the review:"This is him."
Really, it is.
Or at least, Sir Paul thinks he is. That's why he said it to David Letterman.
He believes that Paul's spirit attached itself onto his left shoulder after he had died.
Hence the lyric: "The movement you need is on your shoulder" in "Hey Jude".
Sir Paul believes that Paul gave him his (Paul's) voice during a séance, speaking through him, saying
"Take this brother! May it serve you well!"
Ah, but here's where it gets interesting.
Can a person take on another's identity outwardly, and still be himself or herself?
Imagine, for example, if you had to take on the identity of Sarah Palin.
You would have to take on behavior that was probably not naturally yours, and
express opinions that weren't necessarily what you truly believed.
AND, you wouldn't be free to express how you really felt about many things.
Would you be able to do it? How long would it be before you drove yourself crazy?
Fortunately Sir Paul, when agreeing to play the role of Paul McCartney, didn't have to take on
a persona that was too far removed from his own, and clearly he made the effort,
but it seems obvious to me that from the very start his ego asserted itself in numerous ways.
For one: He was "Billy Shears", and he established HIS identity on the first Beatle album he was on,
even though it was Ringo who sang "I Get By with a Little Help from My Friends".
He made himself a presence - a person - on the album.
For two: When he signed on with the Beatles, he insisted that HE have control of the band as a condition
for filling in as Paul.
I can't imagine doing such a thing, given the chance, but then, that's me.
Sir Paul (or rather William Wallace Shepherd, as he lets us know in the book)
fancied he was a more accomplished musician than Paul, and lets you know this
again and again and again in the text. Moreover, he wasn't too crazy about their
earlier work, and dismisses it as "silly love songs". He figured HE would show
the others how to go beyond the level of accomplishment they had achieved prior
to his arrival, and since they were at a loss to do anything without Paul's presence,
they more or less allowed him to have his way.
Now to be fair, William "Walrus" Shepherd did make a very real effort to attune himself to
what Paul would have had them be doing, if he were still present with the band, and William
seriously did what he could to channel the spirit of Paul on a full time basis - EXCEPT - it seems to me -
when he didn't feel like doing it because HE knew how to do things 'better better better'.
And so you have a situation where William wanted to do right by Paul, but always seems
to have had an attitude that he was the superior musician, writer, producer, etc.
which he
may have been, but his lack of modesty effectively prevented
Paul and John from having the casual and cordial relationship they had had before.
Now since Sir Paul did/does have a bit of an ego -
Let me rephrase that.
In as much as Sir Paul has
A Rather Large Ego!(justifiably or otherwise)
he was able to push, pull, demand, and GET what he wanted from the Beatles,
and some of 'their best' work came out under his direction.
That is, until they couldn't stand it any more.
And until HE couldn't stand it any more, and then he left the band!
Without a Paul of either variety in the band, it fell apart, and the individual Beatles
started their solo careers.
But this book is fiction, you say. The author himself says as much!
Yes, because for legal reasons, it
has to be. But it's snot.
There is
a ton of information in the book.
The locations of numerous "back masking" and reversals in Beatles songs
(MANY of which we've found!)Explanations of Beatle songs: who they were about, what inspired them.
Revelations of songs by others that resulted from Paul having died in an automobile accident with "Donna".
What the days ("Sunday's on the phone to Monday" etc.) are about.
And many other topics, including: Doesn't the publishing of Sir Paul's memoirs revealing many of the secrets
mean that people who pursue the mystery on websites like this one are now irrelevant?
(He says 'no'.)I will not lie. Reading this book is "a spoiler". Many of your questions will be answered, as well as some you never asked!
But not all.
Will it "ruin it" to read the book?
Yes/
NoBut I say, it's all right. Take the plunge! You'll never regret it!
I'll give it 5 stars
*****. Or maybe even 7, 8, or 9. Or more!