|
Post by chica on Apr 14, 2016 14:30:46 GMT -5
There are many "Paul is Dead" Websites that talk about all this stuff! "Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him", TKIN, etc. Alice Cooper was probably replaced too! Anyone interested should read the stuff written by Dave McGowan and the fact that almost ALL rock stars lived in Laurel Canyon (including Keith Moon)! Great stuff! www.amazon.ca/Weird-Scenes-Inside-Canyon-Laurel/dp/1909394122 My next read is the Laurel Canyon book. I'm waiting for "Here, There and Everywhere. My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles" by Geoff Emerick. I have read "The True Story Of The Beatles" by Billy Shepherd.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 14, 2016 11:29:21 GMT -5
Yes ALL the Beatles were replaced and many people around the Beatles were replaced or died under mysterious circumstances! Jane Asher (Paul's girlfriend) was replaced and her father died under mysterious circumstances! Mal Evens (road manager) died under strange circumstances just before he was going to publish a biography. On the night he died Keith Moon was at a movie opening with Faul McFake. George Martin was replaced. Two members of "Badfinger" (a band on the Apple label) committed suicide. All sorts of strange thing happen with the Beatles and really ALL rock and roll! And prey tell where do you get your information? I do agree that Jane Asher's fathers death was odd. I've read he was in the basement for 2wks or 3days?, but yet one would wonder why the family didn't check the basement to see if dear old dad was there. Do agree Mal Evan's death was odd given the biography coming up missing. Keith Moon was an alcoholic so the connection to him and Fartney isn't to surprising since many of the people in the music industry are photographed with each other from time to time. Hell Keith was even photographed with Alice Cooper. Uh, notice the drink in his hand??
This is probably a lot closer to the truth.
www.feelnumb.com/2009/10/13/keith-moon-of-the-who-died-here/
The '60's' played hell on the Rock and Roll world, nothing too surprising given the amount of drugs and drink that were involved.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 12:34:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 12:32:32 GMT -5
1988...At about 1:06 Ringo says there used to be 4 and motions around the stage and says what's on stage is all that's left. At about 2:23 George says he and Ringo are representing the Beatles but on stage is all that's left, then at about 2:28 George says we all lovED John and we lovED Paul. If Sir Faul is really Paul, why didn't George say we love Paul instead of lovED. Big difference guys. rockhall.com/inductees/the-beatles/video/2440/
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 12:31:46 GMT -5
1988...At about 1:06 Ringo says there used to be 4 and motions around the stage and says what's on stage is all that's left. At about 2:23 George says he and Ringo are representing the Beatles but on stage is all that's left, then at about 2:28 George says we all lovED John and we lovED Paul. If Sir Faul is really Paul, why didn't George say we love Paul instead of lovED. Big difference guys. rockhall.com/inductees/the-beatles/video/2440/
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 12:28:51 GMT -5
1988...At about 1:06 Ringo says there used to be 4 and motions around the stage and says what's on stage is all that's left. At about 2:23 George says he and Ringo are representing the Beatles but on stage is all that's left, then at about 2:28 George says we all lovED John and we lovED Paul. If Sir Faul is really Paul, why didn't George say we love Paul instead of lovED. Big difference guys. rockhall.com/inductees/the-beatles/video/2440/rockhall.com/inductees/the-beatles/video/2440/
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 12:10:38 GMT -5
FURTHERMORE DIS-INFORMATION AGENTS ARE USUALLY PIDERS, SO WHY WOULD THEY PUT OUT SOMETHING THT WOULD SEEM TO SHOW THAT PAUL IS ALIVE AND SIR FAUL IS A LIAR AND A FRAUD?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 11:31:24 GMT -5
Can anyone see the difference between the two pictures? The parting on the left is now parting on the right. WHAT IS THIS? KIDDING ABOUT HAVING A FAKE EYE?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 11:29:10 GMT -5
Meaning it isn't Paul. Since PID was resurrected on the internet in 2002, many agents have been sent to cause confusion, tell half truths, and deceive in general. They have DELIBERATELY picked someone who could potentially be seen as Paul to move into his old house. It isn't Paul, he was probably paid money to do this, as was Colin Unwin, who one might suspect was really John Lennon. Neither are the original Beatles but that is the point, to add chaos into the mix, to make you think they might still be alive. All four Beatles were MURDERED; none of them are with us, let's make no mistake about this. However, they would often use doubles for various reasons. Paul & Brian stayed in Los Angeles after their last American tour, perhaps to look for a cure to Paul's illness. They are the ones who got lost in LA. A double was used upon their official return to Britain, it is a Paul double coming down the plane steps and also a double at the Melody Maker awards. Paul was ill from being poisoned a couple of years before and so a double had become a semi-regular practice and they had more than one. When the Melody Maker awards were on (September 13th), they just assumed Paul & Brian had been delayed and would be back soon; they were already two days dead but the rest didn't know this as the bodies weren't discovered until several days later. While the double used in aforementioned gig looks a lot like Paul, that didn't mean the guy could sing. They had a handful of potential candidates and it was a few months before they settled on Billy. In the meantime they tried with Denny Laine (suddenly quitting The Moody Blues in October 1966) who both sings and is seen in both Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields videos, but the surgery wouldn't work on him. This is why those two songs were removed from Sgt. Pepper, as the clues to Paul's replacement would be inconsistent after they settled on Billy. Soon after Paul died, so did Ringo (who was poisoned at the same time around August 1964), who to this day is being impersonated by TWO people, one an actor, the other Tara Browne, who death was faked. ROFL. TALK ABOUT DIS-INFORMATION. lOT OF CONJECTURE BUT NO PROOF. ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE THAT THINKS ALL THE BEATLES ARE DEAD AND THEIR FAMILY MEMEBERS HAVE ALL BEEN REPLACED TOO?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 11:10:49 GMT -5
WHY DID MIA FARROW GO TO INDIA?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 11:02:52 GMT -5
I HAVE TO ASK 'WHEN WAS THIS BOOK WRITTEN' AND 'WHO ARE THE PEOPLE THAT WERE INTERVIEWED'? INFORMATION IS AS ONLY AS GOOD AS IT'S SOURCE.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 13, 2016 9:51:35 GMT -5
hello, i just joined...i started reading the paul is dead books a few mo. ago, culminating in the billy shears book, the big one, wow. i hope someone can answer me this: i have seen the same evidence, over and over, online, in books, in videos. i just saw for the first time, not having been an avid PM fan since the beatles broke up, the cover of driving rain... WHO IS THAT???
it looks like william shepherd before his first plastic surgery conversion to become PM...
any comment? please! i hope so!
and i have seen the beatles clues over and over and over ad nauseum...
has anyone made a point of looking over all the solo mccartney stuff?
there's one cd where the title is a reference to two of him!!! twins or something.
anyway, nice to join.
but seriously...WHO IS THAT ON THE COVER OF DRIVING RAIN?
another clue from Faul i would imagine...what he looked like before any surgery?
thanks,
laura
Hello laura, I'm new here too and . You need to be careful with the books you read from what I understand. How can people that didn't even know the Beatles or interview them directly know the truth. I read The Memoirs of Billy Shears and I think its a piece of crap! There is a whole series of the Billy Shears books and someone is making bookoos of money from it. I don't see how you come to the conclusion that the person on the albumn cover is William Shepherd before his first surgery to become Paul, the thing is so blurry and how do you even know who WS is or what he looks like if he really exists. You're assuming too much. I'm afraid like someone said we may never know who replaced Paul. The only concrete evidence that the guy that is calling himself Paul McCartney today is not Paul is from the work of Francesco Gavazzeni and Gabriella Carlesi. They were true to using pre '66' photos of Paul and comparing them to Faul (todays McCartney). Good Luck in your investigation.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 11, 2016 16:58:29 GMT -5
The moped accident is an interesting subject. Paul said he and Tara Browne were on their way to Paul's cousins house. Paul says the moon was out and he was looking at it not paying attention to his driving, but I read the moon wasn't out on the night he claims. I don't know how it can be done, but it is possible to go back in history and check things such as weather and what not and it is claimed by checking the date Paul claims it can be determined that the moon wasn't out that night. Maybe he was speaking in code and he was actually saying that Tara had his pants down and his ass up. Well, according to this:
www.beatlesbible.com/1965/12/26/paul-mccartney-moped-accident-liverpool/
Tara was behind Paul:
"We were riding along on the mopeds. I was showing Tara the scenery. He was behind me, and it was an incredible full moon"
And I ask, HTH can anyone see scenery when it's dark and the moons out? HUH?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 11, 2016 15:40:13 GMT -5
Maybe he was speaking in code and he was actually saying that Tara had his pants down and his ass up. ROFL, good one. Hmmm, Paul supposedly said it was bright and beautiful. I tell you, these people spoke in code probably more than any group of people on the face of the earth if that's true.After looking at this picture again I can see the asemmetrical eye on the right. That's why whoever this is won't look directly at the camera. You see pictures of Paul? with a scare on his lip but from the looks of this picture he should have had a scar on the eyebrow too. It wouldn't have been anything for a plastic surgeon to make it look like Paul? had a scared lip and for a dentist to make it look like he chipped his tooth. There never was a moped accident it was all staged to use for future evidence and make us think that Faul was Paul.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 11, 2016 15:23:29 GMT -5
The moped accident is an interesting subject. Paul said he and Tara Browne were on their way to Paul's cousins house. Paul says the moon was out and he was looking at it not paying attention to his driving, but I read the moon wasn't out on the night he claims. I don't know how it can be done, but it is possible to go back in history and check things such as weather and what not and it is claimed by checking the date Paul claims it can be determined that the moon wasn't out that night. Maybe he was speaking in code and he was actually saying that Tara had his pants down and his ass up. ROFL, good one. Hmmm, Paul supposedly said it was bright and beautiful. I tell you, these people spoke in code probably more than any group of people on the face of the earth if that's true.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 11, 2016 11:18:40 GMT -5
The moped accident is an interesting subject. Paul said he and Tara Browne were on their way to Paul's cousins house. Paul says the moon was out and he was looking at it not paying attention to his driving, but I read the moon wasn't out on the night he claims. I don't know how it can be done, but it is possible to go back in history and check things such as weather and what not and it is claimed by checking the date Paul claims it can be determined that the moon wasn't out that night.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 9, 2016 15:33:05 GMT -5
Can anyone see the difference between the two pictures? The parting on the left is now parting on the right. It is the eyes I'm interested in. Here is Sir Faul yucking it up with David Bowie. The same asemmetrical eye:
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 9, 2016 8:36:51 GMT -5
In Ramone's picture it looks like one eye socket is lower than the other also. So they made a Faul mask with one eye socket lower than the other? Look at these, I can't believe that no one has noticed this before.
And this.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 9, 2016 8:32:48 GMT -5
In Ramone's picture it looks like one eye socket is lower than the other also. So they made a Faul mask with one eye socket lower than the other? Look at these, I can't believe that no one has noticed this before.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 8, 2016 16:16:57 GMT -5
In Ramone's picture it looks like one eye socket is lower than the other also. So they made a Faul mask with one eye socket lower than the other?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 7, 2016 22:10:29 GMT -5
It's getting late, tomorrow? Nitey nite.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 7, 2016 22:08:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 7, 2016 22:08:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 7, 2016 21:12:59 GMT -5
Where'd you get the pics? Lurking around on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 7, 2016 21:11:53 GMT -5
I don't think they're from the same year imo. Interview (John's comment) The thing is about your picture is it's not a straight on picture. As of 1964 this is what Paul looked like This book was published in 1964. The author is Billy Shepherd. The only other person I've seen that has that kind of an eye is William 'Junior' Campbell
|
|