|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 12:10:58 GMT -5
Superman, even watched the Waterfalls vid and didn't see anything in it. I think people are right, you are making too much of this. Oh and the back of the Abbey Road albumn doesn't look like a manly leg to me. Who are these “people” whom you think are right anyway? And what did you think of my take on "When We Was Fab?" Whatever the case, don’t let it ever be said that I didn’t believe everyone was entitled to their opinions. But if the few examples I’ve pointed out are evidence that I’m "making too much of things", then let me REALLY take you down (ahem!)… I don’t believe the Beatles were just this loveable cadre of talented moptops who just happened to rise to the top through innovations and a few unconventional tactics within the music industry. I believe they were selected to be a part of a bigger picture that they themselves most-likely weren’t even aware of… in the beginning. They, and other rockers, were instructed to pursue a plan that would herald in a so-called “Harmonic Convergence,” which in turn would ultimately usher in an era global New Age unity and a one world religion. The CIA, The Tavistock Institute and the MK-Ultra mind-control program were (and most-likely still are) the brain-trusts of this gambit. They’re financed by the sickest of the sick – the uber-wealthy elite who view regular people as inhuman chattel to be manipulated, experimented upon… even executed if need be. In the 60’s, the first phase of the plan centered on the proliferation of mind expanding narcotics within the United States. These are drugs like LSD (and Beatles just sat there either completely silent or blatantly lying through their teeth about the meaning of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds). What we have today, in the form of a myriad of disguised and corrupted liberation movements (Women’s movements, gay movements and so on) can be traced back to a plan created by the elites to corrupt the youth through mind control, sex and drugs and, of course, media/music. By creating and exalting a so-called “counterculture”, a generation of Americans were left susceptible to mass manipulation. And the Beatles led the way. Hell, Rockers like Harrison would later say that they were disgusted by the sight of bunt-out hippies and aimless, brain-blasted kids … and yet take absolutely no responsibility in having guided many of their adoring sheep down these paths. A beatle (with an “a”) is a spike-like tool used to shatter stone. Jesus is often referred to as The Rock (sorry Dwayne). When a rock gets cracks in it, the beatle tool is wedged into one of the fissures and is struck with a hammer until the stone shatters. The Early successful rockers were symbolic of the cracks in the stone, but The Beatles were the tool that symbolically shattered the rock in the minds of those who had this goal in mind. I won’t get into things like Operation Mockingbird, artificially-gestated clones and the Satanism involved in all of this. I mean, .If you think the few examples I’ve showcased are evidence that I’m “making too much of things”, stuff like that will most-certainly leave you with the opinion that I’m a full-blown nut job. Again, I won’t devalue your opinion in any way. Let me start by saying I apologize if I left you with the impression that I think you're a full-blow nut job. It's been suggested that the Beatles were a creation of Tavistock and that I don't believe, that being said I do believe that Tavistock could have seen the huge potential to utilize them for their agenda because of their mass appeal. I do believe there are people with money and power that manipulate people in an effort to bring about what they want and could care less if it is for the betterment of mankind and see humanity as no better than cattle and care less about human collateral damage because to them the end justifies the means. Do I think Paul could have been offed because he wouldn't cooperate, sure. It's interesting that this guy could be a poster child for a NWO It's not inserting my videos again, here is the URL www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tks0bS4tXw
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 10:52:08 GMT -5
WOW, some of you sure know your business. Linus you made some very interesting observations about the piano. In his book "THE MACS MIKE McCartney's FAMILY ALBUMN" Copyright Peter Michael McCartney 1981, Paul's brother says (there are no pg.#'s in the book):
"Encouraged by father Joe, another of Dad's great loves was music, and after teaching himself chords on the second hand 'Nems' piano, given to the the Mac's during World War I, he formed the Masked Melody Makers (Mmm!)."
Father Joe would have been Paul's grandfather.
There was always a piano in their home and the book shows pics of Paul hammering away on a set of drums. So drums and piano wouldn't have been foreign to him.
Hope your still around to read this Linus.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 9:32:52 GMT -5
Superman, even watched the Waterfalls vid and didn't see anything in it. I think people are right, you are making too much of this. Oh and the back of the Abbey Road albumn doesn't look like a manly leg to me.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 9:20:33 GMT -5
Since he's still singing it I guess Desmond started singing with the band and became a female impersonator? Heard a story once that when they were in Germany some club they were playing in had strippers (could they have been female impersonators?). Anyway they found John back stage in one of their dressing rooms stark butt naked. I think the story eluded to that fact.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 9:11:13 GMT -5
It's hard to stand here representing the Beatles when this is all that's left.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 23:27:48 GMT -5
The Abbey Road comment was so stupid even my daughter who isn't into PID when I told McFartney's excuse said WHAT? ? As much music as they sang I wouldn't doubt that it could happen. But, I don't understand where you're going with the Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da thing. What are you getting at? Oh, it's not so much the song itself, but the idea that "Beatles" played around with sexuality as much as anything else. They don't tackle it full-on, but "play around" with it in songs, pictures, videos. I believe they [The Beatles] engaged in homosexual practices, dabbled with the transgenderism (is that a word?) at times as well. The back cover of Abbey Road has the woman in the blue dress who happens to create the shape of Paul's profile. The leg of the woman in the blue dress is quite manly as someone pointed out some years ago, and I know that this was done on purpose. Even after Beatlemania you see this. I mean, the "Paul" seen in the video "Waterfalls"... is that Faul or Faulette? I've already spoken on Harrison's "When We Was Fab".
Check out Linda McCartney in this vid. Hilarious. OK, watched the "When we was fab", don't see what you're talking about if it pertained to sexuality even read the lyrics. I surely believe John dabbled in homosexual pratices: Whether the rest did I think is pure speculation, just because they sang about those things I think was more about changing times and could have had more to do with shock effect than anything else. Remember Epstein was homosexual and they considered him the fifth Beatle and probably loved him and it was their way of opening peoples eyes to what they thought was, well, what it was. Kinda like it's real folks, deal with it. Don't forget Sweet Loretta Martin.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 20:25:49 GMT -5
THERE REALLY MAY NOT BE ANYTHING TO IT: When singing the vocals over the final verse, McCartney made a slip and said "Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face" (rather than Molly), and had Molly letting "the children lend a hand". Reportedly, this mistake was retained because the other Beatles liked it.[9] Harrison and Lennon yell "arm" and "leg" between the lines "… Desmond lets the children lend a hand" and "Molly stays at home …"[10] [9] Turner 2005, p. 154. [10] Lewisohn 1988, p. 141. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da I dunno. I am of the opinion that almost every crafty step these "Beatles" made were very carefully orchestrated. And they DO lie. From cranberry sauce to "Paul" going barefoot on an album cover because "It was a hot day". The Abbey Road comment was so stupid even my daughter who isn't into PID when I told McFartney's excuse said WHAT? ? As much music as they sang I wouldn't doubt that it could happen. But, I don't understand where you're going with the Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da thing. What are you getting at?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 16:37:07 GMT -5
Hey Valis
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 15:22:25 GMT -5
Hate to tell you this, but in this pic Paul's eyes don't look ......lighter brown....they look hazel. In his book "The True Story Of The Beatles" Billy Shepherd says on pg. 176, Paul's eyes are hazel. Hey just sayin guys.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 14:51:13 GMT -5
THERE REALLY MAY NOT BE ANYTHING TO IT: When singing the vocals over the final verse, McCartney made a slip and said "Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face" (rather than Molly), and had Molly letting "the children lend a hand". Reportedly, this mistake was retained because the other Beatles liked it.[9] Harrison and Lennon yell "arm" and "leg" between the lines "… Desmond lets the children lend a hand" and "Molly stays at home …"[10] [9] Turner 2005, p. 154. [10] Lewisohn 1988, p. 141. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 14:37:41 GMT -5
A case can be made we're dealing here with Bruce Jenner story. JPM was raised as a boy but thought he was a woman. He put on his female outfit for that event. To my eye JPM and 'Bill' here are one and the same person.
Listen carefully to the much-overlooked Beatles classic "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" (Especially the ending) OK, picked up on "Desmond stays at home and does...his....pretty face" and in the evening...she's...a singer with the band. So what yuh gettin at? Desmond is a transgender married to a straight woman?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 11:45:15 GMT -5
I put this here since she is linked to Paul.
David Thomas
12:01AM BST 19 Aug 2004
Jane Asher looks lovely and bakes gorgeous cakes. But why is she so sensitive about the image we have of her – and why is she drawn to playing women with something to hide, asks David Thomas
Then she says:
"Life is bloody dark and awful," says Asher, finally dropping the game-playing. "It doesn't mean I go round being permanently depressed. But I would if I really started to think about things. I don't think there's any meaning to anything. I have slightly more of an acceptance that you're hurtling towards the abyss [than I had before]. At least you won't know anything once you're in it."
I'm wondering, HTH did her father lay in the basement of their home for a WHOLE WEEK without someone finding him? You'd think two days at the most they would have searched the house top to bottom to see if they could find dear ole dad.
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/drama/3622480/The-darkness-behind-the-smile.html
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 11:39:47 GMT -5
This is an excellent vid!
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 22:19:07 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 22:19:07 GMT -5
My above post made no sense! If McFartney stole Manson's song, Paul wouldn't have been around when McFartney was.
It's getting late, I'm off to look at the back of my eyelids.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 22:06:43 GMT -5
It's hard to read what's written under the picture, it says:
Purser Ed Bauer raffles off wash cloth used by Ringo Star on London-New York flight. Neighborhood kids crowd Ed's back yard in Union, New Jersey to draw lots for the wash cloth and other Beatle souvenirs.
August 30, 1965 Attachments:
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 21:36:15 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 21:36:15 GMT -5
Yeah, read that a while back. Then found this on Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_Campbell
This is obviously him, so I guess he is living under his own name as of today. I remember reading somewhere that the group Marmalade sang the song Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da before the Beatles ever released it. There could be some connection. He is very talented and could have done studio work for them after Paul was no longer with them or even before. Also read that Charles Manson composed Helter Skelter and McFartney coped it from him. That's something to think about, could the Manson family have abducted Paul on their last American tour in retaliation from swiping Manson's song? Wonder if the farm McFartney lived on in Scotland was Junior Campbell's since he is from Scotland.
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 21:20:54 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 21:20:54 GMT -5
That is really cool thanks. maybe I'll ask them to give some help with PID. Hmmmm, wonder if here is any information on 462.65. ok ok that was a lttle silly
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 19:14:59 GMT -5
I tried to register yesterday and still havn't gottin an e-mail confirming my acceptance. They were getting rid of posts by people that hadn't been there in certain amount of time (can't remember how long now).
|
|
|
EARS
Apr 16, 2016 16:09:18 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 16:09:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 13:44:26 GMT -5
You're a Troll. Edit: was gonna try and be more understanding of what you had mentioned; drawing a blank ::sadface:: EDIT EDIT: and I would try to salvage a question, but I've been here long enough to know how these responses usually Go. What do you mean "troll"? ALL of this stuff I learned on Proboards forums like TKIN, "Doppelganger and Identity Research Society", Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him! Look at those sites and you will see there is tons of information backing up everything I say! And? What makes TKIN or Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him some how the world authority on the subject?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 13:11:20 GMT -5
"Michael Jackson was whacked in 1985 cause.....he knew too much....and was replaced by some white guy." Isn't that just as compelling as GM being killed ten years ago? After all, Jackson was, at the very least, white when he died. Message board rumors are really easy to start...and really hard to unwind....even the really dumb ones**. **any "theory" found at TKIN Absolutely!, seems all someone has to do is say it or write a book and people take that shit for the gospel.
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 11:41:47 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 11:41:47 GMT -5
GOOD LORD ALL MIGHTY! A USED ONE IS NOW GOING FOR $462.65!!!!!!!!!
THERE ARE 3 CUSTOMER REVIEWS SO SOMEONE WAS DENSE ENOUGH TO BUY IT!
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 11:33:10 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 11:33:10 GMT -5
Thanks for the reply, but, what about the $444.44? Those puppies will collect dust before I pay that much for a CD. It would be interesting to know if anyone bought one.
|
|
|
$444.44
Apr 16, 2016 10:29:25 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 16, 2016 10:29:25 GMT -5
Started looking for the albumn "Second Time Around" by Junior Campbell. I went to Amazon and they didn't have any but they did have a CD for $444.44! I did get the albumn on Ebay for $20. but it's not a first pressing.
I found the price of the CD to be very odd. I'm not into numerology but thought five '4's might have some sort of significance.
Does anyone have any thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 15, 2016 8:58:49 GMT -5
It's a shame some of the pictures you guys are talking about are missing. Why?
|
|