Post by ekauqodielak on Sept 28, 2019 11:09:56 GMT -5
Here is Ralph Ellis participating in a panel interview with Spencer Leigh on the 29th of June, 2018:
Clearly, this man bears no resemblance to any of the public faces of "John Lennon". Further inquiry reveals that those who have long pushed the lie that Ellis was a Fennon very intentionally cherry-picked the few images in which Ellis bore any resemblance to "Lennon" at all.
Ellis:
I would further argue that anyone who posits that any of the Feorges, Fingos, Fauls or Fohns were publicly known entertainers under alternate identities (e.g. Charlie Brill) are completely full of shit and, worse than that, wasting energy on asking the wrong questions. The lack of logic in the idea that one "agent" would be given multiple, high profile roles to play simultaneously, roles which necessitated extraordinarily busy scheduling and which made the performer recognizable to the public globally, is a head slapper, at best. Who the dozens of men were who portrayed the Featles is a question that is very, very unlikely to ever be answerable and it's really beside the point, as far as I'm concerned. Why multiples were engaged, who engaged them and to what purpose, the organizational structure and assignment of functions and what crafts were employed to turn these men into ringers and wooly eye the public seem far more pertinent questions to me.
Clearly, this man bears no resemblance to any of the public faces of "John Lennon". Further inquiry reveals that those who have long pushed the lie that Ellis was a Fennon very intentionally cherry-picked the few images in which Ellis bore any resemblance to "Lennon" at all.
Ellis:
I would further argue that anyone who posits that any of the Feorges, Fingos, Fauls or Fohns were publicly known entertainers under alternate identities (e.g. Charlie Brill) are completely full of shit and, worse than that, wasting energy on asking the wrong questions. The lack of logic in the idea that one "agent" would be given multiple, high profile roles to play simultaneously, roles which necessitated extraordinarily busy scheduling and which made the performer recognizable to the public globally, is a head slapper, at best. Who the dozens of men were who portrayed the Featles is a question that is very, very unlikely to ever be answerable and it's really beside the point, as far as I'm concerned. Why multiples were engaged, who engaged them and to what purpose, the organizational structure and assignment of functions and what crafts were employed to turn these men into ringers and wooly eye the public seem far more pertinent questions to me.
.jpg){kind=icon}
