|
|
Post by eyeseeyou on Sept 28, 2008 22:23:19 GMT -5
03 April 1967  Same guy ?? 12 April 1967  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Sept 29, 2008 0:13:18 GMT -5
Nope.
|
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Sept 29, 2008 6:20:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Sept 29, 2008 8:02:40 GMT -5
Quick fashion note:  look! it's been going on forever trainers and high waters ;D |
|
|
|
Post by eyeseeyou on Sept 29, 2008 15:57:33 GMT -5
One photo taken in England one in LA and just 9 days apart. Both with bad taste in fashion  Paul wouldn't be caught dead in that. |
|
|
|
Post by sunsoflight on Oct 15, 2008 5:14:11 GMT -5
And to think, Phil Collins thought he started the whole wearing sneakers with a suit.  The reason for the high waters is it is the taller Faul is wearing one of Paul's suits. Just kidding of course. I am an eclecticist when it comes to humour. |
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Oct 15, 2008 8:10:16 GMT -5
That's not such a strange thing to consider. I found myself thinking the same thing.  |
|
|
|
Post by B on Oct 15, 2008 9:49:43 GMT -5
Looks like the same guy to me. Both wearing the same jacket.
|
|
|
|
Post by sunsoflight on Oct 15, 2008 11:55:54 GMT -5
Funny |
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Oct 15, 2008 16:28:49 GMT -5
The guy in the second photo looks smaller. Look at his arm in the sleeve of the jacket, compared to the guy in the 1st photo.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlesfan12 on Oct 17, 2008 15:05:18 GMT -5
How are you so sure that the photo of Paul/Faul wearing sneakers has been taken in 12 April 1967? Except from wikipedia, i found another link: www.answers.com/topic/mal-evansand one more link: www.videoinside.org/show/Mal_EvansThere you will find the photo i mentioned above with the description "paul and mal at heathrow airport 1966" or smth like that. Another mistake? I don't think so. Wearing the same clothes doesn't mean anything. |
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Oct 17, 2008 18:43:26 GMT -5
I believe it to be the same Faul. In the picture with Mal he is holding something under his arm, which would pull the jacket sleeve up, making the sleeve appear shorter. And his left arm, in the same photo, is pulled to the front of him, not at his side, making the left sleeve appear shorter.
And I get the DISTINCT feel that the reason for all the weird clothes was to call attention to himself, saying, "I am not Paul! Paul wouldn't be wearing this!" I'm sure that's what he was trying to do.
|
|
iwasyou66
Hard Day's Night 
i was you..
Posts: 20 
|
Post by iwasyou66 on Nov 2, 2008 21:04:00 GMT -5
these two men do look very similar, and yes it is possible that they are both Faul, however i keep getting a feeling that something see,s a bit different. there's some small difference between the two.
This got me thinking about how voice analysis' showed that there were three Paul McCartney's. James Paul, 'The Imitator' and then Faul. I can't help but think that were looking at the imitator and Faul in the early days of all the chaos that we now know as the PID/PWR mystery.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Nov 3, 2008 0:31:21 GMT -5
And to think, Phil Collins thought he started the whole wearing sneakers with a suit. The reason for the high waters is it is the taller Faul is wearing one of Paul's suits. Just kidding of course. I am an eclecticist when it comes to humour. Yes but perhaps ecletocorrect., i.e. off the mainstream YET still correct. Because for some time now (possibly years) I have suspected that Bill has some sort of ankle fetish, i.e., this peculiar thing (and not necessarily overtly sexual but just socially kinky) of revealing his ankles to everyone, if not the skin itself just the shape. Showing his ankles. To the world. It may stem from some Jungian/Gestalt complex type thing but who nose. I mean, knows. He just seems internally motivated to dress and move in ways that call attention to his ankles. Maybe he feels he has lovely ankles and calves? But the high waters and sneakers, Wizard of Oz socks, barefoot antics and balletic toe pointing all add up to one thing: an acute case of chronic anklemancy. www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhtZTat78aAI think it is too late for any sort therapeutic action. |
|
Paul wouldn't
The reason for the high waters is it is the taller Faul is wearing one of Paul's suits. Just kidding of course. I am an eclecticist when it comes to humour. 
