gfinn
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 12
|
Post by gfinn on Aug 6, 2009 13:54:00 GMT -5
One thing I can't get is why the hell Faul immediately became a leader of the group, starting all those projects like SPLHCB or MMT or Get Back. He should be sitting confused in the corner making stevie riсks-alike faces, shouldn't he?
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Aug 6, 2009 20:33:24 GMT -5
What?
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Aug 6, 2009 21:02:54 GMT -5
One thing I can't get is why the hell Faul immediately became a leader of the group, starting all those projects like SPLHCB or MMT or Get Back. He should be sitting confused in the corner making stevie riсks-alike faces, shouldn't he? It's quite possible vintage Paul was the real contributor for Pepper -writing for 'his' songs, bass playing, and it's probably him doing the singing on his lead vocals. Also, there's a fair amount of lead guitar attributed to Paul, maybe even more than George (on Pepper). (according to who did what as far as contributions). After Pepper I think Faul settled in more, got more comfortable and the bottom line was he had to be in a take the lead mode for his role. It would seem odd if he became a wallflower given JPM's contributions prior.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Aug 6, 2009 21:06:16 GMT -5
Paul and Blll were brothers, they were seperated at birth 1 to mom 1 to Dad Dad was obsessed with Magick They made Blll the secret God Paul was killed oct 3 1966 Blll replaced him.
|
|
gfinn
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 12
|
Post by gfinn on Aug 6, 2009 23:20:39 GMT -5
proof-link?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 8, 2009 7:59:58 GMT -5
Since JPM was the "leader" of the group 64-66, Bill had to appear to be in that role also as part of the illusion.... It was in the script.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Aug 8, 2009 18:38:51 GMT -5
The rest of the Beatles were too devastated after Paul's death to do more than go through the motions. Faul was the only one not grieving so naturally he would be the logical one to become the "leader".
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Aug 9, 2009 22:28:45 GMT -5
The rest of the Beatles were too devastated after Paul's death to do more than go through the motions. Faul was the only one not grieving so naturally he would be the logical one to become the "leader". Along those same lines, he obviously had the backing of whomever placed him in Paul's place. They were probably the real ones calling the shots. (whoever "they" is)
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 11, 2009 19:03:46 GMT -5
Paul and Blll were brothers, they were seperated at birth 1 to mom 1 to Dad Dad was obsessed with Magick They made Blll the secret God Paul was killed oct 3 1966 Blll replaced him. I assume that you got this information from the Prophet Himself, especially given that his most recent video seems to have a new interpretation of IONEIX. I note that the Prophet, in his earlier videos, accepted the canonical November 9, 1966 date as the date of JPM's expiration but that his most recent video sets it at October 3. But where is the evidence connecting Jim and/or Mother Mary McCartney with Aleister Crowley?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 11, 2009 19:04:51 GMT -5
Since JPM was the "leader" of the group 64-66, Bill had to appear to be in that role also as part of the illusion.... It was in the script. I think that most people would say that John was the leader during that early time period.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 11, 2009 19:09:55 GMT -5
One thing I can't get is why the hell Faul immediately became a leader of the group, starting all those projects like SPLHCB or MMT or Get Back. He should be sitting confused in the corner making stevie riсks-alike faces, shouldn't he? If one hypothesizes that there really was a "Faul" taking over for a secretly-dead Paul, then one can hypothesize that he took advantage of his indispensability to become more influential than his predecessor. In some versions, "Faul" is five years older than Paul was -- per his impromptu remarks from the Magical Mystery Tour. So that advanced age might also be worth some leadership points. But I doubt it. McCartney or whoever he is seems to be in extraordinarily good physical condition for a man of 67. It would be stretching credibility even more to suppose that he really might be older than that.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Aug 11, 2009 19:40:10 GMT -5
But I doubt it. McCartney or whoever he is seems to be in extraordinarily good physical condition for a man of 67. I wonder why..?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 11, 2009 21:16:07 GMT -5
Since JPM was the "leader" of the group 64-66, Bill had to appear to be in that role also as part of the illusion.... It was in the script. I think that most people would say that John was the leader during that early time period. I was under the impression that John was the group leader in the very early days, but when the matching suits & Ed Sullivan era began, JPM was made the "leader". But who knows... you may be right.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 11, 2009 21:57:22 GMT -5
But I doubt it. McCartney or whoever he is seems to be in extraordinarily good physical condition for a man of 67. I wonder why..? Maybe "Faul" is actually younger than 67. Maybe he was actually born AFTER 1942. Of course, if he was conceived in 1948 or later, he couldn't be the "Son of the Magickian".
|
|