|
Post by eggy on Mar 17, 2004 9:09:47 GMT -5
I've already asked him. The answer was that ALL "Sun King" told is in that forum and ONLY in that forum under his signature. You are "still" free to search by yourself what you need to know, there. P.S. this thread is about other arguments. Better opening another for that. I think you're wrong, i saw others "SKs things" out of his forum, but thats another subject
|
|
|
Post by TKIN on Mar 17, 2004 10:32:53 GMT -5
I think you're wrong, i saw others "SKs things" out of his forum, but thats another subject I saw many Picasso's in my life....the most were faked...
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Mar 17, 2004 11:39:32 GMT -5
you need to settle down. Stop being disruptive. Stop hiding behind your "alias" and pretending that you are not Sun King (like when you refer to Sun King in third person). Stop flinging poorly veiled insults at mods of this board. Maybe you should spend more time "seeing Picassos", instead of causing trouble.
|
|
|
Post by TKIN on Mar 17, 2004 12:23:45 GMT -5
you need to settle down. Stop being disruptive. Stop hiding behind your "alias" and pretending that you are not Sun King (like when you refer to Sun King in third person). Stop flinging poorly veiled insults at mods of this board. Maybe you should spend more time "seeing Picassos", instead of causing trouble. Daily I spend my time to look at the more than a Gigabyte of vintage documentation you, xpt626, sent "Sun King". More amazing than any Picasso's.
|
|
|
Post by eggy on Mar 17, 2004 13:10:12 GMT -5
Daily I spend my time to look at the more than a Gigabyte of vintage documentation you, xpt626, sent "Sun King". Oh yeah, it was from the time we all believed in SK before knowing who he really was
|
|
|
Post by eggy on Mar 17, 2004 13:12:50 GMT -5
I saw many Picasso's in my life....the most were faked... Hahahaha!!! I'm sure about that you saw many faked things in your life like i saw time ago
|
|
|
Post by TKIN on Mar 17, 2004 13:30:33 GMT -5
Oh yeah, it was from the time we all believed in SK before knowing who he really was Closing all that, only two questions: " Do you know that 60IF site went out A YEAR before Uberkinder's one....or not? " and... " If that "Sun King" told lies, WHY are you here then, since ALL THAT started from 60IF site? " A dedicated thread, if you want, is better.
|
|
|
Post by eggy on Mar 17, 2004 13:42:19 GMT -5
Closing all that, only two questions: " Do you know that 60IF site went out A YEAR before Uberkinder's one....or not? " and... " If that "Sun King" told lies, WHY are you here then, since ALL THAT started from 60IF site? " A dedicated thread, if you want, is better. Well i really dont care if 60IF started after or before Uberkinders site, anyway 60IF is a BIG LIE and about why we are here? I think that we are because some of us and others no, find that something happened in The Beatles in the mid 60s, that for sure it isnt what 60 IF lie tells Personaly, i'm trying to find the truth for myself Thanks!!!!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 17, 2004 14:13:15 GMT -5
And that was from what source? Do we need to go through all that again? How many stories were there regarding that?
Hardly... it started in the sixties, and we are here because of various reasons, but mainly it's to discuss PID/PWR or whatever, without basing it on some "bible" that no one had dare question.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Mar 17, 2004 14:17:33 GMT -5
Daily I spend my time to look at the more than a Gigabyte of vintage documentation you, xpt626, sent "Sun King". More amazing than any Picasso's. *sigh* yes, Sun King, I did. I spent hours scanning and emailing those pix to you. I really wish you'd put some of them up. Please just behave, and get back to James Paul. We (admins here) already know you do not like us, or some decisions we made. It doesn't matter.....this is not the place for that.
|
|
|
Post by TKIN on Mar 18, 2004 16:18:50 GMT -5
... I spent hours scanning and emailing those pix to you. I really wish you'd put some of them up... Ready! xpt626 can you post here the covers of the magazines from where those pictures were taken? Thank You
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Mar 31, 2004 20:40:56 GMT -5
I hope its a mask from another shot dissolving into this frame, or some incidental "Rorshach" confusion that we get when we're tired, especially with indistinct pictures. So Dr. Robert, (if you're not tired now) do you still see it? Can you circle it for us?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 1, 2004 2:32:25 GMT -5
In this pic ? Please describe what you see. It could be just a digital artifact. One thing that struck me as odd is how short Faul's hair is cut. Seems rather conservative for a Beatle on vacation. Merely an image suggested by the overlap and diffusion of background details. I guess this is African savannah. Behind Bill's (I can't imagine that that is Paul, sorry) left shoulder there is a dark area, with a small lighter area below it. That implies the "mouth, and bottom teeth". Near the right edge a third of the way down is an area suggestive of a left eye; move back toward Bill, go diagonally upward a titch, but nearer the darker trees, there is another dark area with a circular form within it.This implies a right eye, malformed, to me. The nose is the indistinct darker area in between. If you draw a straight line from Bills left thumb (assuming this is not mirror printed) all the way to the right side you will pass through the "left eye". The orientation of the "face" is tilted to our right, but more or less straight out of the pic. The left eye almost has a pupil, curiously turned into the center of the face. Granted, it is more like a distorted mask rather than a human face. If you cant see it, well, I guess I have freaky perceptions. Im rested and sober at the moment---------it really is just the accidental position of shadows and light places in a poor quality pic. After all, I see faces in the clouds. Early in the sober day.........(I hate to admit to this.....) but I',m allright, really........reALLY I AM.......really doc.....what's that? .........the thorazine?.....no, not again......no.........snore.............................
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Apr 1, 2004 8:54:11 GMT -5
I do see it now -- it resembles Jar Jar Binks in a way... and / or it's time for my meds, as well
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 1, 2004 22:27:15 GMT -5
Ah, yes, Jar Jar.
First there is the face.
And then the voice.
And lastly, the name itself: Jar Jar. And, "Binks."
He's charmed the world.
So much to delight all in one package.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 10, 2004 12:14:31 GMT -5
|
|
Imgonnaopenmymind
Hard Day's Night
I am the voice of James Faul McCartney. :o
Posts: 20
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Aug 8, 2004 6:37:40 GMT -5
The kid's obviously had experience with smoking.
|
|
|
Post by kazu on Aug 8, 2004 18:12:04 GMT -5
You know the short hair could be because it was really hot there. Or a Beatle on vacation would look less like a Beatle with short hair. Maybe be less harassed by fans? I dunno. It still seems like Paul to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2004 18:55:04 GMT -5
] ] first of all, he's focusing with his right hand........ I think they were in Kenya EXPRESSLEY for the purpose of the metamorphosis.........both PIX were taken on the same trip, yet what happened with the hair? lot of old, dirty money floating around in Kenya too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2004 19:03:07 GMT -5
Perplexed, I mean, Dr Robert! ;D I definitely see a face in this one! How could one frame have a double exposure?
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Aug 8, 2004 20:21:22 GMT -5
It's a frame from a dissolve (cross-fade) between two scenes in the movie. I don't think there's anything significant about it.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Aug 11, 2004 2:13:59 GMT -5
Well, it's a cross fade to John Lennon, isn't that plain? The nose, sideburns, glasses?
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Aug 11, 2004 19:18:07 GMT -5
Uh, can someone draw over the John Lennon out line you're seeing? I don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by kazu on Aug 11, 2004 20:34:14 GMT -5
It is a huge John Lennon that appears to be facing Paul. We see the left/back of his head.
|
|
|
Post by ecenzo1 on Aug 12, 2004 21:55:30 GMT -5
Lennon's left eyeglass is "touching" Paul's left eye/left temple area.
|
|