|
Post by Doc on Oct 29, 2010 2:42:23 GMT -5
seems to have been a lot of ufo/alien based TV shows on in the last few months and all Everybody must be getting ready for....."The EVENT.'
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 27, 2010 14:53:37 GMT -5
Last night I dreamed that I was joining John Lennon in a performance meant to honor "The Beatles". I was to be in the roll of Paul. No one was to know that I wasn't really Paul. The public was to think they had seen John and Paul. I had a week to learn to play guitar, be fitted with a wig, outfit, etc. Now the funny thing to me is - not once, in the whole dream, did the notion of "Faul" occur to me. I've been on the PID/PWR boards for 5 years, and yet, in the dream, the thought "I'm a Faul!" never crossed my mind. Perhaps because I was so worried about getting my skills and appearance up to snuff. How can that happen?! With so little time to prepare, one can't waste any effort on pet names and such. It's a "go to it and just do it" kind of job!
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 27, 2010 14:46:46 GMT -5
Odd. I've checked both inbox and sent emails and I can't find anything. Sir, I sent an email to you on 9/5/10 at 4:43AM my time. It read: "Forgive the intrusion, but the folks at MFH are concerned about you. We heard about the major earthquake and wanted to make sure you are ok." You replied on 9/4/10 5:01PM, I guess NZ time. You wrote: "Hi, Yes, I'm fine thanks." And you put your first name. Paul Bearer--do you have any children?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 27, 2010 0:29:05 GMT -5
These are 2 peculiar images. On the left is 2009, on the right, is last week, in 2010. Two of the original cast have changed; the rest are all the same. The cat has become a dog; and Dapperly Dreadful has become me, Deadly Dreadful, a victim of capital punishment for becoming a, yes, this is my character by-line, becoming a killer pianist. Oh woah is me. We are here: www.puppet.org/perform/ghastly10.shtmlI am a puppet pianist another fun week, then back to basics.....
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 26, 2010 16:51:48 GMT -5
Waters, Gilmour of Pink Floyd spotted dining together in Minneapoliswww.startribune.com/entertainment/blogs/105797953.html?elr=KArks:DCiU1OiP:DiiUiacyKUHDYaGEP7eyckcUsAs is well known among Pink Floyd fans, David Gilmour has committed to showing up as a surprise guest at one (and only one) of the shows on Roger Waters' "The Wall" tour. This month's Rolling Stone cover story on Waters referenced that promise, and then the writer added a snarky line about London being the most likely spot "as opposed to, say, Omaha." Any smart Floyd fan could've guessed right there and then that the once-feuding bandmates were probably going to meet up in Nebraska, and now that hunch seems to be true. Waters and Gilmour were spotted dining together at Bar La Grassa in Minneapolis on Monday night. A restaurant staffer confirmed that Waters was there with an entourage but didn't know for sure if Gilmour was among them. Local scenester, writer and music nut Chuck Terhark, however, happened to be dining there for his birthday on Monday and says he is absolutely certain Gilmour was with them. "Waters was wearing a marching hammers hoodie, which was hilarious," Terhark said (marching hammers being part of "The Wall's" animation). Here's the confusing part, though: Monday was an off night for the tour. Waters is set to perform in Omaha tonight, and then he has his Xcel Energy Center gig in St. Paul on Wednesday night. It's very feasible that he is spending all three nights (Monday through Wednesday) in the Twin Cities as a base and only flying straight in and out of Omaha. That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of Omaha's hospitality, but I doubt anybody in Omaha will be complaining if Gilmour does indeed appear at the show tonight. If he's not there tonight: My money is then on St. Paul. Maybe this terrible weather we're having will convince Gilmour to stay put in the Twin Cities and not travel to Omaha. Bring on the snow and freeze! How fabulous; and to think I was in Omaha last August and had a great time..... oh well....
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 24, 2010 0:35:32 GMT -5
Something went terribly awry in the editing room that day. She's wearing great shoes, though.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 22, 2010 23:34:14 GMT -5
It might have been OK had this been a full size jet. This balance ratio of the plane might have proved less severe in the ensuing panic. When the Croc began to rock, they should have gave his head a knock, or shot him with a Glock, thrown him off the loading dock, tossed a thousand feet thru a mighty hungry flock, hits the ground in pieces, makes a sound just like a "sh-plock", of this I do not mock. My post is stupid and silly, but so is sneakin' a croc on board a plane. Nincompoop.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 22, 2010 23:13:59 GMT -5
Preserving and promoting the fine fine work of all the Beatles is quite important. I say thanks to Sir Paul (and all others) for laboring to do so. Ringo is looking great, sounding great.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 22, 2010 22:27:43 GMT -5
i.e. it allows power to pass thru it. Suddenly Someone is there at the turnstile. This could have many, many, excellent future applications. Plasma people and electric medicine! We shall see........
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 22, 2010 3:50:48 GMT -5
Aren't bunyans things you get on your toes? As long as I'm not getting on your tits... (*thinks* international readership... potentially offensive colloquialism... better explain... don't bother...) I really didn't need to see that foot. Unless it's a clue... Looking through the bent back... tootsies? Little piggies? I bet the whole White Album's in that picture. tits? that's---Theatre in the Square, Marietta GA. TOTS? that's-----Theatre of the Stars, Atlanta GA. TUTS?, thats'====Theatre Under the Stars, Houston, TX. Theater With Out the Stars, not yet, but with any luck.....
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 22, 2010 0:44:35 GMT -5
i.e. it allows power to pass thru it.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 21, 2010 22:47:48 GMT -5
the other Bunyan? Would that be John ? Well... Aren't bunyans things you get on your toes? Always helps to "be on your toes" around here. Thanks for that story about John Bunyan. It's compelling to see how John was able to go on to live the new life that he had chosen.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 21, 2010 4:47:43 GMT -5
Thinking about Derek's admission (see jojo's stuff), the sgt pepper cover was a grave. That was a central point being conveyed. Who's dead? The beatles. Why? Paul is 'gone'. Gone and, metaphorically (at least), "buried".
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 21, 2010 4:43:59 GMT -5
Doc, first of all we don't know what happened so we can't stop just because there is this hypothesis among the others. Then, even if this is what really happened, we can still try to understand who is the substitute and what really happened, avoiding to discover (and I don't really think it's so easy ;D ) where the real Paul is now. Agreed. We can study what is shown; we can learn about the substitute and all he has done to be what he needed to be. As far as Paul goes; the world is too big to guess where he might live, but Proboards is where many of us wind up sooner or later, don't you imagine? Thanks Il Ras.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 21, 2010 4:31:04 GMT -5
Yes, I see. And that "someone" might either be parties we do know of, or more likely, parties we know nothing about. That "party" may be the reason for Paul to have entered a sort of "witness protection program". If this is the case, then legally, and ethically, we have no legitimate grounds for finding out what happened. His safety, and maybe the safety of others, would, somewhat sadly for us, supersede any concerns we might have about the situation. But such a limitation would be completely understandable. Don't worry, Doc. It's only a scratch. The "witness protection program" is fail-safe. The parties involved took good care of that. ;D She knows. But she's good at her job.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 18, 2010 22:32:19 GMT -5
The only explanation I can give (if we want to keep a PWR scenario) is that those were messages for someone that had to think that Paul was really dead. someone had to think that Paul was really dead. That would make quite a bit of sense, for the big picture. Yes, I see. And that "someone" might either be parties we do know of, or more likely, parties we know nothing about. That "party" may be the reason for Paul to have entered a sort of "witness protection program". If this is the case, then legally, and ethically, we have no legitimate grounds for finding out what happened. His safety, and maybe the safety of others, would, somewhat sadly for us, supersede any concerns we might have about the situation. But such a limitation would be completely understandable.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 18, 2010 2:03:16 GMT -5
OMG yes, very very extremely Bill-esque. One of the players in the cast, maybe? Who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 18, 2010 1:55:46 GMT -5
Wow! A very interesting footage! I' ve noticed there was a very "Paulie" character inside. Spencer Davis his name Why the name Spencer Davis? Spencer: one who dispenses... Sirname meaning butler or steward. Davis? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lesser_Key_of_SolomonThat indeed favors Paul a lot; maybe this is one of his "areas of service" while transitioning away from being a Beatle....... who knows...... interesting.....
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 18, 2010 0:57:28 GMT -5
This is one of the very films taken originally that survived the switch. We are seeing David Frost and the original Paul McCartney here; the film is old and in poor condition. Perhaps EMI or the lawyers saw fit to blur it even further but it does show how similar Paul and Bill are. Clearly this is James Paul the first guy: Anyway, the testimony is there that makes a strong case for Macca simply deciding to retire in 1966. The reports of the dissenters in Japan during the Budokan concert; the horrible events in the Philippines when they were leaving; the scary gunshot, or firecracker or whatever it was in Memphis; the whole rot about John's saying they were more popular with youth than Jesus; it all adds up. Paul wanted out, period. The others opted to stay and try but it was a difficult course. The bad events of 1966 were too much to go on performing; it was over. Recording was all they had left. I suspect McCartney continued to write but was most likely burnt out and left Bill to carry on in the main. Frankly, the whole Imelda Marcos BS would have been enough for me to roll up my stakes and move on.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 12, 2010 2:35:37 GMT -5
This profile is from the "Making Band on the Run" promo that iameye posted. Compared to this from 1976, I believe. Granted, the angle is slightly different, but those aren't the same noses. Hmmmmm. Well, I think it's all Sir Paul; strictly some kind of lighting and/or make-up issue, that's all.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 12, 2010 2:26:18 GMT -5
The problem with this line of thinking is that Tara Browne looked more like Lennon and Harrison than McCartney. www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8ljSfXyg-cSpencer Davis looks more like McCartney here than Browne does. Excellent find! What we are looking for isn't someone who looks like Paul McCartney (Keith Allison looks a lot like him, and maybe he stood in for Paul on occasion for photo ops or whatever). No, what we are looking for is someone who looks like Faul (with the potential to look like JPM). IMHO, Tara Browne doesn't look too dissimilar from Faul. We can see was tall and lanky. He has a little freckle or mole on his chin that I'm looking very carefully, to see if there's anything like it on a photo of Faul. Most males that age tend to fill out a little more as they get into their twenties (and beyond-- I wonder if I should put Doc on the spot here... ). Pics of Faul in 1967
www.art247.com/images/large/MIRRORPIX/WA/WA1703954.jpg
img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/JGD/MGB/JPSP3.jpg
I'm listening to his voice and Tara's sounds soft, low to mid-range. Faul sometimes will speak in that same tone, and sometime's it'll be higher in pitch (it may be as a result of trying to immitate a Scouse accent).
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC4lumYPQD8
www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/music/watch/e131373mjxfzjta
These are all very interesting examples. And yes, you can as I can commiserate about the weight issue as I am 53 years old and as big as all outdoors. I need yards and yards of material just to get started anymore. Oh, well... But keep up the good work!!
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 10, 2010 13:25:04 GMT -5
He's liquidating! Mull of Kintyre estate up for sale (UKPA) – 30 minutes ago A country estate made famous by Sir Paul McCartney's song Mull of Kintyre is up for sale at almost £3 million, it has been announced. The 7,360-acre Carskiey Estate forms the Mull of Kintyre, which Kintyre resident McCartney sang about with his band of the time Wings in the 1977 hit song. Now the estate, which includes the Edwardian Carskiey House and nine miles of coastline, has been put on the market by estate agents Strutt & Parker at offers over £2.95 million.The song probably earned McCartney more than the entire estate is worth today.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 9, 2010 2:25:34 GMT -5
Dammit I hate cameras anyway. Ever since I passed 40 years ols they've been nothing but trouble and lying SOBs. OK, they are honest, but I have to have something to criticize them for......
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 9, 2010 2:22:55 GMT -5
Alrighty then, what can one say? I would fly my overweight XXX down to Argentina and see the show if I could swing it, but alas, can't leave right now.
How can you argue with an ad like that one? Rock on, Sir Paul!
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Sept 23, 2010 21:00:48 GMT -5
So I'm fairly new to the revived PID movement (i.e. discovered some stuff last year, and just found this site a couple days ago), so bear with me if this has been covered before. If it has, I've searched the forums and been unable to come up with anything. Anyway, what I'm unsure of is: what songs are generally agreed that Paul wrote/appeared on? We know everything from With the Beatles to Revolver is JPM. But what about after? Some accounts suggest that John and Paul had a backlog of already recorded songs, which were touched up and put on the Sgt. Pepper/MMT albums. Others suggest that these songs were already recorded or pre-written, but were re-recorded with Faul. I've even seen it suggested that the reason for the Abbey Road medley was to "get out" the last remaining bits of material JPM had recorded, and that since none were completed songs, they had to put it in the context of a medley. So, what's the case? Which post-Revolver songs did the REAL Paul either sing/play on or write? This diagram may (or may not ) shed some light on your question. It's on the back of Ram, which was McCartney's second solo album. 01. Please Please Me 02. With The Beatles 03. A Hard Day's Night 04. Beatles For Sale 05. Help! 06. Rubber Soul 07. Revolver 08. Pepper 09. Magical Mystery Tour 10. White Album 11. Yellow Submarine 12. Abbey Road 13. Let It Be 14. McCartney 15. Ram Quite possibly true.
|
|