|
|
Post by DarkHorse on May 9, 2009 19:00:41 GMT -5
I rather enjoy the Pauline threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 10, 2009 0:09:12 GMT -5
Well, maybe Bill had Paul looking over his shoulder, or something, I don't know. That hand looks too small, the fingers too short. The picture dissolves in an interesting way.  www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSXzox57e-o'Nuff said. Well almost. Come on, this is Perplexed. Two words is NEVER enough. So, to continue, also, the song is really nice and very touching and very sincere. And it's by Carl Perkins. By coincidence, (and I'm not lying, why start now?) I regularly work with a drummer from the Memphis area named D?  S? ?, who I really enjoy working with. We were doing "Blue Suede Shoes" in a show together. At the end one night, he said, he loved doing that song, because it was by his cousin. And I said, "Ha! Well, only if your cousin is Carl Perkins!" And he said, "Well, he was." And I said how? "Well, Cousin Sue married Jack whose third cousin etc, on and on blah blah but somehow it turns how that my friend and Mr. Perkins were like second cousins. I though, way cool. Well, that's why you're so talented!--I told him. Perkins was a master. And he was friends with the Beatles. Way cool. |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 10, 2009 0:27:29 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_PerkinsOK, so what I see here is, that Perkins met the Beatles in 1964. QUOTE: On the last night of the tour, Perkins attended a party that turned out to be for him, and ended up sitting on the floor sharing stories, playing guitar, and singing songs while surrounded by The Beatles. And worked with Sir Paul in 1981: QUOTE: In 1981 Perkins recorded the song "Get It" with Paul McCartney, providing vocals and playing guitar with the former Beatle. This recording was included on the chart-topping album Tug Of War released in 1982.[19] This track also appeared as the B-side of the title track single in a slightly edited form. One source states that Perkins "wrote the song with Paul McCartney."[46] What I see is, this little fact coming to light makes the whole Paul-is-Dead a little more hard to explain, even problematic. I mean, he either met one Paul or two; did he get confused or have doubts? Apparently none are reported. Does Carl Perkins destroy everything we have theorized in the last 6 years? Does anyone else see this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 10, 2009 0:38:54 GMT -5
but.....in the song..... Macca sings:
"I wanna get it---- unless the world is flat."
He sings that like in a tone of sarcasm. What does he mean, unless the world is flat, of COURSE it's flat! Golldern it, it's Flat! It's Flat as a pancake!
It's Flat it's Flat it's Flat---totally mind bendingly flat! It's Damn-it Flat! It's mo-fo flat, it's g--d--- flat! FLAT FLAT FLAT!
FLAT! Copernipuss was wrong. Galileo was on crack. The pope was right. There is no spheroid planet. It's flat!
This is my new thing y'all, not PID or the phony moon missions, 911, or even Iran-Contra. It's the flat earth.
You can't dig down to China, it's on the same side as we are! There is nothing down there!
Can't you see? This is gigantic, it's enormous, it's the end all, be all!
WOW!!!!!
Do I really believe this!
Why no, not really. Go on about your business. I'm kidding. The earth is a flat as my left buttock. (Though there is debate about my right one.)
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on May 10, 2009 16:29:06 GMT -5
Oh please, you guys over-analyze too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 11, 2009 11:09:00 GMT -5
 FAUL STORY by pictures Dear GN, GIVE IT UP. No-one believes this. Get a life, or something.  ... you say? ... |
|
|
|
Post by B on May 11, 2009 11:17:37 GMT -5
He could have been cloned from her. I do see a resemblance, but I don't think she could have pulled
off 'being' Paul.
GN, Why is it Ringo's 'Aunt Jessie' who plays the drums in the Magical Myster Tour comics?
What's that all about?
|
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on May 11, 2009 11:43:03 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_PerkinsOK, so what I see here is, that Perkins met the Beatles in 1964. QUOTE: On the last night of the tour, Perkins attended a party that turned out to be for him, and ended up sitting on the floor sharing stories, playing guitar, and singing songs while surrounded by The Beatles. And worked with Sir Paul in 1981: QUOTE: In 1981 Perkins recorded the song "Get It" with Paul McCartney, providing vocals and playing guitar with the former Beatle. This recording was included on the chart-topping album Tug Of War released in 1982.[19] This track also appeared as the B-side of the title track single in a slightly edited form. One source states that Perkins "wrote the song with Paul McCartney."[46] What I see is, this little fact coming to light makes the whole Paul-is-Dead a little more hard to explain, even problematic. I mean, he either met one Paul or two; did he get confused or have doubts? Apparently none are reported. Does Carl Perkins destroy everything we have theorized in the last 6 years? Does anyone else see this? For that matter, as far as I know, David Frost never indicated that the man that he interviewed in 1997 seemed all that different from the man that he interviewed in 1964. I mean, are you kidding, Doc? I mean, isn't this what PIA people have been saying for years? Isn't what you just said a small portion of what's wrong with all of this? The fact that NONE of Paul McCartney's family members and professional associates reported any uneasiness with their perceptions of the post-1966 McCartney? The notion that such a secret could have remained so tightly guarded for so many years? The answer to your question is that OF COURSE, that's a major problem with the idea that Paul McCartney was ever replaced. |
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on May 11, 2009 11:48:34 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_PerkinsOK, so what I see here is, that Perkins met the Beatles in 1964. QUOTE: On the last night of the tour, Perkins attended a party that turned out to be for him, and ended up sitting on the floor sharing stories, playing guitar, and singing songs while surrounded by The Beatles. And worked with Sir Paul in 1981: QUOTE: In 1981 Perkins recorded the song "Get It" with Paul McCartney, providing vocals and playing guitar with the former Beatle. This recording was included on the chart-topping album Tug Of War released in 1982.[19] This track also appeared as the B-side of the title track single in a slightly edited form. One source states that Perkins "wrote the song with Paul McCartney."[46] What I see is, this little fact coming to light makes the whole Paul-is-Dead a little more hard to explain, even problematic. I mean, he either met one Paul or two; did he get confused or have doubts? Apparently none are reported. Does Carl Perkins destroy everything we have theorized in the last 6 years? Does anyone else see this? Check out the thread that I started on Pete Best. Even though "Sir Paul McCartney" is -- according to some -- not the same "Paul McCartney" as the one who sacked Pete Best in 1962, Best seems to be as bitter at Sir Paul as if he were the same person. In fact, Best is reacting -- even today -- as though it WAS the same person ("It would have been nice if just once, in these last 47 years, Sir Paul had picked up a phone to make that call and explain it as that, just as one old mate to another.") Imagine that! |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on May 11, 2009 17:21:25 GMT -5
... you say? ... First things first. How tall was Pauline? Get her official height because, as of now, I'd be surprised to see that she's as tall as Macca. If she was as tall as Macca, then we can proceed from there. |
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 12, 2009 7:27:02 GMT -5
... you say? ... First things first. How tall was Pauline? Get her official height because, as of now, I'd be surprised to see that she's as tall as Macca. If she was as tall as Macca, then we can proceed from there. You know official height is easy to fake curving back bending knees under a skirt ... It's not the same for head dimension:   Now you see difference yet maybe just in forehead and chin ?   It's just about S.O.E. "strategic" make-up |
|
|
|
Post by B on May 12, 2009 8:02:52 GMT -5
GN wrote: "You know official height is easy to fake curving back bending knees under a skirt ..."  An absurd statement. GN wrote: "It's just about S.O.E. 'strategic' make-up"The chin is entirely different. |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on May 12, 2009 9:51:05 GMT -5
You know official height is easy to fake curving back bending knees under a skirt ... It's not the same for head dimension: Now you see difference yet maybe just in forehead and chin ? It's just about S.O.E. "strategic" make-up According to sources, Macca is 5' 10½" (1.79 M). So you are saying that Pauline, as a woman, is wearing a fake bra, and curving her knees and slumping her back to appear to be about the same height as Queen Elizabeth? She would need a team of chiropractors, especially at her age in the picture. There is no way this 90+ yr. old woman is performing a limbo at all of her public appearances. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on May 12, 2009 12:49:43 GMT -5
I gotta say the Queen these days is very short.
|
|
|
|
Post by skyward on May 12, 2009 13:09:47 GMT -5
I have her height as being around 5 feet 5 or 6 inches, information given to me from a person who spent a day with her when she was in her 90s. That is far too much of a height difference to adequately impersonate a 5 foot 11 inch man. I suppose one might try to sell the notion that she had been an expert stilt-walker. Pauline in swimtrunks? Anyone else have pics of Pauline wearing a man's swimming trunks showing off her masculine build? |
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 13, 2009 10:00:53 GMT -5
You know official height is easy to fake curving back bending knees under a skirt ... It's not the same for head dimension: Now you see difference yet maybe just in forehead and chin ? It's just about S.O.E. "strategic" make-up According to sources, Macca is 5' 10½" (1.79 M). So you are saying that Pauline, as a woman, is wearing a fake bra, and curving her knees and slumping her back to appear to be about the same height as Queen Elizabeth? Her Majesty needs. She would need a team of chiropractors, especially at her age in the picture. You are getting closer    |
|
JS2
For Sale 
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on May 13, 2009 13:58:49 GMT -5
Dear GN, GIVE IT UP. No-one believes this. Get a life, or something. ... you say? ... Yes, I do say. You act as if that proves something. Get a damn life, you little weirdo. No-one gives 1/2 a shit what you have to say, ever since you killed your credibility with this pathetic crap. No-one, read this, NO-ONE believes this anymore, just give up and do something worthwhile. P.s. Posting on your own forum might be a start, at least. some nutters (GooGoo, who is coincidentally GaGa) believe you over there. Peace. |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on May 13, 2009 15:41:22 GMT -5
You're displaying a shameless corporeal-centric bias here. Ghosts are some of the most valued contributors to this forum! To see without looking...They don't know. They can't see. Are you one of them?...Never glimpse the truth...What do you see when they turn out the light? I can't tell you...What did you see while you were there? Nothing that doesn't show...N Obviously, you're not Neil Aspinall. |
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on May 13, 2009 16:03:58 GMT -5
TI, I don't agree with all that Illuminati stuff, but you deliver some gold sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 15, 2009 9:49:09 GMT -5
I would like to read "A Pinch of Vermouth" opinion about the "Pauline" affair.
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on May 15, 2009 12:20:01 GMT -5
I would like to read your resignation from the forum.
Or at least admission that the Pauline mess is faked.
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 20, 2009 15:21:55 GMT -5
GN: In your reply on May 3rd., you have a photo of Paul in what looks like an old deepsea diving suit. Do you know when that was taken and where? That could be the origin of "looking through a glass onion." Or, I've been trying to find photos of old isolation tanks w/ glass dome covers that also might be the "glass onion."  You mean that one? So is it an old deep sea diving suit or an astronaut suit? If that's an old deep sea diving suit then it could be about the yellow submarine too .. |
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 21, 2009 14:57:12 GMT -5
Astronaut I believe. ('65?)
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on May 21, 2009 17:25:37 GMT -5
Astronaut I believe. ('65?) Yes I think it was taken on late 1965 ( no scar on upper lip yet) It's a Paul "solo" photo. I think that's well linked to "Yesterday" |
|
|
|
Post by B on May 23, 2009 18:07:01 GMT -5
To my eyes, these two Fauls are not the same person, and the one on the left is predominantly female. Look at her eyes, eyelashes, delicate nose, and small ear. It's not altogether male, Adam's apple not withstanding. The one on the right is a male. I'm not saying it's Pearl; I don't know who it is, but GN is onto something.  |
|
.jpg){kind=icon}
