hdog
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 2
|
Post by hdog on Jun 11, 2014 16:31:09 GMT -5
I'm for lack of a better term a 'conspiracy theorist.' I find JFK, RFK, MLK, OKC, 9/11 etc. easy compared to PID or PWR. Tend to look the science whenever possible. There's no doubt in my mind the Beatles were backed by the Crown and British intelligence, which along tribute bands and political doubles makes the notion of a replacement plausible to me. Tend to look the science whenever possible. I see the Italian Wired findings had its problems.
I hope to learn a few things here as I'm somewhat new to this.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jun 11, 2014 17:04:45 GMT -5
Hello hdog! welcome. Yes, by comparison, JFK, RFK, OKC etc. are simple compared to PID/PwR, though some here might disagree. And don't let hotman637 tell you that Jackie did it, because she wasn't involved. Er - that I know of.
|
|
|
Hello all
Jun 11, 2014 17:07:05 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 11, 2014 17:07:05 GMT -5
I'm for lack of a better term a 'conspiracy theorist.' I find JFK, RFK, MLK, OKC, 9/11 etc. easy compared to PID or PWR. Tend to look the science whenever possible. There's no doubt in my mind the Beatles were backed by the Crown and British intelligence, which along tribute bands and political doubles makes the notion of a replacement plausible to me. Tend to look the science whenever possible. I see the Italian Wired findings had its problems. I hope to learn a few things here as I'm somewhat new to this. A great place to start is the Sgt. Pepper Code thread. I hope you have a Library Card... invanddis.proboards.com/thread/6932/sgt-pepper-codewww.youtube.com/user/Beacon1966Careful, Beacon is a Prankster, too. "Never trust a Prankster."
|
|
|
Hello all
Jun 11, 2014 17:09:22 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 11, 2014 17:09:22 GMT -5
Hello hdog! welcome. Yes, by comparison, JFK, RFK, OKC etc. are simple compared to PID/PwR, though some here might differ. B, you are a Prankster... Paul being dead was what "They" used to distract the entertainment industry. Meanwhile, the real sharks were busy on Wall Street. I always thought it was funny when Abbie disappeared Jerry Rubin went into Finance and became a Wall Street-type: Yippies = Yuppies. Anyway. Music is so peripheral to global affairs. A distraction, if anything. Good at de-railing genuine dissent. Look at the 6 day War between Israel and Palestine. It happened around the same time as the "All You Need Is Love" satellite broadcast, right? Pepper was released June 1st. The 6 Day war began the 7th. The Broadcast was the 25th.
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 11, 2014 17:14:07 GMT -5
None of this is as complicated as the reason why 'Marathon' bars in the UK became 'Snickers'. THEY don't want us to investigate so they throw us distractions like 'Paul is Deadly' ; )
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 11, 2014 17:22:19 GMT -5
Hello hdog! welcome. Yes, by comparison, JFK, RFK, OKC etc. are simple compared to PID/PwR, though some here might disagree. And don't let hotman637 tell you that Jackie did it, because she wasn't involved. Er - that I know of. Correct me if I am wrong ( I may be!) but Jackie shooting JFK is RIGHT IN PLAIN SIGHT (on the Zapruder film)! If she didn't do it, who did? Not only that it ties in with 9/11 (Isis), and PID (Kali) in that God is woman! ONLY a woman can CREATE, PRESERVE and DESTROY the universe. If anyone has a better theory lets hear it!
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 11, 2014 17:39:49 GMT -5
Hotman, you so crazy..
|
|
hdog
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 2
|
Post by hdog on Jun 11, 2014 18:25:37 GMT -5
Thanks everybody.
|
|
|
Hello all
Jun 12, 2014 0:48:40 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by linus on Jun 12, 2014 0:48:40 GMT -5
I'm for lack of a better term a 'conspiracy theorist.' I find JFK, RFK, MLK, OKC, 9/11 etc. easy compared to PID or PWR. “How is a raven like a writing desk?” Lewis Carroll created this riddle with the intent of there being no solution to it. Lewis Carroll was an enormous influence on The Beatles work in 1967-1968. We all know of the doll wearing the Rolling Stones sweater on the Sgt. Pepper cover. On 12/8/67 The Rolling Stones released their answer to Sgt. Pepper, Their Satanic Majesties Request. Images of all four Beatles on the cover. On the inside of the jacket, on the right side there is a maze. There is no way to get to the center of the maze. Is this a way of saying that PID is an unsolvable riddle?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2014 6:44:18 GMT -5
“How is a raven like a writing desk?” Lewis Carroll created this riddle with the intent of there being no solution to it. Lewis Carroll was an enormous influence on The Beatles work in 1967-1968. We all know of the doll wearing the Rolling Stones sweater on the Sgt. Pepper cover. On 12/8/67 The Rolling Stones released their answer to Sgt. Pepper, . Images of all four Beatles on the cover. On the inside of the jacket, on the right side there is a maze. There is no way to get to the center of the maze. Is this a way of saying that PID is an unsolvable riddle? The riddle is not "how" but WHY is a raven like a writing desk? lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2014 8:41:45 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2014 9:01:23 GMT -5
once upon a midnight dearie I woke with something in my headI couldn't escape the memory of a phone call and of what you said A parting gift. But to be able to enter one final plea: I still got this dream that you just can't shake: I love you to the point you can no longer take.
Well, all right, o,k., so be that way I hope and pray that there's something left to say.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jun 13, 2014 8:39:31 GMT -5
Actually hotman637, what I meant was that Jackie had nothing to do with Paul being dead or replaced. But then again, what do I know? She probably did! Yes! Now it all makes perfect sense! Say, what's in this coffee?!!
|
|
|
Hello all
Jun 13, 2014 17:25:41 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by hotman637 on Jun 13, 2014 17:25:41 GMT -5
Actually hotman637, what I meant was that Jackie had nothing to do with Paul being dead or replaced. But then again, what do I know? She probably did! Yes! Now it all makes perfect sense! Say, what's in this coffee?!! OK I misinterpreted your post. We may not know the WHO but I came up with about four reasons WHY they replaced Paul (IMO). #1 Money. There may be no way to count how many millions they made selling product to people looking for "clues". #2 Peer pressure. Just about EVERY other rock star was replaced (Stones, Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Elvis, Dylan, Rod Stewart, Eric Clapton, Joni Mitchell, Elton John etc. etc.) from the sixties and 70's so they had to replace JPM too. #3 Prop up MacFakes career. There are plenty off rock stars that had far more talent (Bon Scott, Keith Moon, Hendrix, John Bonham) who died under mysterious circumstances but MacFake just keeps getting richer. #4 God is a woman and the Devil is a man!
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jun 13, 2014 18:07:53 GMT -5
Hello hotman637, that's a good list; any ideas at what point Rod Stewart was replaced? Also, Feric Flapton I believe took over after Blind Faith split 1970....
Also, they did not "replace Paul" as there were multiple Pauls from 1958 (maybe earlier)...do your homework.
By the way, welcome hdog!
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 16, 2014 10:57:22 GMT -5
Hello hotman637, that's a good list; any ideas at what point Rod Stewart was replaced? Also, Feric Flapton I believe took over after Blind Faith split 1970.... Also, they did not "replace Paul" as there were multiple Pauls from 1958 (maybe earlier)...do your homework. By the way, welcome hdog! I know about the multiple Pauls and I have no problem with that. The problem is when the "Pauls" and the "Fauls" become INTERCHANGEBLE! When I got into this years ago on TKIN there was PAUL (up to 1966) and the there was FAUL (after 1966). That is plain as day as far as I can see. Paul has brown eyes was left handed and was quite a bit shorter. Faul was taller, hazel eyes and right handed. Then on "Paul is Dead Miss Him" there were multiple Pauls and I can see that. But THEN it got out of control (IMO). People were making the case that some of the "Fauls" were interchaneable with the "Pauls"! The BIG PROBLEM with that being true is that "Paul" is NOT DEAD or even replaced! Or at least it is virtaully IMPOSSIBLE to make that case! If "Faul" looks just like "Paul" then the whole theory falls apart and we might as well quit. To put a wider context on it if the "Mop-Top" Beatles are the same as the "Hippie" Beatles then we are wasting our time. ALL the Beatles were replaced in late 1966 and a WHOLE NEW BAND was put in place. Thye even ADMIT IT (Seargent Peppers)! In other words I try and keep it simple as possible or it just gets to confusing for my simple mind, lol.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jun 16, 2014 17:16:03 GMT -5
Hello hotman637, that's a good list; any ideas at what point Rod Stewart was replaced? Also, Feric Flapton I believe took over after Blind Faith split 1970.... Also, they did not "replace Paul" as there were multiple Pauls from 1958 (maybe earlier)...do your homework. By the way, welcome hdog! I know about the multiple Pauls and I have no problem with that. The problem is when the "Pauls" and the "Fauls" become INTERCHANGEBLE! When I got into this years ago on TKIN there was PAUL (up to 1966) and the there was FAUL (after 1966). That is plain as day as far as I can see. Paul has brown eyes was left handed and was quite a bit shorter. Faul was taller, hazel eyes and right handed. Then on "Paul is Dead Miss Him" there were multiple Pauls and I can see that. But THEN it got out of control (IMO). People were making the case that some of the "Fauls" were interchaneable with the "Pauls"! The BIG PROBLEM with that being true is that "Paul" is NOT DEAD or even replaced! Or at least it is virtaully IMPOSSIBLE to make that case! If "Faul" looks just like "Paul" then the whole theory falls apart and we might as well quit. To put a wider context on it if the "Mop-Top" Beatles are the same as the "Hippie" Beatles then we are wasting our time. ALL the Beatles were replaced in late 1966 and a WHOLE NEW BAND was put in place. Thye even ADMIT IT (Seargent Peppers)! In other words I try and keep it simple as possible or it just gets to confusing for my simple mind, lol. ******************************************************************************************************** Sorry to confuse matters, hotman637, as I am in agreement with yourself that the Beatles had all been replaced by 1967, yes, the more you research it, this becomes a sad and inescapable truth. However, looking at photos of Paul from early Hamburg, there does appear to be different individuals in the role of "Paul", shorter, taller, different physique, effeminate type, wild type, etc. This has become a mystery in itself. So yes, Paul was replaced, and PID, but the replacements were also replaced/kept being changed. You just have to make a cursory scan of the pictorial evidence to see this. Paul in Wings circa 1971 had no resemblance to Paul in the early 1960s.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jun 16, 2014 17:24:51 GMT -5
I am on your wavelength, hotman637; yes, it was a whole new band. Look at the "Hello, Goodbye" promo film to see the body language was different, on stage stances, chemistry between the group members/awkwardness. Brightly coloured outfits/long jackets disguise different physiques.
Change in personalities circa mid 1966; when at the American press conference "Paul" took over as spokesman and the other three barely spoke a word.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 16, 2014 18:20:17 GMT -5
I know about the multiple Pauls and I have no problem with that. The problem is when the "Pauls" and the "Fauls" become INTERCHANGEBLE! When I got into this years ago on TKIN there was PAUL (up to 1966) and the there was FAUL (after 1966). That is plain as day as far as I can see. Paul has brown eyes was left handed and was quite a bit shorter. Faul was taller, hazel eyes and right handed. Then on "Paul is Dead Miss Him" there were multiple Pauls and I can see that. But THEN it got out of control (IMO). People were making the case that some of the "Fauls" were interchaneable with the "Pauls"! The BIG PROBLEM with that being true is that "Paul" is NOT DEAD or even replaced! Or at least it is virtaully IMPOSSIBLE to make that case! If "Faul" looks just like "Paul" then the whole theory falls apart and we might as well quit. To put a wider context on it if the "Mop-Top" Beatles are the same as the "Hippie" Beatles then we are wasting our time. ALL the Beatles were replaced in late 1966 and a WHOLE NEW BAND was put in place. Thye even ADMIT IT (Seargent Peppers)! In other words I try and keep it simple as possible or it just gets to confusing for my simple mind, lol. ******************************************************************************************************** Sorry to confuse matters, hotman637, as I am in agreement with yourself that the Beatles had all been replaced by 1967, yes, the more you research it, this becomes a sad and inescapable truth. However, looking at photos of Paul from early Hamburg, there does appear to be different individuals in the role of "Paul", shorter, taller, different physique, effeminate type, wild type, etc. This has become a mystery in itself. So yes, Paul was replaced, and PID, but the replacements were also replaced/kept being changed. You just have to make a cursory scan of the pictorial evidence to see this. Paul in Wings circa 1971 had no resemblance to Paul in the early 1960s. I agree! But I think it is simpler than it appears. Instead of looking at the men look at the woman. Paul had a steady girl friend,Jane Asher untill he was replaced then Faul married Linda Eastman and was with her till she died. John married Cynthia and had a kid and was marred till he was replaced with "Fohn" who then married Yoko and was with her till he died. Ringo married Marreen and had a kid then was with her till he was replaced then he married Barbara Bach and they are STILL MARRIED. In other words they were replaced and may of had a number of doubles and so on but if you look at their FAMILIES they were ALL good family men and fathers and they all had stable family lives (of course that is by "rock star" standards but even so). My point is that at rock bottom the "Mop-Tops" were four real people who had real lives and TPB just make it look more confusing then it is. Same with the "Hippie Beatles" starting in late 1966. Of course this is just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jun 16, 2014 18:57:31 GMT -5
Yes, I agree with you part of the way; I'm not sure that the replacements have been the same all the way through. I do agree with you that John did not "marry" Yoko it was Fohn. Photos of Fohn and Foko are not all of the same people; you can check out the heights and that Fohn is often covering his face with a funny hat and hair/beard. Foko's height varies. You have not mentioned George, so far, in this hypothesis. It is not that simple to spot the joins.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 16, 2014 5:45:14 GMT -5
Hello hdog! welcome. Yes, by comparison, JFK, RFK, OKC etc. are simple compared to PID/PwR, though some here might disagree. And don't let hotman637 tell you that Jackie did it, because she wasn't involved. Er - that I know of. Correct me if I am wrong ( I may be!) but Jackie shooting JFK is RIGHT IN PLAIN SIGHT (on the Zapruder film)! If she didn't do it, who did? Not only that it ties in with 9/11 (Isis), and PID (Kali) in that God is woman! ONLY a woman can CREATE, PRESERVE and DESTROY the universe. If anyone has a better theory lets hear it! Well that's one theory that was never shown on tv...Jackie doing it....seriously...maybe she was replaced too. Maybe we all were replaced. By the way, the secret on the Rolling Stones Album is....Brian Jones is Dead... For those who have been in the twilight zone...and came back to see all of this...
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 16, 2014 5:46:29 GMT -5
I know about JFK, RFK, MLK, but who is OKC? I know KFC....and for many who have eaten there, could be a hidden conspiracy as well....
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Oct 16, 2014 16:42:52 GMT -5
I know about JFK, RFK, MLK, but who is OKC? I know KFC....and for many who have eaten there, could be a hidden conspiracy as well.... Not sure whether to take you seriously or not. It could be you're joking. Perhaps you're always joking
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 20, 2014 17:22:49 GMT -5
I know about JFK, RFK, MLK, but who is OKC? I know KFC....and for many who have eaten there, could be a hidden conspiracy as well.... Not sure whether to take you seriously or not. It could be you're joking. Perhaps you're always joking You never can tell.....
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 20, 2014 17:25:51 GMT -5
Add the Boston Marathon Bombing as another staged event as well.
|
|