|
Post by maclen on Nov 20, 2016 12:52:18 GMT -5
the imposter is hardly a fiction. here he is before face reapportionment, make-up, silly dress, substandard self-penned songs, and crude public remarks became his trademark: Talk about a receding hairline! yes, talk about receding hairlines Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 20, 2016 12:33:29 GMT -5
Well, to prove that McCartney wasn't replaced, we must prove that this alleged "faux-McCartney" is fictional. the imposter is hardly a fiction. here he is before face reapportionment, make-up, silly dress, substandard self-penned songs, and crude public remarks became his trademark:
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 20, 2016 3:55:24 GMT -5
thank you bandi, michelle, and applepie
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 21:06:34 GMT -5
"soon I was ready for my first close-up as paul"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 21:02:53 GMT -5
"met a nice girl. she took some stills during my transformation"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 20:45:25 GMT -5
"the first round with facial reapportionment went really well. we didn't feel a thing"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 20:38:29 GMT -5
"but I skipped the part about well, you know"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 20:27:55 GMT -5
"they sent me to kenya with mal for preliminary dental work and to practice being paul - they handed me a camera and told me to roll film because that's what paul liked to do"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 20:13:21 GMT -5
"learning to be paul was fun and friends were always close by to help"
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 19, 2016 16:10:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 10, 2016 11:28:59 GMT -5
paul was still experimenting with different facial expressions congruent with maturation and innate acting ability. he was interpreting and reinterpreting himself consistent with the rewards and stresses surrounding him. this has contributed to or aided the effort to make us think there was more than one paul prior to later '66
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Sept 6, 2016 13:54:20 GMT -5
hi, b welcome back and good to cu
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Sept 6, 2016 13:46:38 GMT -5
paul mccartney's singing had range - the unconvincing replacement consistently stays in the upper register. to me ear and imo
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Aug 6, 2016 12:33:39 GMT -5
a bit of a great hideous hooter on our handsome steve subject - from mum's side, perhaps. or, maybe he's actually ringo's whelp
but, i like his bungalow bill narrative, so time will tell. having judyth baker vary's defender, james fetzer, on board, does nothing to add credibility, however
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 11, 2016 15:11:20 GMT -5
Post by maclen on Mar 11, 2016 15:11:20 GMT -5
I didn't find any info on him at all. So, who is this guy. What is this guy, and where is this guy, now. Any Beatles experts nearby who might venture a comment? Other than he looks like several pre, or, subsequent attempts to replace McCartney.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Mar 11, 2016 14:27:22 GMT -5
well to be rid of an atrociously titled subject line
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Mar 11, 2016 14:22:06 GMT -5
i'm happy not to have invested one dime in his disgraceful usurper's business
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Mar 8, 2016 0:23:12 GMT -5
had she referred to him as the beaknosed-bulbous-headed-bungalow bill you might have had something
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 9, 2016 15:24:30 GMT -5
was the u.s. military discovered using tax money to clandestinely create 'support the troops' television advertising with a fake citizens group as the fake sponsors, again. and, were paul and other true artists done in so that low-culture crap as exemplfied by the topic under discussion could prevail
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 7, 2016 16:11:36 GMT -5
now, if the half-time show had something interesting like man against horse in a three furlong race, or, speed blanket-weaving, i do believe i'd watch
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 7, 2016 15:55:17 GMT -5
poor dudes used to be called 'the flunkies'. had some nice tunes, though. mickey - keeper of the secret, or, el stupido - dolenz, appeared in a handful of photos with 'bungalow'. the monkees, who never had control of their image, meet "the beatles", who lost control of their image, when they lost paul, were there to provide aid in the cover-up. not a sterling reference, imo
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 4, 2016 12:47:25 GMT -5
and, as far as that roly-poly little fuck, aquino, goes, he's been scrubbed from mission:wikipedia and i've only come across one article alluding to his general's rank and active status. can seasalt tell us something happy about the chap that's ground-based and comic book fantasy-free. for instance, is he dead, yet
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 2, 2016 21:50:23 GMT -5
isn't general aquino a member/director of the war machine I would say Aquino is a theorist that worked for the government. He specialized in East/West Berlin relations, and his work contributed to the fall of the USSR and the Cold War. Something that did not involve millions of troops and World War Three, as many feared. Instead, mass discontent - an effect augmented through western psy-ops programs - forced change. Clearly Aquino had an open mind and was willing to hear the opinions of people he respected. Paul Kantner was one of these people. The point I think is overshadowed by Aquino, for you, is Paul Kantner's influence. His accomplishments were not limited to playing music for dirty hippies. He was a great futurist and could envision a new world, which he shared with us. And you may be missing the point that I chose share the fact that this bizarre friendship even existed. Because I thought it would be interesting. Kantner's ideas were considered valid enough by uptight, rigid, government scientists that he was given the chance to loosen their imaginations. Anyway, war-like people are sexually and creatively frustrated. And, as Anton Lavey would say, compulsively unhappy. So yes, Paul Kantner was a High Ranking member of the Temple of Set, a rabid Satanist and sacrificed hundreds of little (potential) children to his bizarre Space Gods. And shared a lot of Joy along the way. Put another way, Kantner was happy and had no need to indulge his war-like impulses or engage in a perverted quest for power. He was our space brother reminding us of our ultimate destiny: The stars. I don't know about you, but to me that seems like a pretty noble pursuit. And I feel like I should probably get in on it. You know, the freedom, happiness, evolution trip to the stars sounds like a more productive use of time than calling soldiers faggots. Excuse my french, but apparently I'm one so it's alright. Peace. Paul is Dead. are you military - you're showing signs
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Feb 1, 2016 0:33:53 GMT -5
if you want to call me something, call me an anti-u.s. military tactics and strategy guy. i wouldn't run from that Aquino's paper Mindwar was a strategy designed to save lives and win wars without bombs or soldiers. I think you're missing the point, actually. One of our people managed to get to the highest ranks of the NSA. We had a freak in the NSA. You can't just disengage from the machine by giving yourself a title and ideology. That isn't going to stop the system. It's going to discredit you. You have to directly confront the system. Free of irrational passion, or anger. Just seems terribly naive to draw these child-sacrifice conclusions and cling to them even though the "research" is based on obvious fabrications of history. Should we just pretend that the war machine doesn't exist? That seems logical... fine collection of non sequiturs and replies to points i didn't raise. but, the term 'war machine' caught my eye. like needle, thread, scissors, giraffe, it, like giraffe, seemed kind of out of place with the rest of your comments. isn't general aquino a member/director of the war machine
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 31, 2016 23:56:11 GMT -5
It's actually called semen, and if you expect your lady to do it you should at least try it. The male body literally exists to produce semen. Your body takes all the best from your diet and synthesizes this delicious cloudy snack. If that grosses you out, there is something wrong with you. Kind of showing where your head is at here... I think you're implying they're gay. Very clever. nah, i was riffin on military service. if i was implying male homosexuality, i would have stated they were antipathetic to women and children. sorry, male homsexuals, i didn't mean it...but, actually
|
|