|
Post by thisone on Aug 13, 2009 19:04:57 GMT -5
Are you familiar with the story at TKIN that Paul may have had an affair, or even a love child, with Sylvie Vartan, and all of that? If not, it may be worth aquainting yourself with it. It may have had something to do with his being there. Or not. Do you want to be an angel, Do you want to be a star, Do you want to play some magic on my guitar? Do you want to be a poet, Do you want to be my string? You could be anything. Do you want to be the lover of another Undercover? You could even be the man on the moon. Or he may have been "stoking the star making machinery behind the popular song" there. I was a free man in Paris I felt unfettered and alive There was nobody calling me up for favors And no ones future to decide You know Id go back there tomorrow But for the work Ive taken on Stoking the star maker machinery Behind the popular songTwo possibilities. Sylvie and Johnny's son. David Halliday aka David Michael Benjamin Smet "On 12 April 1965 they were married in Loconville.[2] They had a son David Michael Benjamin, known as David Hallyday" "David Hallyday (born David Michael Benjamin Smet on 14 August 1966)"
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Aug 13, 2009 18:44:02 GMT -5
Wondered if this would be in yet! As always...
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Aug 12, 2009 18:51:20 GMT -5
All the time. F5.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Aug 8, 2009 15:51:39 GMT -5
Ok, no answers! Then which one is "Billy"?
Why will people not deal with this, I don't know!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Aug 8, 2009 10:38:42 GMT -5
From the phoney vid! Aren't you guys at all bothered by the pre-66 Pauls? Which "Paul" was replaced? Which Paul is PID? A question!! Which one of these guys is Paul Mc Cartney?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Aug 7, 2009 19:40:56 GMT -5
From the phoney vid! Aren't you guys at all bothered by the pre-66 Pauls? Which "Paul" was replaced? Which Paul is PID?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 31, 2009 19:09:59 GMT -5
This is the Roadmap for Peace that's been proposed! Bush is running Fox these days, isn't he?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 30, 2009 19:56:02 GMT -5
Go Jarv!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 22, 2009 12:25:54 GMT -5
JoJo, can you make this thread sticky or something? It's importance is being diminished (in the 100 latest at least) by tactical postings in less important threads - such as, "the song assocaition game".
Isn't identity theft a crime?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 18, 2009 6:02:59 GMT -5
what's up with Bruce Willis getting flowers? To save on bandwidth, I cut out the usual Letterman first half filler, but it was just about a reward for reading the top ten list. However, it did remind me of the scene in Yellow Sub, and also many an occasion where Sir Paul gets a bouquet thrown at him.. Now, if I were to pretend that he reads this forum, (indulge me) I would say he put on a pink shirt as a way of almost daring Mommybird to say he looked uh.. "feminine". Also that bit about that "he's a boy", and "likes girls". (maybe he read the thread about the English spy woman) Cmon now, shouldn't blame the DJ's and Abbey Road for the PID rumors.. According to Bill Harry's Paul McCartney encyclopedia, the rumors started in England in late 1966.. I wonder why? I think it would have been a more fair statement to say the time around Abbey Road was when people noticed something, and didn't just focus on AR.. The focus went back to Pepper as we know, and then overshot the mark a bit, well.. perhaps more than a bit. Personally, I think the game was well afoot before 1966. These are from 63/64.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 11, 2009 13:38:20 GMT -5
B, I dont mean to be "contradictatorial" but my impression was - that it was a Butlin's or Pontin's holiday camp. They were very busy cheap working class holidays in the UK during the 60's - no offence to cheap working class peeps - like myself! A few British "artistes" cut their teeth there and moved into TV and the like. Pantomimes for the kids during the day and pantomimes plus alcohol for the adults at night. Crazy Golf and Barney all rolled into one!! They had quite a reputation for eh......sexual goings on among the residents.
They've now largely gone out of fashion due to budget airlines. The sex is better abroad. I've heard that one or two have been turned into camps for fugees.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 10, 2009 10:46:20 GMT -5
This is quite revealing and emotion is raw. Fascinating - to quote a well known Vulcan! Great sound, great recording. Saw them in 1980 in London Wembley, Mooner was gone alas. All lasers and flag waving. Not my cup of rosie lee.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 6, 2009 2:13:09 GMT -5
Knife in right hand, fork in left. My brother's a lefty, he does it the other way!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 4, 2009 18:27:00 GMT -5
I have to say, I was a bit suspicious about the passages from the book - they seemed somewhat contrived... playing to the gallery regarding Paul and the areas in question. The bike accident. His poor litlle baby-face. "Oh that's why he looks different in every photo" - you can all go back to sleep now, sort of thing. Why would he and Tara be friends? Paris, Gay. Tara's "accident" etc.
And now having seen the cover of the book, I'm convinced it's a con. Why would he be posing with Faul?
Money? Was he part of the whole charade from the beginning? I'm now even less inclined to believe that there was anybody named Paul Mc Cartney at all. Just a fictitious changeable character created for the purpose of the Beatles.
Name changes? Why? Who was the chap who sang and played at the Royal Albert Hall? It was not that eyebrowed freak on the cover of the book! What about the films? who was that? Bears no resemblance whatsoever.
Mystified! My best guess is that the whole saga of the Beatles is an Establisment "conspiracy" for want of a better word!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 4, 2009 11:51:45 GMT -5
I'm sure she meant Jimi. They would have had to rename Nixon, Trippy Dicky, had her plan succeded. Come to think of it, the earth might be a smouldering dead planet too. Imagine Nixon with 600mu of Californian Sunshine!! Toast. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xuad6LmS8wAuniversoulightforms.com/Always wanted that shit!! ;D I just missed the hippy era. You must be this tall to ride!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 1, 2009 18:37:00 GMT -5
Giant Coke bottles (Not a reference to Buddy's glasses) ah, those were the days! And yes I see what you mean!!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 1, 2009 18:30:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 1, 2009 11:39:58 GMT -5
Welcome Jim. Follow the yellow brick road. See Rosemary's Baby and Laurel Canyon threads. Your eyes will indeed be opened to the nature of things on a grander scale. You may find yourself going places you hadn't thought existed.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jul 1, 2009 6:57:44 GMT -5
Can anyone make out what's on the menu?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 28, 2009 21:21:20 GMT -5
Got this is the post yesterday! The Dr Emmanuel, is brother of Rahm Emmanuel, zionist warlord of the Obama adminstration.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 22, 2009 22:16:47 GMT -5
Exact same hair - in fact. I get a distinct Stallone vibe from those photos. I'm not trying to mislead, just an observation.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 19, 2009 19:07:50 GMT -5
That UK Mirror rag, link has been reporting an error for a couple of hours now and there's not a lot of the internets about it! I suppose all those trillion dollar Moon Shots never thought of looking for water! And NASA have the Moon mapped already. This is Blackjack weekend!! David Bowie Fall (maybe that's Faul) Dog Bombs the Moon www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-zRr3oJGr8Assholes, it's not their fucking moon - there again, neither is Iraq or Afghanistan. I wonder if there are muslim villages of women and children up there!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 8, 2009 16:45:27 GMT -5
Thanks for keeping us updated on this P(Denny)! Looking forward to the read!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 8, 2009 9:44:19 GMT -5
Yes, that's a blogger server policy! They don't like hot-links.
Right click image in question, save to desktop and re-upload using the board function!
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 7, 2009 17:01:40 GMT -5
Aye true! But the ' would be after the s and not before it. You will, no doubt know the correct syntactical terminology. Maybe it was dropped because it's visually awkward or un-appealing.
|
|