|
Post by JoJo on Jan 2, 2009 11:54:05 GMT -5
Anyway, people here seem to instantly dislike most of "F"aul's stuff, so blah. Not everyone.. The solo McCartney material "haters" simply are the most vocal. The ones who like him probably feel getting into an argument about it is pointless. I like everything in varying degrees starting with "McCartney", although I can take or leave early to mid 80's material.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 4, 2009 3:38:28 GMT -5
You guys can't honestly believe Paul McCartney is actually dead. It just isn't true. Maybe it's better that I haven't seen the Beatles in their time, because it's obvious you guys think about it in a different way as to me. I've shown friends who have never seen a real image of Paul McCartney before and after 1966, and after seeing all the clues, they think he's dead aswell, but after watching Iamaphoney every day, you can't tell me he isn't related in some way to Paul.
Why do I say that? The one fact of evidence that nobody else seems to be judging, the Fireman itself. This guy has been producing video's about the Fireman a good year before Paul even announced the new album. Isn't that clearly telling you something?
Another thing, is with the bible and John Lennon. Now, I was never a religious man. After a while, I started looking into these passages, and terms about "222, 444" with the bible, and it has to do with the second coming of Jesus.
December 21, 2012. If you don't think the World is changing, look at the clues in that IAAP video. You guys mis-interperet it.
IAAP - John Lennon YKMN - Paul McCartney
Paul isn't dead, Bob Dylan introduced him to weed. He emerged with a different look, claiming the old Paul was "dead" and since everyone else was stoned, the creative mind of Lennon thought it would be groovy if they sturred everything around a rumor.
At the same time, they started reading more into the bible. They noticed how God wanted World Peace, and would unleash hell if nobody would understand. That's why John and Paul were pushing the boundaries for peace. Listen to "Within you Without you"
"It's a long road until 2012." And if you pay attention to the news, remember, 2009 is the first year in history that was delayed a second because of the Earth's slowing rotation. Yellow S u b m a r i n e anyone?
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 4, 2009 14:21:55 GMT -5
ph0neyprophet wrote: "Why do I say that? The one fact of evidence that nobody else seems to be judging, the Fireman itself. This guy has been producing video's about the Fireman a good year before Paul even announced the new album. Isn't that clearly telling you something?"
Uh, no it isn't. Can you explain what you mean, please?
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 4, 2009 18:47:06 GMT -5
Was Paul going around telling everyone he would be the Fireman? How did Iamaphoney know about this?
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 4, 2009 18:50:01 GMT -5
good point
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Jan 4, 2009 19:37:23 GMT -5
Was Paul going around telling everyone he would be the Fireman? How did Iamaphoney know about this? Paul has been The Fireman since the 1993 release of "Strawberries Oceans Ships Forest," which is 14 years before the release of the videos you have been watching on youtube. -j
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 4, 2009 19:50:30 GMT -5
Was Paul going around telling everyone he would be the Fireman? How did Iamaphoney know about this? Paul has been The Fireman since the 1993 release of "Strawberries Oceans Ships Forest," which is 14 years before the release of the videos you have been watching on youtube. -j Ok, but that's not the point. The point is, whomever IAAP is knew about the new Fireman album before Paul announced it.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 5, 2009 7:39:33 GMT -5
Paul isn't dead, Bob Dylan introduced him to weed. He emerged with a different look, claiming the old Paul was "dead" and since everyone else was stoned, the creative mind of Lennon thought it would be groovy if they sturred everything around a rumor. At the same time, they started reading more into the bible. They noticed how God wanted World Peace, and would unleash hell if nobody would understand. That's why John and Paul were pushing the boundaries for peace. Listen to "Within you Without you" Well that first paragraph is an interesting and plausible take on it, but the second paragraph misses out some relevant information IMO. First, the song Within You Without You was most definitely George Harrison's brainchild as he, out of them all, was heavily into eastern mysticism and religion and I don't believe John or Paul had any influence on lyrics at all. Secondly, although John liked to use biblical references and comparisons, that only serves the purpose that tells us that he was knowledgeable about Christianity, but I think you will find that he was rather cynical of the teachings that he found hypocritical.
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Jan 15, 2009 13:01:49 GMT -5
Paul has been The Fireman since the 1993 release of "Strawberries Oceans Ships Forest," which is 14 years before the release of the videos you have been watching on youtube. -j Ok, but that's not the point. The point is, whomever IAAP is knew about the new Fireman album before Paul announced it. Prove it. He knew about the Fireman, but then, so did i! He never mentioned Electric Arguments at all!
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 19, 2009 20:51:02 GMT -5
Then why didn't he release Electric Arguments as a Paul McCartney album?
You would think, that detail would be enough to make you believe Paul McCartney and IAAP have ties in some way.
Not even the hidden image of Crowley in "Sing the Changes" is proof McCartney is behind all of this, if it really is him. My belief is that there are two. PID was just an insider joke between the group, which involved LSD, weed, whatever you want, about Paul "actually seeing the light from Heaven" and spiritually transforming..
Although it was a joke, the group took it seriously which involved stand-ins from the look-alike contest, to actually have the honor to become the Beatles.
When the Beatles got tired of writing music, they went their ways, still using their doubles, but when Lennon started getting issues with Nixon, him and Paul actually started planning about the possibility of Lennon becoming McCartney, if infact, there would be a hit on Lennon.
That's my view on it.. I certainly believe it's a more reasonable story then "Faul" actually being some 90 year old woman who served in World War 1.. I might not understand what you guys mean, if she was the mother of Beatle Bill, but when I see McCartney's head over hers, it makes me think otherwise..
I'm mentioning this again.. There's a hidden image of Crowley in Sing the Changes, incase you doubt Paul and IAAP have nothing to do with each other. Why would Paul place an image of Crowley in his newest album?
Why would Paul release "222" on Youtube, when all Iamaphoney watchers heard that from his other videos?
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Feb 6, 2009 16:01:43 GMT -5
There seem to be other possibilities though. Couldn't IAAP just have a contact in the music industry, as he himself is a musician? I would think there are many production people and record company employees that know when records will be released, yes?
The fact that McCartney includes Crowley references in his work only confirms that he continues to admire the man and to me confirms the symbolism that he uses, but doesn't necessarily make a direct connection from him to IAAP, only that IAAP could have known what his video would include (again possibly from insider information?) and could have beat him to release as his process is much shorter, I'm sure.
I do agree with the IAAP name making more sense for John Lennon though. He was the one that Chapman referred to as A Phoney, which was why he needed to be taken out (ala Catcher in the Rye). It seems more logical to me.
|
|
|
Post by tomdrums on Apr 25, 2009 5:39:58 GMT -5
however...that song played and whistled by Paul was an Ennio Morricone song froma a western movie soundtrack...
|
|
|
Post by knowthe411 on Dec 4, 2009 0:38:19 GMT -5
The Paul in the Noel Edmonds interview is definitely JPM, the real Paul. He's very funny, very personable, very boyish, still tall and lanky like JPM.
The Paul in the "Did Yoko break up the Beatles?" is JPM. Still very personable.
The Paul in the Two Fingers video is Phil Ackrill. Not Bill - Phil. He has that smaller upper lip and the Cockney accent - "loovely baby".
I now believe that Paul didn't die. He just took a long hiatus. And Faul/Bill and Phil Ackrill stepped into his shoes for a while. But now that Phil is dead, JPM is doing more public appearances and concerts, and Bill/Faul is doing the animal rights, pro-vegan thing.
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Jun 6, 2011 16:43:43 GMT -5
And there's the rub... How many Faul McCartneys have there been over the past 40 + years Another rub: How many PAUL McCartneys were there during the pre-66 Beatles era? I have found 2 or 3, then I found this site as well, which says much the same thing: Paul McCartney: Dead or Alive?" (Possibly both, because his reputation and legacy changed when they brought in Bill to promote LSD). pp said it's about the bible. My view of that is it's like the 3 versions of Jesus Christ. There's the true Historical Jesus that some believe in, there's the Bible Jesus, made up of a composite of Rabbi Jesus and Judas Khrestus (Tony Bushby: "Bible Fraud"), then there's the Legendary Jesus who was the super-hero and demi-god, which is what the legend of Paul McCartney is like. There is the real James Paul McCartney - the Historical Paul - and he did not die, but was intermittently replaced. JMO, and I'm working on this more. I think the Paul in the OP is one of the "other" Pauls from the pre-66 era, or else it's Bill as the site says, because that's who was with Linda.
|
|
maxwell
Help!
The Greys are packing KY jelly.
Posts: 77
|
Post by maxwell on Jul 29, 2011 18:38:27 GMT -5
An IQ of 119 is well above average, & certainly nothing to be ashamed of. This is Faul 10 years on, obviously more comfortable in his borrowed skin. Exhibiting his signature 'car-salesman' swagger. from the top of the page: (advertisement) Paul McCartney's IQ = 119 Smarter Than Paul McCartney? Take a Real IQ Test Now! www.Celeb-IQ-Quizzes.comThat's not a bad score if you're a regular chump, but that would have to be disappointing for someone (fake or not) in that role. (And yes I am! )
|
|
maxwell
Help!
The Greys are packing KY jelly.
Posts: 77
|
Post by maxwell on Jul 29, 2011 18:50:01 GMT -5
I doubt Faul McCartney did much Bible study or praying for 'world-peace'. he's a member of the Process Church (of Satan). iamaphoney could be in league with Faul. for Beatles' notoriety or even recognition as Billy Campbell before he dies. You guys can't honestly believe Paul McCartney is actually dead. It just isn't true. Maybe it's better that I haven't seen the Beatles in their time, because it's obvious you guys think about it in a different way as to me. I've shown friends who have never seen a real image of Paul McCartney before and after 1966, and after seeing all the clues, they think he's dead aswell, but after watching Iamaphoney every day, you can't tell me he isn't related in some way to Paul. Why do I say that? The one fact of evidence that nobody else seems to be judging, the Fireman itself. This guy has been producing video's about the Fireman a good year before Paul even announced the new album. Isn't that clearly telling you something? Another thing, is with the bible and John Lennon. Now, I was never a religious man. After a while, I started looking into these passages, and terms about "222, 444" with the bible, and it has to do with the second coming of Jesus. December 21, 2012. If you don't think the World is changing, look at the clues in that IAAP video. You guys mis-interperet it. IAAP - John Lennon YKMN - Paul McCartney Paul isn't dead, Bob Dylan introduced him to weed. He emerged with a different look, claiming the old Paul was "dead" and since everyone else was stoned, the creative mind of Lennon thought it would be groovy if they sturred everything around a rumor. At the same time, they started reading more into the bible. They noticed how God wanted World Peace, and would unleash hell if nobody would understand. That's why John and Paul were pushing the boundaries for peace. Listen to "Within you Without you" "It's a long road until 2012." And if you pay attention to the news, remember, 2009 is the first year in history that was delayed a second because of the Earth's slowing rotation. Yellow S u b m a r i n e anyone?
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 29, 2011 21:39:14 GMT -5
I doubt Faul McCartney did much Bible study or praying for 'world-peace'. he's a member of the Process Church (of Satan). iamaphoney could be in league with Faul. for Beatles' notoriety or even recognition as Billy Campbell before he dies. You guys can't honestly believe Paul McCartney is actually dead. It just isn't true. Maybe it's better that I haven't seen the Beatles in their time, because it's obvious you guys think about it in a different way as to me. I've shown friends who have never seen a real image of Paul McCartney before and after 1966, and after seeing all the clues, they think he's dead aswell, but after watching Iamaphoney every day, you can't tell me he isn't related in some way to Paul. Why do I say that? The one fact of evidence that nobody else seems to be judging, the Fireman itself. This guy has been producing video's about the Fireman a good year before Paul even announced the new album. Isn't that clearly telling you something? Another thing, is with the bible and John Lennon. Now, I was never a religious man. After a while, I started looking into these passages, and terms about "222, 444" with the bible, and it has to do with the second coming of Jesus. December 21, 2012. If you don't think the World is changing, look at the clues in that IAAP video. You guys mis-interperet it. IAAP - John Lennon YKMN - Paul McCartney Paul isn't dead, Bob Dylan introduced him to weed. He emerged with a different look, claiming the old Paul was "dead" and since everyone else was stoned, the creative mind of Lennon thought it would be groovy if they sturred everything around a rumor. At the same time, they started reading more into the bible. They noticed how God wanted World Peace, and would unleash hell if nobody would understand. That's why John and Paul were pushing the boundaries for peace. Listen to "Within you Without you" "It's a long road until 2012." And if you pay attention to the news, remember, 2009 is the first year in history that was delayed a second because of the Earth's slowing rotation. Yellow S u b m a r i n e anyone? "They noticed how God wanted World Peace, and would unleash hell if nobody would understand." How interesting you should say that.
|
|
|
Post by tomdrums on Nov 17, 2011 12:44:27 GMT -5
it is the real Paul McCartney, just after a small joint...he smokes until now joints, no doubt about it.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Nov 19, 2011 19:19:13 GMT -5
1964. 1980. The easiest way to tell they're not the same (assuming you can't tell by looking) is the speaking voices. Paul's voice is lower in pitch and more nasal than Faul's. This is true for Paul from 1966 as well. The second clue is personalities. Paul is a bit less outgoing than Faul. He chooses his words more carefully. He's more thoughtful and deliberate during interviews. Neither of these traits changed until after 1966.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Nov 20, 2011 1:15:03 GMT -5
1980.@2:14 It was his idea. He wrote it for his sins what was that plot again for "give my regards to Broad Street"? how about the title? hmmmm
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Feb 10, 2012 2:32:54 GMT -5
His face looks strange. There's something not quite right in it's configuration. His nose looks different. His upper lip looks thin and his teeth look different from Paul's. Oh, and his ears look fake. I agree with you about the ears, mommybird, but that's the JPM nose and teeth. He has the highly swooped right eyebrow that's been around since the very early 60s. I have found too much evidence of multiple Pauls all along to believe there was only one until 1966. They all had these teeth, and this one in the interview with Geraldo even has the inward upper right teeth that only the 'real' Paul was supposed to have. And aren't those the long fingers of Paul McCartney?
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 22, 2014 21:46:24 GMT -5
1980.@2:14 It was his idea. He wrote it for his sins what was that plot again for "give my regards to Broad Street"? how about the title? hmmmm Ah ha! Now I remember :-p
|
|
javlim
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 10
|
Post by javlim on Dec 31, 2014 13:23:17 GMT -5
Thanks for the vid. But, of course, it's the same old bill. The real dude: Happy New Year 2015 to all . Hey ! ramone, for me to Paul , 1980 in the above video is this, also in 1964 , 1:27 to 1:30 which says, " I'm not married " is the same smile and the same sarcasm . This certainly shows that did not die at least in 1966 and even before there was a "stand in"
|
|
javlim
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 10
|
Post by javlim on Dec 31, 2014 13:59:27 GMT -5
And there's the rub... How many Faul McCartneys have there been over the past 40 + years Another rub: How many PAUL McCartneys were there during the pre-66 Beatles era? I have found 2 or 3, then I found this site as well, which says much the same thing: Paul McCartney: Dead or Alive?" (Possibly both, because his reputation and legacy changed when they brought in Bill to promote LSD). pp said it's about the bible. My view of that is it's like the 3 versions of Jesus Christ. There's the true Historical Jesus that some believe in, there's the Bible Jesus, made up of a composite of Rabbi Jesus and Judas Khrestus (Tony Bushby: "Bible Fraud"), then there's the Legendary Jesus who was the super-hero and demi-god, which is what the legend of Paul McCartney is like. There is the real James Paul McCartney - the Historical Paul - and he did not die, but was intermittently replaced. JMO, and I'm working on this more. I think the Paul in the OP is one of the "other" Pauls from the pre-66 era, or else it's Bill as the site says, because that's who was with Linda. Hey ! Silversong , I support you. How many Pauls had at that time you mention ? All we are left with the image and voice of Paul in "Yesterday" , " And I love her" and of course in " A hard day's night" . And if we take the classic video for " And I love her" we have to take into account besides his voice , the two dots that can be seen on his neck on the left side (1:18 to 1:26) the same as we see in some photos and videos. ( Obviously in some pictures can be faked and others clearly do not exist)
|
|
|
Post by silverbeatle on Jan 2, 2015 0:09:11 GMT -5
What about this guy? Also from 1980.
|
|