|
Post by maclen on Dec 5, 2019 13:53:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 5, 2019 18:50:07 GMT -5
It's not "faul (bill)" .
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 6, 2019 2:15:02 GMT -5
Charley and Charlie
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 6, 2019 2:27:42 GMT -5
Let's see.... the figure above and behind George.... Do you mean Eddie Haskell or Al Capone? Sonny & Cher
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Dec 6, 2019 12:53:11 GMT -5
I'm guessing this guy -
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 8, 2019 22:26:06 GMT -5
Charley and Charlie Hey Now B)
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 8, 2019 22:30:42 GMT -5
She deleted her post. Now it makes no sense. Not that it did before, mind you.
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Dec 9, 2019 2:40:43 GMT -5
Charley and Charlie Hey Now B) Oh I stated there were two Charley Chaplins. One was male and the other one female. I misspelled Charlie Chaplin. Soviet Union had large collection of female Chaplin. She was not as good as the guy. It is what it is. Stalin was investing into movies he thought will cause world revolution. Revolution #9, right? MALE CHAPLIN was John Lennon look alike. Pauline and Charlene?
|
|
|
Post by kennethmd on Dec 9, 2019 15:17:05 GMT -5
Think about look a likes,there's a woman left of the police officer,(which would be our right),that look like Ringo.
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 9, 2019 18:35:01 GMT -5
----------------------------
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 10, 2019 22:21:49 GMT -5
Oh I stated there were two Charley Chaplins. One was male and the other one female. I misspelled Charlie Chaplin. Soviet Union had large collection of female Chaplin. She was not as good as the guy. It is what it is. Stalin was investing into movies he thought will cause world revolution. Revolution #9, right? MALE CHAPLIN was John Lennon look alike. Pauline and Charlene? You said the name now my head will pop off, great
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 10, 2019 22:24:14 GMT -5
Don’t worry I’ve got a Plan.
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 13, 2019 20:08:37 GMT -5
IMHO what we see here is Pauline playing Ringo and Charlene the other character. They most likely are not even human. Ringo and John looked just like that when Beatlemania was happening. I don't know why you would think it was anyone but they themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Dec 14, 2019 12:46:13 GMT -5
IMHO what we see here is Pauline playing Ringo and Charlene the other character. They most likely are not even human. Ringo and John looked just like that when Beatlemania was happening. I don't know why you would think it was anyone but they themselves. Psst... It's because of the Masonic hand signals!
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 14, 2019 13:24:55 GMT -5
Shirley that's it!
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 9, 2020 18:30:24 GMT -5
It's not "faul (bill)" . Who the fuck is it, then.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 22, 2020 4:56:12 GMT -5
…Can any of you recreate what "John" is doing with his right forefinger and "thumb"?… Yeah, I'm back…
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Jan 22, 2020 18:57:17 GMT -5
…Can any of you recreate what "John" is doing with his right forefinger and "thumb"?… Yeah, I'm back… It's just movie making technology of the time. Why is it interesting? 'Ken Russell claimed his film was not so much the story of Tchaikovsky as it was a commentary on the destructive force of dreams on reality' lecinemadreams.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-music-lovers-1970.html
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 22, 2020 23:48:25 GMT -5
They all had consistently weird hands.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Dec 21, 2021 9:51:01 GMT -5
The thumbnail photo is a shopped up mess. More like a collage of people stuck together, than a true crowd photo. I think the point the channel owner was making is that the man in the crowd directly above George, and the waving Paul we see, ARE ONE AND THE SAME PERSON. Both the entity known as Billy. But masked up into the doe-eyed template when standing with the other Beatles. That seems to be the channel owner's theory, anyway. The collage telling the story of a pre-plastic surgery Billy trailing along during Beatlemaina, ready to mask up as a Paul stand-in when needed.
|
|