|
|
Hefty John
Jan 23, 2015 18:41:56 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on Jan 23, 2015 18:41:56 GMT -5
Kind of curious whether hefty John existed. He seem to be looking like his father here. Orange skinny dude just doesn't look right to me. View AttachmentThat's one of the reasons he got back with Yoko He didn't know what to eat |
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 11, 2015 8:57:59 GMT -5
John was never skinny. Watch "A Hard Day's Night" and see him (and the others) from the back view as the camera moves around as they play on stage wearing tailored suits. (I wonder what happened to these and other stage suits, they would be worth a fortune now?)
People who weren't around then can be persuaded falsehoods surrounding the The Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Apr 12, 2015 17:34:55 GMT -5
The guy(s) impersonating John don't look as much like their "father" Al(fred) Lennon as what the original John did... moreover, John's daddy (Freddie) was better-looking (and thicker) in his 50's than the Fohns ever were in their so-called "30's". Where there's smoke there's bound to be a fire... if there isn't already, but I digress.    And I agree w/ Cheryl... John was NOT a skinny, "metro-sexual", pinched/beak-nosed, haggard, old-looking, cankered-looking, hen-pecked, unattractive man like the above impostors, but was stocky and attractive... and NOT married to the FAKE Yoko(s), who appear to be men masquerading as women. [That is DEFINITELY a MAN standing with one of the multiple Fohns in the last photograph; just look at the masculine jawline, legs and big/over-sized boat feet.] S/He reminds me VERY much of this weird, kooky Japanese dude in the below video, who's apparently dressed in drag or women's lingerie {I'm a bass player myself, so I discovered this video}: |
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 13, 2015 15:17:09 GMT -5
Why can't folk see that Fohn was a different person, much thinner than John Winston Lennon and invariably with shades on/long hair/sideburns (as on the Baker Street "Get Back" promo film) thick fur coat disguising the physique once again, clothing was cleverly used to cover up the fact it was an imposter.
Thanks NothingIsReal1985 for more commonsense. John strongly resembled his father; the imposter does not, including pointy chin.
|
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 13, 2015 18:17:45 GMT -5
Kind of curious whether hefty John existed. He seem to be looking like his father here. Orange skinny dude just doesn't look right to me. View AttachmentThis picture pops with hefty John search.  People seem to be getting confused with the "hefty" John and the "hagard" John. As I said previously, watch AHDN; the plot is daft at face value (though full of Illuminati symbolism); the music and the charisma of these young men is just as mesmerising as it was back in 1964. That is the true John and he was not skinny. Also see photos of him on the beach with Cynthia in Trinidad, January 1966. That is John's true physique. Then compare with the person with Yoko. You will see the difference in, not only physique, but facial features if only you can strip away the beard, long hair, bushy sideburns and spectacles/shades. Some people around these parts seem to think the thin, hagard character is John and the "hefty" one is the imposter. No, it is the other way around. As for his nose, it was finely chiselled on the end; not beaky like a bird of prey with pinched in nostrils. His chin was squared off not pointed and as for his eyes, they were like his father Alfred (Freddie) Lennon's almost exactly. That is why he is wearing spectacles with thick lenses/shades post 1966. |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Apr 20, 2015 18:30:40 GMT -5
People seem to be getting confused with the "hefty" John and the "hagard" John. As I said previously, watch AHDN; the plot is daft at face value (though full of Illuminati symbolism); the music and the charisma of these young men is just as mesmerising as it was back in 1964. That is the true John and he was not skinny. Also see photos of him on the beach with Cynthia in Trinidad, January 1966. That is John's true physique. Then compare with the person with Yoko. You will see the difference in, not only physique, but facial features if only you can strip away the beard, long hair, bushy sideburns and spectacles/shades. Some people around these parts seem to think the thin, hagard character is John and the "hefty" one is the imposter. No, it is the other way around. As for his nose, it was finely chiselled on the end; not beaky like a bird of prey with pinched in nostrils. His chin was squared off not pointed and as for his eyes, they were like his father Alfred (Freddie) Lennon's almost exactly. That is why he is wearing spectacles with thick lenses/shades post 1966. As much as your comment makes sense the thing is that in order to see a this phenomenon for what it TRULY is one would have to have their SPIRITUAL thinking cap on, for this is a deep, complicated, confusing and complex subject to comprehend. It's one thing to have a HEAD knowledge of something, because many people have a cognizant awareness of hard-hitting truths, yet they still have blinders on their eyes, for they REFUSE to see the ugly, naked TRUTH about things. I also wanna add that the impostors were too tall, lanky and long in their bodies to be the REAL John Lennon. Although John Lennon was stocky and had those lovely love handles and cellulite I could still yet see his rib cage and clavicles (collarbones), which speaks volumes about the fact that he had a larger skeletal [as well as muscular] frame -- and thus naturally chunkier/heavier -- than the ugly, skinny, beak-nosed, haggard-looking men who were had replaced, assumed and co-opted/hijacked his identity. What a sad, sick world we live in.  If the original John Lennon -- along with the actual Cynthia -- was replaced when I think he was, then it was very likely that poor Julian grew up w/o his REAL parents, being passed around various "foster" homes like a packet of smokes among the impostors PRETENDING to be his real parents. It also appears that John's father (Freddie) was taken out shortly after John and Cyn because I don't see any photos of him post-'66, either.  |
|
|
|
Hefty John
Apr 20, 2015 21:03:14 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 20, 2015 21:03:14 GMT -5
People seem to be getting confused with the "hefty" John and the "hagard" John. As I said previously, watch AHDN; the plot is daft at face value (though full of Illuminati symbolism); the music and the charisma of these young men is just as mesmerising as it was back in 1964. That is the true John and he was not skinny. Also see photos of him on the beach with Cynthia in Trinidad, January 1966. That is John's true physique. Then compare with the person with Yoko. You will see the difference in, not only physique, but facial features if only you can strip away the beard, long hair, bushy sideburns and spectacles/shades. Some people around these parts seem to think the thin, hagard character is John and the "hefty" one is the imposter. No, it is the other way around. As for his nose, it was finely chiselled on the end; not beaky like a bird of prey with pinched in nostrils. His chin was squared off not pointed and as for his eyes, they were like his father Alfred (Freddie) Lennon's almost exactly. That is why he is wearing spectacles with thick lenses/shades post 1966. As much as your comment makes sense the thing is that in order to see a this phenomenon for what it TRULY is one would have to have their SPIRITUAL thinking cap on, for this is a deep, complicated, confusing and complex subject to comprehend. It's one thing to have a HEAD knowledge of something, because many people have a cognizant awareness of hard-hitting truths, yet they still have blinders on their eyes, for they REFUSE to see the ugly, naked TRUTH about things. I also wanna add that the impostors were too tall, lanky and long in their bodies to be the REAL John Lennon. Although John Lennon was stocky and had those lovely love handles and cellulite I could still yet see his rib cage and clavicles (collarbones), which speaks volumes about the fact that he had a larger skeletal [as well as muscular] frame -- and thus naturally chunkier/heavier -- than the ugly, skinny, beak-nosed, haggard-looking men who were had replaced, assumed and co-opted/hijacked his identity. What a sad, sick world we live in. If the original John Lennon -- along with the actual Cynthia -- was replaced when I think he was, then it was very likely that poor Julian grew up w/o his REAL parents, being passed around various "foster" homes like a packet of smokes among the impostors PRETENDING to be his real parents. It also appears that John's father (Freddie) was taken out shortly after John and Cyn because I don't see any photos of him post-'66, either. Nobody was ever replaced, though. You guys honestly believe in replacements and MK ultra by the government but when it comes to hiding in plain sight and the afterlife, everyone turns into Hellen Keller |
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 22, 2015 15:59:02 GMT -5
The evidence is there, it is up to you if you choose to ignore it.
|
|
|
|
Hefty John
Apr 22, 2015 17:34:46 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 22, 2015 17:34:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 2:23:57 GMT -5
 everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR. consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different. there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed |
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 2:33:04 GMT -5
Now I have a counter point to make. Don't watch the entire video now, just listen to the opening 30-60 seconds (Ringo speaking)
answer me just this One question
where has Ringo ever said that before, and why on Earth would he ?
the answer is right infront of you, If You're Not Ready For TheTruth You Can't See It |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Apr 23, 2015 4:02:07 GMT -5
If you don't believe that it's VERY much possible to replace someone -- nor do you plan on taking any of this replacement business seriously -- then why are you here? (I don't know how much clearer I can be about John being replaced early on.) Sounds like someone has too much time on their hands, not to mention a shill to throw people off the main scent, but I digress. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 23, 2015 4:33:43 GMT -5
then why are you here? (I don't know how much clearer I can be about John being replaced early on.) Sounds like someone has too much time on their hands, not to mention a shill to throw people off the main scent, but I digress.  cant say that I'd be putting fourth so much of an effort if you guys (er gals) were sniffing the right stuff, sweetheart there was a book, I forget the title everytime but it talked about this guy that came along with magical mystery powers and could turn pop into punch and use that punch to give people vision Christ, I would be lying if it wasn't at the tip of my tongue  We want to turn you onto the truth but if yer not ready for TheTruth then you can't see it |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Apr 24, 2015 9:05:08 GMT -5
everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR. consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different. there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed That may be so, but there are still some things that just can't be explained away, like the VERY noticeable discrepancies in the in the ratios, planes and dimensions of the facial features -- as well as other traits, such as personality, voice, and body type(s) -- in comparison photos, videos and audio. The last I checked, a person's voice gets DEEPER as they get older, and not HIGHER, like Fohn and Faul's did by 1967. A picture's worth a thousand words {as seen below}, take it or leave it. I. II. III. VI. V. At least I have EVIDENCE to back up my claims of the ORIGINAL John being taken out by 1966... but where's yours? As seen in the above images, John Lennon was undeniably a VERY beautiful, exotic-looking man pre-'67. He had a friendly countenance, good sense of humor, soft, page-boy features, a baby face, a cute pixie mouth, lovely fit athletic figure, hairless runner's legs, a beautiful, well-dressed, classy wife and cute baby son he actually cared about, etc. But afterwards... it was a VERY different story and downhill from there with the multiple impostors that had assumed his identity. They not only looked noticeably DIFFERENT, but they were NOT attractive, either. Are people BLIND?! What have they been smoking?! But then again... what do I know?  JPM was NOT the only victim of impostor-replacement, like most everyone else would LOVE to be content to believe like Clare Kheun; after all -- as the old adage goes -- " THREE can keep a secret... but ONLY if TWO are dead". If they replaced Paul... then it makes PERFECT sense to me that they would do the REST of The Beatles that way too, so the truth wouldn't come out. Stop drinking Jim Jones' infamous Kool-Aid, unless you actually relish in being poisoned.  After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, because this sort of matter is VERY serious and NOT be taken lightly. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it guilt by association. After all, if this [very same thing] were to happen to YOU or someone YOU cared about, then YOU would care [and want someone else to do so accordingly], wouldn't you? On top of that YOU would want someone to help YOU (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of these sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress. Peace. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 24, 2015 9:54:02 GMT -5
everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR. consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different. there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, assumed and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, for this sort of matter is VERY serious. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it [guilt by association]. After all, if this were to happen to YOU or someone you cared about YOU would care, wouldn't you? On top of that you would want someone's help (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of this sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress. you're there but you're not at the same time, May I ? www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=p&p=59"introduce (someone or something) formally or ceremonially;"You know that We're as Close as Can be, Man. Go see what you wrote but, looking thru a Glass Onion |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Apr 24, 2015 23:09:04 GMT -5
everyone looks different with age, even the voice might change slightly.. BUT keep in mind that back during this time, we went from black and white to COLOR.
consider that, different cameras, different film, different record players -- ALL very much the same yet at that time you didn't have to do much to make something appear different.
there's a much more reasonable explanation to offer, but I've yet to see anyone grasping the actual concept. the ones that have are simply waiting for this "Truth" to finally be revealed
That may be so, but there are still some things that just can't be explained away, like the VERY noticeable discrepancies in the in the ratios, planes and dimensions of the facial features -- as well as other traits, such as personality, voice, and body type(s) -- in comparison photos, videos and audio. The last I checked, a person's voice gets DEEPER as they get older, and not HIGHER, like Fohn and Faul's did by 1967. A picture's worth a thousand words {as seen below}, take it or leave it. At least I have EVIDENCE to back up my claims of the ORIGINAL John being taken out by 1966... but where's yours? As seen in the above images, John Lennon was undeniably a VERY beautiful, exotic-looking man pre-'67. He had a friendly countenance, good sense of humor, soft, page-boy features, a baby face, a cute pixie mouth, lovely fit athletic figure, hairless runner's legs, a beautiful, well-dressed, classy wife and cute baby son he actually cared about, etc. But afterwards... it was a VERY different story and downhill from there with the multiple impostors that had assumed his identity. They not only looked noticeably DIFFERENT, but they were NOT attractive, either. Are people BLIND?! What have they been smoking?! But then again... what do I know? JPM was NOT the only victim of impostor-replacement, like most everyone else would LOVE to be content to believe like Clare Kheun; after all -- as the old adage goes -- " THREE can keep a secret... but ONLY if TWO are dead". If they replaced Paul... then it makes PERFECT sense to me that they would do the REST of The Beatles that way too, so the truth wouldn't come out. Stop drinking Jim Jones' infamous Kool-Aid, unless you actually relish in being poisoned. After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, because this sort of matter is VERY serious and NOT be taken lightly. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it guilt by association. After all, if this were to happen to YOU or someone you cared about YOU would care [and want someone else to do so accordingly], wouldn't you? On top of that you would want someone to help YOU (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of these sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress.     digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html |
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 25, 2015 4:06:30 GMT -5
That may be so, but there are still some things that just can't be explained away, like the VERY noticeable discrepancies in the in the ratios, planes and dimensions of the facial features -- as well as other traits, such as personality, voice, and body type(s) -- in comparison photos, videos and audio. The last I checked, a person's voice gets DEEPER as they get older, and not HIGHER, like Fohn and Faul's did by 1967. A picture's worth a thousand words {as seen below}, take it or leave it. At least I have EVIDENCE to back up my claims of the ORIGINAL John being taken out by 1966... but where's yours? As seen in the above images, John Lennon was undeniably a VERY beautiful, exotic-looking man pre-'67. He had a friendly countenance, good sense of humor, soft, page-boy features, a baby face, a cute pixie mouth, lovely fit athletic figure, hairless runner's legs, a beautiful, well-dressed, classy wife and cute baby son he actually cared about, etc. But afterwards... it was a VERY different story and downhill from there with the multiple impostors that had assumed his identity. They not only looked noticeably DIFFERENT, but they were NOT attractive, either. Are people BLIND?! What have they been smoking?! But then again... what do I know? JPM was NOT the only victim of impostor-replacement, like most everyone else would LOVE to be content to believe like Clare Kheun; after all -- as the old adage goes -- " THREE can keep a secret... but ONLY if TWO are dead". If they replaced Paul... then it makes PERFECT sense to me that they would do the REST of The Beatles that way too, so the truth wouldn't come out. Stop drinking Jim Jones' infamous Kool-Aid, unless you actually relish in being poisoned. After all, someone being cloned, murdered in cold blood, having their identity stolen, and co-opted/hijacked -- and even WORSE, deceiving the fans and general public about it for DECADES afterward -- is NOTHING to just sneeze at whatsoever, because this sort of matter is VERY serious and NOT be taken lightly. Ignoring it and refusing to see the truth for what it is sails in the VERY same boat as CONDONING it guilt by association. After all, if this were to happen to YOU or someone you cared about YOU would care [and want someone else to do so accordingly], wouldn't you? On top of that you would want someone to help YOU (mainly the authorities) in getting into the bottom of these sort of crimes perpetrated against you, find the perpetrators and bringing them to justice? Yeah... that's what I thought/I thought so; but I digress.     digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Jun 1, 2015 13:54:05 GMT -5
The face is much too long and thin -- as is often the case with cloned individuals -- for it to be the REAL John; John's face was fuller, chubbier and more square. Moreover, the teeth are too crooked -- John's teeth were a bit straighter than this -- and the nose too beak-y... John had a straight aquiline nose much like his pops. And did I ALSO mention that this Fohn -- well, one of many versions of him -- is also too small in the {body} frame to be the ORIGINAL (one and ONLY) John Lennon?! John had a larger, chunkier [skeletal] frame, as well as more fat and muscle on him, but I digress.  |
|
.jpg){kind=icon}
