|
imagine
May 28, 2015 18:31:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on May 28, 2015 18:31:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
imagine
May 27, 2015 18:48:46 GMT -5
via mobile
B likes this
Post by beatlas231 on May 27, 2015 18:48:46 GMT -5
Nothing is real! Yes I see what you mean ! So does MacFake know the earth is flat and he is just part of the cover up? You would have to ask a Woman because the Devil is a Man, remember ?
|
|
|
imagine
May 17, 2015 2:28:36 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on May 17, 2015 2:28:36 GMT -5
Nothing Israel
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on May 7, 2015 0:37:18 GMT -5
I read that John Lennon went crazy back in 1966, throwing chairs, screaming and crying out. What he was allegedly pissed beyond words at was "why did Polanski introduce JPM to the Manson people"--or was it the Prophet Church crazies--and it's "all his fault" (Roman Polanski). What he didn't say was what Polanski did exactly. It led me to believe that there was something to it, that maybe, just maybe, JPM was murdered in a sacrifice by either Manson or Prophet Church people. There's something there, I think. Not sure what, but it should be discussed. It wasn't 66.. It was in the early 70s sometime after the song "how do you sleep" came out
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 28, 2015 3:56:04 GMT -5
and now for the prize....Um - I dunno, we'll come up with something ! Something in the way she moves.lol
It's about That Time
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 25, 2015 4:06:30 GMT -5
That may be so, but there are still some things that just can't be explained away, like the VERY noticeable discrepancies in the in the ratios, planes and dimensions of the facial features -- as well as other traits, such as personality, voice, and body type(s) -- in comparison photos, videos and audio. The last I checked, a person's voice gets DEEPER as they get older, and not HIGHER, like Fohn and Faul's did by 1967. A picture's worth a thousand words {as seen below}, take it or leave it. At least I have EVIDENCE to back up my claims of the ORIGINAL John being taken out by 1966... but where's yours? As seen in the above images, John Lennon was undeniably a VERY beautiful, exotic-looking man pre-'67. He had a friendly countenance, good sense of humor, soft, page-boy features, a baby face, a cute pixie mouth, lovely fit athletic figure, hairless runner's legs, a beautiful, well-dressed, classy wife and cute baby son he actually cared about, etc. But afterwards... it was a VERY different story and downhill from there with the multiple impostors that had assumed his identity. They not only looked noticeably DIFFERENT, but they were NOT attractive, either. Are people BLIND?! What have they been smoking?! But then again... what do I know? JPM was NOT the only victim of impostor-replacement, like most everyone else would LOVE to be content to believe like Clare Kheun; after all -- as the old adage goes -- " THREE can keep a secret... but ONLY if TWO are dead". If they replaced Paul... then it makes PERFECT sense to me that they would do the REST of The Beatles that way too, so the truth wouldn't come out. Stop drinking Jim Jones' infamous Kool-Aid, unless you actually relish in being poisoned. After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, because this sort of matter is VERY serious and NOT be taken lightly. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it guilt by association. After all, if this were to happen to YOU or someone you cared about YOU would care [and want someone else to do so accordingly], wouldn't you? On top of that you would want someone to help YOU (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of these sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress. digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 24, 2015 12:15:30 GMT -5
In that video thumbnail Faul is obviously a FEMALE -- and "Linda/Finda" is obviously a MAN -- because... is that his/her CAMEL-TOE?! That sure isn't a... well, his/her manhood I see between the legs. Faul's legs also look feminine while Linden's look masculine. Truth is stranger than fiction. Father Bruce would not like this
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 24, 2015 9:54:02 GMT -5
everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR. consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different. there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, assumed and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, for this sort of matter is VERY serious. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it [guilt by association]. After all, if this were to happen to YOU or someone you cared about YOU would care, wouldn't you? On top of that you would want someone's help (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of this sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress. you're there but you're not at the same time, May I ? www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=p&p=59"introduce (someone or something) formally or ceremonially;"You know that We're as Close as Can be, Man. Go see what you wrote but, looking thru a Glass Onion
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 5:08:28 GMT -5
There's Nothing you can See that isn't ShownNothing you can Gnome that isn't KnownYou can Learn how to be You in Time,
It's Easy
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 5:03:47 GMT -5
thank you for being so patient, hope you all enjoyed the ride please watch the videos in an orderly fashion and try not to hit your head on the way Out It's Tyme2Party
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 4:33:43 GMT -5
then why are you here? (I don't know how much clearer I can be about John being replaced early on.) Sounds like someone has too much time on their hands, not to mention a shill to throw people off the main scent, but I digress. cant say that I'd be putting fourth so much of an effort if you guys (er gals) were sniffing the right stuff, sweetheart there was a book, I forget the title everytime but it talked about this guy that came along with magical mystery powers and could turn pop into punch and use that punch to give people vision Christ, I would be lying if it wasn't at the tip of my tongue We want to turn you onto the truth but if yer not ready for TheTruth then you can't see it
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 2:33:04 GMT -5
Now I have a counter point to make. Don't watch the entire video now, just listen to the opening 30-60 seconds (Ringo speaking)
answer me just this One question
where has Ringo ever said that before, and why on Earth would he ?
the answer is right infront of you, If You're Not Ready For TheTruth You Can't See It
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 2:23:57 GMT -5
everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR. consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different. there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed
|
|
|
Hefty John
Apr 22, 2015 17:34:46 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 22, 2015 17:34:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 22, 2015 4:41:04 GMT -5
WELL, technically it is Wednesday morning at 5 o'clock right now NY tine
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 21, 2015 6:34:42 GMT -5
Warmer than the Sun, Colder than the Air
Literally lol
|
|
|
Hefty John
Apr 20, 2015 21:03:14 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 21:03:14 GMT -5
People seem to be getting confused with the "hefty" John and the "hagard" John. As I said previously, watch AHDN; the plot is daft at face value (though full of Illuminati symbolism); the music and the charisma of these young men is just as mesmerising as it was back in 1964. That is the true John and he was not skinny. Also see photos of him on the beach with Cynthia in Trinidad, January 1966. That is John's true physique. Then compare with the person with Yoko. You will see the difference in, not only physique, but facial features if only you can strip away the beard, long hair, bushy sideburns and spectacles/shades. Some people around these parts seem to think the thin, hagard character is John and the "hefty" one is the imposter. No, it is the other way around. As for his nose, it was finely chiselled on the end; not beaky like a bird of prey with pinched in nostrils. His chin was squared off not pointed and as for his eyes, they were like his father Alfred (Freddie) Lennon's almost exactly. That is why he is wearing spectacles with thick lenses/shades post 1966. As much as your comment makes sense the thing is that in order to see a this phenomenon for what it TRULY is one would have to have their SPIRITUAL thinking cap on, for this is a deep, complicated, confusing and complex subject to comprehend. It's one thing to have a HEAD knowledge of something, because many people have a cognizant awareness of hard-hitting truths, yet they still have blinders on their eyes, for they REFUSE to see the ugly, naked TRUTH about things. I also wanna add that the impostors were too tall, lanky and long in their bodies to be the REAL John Lennon. Although John Lennon was stocky and had those lovely love handles and cellulite I could still yet see his rib cage and clavicles (collarbones), which speaks volumes about the fact that he had a larger skeletal [as well as muscular] frame -- and thus naturally chunkier/heavier -- than the ugly, skinny, beak-nosed, haggard-looking men who were had replaced, assumed and co-opted/hijacked his identity. What a sad, sick world we live in. If the original John Lennon -- along with the actual Cynthia -- was replaced when I think he was, then it was very likely that poor Julian grew up w/o his REAL parents, being passed around various "foster" homes like a packet of smokes among the impostors PRETENDING to be his real parents. It also appears that John's father (Freddie) was taken out shortly after John and Cyn because I don't see any photos of him post-'66, either. Nobody was ever replaced, though. You guys honestly believe in replacements and MK ultra by the government but when it comes to hiding in plain sight and the afterlife, everyone turns into Hellen Keller
|
|
|
imagine
Apr 20, 2015 7:13:19 GMT -5
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 7:13:19 GMT -5
lol A Movable FeastA Dreamable Feast lol Number Nine
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 7:07:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 3:46:32 GMT -5
zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue244.htm" The contorted dance that Planet X and the Earth perform prior to the hour of the pole shift is complicated further by the presence of Venus and the Earth's Dark Twin, who are caught in the eddy flow cup in front of Planet X along with the Earth. Mythology states that we will see Venus and the Dark Twin loom large, coming closer to the Earth, and the Zetas have confirmed this. Shiva, in Hindu lore, is Planet X and Kali, the Dark Twin, is his wife. She survives to be visible once he has passed and left the solar system...." funny story... I wrote her once with a question, many years ago and her odd reply was to ask me what I will do when all the orphans come to my door. well, at least I know now lol Am I visible yet? All of our messages were subliminal, you know Looking back on it
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 3:37:23 GMT -5
And they grew up to be..... anthromorphans! Modern literature John Tenniel's depiction of this anthropomorphic rabbit was featured in the first chapter of Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland Building on the popularity of fables and fairy tales, specifically children's literature began to emerge in the 19th century with works such as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865) by Lewis Carroll, The Adventures of Pinocchio (1883) by Carlo Collodi and The Jungle Book (1894) by Rudyard Kipling, all employing anthropomorphic elements. This continued in the 20th century with many of the most popular titles having anthropomorphic characters,[17] examples being The Tales of Beatrix Potter (1901 onwards),[18] The Wind in the Willows (1908) by Kenneth Grahame, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C. S. Lewis and Winnie-the-Pooh (1926) by A. A. Milne. In many of these stories the animals can be seen as representing facets of human personality and character.[19] As John Rowe Townsend remarks, discussing The Jungle Book in which the boy Mowgli must rely on his new friends the bear Baloo and the black panther Bagheera, "The world of the jungle is in fact both itself and our world as well".[19] Another notable work is George Orwell's Animal Farm. The fantasy genre developed from mythological, fairy tale and Romance motifs[20] and characters, sometimes with anthropomorphic animals. The best-selling examples of the genre are The Hobbit[21] (1937) and The Lord of the Rings[22] (1954–1955), both by J. R. R. Tolkien, books peopled with talking creatures such as ravens, spiders and the dragon Smaug and a multitude of anthropomorphic goblins and elves. John D. Rateliff calls this the "Doctor Dolittle Theme" in his book The History of the Hobbit[23] and Tolkien saw this anthropomorphism as closely linked to the emergence of human language and myth: "...The first men to talk of 'trees and stars' saw things very differently. To them, the world was alive with mythological beings... To them the whole of creation was "myth-woven and elf-patterned" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropomorphismmyth? or truth? ;D an·thro·pol·o·gy [an-thruh-pol-uh-jee] noun 1. the science that deals with the origins, physical and cultural development, biological characteristics, and social customs and beliefs of humankind. 2. the study of human beings' similarity to and divergence from other animals. 3. the science of humans and their works.
lol ;D Now PitchingNumber 42anthropoMorphism Riveralisten to that crowd reaction when they find out he's in the game This should do the Tricky Trick
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 19, 2015 17:24:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 14, 2015 6:02:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 14, 2015 5:56:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 13, 2015 3:17:04 GMT -5
make it a Double
dick is that You? Now You got me fired up
|
|