mrshepherd
Hard Day's Night
Living is Easy with Eyes Closed...
Posts: 21
|
Post by mrshepherd on Aug 7, 2021 13:07:49 GMT -5
I saw a lot of other people making comparisons between the person seen in the beginning of MMT and William, and even tho i don't really think he is Faul, there is a lot of evidence that said otherwise. I tried to get as many images of this man and compare it with images of ''McCartney'' after 1966.  Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Aug 9, 2021 15:05:56 GMT -5
I saw a lot of other people making comparisons between the person seen in the beginning of MMT and William, and even tho i don't really think he is Faul, there is a lot of evidence that said otherwise. I tried to get as many images of this man and compare it with images of ''McCartney'' after 1966. Your first row of mystery men are 3 different people: 1; 2; & 3/4 Your second row of Pauls are also 3 different people: 1 (the image is flipped) & 2; 3; 4 |
|
mrshepherd
Hard Day's Night
Living is Easy with Eyes Closed...
Posts: 21
|
Post by mrshepherd on Aug 10, 2021 1:21:26 GMT -5
I saw a lot of other people making comparisons between the person seen in the beginning of MMT and William, and even tho i don't really think he is Faul, there is a lot of evidence that said otherwise. I tried to get as many images of this man and compare it with images of ''McCartney'' after 1966. Your first row of mystery men are 3 different people: 1; 2; & 3/4 Your second row of Pauls are also 3 different people: 1 (the image is flipped) & 2; 3; 4 This is why i didn't believe in this theory. The person in the first image is clearly not the one in the second, the one in the second //might// be somehow related to the third (even tho there are small differences when you look at their ears), but the one in the third photo is the same man in image 4. |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Aug 10, 2021 6:29:39 GMT -5
Your first row of mystery men are 3 different people: 1; 2; & 3/4 Your second row of Pauls are also 3 different people: 1 (the image is flipped) & 2; 3; 4 This is why i didn't believe in this theory. The person in the first image is clearly not the one in the second, the one in the second //might// be somehow related to the third (even tho there are small differences when you look at their ears), but the one in the third photo is the same man in image 4. I think Mystery Man 3/4 could possibly be related to "Paul" 3 because of the similarity of the orbital sockets, but they're also clearly not the same person (mouths, chins, etc) and that "Paul" was around long before Magical Mystery Tour. People have a lot of theories that only "work" if you restrict your research to 65/66 and after. None of the '66 death theories hold up when you start looking at early photos/footage of the people originally presented as The Quarrymen. |
|
|
|
Post by paulmoran on Aug 16, 2021 20:24:00 GMT -5
MMT back of the bus guy always reminds me of this football player Neil Simpson: ![]()  Funnily enough, although a Scottish footballer, he was born in London. In a strange coincidence, I found this (not saying that it's anything though):  |
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Dec 8, 2021 17:39:58 GMT -5
This is why i didn't believe in this theory. The person in the first image is clearly not the one in the second, the one in the second //might// be somehow related to the third (even tho there are small differences when you look at their ears), but the one in the third photo is the same man in image 4. I think Mystery Man 3/4 could possibly be related to "Paul" 3 because of the similarity of the orbital sockets, but they're also clearly not the same person (mouths, chins, etc) and that "Paul" was around long before Magical Mystery Tour. People have a lot of theories that only "work" if you restrict your research to 65/66 and after. None of the '66 death theories hold up when you start looking at early photos/footage of the people originally presented as The Quarrymen. Yep. That's the problem I started running into, so I could no longer defend my initial staunch position as a 66er. Gotta face facts and go back and delete some YouTube posts now..... |
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Dec 9, 2021 9:37:20 GMT -5
I think Mystery Man 3/4 could possibly be related to "Paul" 3 because of the similarity of the orbital sockets, but they're also clearly not the same person (mouths, chins, etc) and that "Paul" was around long before Magical Mystery Tour. People have a lot of theories that only "work" if you restrict your research to 65/66 and after. None of the '66 death theories hold up when you start looking at early photos/footage of the people originally presented as The Quarrymen. Yep. That's the problem I started running into, so I could no longer defend my initial staunch position as a 66er. Gotta face facts and go back and delete some YouTube posts now..... Why are Catholics devout and Protestants staunch? You never hear of staunch Catholics or devout Protestants. |
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 9, 2021 22:59:07 GMT -5
We have staunch Catholics in my neck of the woods. As for the Protestants, well - what can I tell ya?  Speaking of ants, who the hell is this?! I thought he was dead!  Adam Ant "Goody Two Shoes" St. Louis 2019youtu.be/0vE51acJqugrarebitfiendfilms Oct 28, 2019 Adam Ant"his mother supported him by working as a domestic cleaner, being briefly employed by Paul McCartney. " |
|
