide. Then when it's not, claim it as proof that you're right. It doesn't work like that in the real world. I can see that you have a lot to learn. Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 18:08:57 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 18:08:57 GMT -5
I suppose the different head shapes are due to Paul wearing high heels and leaning back. lol. no. THIS involve MUCH more complicated tricks: Going to the hairdresser and opening your mouth! Don't think so. Closed mouths, same hairstyle, and yet low and behold, different headshapes - Gotcha! Oh dear. You'll have to come up with another silly explanation now lol. So far you've given us high heels, leaning over like a drunk, open mouths and a new hairstyle as excuses for obvious differences. lol. It gets sillier and sillier. What crazy ideas are you going to come up with next? My evidence keeps slapping you on the face, yet you keep coming back for more. lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:37:29 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:37:29 GMT -5
I suppose the different head shapes are due to Paul wearing high heels and leaning back. lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:21:06 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:21:06 GMT -5
You cannot prove my evidence wrong so you resort to jibberish in order to confuse people. There is no need to prove your evidence wrong, since you have no evidence. Everybody can see I have posted photo comps in this thread. They are evidence. Do you think lying is gonna fool people into believing your PIA claims? I am too clever for you. Is that another word for lies? lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:18:08 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:18:08 GMT -5
Ah so? lol - make you're mind up! First of all you said "it was the other way around" until I proved you wrong. Prove he is leaning. High heels?! lol. You'll be claiming Paul is a transvestite next. What I meant was - same thing, about the LEANING only the other way - really, it's not that hard, you should try that sometime. And about the heels: - John has LONG HAIR, they wear FUR COATS....I mean, learn some history before you jump into conclusions. "Feminine" clothes constituted a large part of the early hippie style, which eventually transformed into "Glam" in the 70's. High High heels, baby. sigh....serenity now! .....relax......... Let it troll...let it troll... All ifs buts and maybes with you, lol. You can't prove any of it. I, however post an actual comp where its provable fact that they are different heights in the picture. I therefore have the strongest evidence. And that's a fact. Not ifs buts and maybes, lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:14:30 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:14:30 GMT -5
lol! Both of those pics came from you. Now then, can anybody spot the difference?! lol. You'll be saying black is white next GN. But keep on posting more youtube pics GN, in a desperate effort to hide the fact that you use doctored pics to discredit the fact that Doubleback Fake Paul is the real impostor.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:15:02 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 10:15:02 GMT -5
You're as nutty as a fruitcake. No wonder you are a PIAer lol. Hey that's not fair! What did fruitcake ever do to you that you should think to insult it so? -j You cannot prove my evidence wrong so you resort to jibberish in order to confuse people. I know your game. Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:00:37 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 10:00:37 GMT -5
I feel really disappointed that some of you cannot see the truth - My own private photo albums contain quite a few pictures that make me and my loved ones appear the wrong height, build, facial structure, etc. -j lol. So your screwy photos prove there is not a height difference between Paul and Doubleback Fake Paul?! lol. Grasping at straws with that one. You're as nutty as a fruitcake. No wonder you are a PIAer lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 9:56:37 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 9:56:37 GMT -5
lol. How easily you fool yourself. You only see what you want to see. You don't want to see the truth - I know what I'm talking about. Ah So? First in the B&W pic Paul IS a bit behind George Ah so? lol - make you're mind up! First of all you said "it was the other way around" until I proved you wrong. Prove he is leaning. High heels?! lol. You'll be claiming Paul is a transvestite next.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:02:39 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 7:02:39 GMT -5
I feel really disappointed that some of you cannot see the truth -
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:00:43 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 7:00:43 GMT -5
More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - Maybe you all believe me now. GN has gone very quiet, lol. His Crossover False Paul has been proven as a false fake Paul. Just like his fake, doctored pics, lol. oh for god's steak, first pic Paul is standing a bit BEHIND George, second pic the other way around lol. How easily you fool yourself. You only see what you want to see. You don't want to see the truth - I know what I'm talking about.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 29, 2011 19:23:04 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 29, 2011 19:23:04 GMT -5
More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - Maybe you all believe me now. GN has gone very quiet, lol. His Crossover False Paul has been proven as a false fake Paul. Just like his fake, doctored pics, lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 29, 2011 6:16:55 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 29, 2011 6:16:55 GMT -5
... and so Mr. Baby Fox News? And so Mr Pic Doctorer? We can see that your original pics were doctored. Using one of the pics you just posted and comparing it with one of your other, doctored, pics, your fraud is easily exposed - - We can all see you've stretched the pic and changed the colour! It's time you came clean and apologised for your dishonesty GN. By denying it you are only making a bigger fool of yourself.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 28, 2011 18:50:32 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 28, 2011 18:50:32 GMT -5
Reference: They are still frames from timing at 0:06/:7:13 and at 0:15/7:13 Anyone can verify that no frame was doctored by GN Just to tell friends here ... Well I have just verified that you have doctored those pics, GN - You have been exposed. Now do the decent thing and apologise for being so dishonest. We can now all see what lengths you will go to in order to discredit Doubleback Fake Paul in order to further your agenda in promoting your Crossover Fake Paul. I'm too clever for you, and no mistake. Now people will believe me when I say that your Crossover Fake Paul is a false fake Paul. There has only been one real impostor. Doubleback Fake Paul.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 27, 2011 17:21:21 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 27, 2011 17:21:21 GMT -5
I see GN seems to have run away with his tail between his legs after I exposed his fraud. More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul -
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Apr 27, 2011 16:40:46 GMT -5
There is only one impostor. Doubleback Fake Paul. And thats a fact. Different head shapes -
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 26, 2011 18:43:52 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 26, 2011 18:43:52 GMT -5
An absolutely mind-blowing discussion! Interesting, isn't it. PID opens a hole can of worms. Well, it's not my fault that GN can't tell the difference between the real fake Paul and a false fake Paul.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 26, 2011 18:27:16 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 26, 2011 18:27:16 GMT -5
You added Crossover False Paul among Paul photos. Why? You blind?! That's Paul, not your Crosseyed False Paul or whatever you call him. That first pic isn't Paul. You can tell easily because the face shape is different and he has a beaky nose - Why have you doctored the face of Doubleback Fake Paul? This proves you want to discredit the fact that Doubleback Fake Paul is the real impostor in order to further your aims of making people believe in your made up Crossover False Paul! And Doubleback Fake Paul never wore a mask. That's just plain silly, and further proof that you want to discredit him. Well, you have been exposed by your photo doctoring GN! Crossover False Paul can't exist because you claim it's him when it is actually Paul. The only real impostor is Doubleback Fake Paul because he only appears when it's not Paul. He started before '66 - and impersonated Paul a few times and then Paul reappeared again. Fake Paul then came back (hence the name Doubleback - see?) a few more times before permanently replacing Paul after 67. I have been researching him for a long time so I know what I'm talking about. Different headshapes: In the above pic, we can see that Doubleback Fake Paul has a rounder shaped head than real Paul. So your photo doctoring of the Hey Jude pics of Doubleback Fake Paul can be clearly seen as an attempt to try and fool people into believing in your Crossover False Paul with a thin face. The impostor didn't have a thinner face, as the above pics prove. Which proves Crossover False Paul doesn't exist and Doubleback Fake Paul does. Please apologise GN for doctoring those pics. I'm keeping my eye on you.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 25, 2011 12:15:54 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 25, 2011 12:15:54 GMT -5
Both of those are Paul. Both were taken before 66. You then post pics from later times and call them Paul! You can't have it both ways mister! You don't make sense, sorry. What you say is right but it's about "Crossover False Paul LOL. No it's not. You have proven you can't tell Paul from an impostor. The one you call Crossover is the real Paul. How do you explain this? ALL of them are clearly Paul. The one I have put in was taken from A fool On The Hill shoot. This proves Paul reappeared after Doubleback Fake Paul took his place for a while. Before he took over permanently. Crossover False Paul is a silly load of old garbage. You need to research Doubleback Fake Paul instead. You are way off track. I've been researching Doubleback for years. Again - BOTH Paul after Doubleback Fake Paul disappeared for a while - Only an idiot would say they aren't the same person.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 20, 2011 17:58:19 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 20, 2011 17:58:19 GMT -5
sorry So you should be. That first photo is NOT Paul. That's Doubleback Fake Paul. He first appeared in '65 and then Paul came back until '66. But Doubleback Fake Paul reappeared in '67.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 7, 2011 20:06:07 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 7, 2011 20:06:07 GMT -5
My rule's a bit more thorough than putting them side by side and drawing one pair of lines. How do you know they're scaled properly? How do you know they arent? Gotcha! If i made the second photo smaller and matched them up with the eyes instead then their chins wouldn't line up like they do now, would they? Gotcha! Line up a lot better? lol. If it was the same person they would line up perfectly wouldn't they. So you have mistakenly admitted they aren't the same person.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 7, 2011 19:59:31 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Mar 7, 2011 19:59:31 GMT -5
you're not fooling me with that doctored monstrosaty. That clearly isn't Paul, if it was why would they doctor it? Proof The normal photo looks reasonable i suppose to those who are easily fooled but if you solerize the photo you can see their bad photoshoping at work. his hair is all funny looking at the top, where they have had to cut off Fauls long head and they've drawn in long stringy bits like seaweed. and you can clearly see where they've drawn in his ears and missed out bits of his hair. the other parts of his face like his nose look natural, so you can see the difference between the photoshoped bits quite easily. And I've seen that post on maccafunhouse and you think you know who i am but I'm not the original truthseeker and i only chose this name to honour her because she has had to leave because she wasnt well.
|
|