|
Post by JoJo on Dec 27, 2004 23:13:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 23:21:08 GMT -5
Okay, now before I do stuff, who do you think is who?
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 27, 2004 23:58:09 GMT -5
Okay, now before I do stuff, who do you think is who? that would take all the fun out of it, FP ;D
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 0:09:46 GMT -5
that would take all the fun out of it, FP ;D Yeah, but I'd rather know which pics to fool around with instead of working my but off on a pic that you're gonna say is doctored and worthless.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 28, 2004 2:14:46 GMT -5
...working my but off on a pic that you're gonna say is doctored and worthless. that's your choice I've told you, if I never see another fade, it'll be fine by me
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 28, 2004 8:43:22 GMT -5
Yeah, but I'd rather know which pics to fool around with instead of working my but off on a pic that you're gonna say is doctored and worthless. Yer gonna be doin' that anyway FP. You don't know the history of yer Faul pics. They could be morphs, or screwed with in other ways. I think about half of all yer fades are Faul to Faul. Dr.Robert has made some rather important statements recently concerning this & I think he's on to something. Don't believe what you read & nothing is real. Remember that. Yes, if I never saw another fade, I'd be a happy camper.
|
|
|
Post by Valis on Dec 28, 2004 18:19:04 GMT -5
Why did his face change so much in just 1 year ?
From the round faced James Paul, to the flatmouth Moustachio Mecha (Almost Charlie Chaplin when he wears a hat), to the slighly rounder faced Sgt. pepper after that the Rubber Faced (Eggman you let your face grow long) MMT to the completely plastic round rebuild era of 68 ?
Why would the most universally recognized most BEAUTIFUL PERSON IN THE WORLD EVER NEED ANY PLASTIC SURGERY ?
Like Ringo says In mmt: "WHY ?"
I am not comfortable with the fact that I as being a Beatlesfan have been fooled for almost 20 years (I'm 29 y.o.)
But the wierd thing is that NOONE ever noticed comparing Photos before. In the original 69 and recurring rumors they only talk about the clues in lyrics and artwork. Shouldn't someone have brought up comparing photos before ?. Doesn't something stink about that ? Those clues can never reveal any truth "it's a mystery and it stays a mystery" But photos and voice confirm that he is replaced, like it or not. I cannot know what exactly happened, but JP pre oct66 is not the same man as Plastic Macca post10-66.
All Love Jan
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Dec 28, 2004 19:22:30 GMT -5
Okay, now before I do stuff, who do you think is who? All three pics in your signature box are Paul/Faul mixed photos. Is that what you were referring to? Btw, thanks for demonstrating the differences in the two.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 20:36:14 GMT -5
All three pics in your signature box are Paul/Faul mixed photos. Is that what you were referring to? Btw, thanks for demonstrating the differences in the two. For some reason you feel they look different, and that's fine by be. But the features DO line up, and you haven't proved otherwise once. Me, and many others have proved that the features line up hundreds of times, and I'm not exaggerating.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Dec 28, 2004 20:59:06 GMT -5
For some reason you feel they look different, and that's fine by be. But the features DO line up, and you haven't proved otherwise once. Me, and many others have proved that the features line up hundreds of times, and I'm not exaggerating. They don't line up perfectly... or even close to perfect for that matter. By your methods, I could get two completely different people to line up time after time after time. Not one of you PIAers have ever gotten a fade of Faul and Paul to match up where the angle is exactly the same and all of the features match up perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 21:20:04 GMT -5
They don't line up perfectly... or even close to perfect for that matter. By your methods, I could get two completely different people to line up time after time after time. Not one of you PIAers have ever gotten a fade of Faul and Paul to match up where the angle is exactly the same and all of the features match up perfectly. If you want EVERYTHING the match up a solid 100%, then you're going to have to fade a picture of Paul with the exact same picture. Not even an undoctored picture of Paul will match up with another undoctored picture of Paul from the same angle. Give me a few pics of Faul that you feel aren't doctored, and I'll match it up with a vintage pic of Paul from this forum or EB's site easily.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 28, 2004 22:20:16 GMT -5
If you want EVERYTHING the match up a solid 100%, then you're going to have to fade a picture of Paul with the exact same picture. Not even an undoctored picture of Paul will match up with another undoctored picture of Paul from the same angle. Give me a few pics of Faul that you feel aren't doctored, and I'll match it up with a vintage pic of Paul from this forum or EB's site easily. Give it up FP, there is no one here to convince except yourself. Just admit that Paul was replaced. No one here will be upset or give you any flack. You would make a much better PID advocate anyway (as your fades indicate). With your passion and determination you could probably get half the M4E crew to see the light.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 22:40:25 GMT -5
Give it up FP, there is no one here to convince except yourself. Just admit that Paul was replaced. No one here will be upset or give you any flack. You would make a much better PID advocate anyway (as your fades indicate). With your passion and determination you could probably get half the M4E crew to see the light. It sounds like you're Darth Vader trying to convince me to join the dark side. I could become I PIDer, but PIA just has a better argument. If Paul didn't match up with "Faul", then there should be a consistent pattern of which features didn't match up. The only one I've seen is the hair part. That argument is on your side 90% percent of the time. I've seen LOTS of pictures of Paul, vintage, and non-vintage, they all look the same. "Faul" doesn't always look like Paul, but he always matches up.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 28, 2004 23:03:22 GMT -5
It sounds like you're Darth Vader trying to convince me to join the dark side. I haven't had so many good chuckles at this board in ages! ;D I feel his presence... (heavy breathing) Or is that Jonna's presence? ;D I know you're joking but RedLion does have a point, are we preventing you from enjoying a comfortable status quo?
|
|
|
Post by jonna on Dec 28, 2004 23:08:52 GMT -5
you know if you click your heals and say my name i show up yeah i'm that damn good
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 23:12:23 GMT -5
I haven't had so many good chuckles at this board in ages! ;D I feel his presence... (heavy breathing) Or is that Jonna's presence? ;D I know you're joking but RedLion does have a point, are we preventing you from enjoying a comfortable status quo? I really don't see RL's point. I'm a PIAer, because Paul consistently matches up with "Faul".
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 28, 2004 23:59:59 GMT -5
It sounds like you're Darth Vader trying to convince me to join the dark side. I can live with that. You should. PIA just has a better argument No, just more excuses. I've seen LOTS of pictures of Paul, vintage, and non-vintage, they all look the same. We know you see better than that FP, you have already proved it. "Faul" doesn't always look like Paul Admitting they are two distinct entities is the first step in the road to recovery. Your arrival is eagarly awaited."It wont be long yeah,yeah,yeah it wont be long yeah,yeah,yeah..it wont be long till FP's PID." ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Dec 29, 2004 0:52:49 GMT -5
Jonna IS back, and , well, my advice? Never EVER say or type her name in five times in a row, in a darkened room, or even whisper...like this... jonna...jonna...jonna...jonna..jonna........ {DoctorRobert vanishes into thin air.....}
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 29, 2004 1:05:29 GMT -5
Well, it feels good knowing you want me on your side ;D, but it's just that Paul and "Faul" always match up!
They do look different once in a while, and there are certain pics where if I found out they weren't him, I wouldn't be surprised.
But with you, it's like that all the time, and I don't see how that can be. The 3 examples in my sig are a perfect examples of why I think it's the same guy. They match up the way 2 pictures of the same person are meant to match up.
And RL, PID has so many excuses for why Paul pics match up, it's not even funny. What makes more sense:
"The head is at a different angle, that's why they don't match up."
"That pic was doctored, that's why they match up."
Each time someone tells me that, I get really annoyed, the way you guys are telling yourself that the pic must be doctored because they match up. Doesn't it make more sense that they match up because they're the same person?
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 29, 2004 1:21:11 GMT -5
I really don't see RL's point. I'm a PIAer, because Paul consistently matches up with "Faul". Yeah, about as consistently as the Cubs get to the World Series.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 29, 2004 1:33:26 GMT -5
Yeah, about as consistently as the Cubs get to the World Series. Wow. Great post. Thanks for backing up your points with evidence and examples.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 29, 2004 1:34:28 GMT -5
Well, it feels good knowing you want me on your side ;D, but it's just that Paul and "Faul" always match up! They do look different once in a while, and there are certain pics where if I found out they weren't him, I wouldn't be surprised. But with you, it's like that all the time, and I don't see how that can be. The 3 examples in my sig are a perfect examples of why I think it's the same guy. They match up the way 2 pictures of the same person are meant to match up. And RL, PID has so many excuses for why Paul pics match up, it's not even funny. What makes more sense: "The head is at a different angle, that's why they don't match up." "That pic was doctored, that's why they match up." Each time someone tells me that, I get really annoyed, the way you guys are telling yourself that the pic must be doctored because they match up. Doesn't it make more sense that they match up because they're the same person? PID must be viewed as a whole. The pictures are just a piece of this complex puzzle. Granted any clue or piece of evidence may argued individually. But as a whole alot of excuses need to be made for PIA to be even a distant possiblity. Someone parading around with Paul McCartney's name and check book does not make him that person. Someday your gonna be looking at pics and it will click in your brain. From that point on you will always see and know the difference. They are two remarkably distinct individuals. Till then keep cranking out those fades, they will help you see the truth.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 29, 2004 1:43:12 GMT -5
Someone parading around with Paul McCartney's name and check book does not make him that person. I know, but someone with the same facial features, eye distance, head shape, voice, head size, HAS TO BE Paul McCartney. Okay, if you say so.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 29, 2004 2:08:47 GMT -5
I know, but someone with the same facial features, eye distance, head shape, voice, head size, HAS TO BE Paul McCartney. Now you are just being funny, I appreciate your humor. ;D
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 29, 2004 2:11:02 GMT -5
Now you are just being funny, I appreciate your humor. ;D None of those have been proven to not match.
|
|