|
Post by JoJo on Mar 11, 2005 18:50:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 12, 2005 16:27:15 GMT -5
Interesting stuff. Any chance of a dateline on the report about Paul & Jane's impending nuptials?
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Mar 12, 2005 21:01:52 GMT -5
Interesting stuff. Any chance of a dateline on the report about Paul & Jane's impending nuptials? It was announced before George's marriage, according to one of those articles, so it was probably in '65. George married Pattie on January 21, 1966.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Mar 12, 2005 21:16:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 12, 2005 21:58:55 GMT -5
Very interesting Xpt, I guess that post of yours was 'waiting for its moment to arrive'. Looks like I may have posted that article on their anniversary..
Agree with Revolver, '65 or possibly '64 because of the age given of Paul and Jane.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 12, 2005 23:02:00 GMT -5
Yes, the Winchell report is key.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 12, 2005 23:26:34 GMT -5
Btw, this has got to one of the best height comparison pics ever, re: John/Paul: Head to toe is visible.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 13, 2005 2:07:02 GMT -5
Toes are not visible. It is not easily possible to tell what kind of lifts JPM may be wearing. Also note Lennon is further from the camera.
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Mar 13, 2005 3:22:01 GMT -5
Hah, I laughed at that clipping about Paul that said "Another Beatle Bites the Dust."
|
|