|
Post by beacon on Aug 31, 2012 5:02:55 GMT -5
I wonder if there's any additional meaning to the lyrics, Woke up, fell out of bed, dragged a comb across my head. Possibly, but I am sure there is a grail reference in the line ' Found my way upstairs and drank a cup'.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 31, 2012 4:11:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 31, 2012 4:02:48 GMT -5
Holy Temples and Hidden Holy Wisdom
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 31, 2012 3:42:11 GMT -5
There are two major blackmail events in Epstein's life that I am aware of. The first involves Dizz Gillespie, Epstein's lover, and would be the incident Nat Weiss is referring too. Gillespie stole some of Epstein's possesions which included his 'medication' and some inflammatory photos believed to be of Epstein's conquests. Gillespie, like the various girls impregnated by horny Beatles, was paid off. The other I wrote about on my blog some time ago, but I will repeat: - beaconfilms2011.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/magick-circle-brian-epstein.htmlBrian Epstein the legendary manager of the Beatles was by 1966 heavily in debt due to gambling and was rapidly losing control of his Beatles empire. Epstein was known to frequent the same casino in London as Robert Fraser . Epstein had become a regular visitor to the Clermont Club, a gambling den in London run by John Aspinall. Aspinall had been approached by Billy Hill, a well known figure in the London underworld and mentor to the infamous Kray twins, about initiating an elaborate scam called the Big Edge for the card game of Chemin de Fer. The cards would be passed through a mangle to produce tiny, virtually indiscernible bends which would then be read by 'trained' players specially schooled by the club. The scam, though not foolproof, was soon earning the club and Billy Hill thousands of pounds a night. Chemin de Fer was a popular game for Epstein and soon, he too, was falling victim to the scam on a massive basis. For Epstein the stakes were enormous, for not only was he gambling his own money but also that of the Beatles too. Epstein was acutely aware that his contract with the Beatles was up for renewal in 1967 and he feared that they would not want to go elsewhere. With his debts and his own paranoia growing, Epstein was resorting to increasingly elaborate attempts to recoup his money. In January 1967 he agreed a deal with Robert Stigwood to merge NEMS with Stigwood's organisation for £500,000. Stigwood thought he would be buying everything, including the Beatles, but once the fab four got wind of this plan they told Brian that they would only ever record God Save the Queen and out of tune to boot. The deal was therefore re-arranged to exclude the Beatles as they had been so incensed by the proposal. However, Brian's problems were only mounting. He had previously met the Kray twins in a gay club in London and now they were putting the squeeze on him after they had discovered his affair with Dizz Gillespie. How they came to discover this is uncertain. It may have come to light through Brian's activities at the Clermont Club where, lest we forget John Aspinall's partner was the Krays friend Billy Hill. Alternatively it may have been via the mysterious David Litvinoff. Litvinoff was a colourful character who was well known in the London underworld as well as that of swinging London. He was, like Brian, homosexual and a massive gambler. He was rumoured to have been a former lover of Ronnie Kray, however what is certain is that, after accumulating huge gambling debts Ronnie and Reggie Kray paid him a visit which involved tying him up by his feet and inserting a sword into his mouth. Ronnie then forced the sword into his mouth, cutting him from cheek to cheek and leaving him with a permanent 'joker like' smile. Litvinoff entered the circle of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones through his association with Robert Fraser and Christopher Gibbs. Indeed Litvinoff would play a major part in the film 'Performance' starring Mick Jagger and James Fox, when he was employed by the director Donald Cammell as a 'voice coach'. This apparently was a euphemism and his real role was to immerse Fox totally into the London gangland scene so as to prepare him for his role as a gangster. However the news reached them, the Krays told Glasgow crimelord Arthur Thompson that they were blackmailing Epstein and were going to take the Beatles from him. Thompson apparently convinced the twins that the Beatles career would go downhill fast if they were associated with the Krays. They settled for blackmailing him for cash instead. On the 27th August 1967 Brian Epstein was found dead in his locked bedroom at his home in London. His death was officially declared an accident at the inquest due to the consumption of too many sleeping pills. Suicide was denied by all around Brian, however long time Epstein employee, Peter Brown claimed that he had removed a suicide note and a will from Brian's bedroom prior to the arrival of the authorities. The suicide note was, according to Brown, apparently from a previous attempt, however it interesting to note that the will left Epstein's house and money to his mother and brother, Clive. Brian's father Harry had died some six weeks earlier, meaning this will would have had to have been recently updated. It is also curious that someone would leave a suicide note just 'lying around'. Had the Krays threats been sufficient to drive Brian to suicide, or even more sinister, had the twins arranged for a little visit to Brian over that weekend? As an interesting footnote to this saga, another long time Epstein associate, the flamboyant London lawyer David Jacobs, is also rumoured to have come to a sticky end. Again, possibly with the involvement of the Krays. Like Brian, Jacobs was Jewish, homosexual and another prodigious user of amphetamines. Jacobs had long been in the employ of Brian and the Beatles and his other clients included Marlene Dietrich and Diana Dors, both of whom featured on the cover of Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club band, as well as the Rolling Stones. Jacobs was found hanging from a length of satin from one of the beams of his garage in December 1968 after reportedly having turned down the opportunity to represent Ronnie and Reggie Kray as the defence lawyer in their forthcoming trial for double murder. Is it possible that Jacobs came to the attention of the Krays after having been used by Brian to try and extricate him from their blackmailing grip? I think Grandfather Aleister is alluding to these events. Interestingly, I left a comment on his YouTube channel and he replied saying "An interview is in the works with someone with additional information that I think you will find most enlightening." Hopefully, all will be revealed.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 30, 2012 5:27:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 30, 2012 5:25:06 GMT -5
I don't know whether PID is real or allegorical. I know the clues are real, despite the Beatles' earnest denials over the decades. But there was a radical change in Paul's image and personality after 1966. He went from a quiet and chic man - with a gregarious alter-ego (practically living in London clubs), to a domineering and crude man - with a retiring alter-ego (hiding out in farms and manors thereafter). The parting in his hair swapped from left to right. Paul always parted his hair from left-to-right, and 'Faul' always parted his hair right-to-left. It's said that he began using his right hand, when Paul was a straight lefty. Re: talent, that's up for interpretation of course. Although I believe an expert identified 2-3 Pauls in the later Beatles' album/s. I've also heard that 'Faul' relied heavily on session musicians in his solo work. To me, John's solo work is much better than Faul's. Re: eye socket surgery. Sure it's possible, they'd reshape it. The eye just rests in the socket. Re: your idea of PID as a gimmick to breathe new life into a dying band. That's bull. The Beatles were never bigger. Creatively they may have stalled. That quip with Jesus only effected the Bible Belt, and Lady Marcos the Philippines - a small market. Besides, the extent and the intricacy of the PID conspiracy is too ambitious. They carried on hiding PID clues in their solo work decades later. Paul or Faul is still hiding PID and BILL clues today. Re: John. Sure, they all dabbled in various drugs at one time or another. While John was receptive to Paul's / Faul's new musical direction ie psychedelics /heavy rock. But John was always the brains and talent of the group. They were all old school friends and a tight-knit group. I can't imagine they'd let an outsider - a replacement - come in and take over. I think Jessbottles hits the nail on the head, It’s possible the clues could be eluding to something other than Paul dying.The clues aren't about Paul dying at all. Maxwells point about them all being old school pals and not allowing an outsider in is hugely valid. Even if Paul did die and was replaced the recording credits were still listed as Lennon/McCartney, meaning either McCartneys 50% went to his family or the new guy, either way, George and Ringo would still be on considerably less. Whatever the talent or contribution of the new guy, surely the whole royalty pot would have been up for debate at this point, but it wasn't. Also, after the end of the Beatles touring days the whole thing becomes the McCartney show, he is the driving force for Sgt Pepper, MMT etc. There is no way the new guy would be given that kind of role. The funeral scene on the Sgt Pepper sleeve is a memorial to Tara Browne. I speculate about the relevance of the other Pepper clues in my book and I won't go into them here, suffice it to say, whether I am right or wrong, PID is a smokescreen that only serves to obscure the real meanings behind the clues. And to answer the question that this thread poses, if Paul McCartney dies - whoever he is - then the whole thing will unravel and begin to reveal itself, there will be no replacement. Anyone wonder why Geoff Baker suddenly showed up here the other week out of the blue? This whole thing has a time frame and maybe we are getting a bit too close to the truth for comfort and risk blowing that time frame. I don't know if he is still on the payroll or not but it was a bit weird to say the least.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 30, 2012 5:02:31 GMT -5
It's possible. 80 degrees Fahrenheit (or 27 degrees Celsius) is a likely temperature at the height of a British summer, as late July / early August is. At 11:30am the Sun is almost overhead, and at its hottest. More photos from that photo shoot have recently emerged, that confirmed Paul's /Faul's story about sandals. There is no doubt that McCartney had sandals that day, the question is why did he take them off? If it was such a hot day then surely the hot tarmac would have burnt his feet? Also, the Beatles attire is hardly befitting that of a roasting hot summer's day - none of them saw fit to take their jackets off for example. An earlier test shot: Note the lack of the VW beetle If we study the various shots we can now see the VW beetle in all of them, however there are only two with the police van visible. This tells me that there had to be a reasnoable time delay between shots. Enough for the van to park up anyway. Presumably the other shots were tests and they returned later for the shot of them in line and with McCartney shoeless. McCartney also claimed that it was imperative that the shot show them walking away from the studios as a symbolic gesture that marked the end of the Beatles, so why the shots of them going the other way if these were anything other than test shots. The whole thing is full of symbolism and hidden meanings and was designed to match McCartney's original sketch. In my opinion he is barefoot not as a symbol of death but as part of his ongoing messiah complex.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 30, 2012 4:40:12 GMT -5
Saw this on the Beatles bible site and it tweaked my interest. www.beatlesbible.com/1968/08/29/recording-dear-prudence-2/Recording: Dear Prudence
7.00pm, Thursday 29 August 1968 (44 years ago)
Trident Studios, St Anne's Court, London Producer: George Martin Engineer: Barry Sheffield
This was the second session at London's Trident Studios for the White Album song Dear Prudence, recording for which had begun the previous day.
This was an overdub session, onto the basic track of acoustic guitars and drums. During this 7pm-6am session, John Lennon recorded two sets of lead vocals, Paul McCartney added bass guitar and piano, George Harrison recorded some electric guitar, and two sets of backing vocals, plus tambourine and handclaps, were added.
Visitors to the studio on this night included McCartney's cousin John, as well as Apple-signed singer Jackie Lomax. With The Beatles' assistant Mal Evans, they contributed to the backing vocals and handclaps. Although left out of the final mix, the song ended with deliberate applause.
Ringo Starr was not present at the session, as he had walked out of the group on 22 August 1968. He returned to the group on 3 September.
During the session a knife fight broke out in St Anne's Court, which at the time was a somewhat insalubrious part of London's Soho. One of the two combatants was wounded, and Beatles fans waiting outside the studio alerted Mal Evans who called an ambulance.
Has anyone got a picture of cousin John? I am wondering if there is a family resemblence? Also, wasn't this around the same time that Terry Knight was over visiting? No mention of him though
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 29, 2012 14:57:10 GMT -5
Interesting start to the paralympic opening ceremony, already had a huge all seeing eye followed by a huge apple, supposedly to represent that key member of the royal society Issac Newton.
Looks as if it will be as full of symbolism as the olympic ceremony!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 29, 2012 14:35:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 29, 2012 8:10:36 GMT -5
Through hardship to the stars!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 29, 2012 8:03:47 GMT -5
In McCartney's career I think the latest albums with the anagrams are big clues that he is/was onto something. I am quite sure that some other albums might need some more research as I'm quite sure that Paul wouldn't let an almost-forty-year gap happen between his clues (Lily - King of Cosmania). Cheers refugeenl, i really enjoyed your post here (part of it quoted above)... You are undoubtedly right! "I'm quite sure that Paul wouldn't let an almost-forty-year gap happen between his clues" ! HEAD ON A TRAINAND, taking into account that the "hillmen" are probably the "fools" "on the hill" (which hill would that be i wonder?) It then makes so much more sense when such an abrupt "answer" appeared within the video here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8eiUBEUF88 in 2009 for all to see. Nevertheless people will see what they wish to see, don't you think? "The idea was to see if anyone made the connection." It seems to be that much of it is for fun, some of it is for a lark, some of it is channeling something other, and A LOT of it also has a VERY DEEP SPIRITUAL meaning as well. Remember, "The time of peace and overwhelming joy is just around the corner for all. The end of the road is not a dead end but an endless highway of life."oh, and to add... i'm certainly no expert on these things. I learn something new everyday! refugeenl is right in the sense that there would not be 40 year gaps between clues, we just have to pull the threads together and decide what is real and what is not. For example Jessbottles, you may well be onto something with the connection between Pretty Little Head and its 'hillmen' lyrics referring back to Fool on the Hill. The word head comes up frequently in the lyrics to that song. However, Pretty Little Head harks back also to Sgt Pepper and specifically She's Leaving Home given the extract at the beginning and the theme of the video. It could have been written as a follow up. Like A Day In The Life, She's Leaving Home was inspired by a newspaper article, however the remarkable story begins some years earlier. Back on Oct 4 1963, The Beatles made their first appearance on the brand-new tv show Ready Steady Go!. Besides miming to She Loves You, I'll Get You and Twist And Shout, all four members were interviewed by Dusty Springfield, and Paul was chosen to judge a teenage miming contest. Of the four contestants miming to Brenda Lee's Let's Jump The Broomstick, Paul selected Melanie Coe as the winner. She ran to the front to shake McCartney's hand and receive an LP from him as a prize. Did Paul choose her beacuse she had a pretty little head? A little over three years later, Ms.Coe ran away from home and her story was featured in an article in the Daily Mirror, which then inspired Paul to write She's Leaving Home. This is remarkable enough however a recent post over on Mystery Tramp adds even more weight to the amazing synchronicity concerning certain Beatle clues. The photo above is a 1964 shot of Jane Asher standing at the door of the bedroom she then shared with Paul. The dark letters on the fish sign spell the words COE and the lighter ones spell LSD. Is this just coincidence or another example of us having to read between the lines?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 28, 2012 8:51:06 GMT -5
The Vigenere cipher is a method of encrypting alphabetic text by using a series of different Caesar ciphers based on the letters of a keywordwhispered words of wisdom lol There will be an answer Friends, Romans, countrymen, LEND ME YOUR EARS is the first line of a famous and often-quoted speech by Mark Antony in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare. LEND ME YOUR EARS and I'll sing you a song and I'll try not to sing out of KEY is a line from the Beatles song 'With a little help from my friends'. Lewis Carroll published The Alphabet-Cipher in 1868, possibly in a children's magazine. It describes what is known as a Vigenere cipher. Caesar Cipher Lewis Carroll memorial at Westminster Abbey Shakespeare memorial at Westminster Abbey www.sirbacon.org/gallery/west.htm In 1741, poet Alexander Pope and three others were mainly responsible for designing this monument. Note that Shakespeare's finger points to the significant word "Temples".
....the Abbey authorities knew the secret when they allowed the monument to be erected, for the stockings are graced with the head of Francis Bacon, the stockings are engraved with Tudor Roses and a crown, and the lace work on the ruffs of the sleeves is an exact representation of the ruff worn by Queen Elizabeth. Between his feet are the Sonnet initials T.T., referring to Masonry (Thirty-Third Degree) The place of honour in front is given to a beautiful youth, a crowned Prince, young Francis Bacon of the Hilyard Miniature. On the left is the figure of the Queen's second son, the Earl of Essex, or the Queen's husband, the Earl of Leicester. The Hilyard Miniature of Francis Bacon as a youth of eighteen appears in the Queen's own prayer book.Another Baconian symbol was the letter T. The T would display a rose and stood for the Tudor rose, the regal lineage from which he was descended. The rose is also a Rosicrucian symbol. What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. The answers lie behind the Temple Dors
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 28, 2012 6:08:02 GMT -5
gilding the lily, To gild refined gold Therefore, to be possess'd with double pomp, To guard a title that was rich before, To gild refined gold, to paint the lily, To throw a perfume on the violet, To smooth the ice, or add another hue Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish, Is wasteful and ridiculous excess. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_DorsAlleged fortune
Before she died, Dors apparently hid away what she claimed to be over £2 million in banks across Europe. In 1982, she gave her son Mark Dawson a sheet of paper, which she told him was a code that would reveal the whereabouts of the money. Her widower Alan Lake supposedly had the key that would crack the code, but as he had committed suicide five months after Dors died, Dawson was left with an apparently unsolvable code.
Dawson sought out computer forensic specialists Inforenz, who recognised the encryption as the Vigenere cipher. Inforenz then used their own cryptanalysis software to suggest a ten-letter decryption key, DMARYFLUCK (short for Diana Mary Fluck, Dors's real name).Although Inforenz was then able to decode the entire message and link it to a bank statement found in some of Lake's papers, the location of the money is still unknown.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 28, 2012 5:18:10 GMT -5
I think I got the ''secret'' about L.I.L.Y. You guys are bringing it too far, I guess. Mirror LILY the same way as you mirrored the Sgt. Peppers drum and you'll get.... ''1 1 1 x'' ''1 one 1 x''. November 9 or September 11. Lonely -> Lily. ''One'' replaced by a more simple ''I'', it's all virtually the same. It's all part of the little clues Paul DELIBERATELY put on his albums. Lily is another play to ''confirm the truth about the other ''codes''''. The same goes for the Love/Code album. Paul's knowledge about these things are bigger than some might think. Remember ''The King of Cosmania'' and ''The Fireman is no mason'', plus the other anagrams and ambigrams found on his albums. Hi Refugeenl, The possibility that L.I.L.Y. is a mirrored date has been discussed before. invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Clues&action=display&thread=6752You are on the right track concerning codes though. It is indicative of the use of double meanings. The standard explanation for L.I.L.Y. is that it is code for Linda I Love You but the real issue is what is it's double meaning? Perhaps it is a reference to John? The origins for the term to 'gild the lily' are believed to orginate from text in a Shakespeare play - King John. The following quote comes from this website www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/gild-the-lily.html SALISBURY: Therefore, to be possess'd with double pomp, To guard a title that was rich before, To gild refined gold, to paint the lily, To throw a perfume on the violet, To smooth the ice, or add another hue Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish, Is wasteful and ridiculous excess.
The context of that speech in the play is King John's satisfaction with his second coronation - "Here once again we sit, once again crown'd". His courtiers aren't so sure, calling the crowning 'superfluous'. The use of Shakespeare's text to denote unnecessary ornamentation is fairly straightforward. After all, 'to gild' is to cover with a thin layer of gold, so 'gilding refined gold' is obviously unnecessary. Unfortunately, remembering text from Shakespeare isn't everyone's forte and the quotation has become rather garbled. As the quotation above shows, 'gild the lily' doesn't appear in the original. So, maybe L.I.L.Y. is a dig at John? Maybe John in Paul's eyes is being seen as the creative king of the Beatles and this is a subtle dig? As pointed out earlier in this thread by Tafultong Paul went to extreme measures to ensure that Lily Evans, widow of Mal, couldn't sell the original lyrics to 'With a little help from my friends'. This in itself is interesting as on Sgt Pepper the song follows the title track when we are introduced to Billy Shears, which maybe an allusion in itself to William Shakespeare, and includes the line 'Lend me your ears and I'll sing you a song, and I'll try not to sing out of key'. The beginning of that line, of course, borrows from Shakespeare and at the end alludes to a key. If nothing else, it is evidence of double meanings, codes and keys. You mention yourself the LOVE/CODE clue. The word love maybe a key. On Sgt Pepper in 'She's leaving home' the Beatles say that 'Fun is the one thing money can't buy' however, the 1964 Beatles state that 'Money can't buy me love'. Add to this that it is claimed that in the picture of the Beatles on the back cover of Sgt Pepper George Harrison positions his hand in a certain way not to point to the printed lyrics, but to make the letter "L", the first letter in the word "LOVE", as the Beatles appear to be spelling out the word "LOVE" with their hands. John's hands are arranged in a "V" shape, and Ringo's clasped hands are said to form an "E". Not sure I buy this myself. McCartneys back that faces us in the picture would make an "I" and the picture itself is a reversed or mirrored image, therefore it would actually spell "EVIL", however, the point is that all is not as it first seems!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 25, 2012 6:18:13 GMT -5
Sounds like many of you have already given up. As far as bomb shelters, that was back when people thought they could actually survive. Now we know better. It's not just about "world peace". It about how we treat each other and solve our conflicts. if you're satisfied to have bombs dropped on children and live in a society where people you trust take your life savings with ponzi schemes, then do nothing. I'm not a religious person, but I have a hard time arguing with religious people who ask me " can't you tell that we are heading to wards Armageddon. Posting on this website hasn't taken given me any reason to believe they are not right. The Beatles were cunts. They talked about peace 'n' love, love, love but never actually practiced it. They were satanists. Their treatment of Pete Best and Mal Evans - who was paid a pittance the whole time. Paul /Faul paid millions of pounds to recall a big dispatch of CDs because of a typo or something. Money that could have been put to much better use. I love their work, but I don't idolize my idols. Wealth and celebrity corrupts everyone it engulfs. People are susceptible. Re: the Beatles' clues, they suggest that Paul died or was possessed. But the Beatles persistently lied about the existence of said clues. So if there is a message, it was not intended for mass consumption. Maxwell, that is stronging it a bit! I dont believe they were satanists they were merely suggesting there is more to western religion than is commonly accepted
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 25, 2012 6:14:18 GMT -5
flash riot lol ;D What does the boxer on the cover of Sgt. Pepper have to do with anything? The Sonny Liston and Diana Dors figures are key to understanding Sgt Pepper. They are representations of Apollo and Diana, the sun and moon gods and also illustrations of the twin pillars from Solomons Temple, Jachin and Boaz, and as such, demonstrate that the cover is an illustration of a masonic initiation ceremony. The band are inviting you to be initiated into their cult. Also note the serpent at Listons feet.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 23, 2012 5:55:06 GMT -5
Very interesting indeed…. This is the little-known reason for the name changes that take place in the Bible. The characters of individuals changed, as well as their genetics and spirituality when they were in contact with a Biblical deity, and since the stone from which they were manufactured is called LIAS, then to indicate this, they are given an 'alias', meaning literally, 'of' or 'from' 'Lias' or A-LIAS. (The use of an Alias is also common in our society as well. Examples of aliases are the famous Jewish evangelist, Billy Graham, whose name was originally Billy Frank, Francis Bacon, editor of the King James Bible, whose name was William Shakespeare and The 'Apostle' Paul, who was a Freemason and whose name was actually Apollonius of Tyana, a famous student of Pythagoras.)There is a school of thought that argues that Apollonius was the model for the biblical crucifixion event. It has often been claimed that someone other than Jesus was crucified. According to some this person was actually Apollonius of Tyana. According to Galatians Apollonius/Paul was in Jerusalem in 30 CE meeting with Jesus’s brothers Peter and James. Further claims state that the image on the shroud of Turin matches a bust of Apollonius of Tyana including a scar in the configuration of the number 11 above Apollonius' left brow. Temples and statues were built in his honour, and for the first three centuries AD he was regarded as a demi-god and saint. The popularity of Apollonius' teachings became a threat to the decaying Roman Empire, so in 325 AD, At the Council of Nicae, emperor Constantine and his bishops devised the New Christianity which would turn attention away from Appolonius, to a Judean carpenter by the name of Jesus. All records of Apollonius and his Essene Christianity were destroyed and this meant burning the libraries, including the most famous one at Alexandria.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 17, 2012 17:06:56 GMT -5
Ah, good boy, have a gold star and a pat on the head.
I do so love being patronised!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 17, 2012 6:29:08 GMT -5
Beacon, I have written so much about "Mary" - have you looked? That's exactly what I was referring to when I told you the answers you are looking for are RIGHT HERE. ok? Here's a new lead question that may help: How can a man older than myself be my Son? Yet, it's true. ps, if anyone sees my kid today, PLEASE tell him to come home because I really, really miss him. Iameye Eye = all seeing eye = eye of Horus which represents the eye of Lucifer. Lucifer = light bearer and can be shortened to Lucy, the girl with the kaleidoscope eye. You often refer to the Statue of Liberty. The Statue of Liberty holds a torch, which is a symbol of enlightenment, and is believed to have been a representation of Mary Magdalene. There is a legend that suggests that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus as well as his half-sister. According to this story Mary Magdalene’s actual name was Cleopatra Selene and she was the offspring of Cleopatra and Mark Anthony and had two brothers in addition to her half-brother, Jesus. Jesus, according to this tale was actually Caesarian (or Little Caesar) or Ptolemy XV, the last Pharaoh of Egypt and the result of the union between Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. Cleopatra claimed herself to be the reincarnation of the virgin goddess Isis, therefore, Caesarian would have been the son of a Virgin Mother Goddess. Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by his adopted son Octavian, who then seized power as the new Roman Emperor. Since Caesarian was Caesars son and the rightful heir to the Empire, Octavian wanted him killed. Cleopatra feared for his safety, so when Octavian and his Roman Army invaded Egypt, Cleopatra arranged for Caesarian's escape with her most trusted servants, Mary of Arthenia and Joseph of Arimathea. Octavian overthrows Egypt, Mark Antony and Cleopatra commit suicide thus Caesarian is forced to hide his identity and changes his name to Esu, which means Son of Isis. As an adult, Esu returns to Egypt, where he grew up as a boy. He spends three years in Egypt before looking for his younger half-sister and two younger half-brothers, fathered by Mark Antony. Within this tale there are certain similarities with the Shakespeare play, Cymbeline, a play that features a character called Iachimo from which McCartney based his pseudonym Ian Iachimoe. Esu finds his half-sister Cleopatra Selene and changes his name to Jesus Christ, which incorporates his Fathers initials. This is reminiscent of the JC initials that Edgar Rice Burroughs instils into his lead characters in his Tarzan and John Carter characters. Jesus then plans to reclaim his Fathers kingdom, the Roman Empire. He plans not to capture it with weapons and armies, but by creating a new religion and by transforming the 'Roman Empire' into the 'Holy Roman Empire'. Jesus then survives the crucifixion and starts a family with Cleopatra Selene/Mary Magdalene. It is believed that Mary Magdalene later travelled to France from whence the Merovingian bloodline emerges. It is from this bloodline that the British Royalty, Illuminati and the Freemasons claim descent. The Statue of Liberty was financed, built and delivered to New York Harbour as a gift from the 'French Grand Orient Temple Masons' in 1886. Therefore, "how can a man older than myself be my Son?" because YOU are Mary and Venus to Paul’s Mars. Am I getting closer?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 16, 2012 11:31:18 GMT -5
Iameye, I dont doubt that you have, however you have over 10,000 posts to trawl through - maybe you should write a book! ;D
You have me with your latest riddle, unless we are talking Father as in priest or step parents then I have no idea.
Please enlighten me!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 16, 2012 9:56:50 GMT -5
.--. .- ..- .-.. .. ... -. --- - -.. . .- -.. "Paul is not dead" Indeed Just part of the code!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 16, 2012 9:28:28 GMT -5
Iameye, thank you very much for taking the time to read it, I can ask no more. "I would also like to thank various anonymous contributors on Beatles related web forums. Their capacity to suspend all forms of rational belief defies logic; however, occasionally they do deliver spectacular results!" You better look right through that Mother's EYE. Why do you post the TIME photo and not address it's importance, Beacon? Don't you want the grail? Don't you know what I mean? Iameye, the Time magazine image was primarily an homage to your good self. It is your clue. I can only tell you what it means to me. It features Grace Kelly as a nurse. Paul McCartney's mother Mary was a nurse. McCartney wrote the song 'Let it Be', in which he references his 'mother Mary', after a vision he had of her in a dream. Incidentally, it is nice to know I featured in your dream. I am the resurrection and I am the light!In the book I talk of Marian worship and the Mary line and its significance to Abbey Road. Grace Kelly became Princess Grace of Monaco and was, rumoured to have been, a high priestess of a neo Templar, Rosicrucian order called the Order of the Solar Temple - here we are with the light again - who, legend has it, arranged her death in an all too familiar car crash when she refused to give them more funds. The Order of the Solar Temple, it has been suggested, knew the secret of the Templar treasure, possibly including the holy grail, because they attempted to raise the spirits of the nine founding Templar knights, the Master Masons. Found my way upstairs and drank a cup. .--. .- ..- .-.. .. ... -. --- - -.. . .- -..
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 16, 2012 7:33:12 GMT -5
Iameye, thank you very much for taking the time to read it, I can ask no more.
"I would also like to thank various anonymous contributors on Beatles related web forums. Their capacity to suspend all forms of rational belief defies logic; however, occasionally they do deliver spectacular results!"
.--. .- ..- .-.. .. ... -. --- - -.. . .- -..
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Aug 16, 2012 4:12:49 GMT -5
This is oddly similar to what I read on Iamaphoney's youtube page and Tafultong's blog for many months and you would believe it's enough to get this forum shut down if one so chose to pursue it. More to the point though, you don't own any of the ideas expressed here and many have been circulating since the sixties; I don't agree with all of Beacon's conclusions, but I agree with quite a few and he's on the right road and it's about time someone finally got on it and made an honest attempt to articulate another viewpoint and I commend him for it. It's an interesting book. Plus, for all of the great work done here years back, not much of it is happening now other than a cryptic esoterica competition. A case study in how not to say anything as often as possible...not exactly something anyone would have an interest to steal. Regardless, threats like this are not a joke and if it's some kid in his basement, someone more adult needs to set them straight; this is serious business... beacon - satan is a bad idea in the first place. fishdelusions - youre goofy. b - thanks for being a human and letting us know how the water is being poisoned. iameye - he thinks youve started a cryptic esoterica competition. fishdelusions - words merely sculpt the nothingness of eternity. the ultimate truth is emptiness. the void devouring the self. ultimate death. man. it probably doesnt mean very much to you but that revelation helped turn on the world. thats "satan". its just us. friend. if a human can be a friend with fish delusions. tells us where hes at. seasaltcaramel - the book is not about satan, nor is it about PID. Fishdelusions knows this because he has at least taken the time and trouble to read it. I respect your opinion and you are entitled to say whatever you like, however, the book is an attempt to stimulate debate and, ultimately, if you agree with my arguments or if you think they are total rubbish, this can only be done by reading the document. The original purpose of this forum was to 'investigate and disseminate'. I have done both and in so doing have put myself up there to be shot down, but please don't make cursory judgements without first availing yourself of the central issues. Look at the 60if document over at TKIN. I am not sure anybody takes that seriously anymore - if they ever did - but you read it, form your own opinion and then express them. In my opinion this debate is stagnating and the key players over the years, Iamaphoney, Tafultong, Apollo C Vermouth etc are for various reasons silent - or busy remixing their latest backward masterpiece! This is an attempt to inject some fresh life into the fetid corpse and spark some new lines of inquiry and, at the very least, I believe I have achieved that. This is the end of my rant but the title of this thread is Paul is Dead in general and, I feel, this post sums up where we are at.
|
|