|
Post by ramone on Mar 24, 2024 14:18:44 GMT -5
Any thoughts? On dates, etc?
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 24, 2024 14:20:57 GMT -5
Scars and teeth (and what's beneath?)
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 24, 2024 14:26:22 GMT -5
Heights in our sights
YMMV with these...
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 30, 2024 13:29:27 GMT -5
Some screen shots above first vid - Same guy? If those dates are correct - evidently not.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 1, 2024 19:58:27 GMT -5
Some screen shots above first vid - Same guy? If those dates are correct - evidently not. Just listen to Pete... The parting on the left is now parting on the right And the beards have all grown longer overnight
|
|
|
Post by superman on May 2, 2024 2:01:56 GMT -5
Any thoughts? On dates, etc? The quick beard is one of those instances where it seems like someone REALLY wants you to see that things don't add up. Like that photo of Paul arriving home after a safari in Kenya. He had allegedly been exposed to the elements in East Africa for some time ... yet he arrives home BONE WHITE... and carrying like some African bongos or something, as if to say "Look, I've been in Africa and have brought home this souvenir of my trip..."
|
|
|
Post by joseph on May 2, 2024 2:37:12 GMT -5
It's so easy, isn't it? "If the conclusion you reach is that I'm dead, then you're wrong, because I'm alive..." What I would say to that is, "No we're not saying you're dead. The fact that you're standing there talking is all the proof we need to say you're alive. What we're saying is Paul McCartney is dead and you're not Paul McCartney."
Let that be a text book example of how the authorities cover up the replacement of somebody with an imposter. All they have to do if anyone questions someone's identity they just wheel out the imposter to say, "I'm alive" and get the reporter to toss a couple of softball questions to them and write a little STFU.
What does "you" or "me" even mean to imposters and their media handlers? "People are saying you're dead." "Me? I'm not dead - I cut myself shaving this morning." It's just too much for the average person to get their head around, "He's him. He can't be dead if he's alive!" "You" just means the person in front of me who I'm talking to. "Me," a name I call myself - anyone and everyone can say, "I'm me."
They've pulled the exact same mind game in Mass Effect 2, a video game sequel which came out in 2010. I played through this sequence 10 times in 2010 and each time it got me to confirm that this was the same guy - Commander Shepard - who I role played as in the first game.
Let me set the scene. The final battle in the first game takes place on a giant space station called the Citadel, wich is about the size of five Manhattan islands and serves as a capital city for the Milky Way galaxy. Shepard saves the Citadel from a threat that's come from "dark space." You're the hero and the credits roll. In the opening sequence of the sequel Shepard gets replaced with an imposter. You might have seen the thread I made about it in the Celebrity Flux.
At some point in the sequel you have to go back to the Citadel and you have to pass through security. The police on this space station are called C-Sec. Since that final battle in the first game humanity has taken a greater role in the policing of the Citadel. You Get a notification that you should talk to the head of security Captain Bailey. Now what I'm telling you here is not shared with the public by the people who made the game, but this Captain Bailey knows that the Shepard he's talking to is not the one you played as in the first game. Watch how they give this encounter the same treatment the authorities give to Paul is dead:
Whoever wrote this dialogue must think they're so smart:
Shepard: "You're not worried I'm some imposter claiming to be me?"
Bailey: "....You're you."
Now the way I justify saying that Captain Bailey knows he's not the original Shepard, is the way Bioware justifies Captain Bailey knows, because if you listen to Bailey's other dialogue he proves himself to be corrupt. You can't view him as an honest broker.
Another thing Mass Effect has in common with Paul is dead concerns Bioware's public relations. Many fans of the first two games were very unhappy with how the third game concluded. It didn't make sense to them. A theory grew out of the discussion called "Indoctrination Theory,"which states that Shepard is being indoctrinated throughout the trilogy by this threat from dark space. One of the lead writers picked this up and issued a denial. What that did was create Streisand effect whereby people started to believe that it was true because it had been denied. That stopped fans looking for other reasons why the series didn't make sense.
I have mentioned Bioware and used their handle in many tweets this year. That should put notifications on their account, and they do use twitter a lot. Someone there must have seen what I've been tweeting about Mass Effect, but they haven't said a word to me. I'm asking them to confirm or deny it. It doesn't matter which to me, because to deny would cause utter turmoil in the video game community.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 4, 2024 22:49:31 GMT -5
Any thoughts? On dates, etc?
3 Different Pauls. The middle one is Forthlin Rd Paul. The one on the right was a bigger guy first seen in the early promo pix on the Liverpool docks, later with a bad eye and a bad nose. The one on the left is first seen in Hamburg, flat face, distinct, was around through the early 90s publicly, notably taller than other Pauls.
Forthlin:
Dock Set B:
Flat face:
3 of at least a half dozen, probably more.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 5, 2024 14:15:34 GMT -5
Hmmm.... Forthlin and set b look the same to me (black and white anyway). Not sure about the rest. Think the vids and info are important is because we can all do our subjective thing - and that can be useful. But something that shows for sure beard growth like that in two days isn't reasonable.
So, barring a pasted on beard - I would think most reasonable people would say it's two diff people. And two diff people means.....(drumroll)
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 6, 2024 16:36:58 GMT -5
Hmmm.... Forthlin and set b look the same to me (black and white anyway). Not sure about the rest. Think the vids and info are important is because we can all do our subjective thing - and that can be useful. But something that shows for sure beard growth like that in two days isn't reasonable. So, barring a pasted on beard - I would think most reasonable people would say it's two diff people. And two diff people means.....(drumroll) Forthlin & Set B (Lumpy) are completely different guys and you can track both of them from '61 through the late 70s, with Forthlin remaining publicly through the 90s. There's two different Ringos in those Dock photos, too (check the haircuts). Forthlin Paul has pointed eyebrows and a sharp nose. Set B Paul has short brows that don't have a down arc, is always taller and heavier than the other, with a bulbous nose (until whatever happened to it later happened to it) and a puffy face. If you can't see the differences, go ahead and run them through a face ID AI yourself. A lot of people come to this subject with a preconceived idea in their heads about there being one Paul who was replaced with a second Paul in 1966. The evidence doesn't support the '66 myth at all, as anyone who examines the Hamburg and early Silver Beatles ('59-'62) photos knows.
|
|