|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 9, 2007 23:18:47 GMT -5
it does look like a distorted... more stretched than anything else... version of IAAP's pineal gland from the 'O' in the CODE/LOVE
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 9, 2007 22:19:42 GMT -5
ahh-so! but where is this picture from?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 9, 2007 21:50:53 GMT -5
THATs mengele? as in the Brazil boys, and that Arizona woman that Icke interviewed?
A-ha!
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 9, 2007 20:29:49 GMT -5
N.B. Click on the images to get a (slightly) larger version 'Treasury'. Reciept for the Greek island? Did I see this on here the other day? The McCartney Years, upside down Masonic ... I don't know what you'd call it... Seal?? Looks sort of like a sporran lol.. hm, maybe the official mason's toolbag, complete with eye and set square and compass and the 'G' (does that stand for Gnosticism?) Janus, the two-faced Roman god of new year (?) ... looking ahead - looking behind... where's that from?? A ram's skull Anubis Bloke (I have no idea) The eye of Horus in the hands of another god .. ? Again, no idea A mummy The Sphinx at Giza Dilating (semi-bionic?) pupil - looks like its from a movie Picture illustrating the all-seeing eye in action The Ankh - Egyptian symbol of life (?) Federal Reserve Seal - Welcome the Coming of the New Secular Order (?) 'The Fireman blows his Mind' with Dr. Who's tardis over Google earth travelling from Reykjavik to London. Collection of Beatles Oldies and a worm-hole Apple logo with EMC, ECM, CME, MEC, MCE?? I've seen it before - no idea what it is though - ecce cor meum? Its his crest isn' tit? (see what I did there? ) RAM and the London Eye That time travel theme again? Looks like Big Ben and the HoP London Eye with (what looks like) Horus' eye and text More eyes...? ...and more eyes... ...cant get enough of the eyes this week... There's a very faint ram's skull behind the eye here Hieroglyphs and the eye Ram's head and the eye real shocker right here!! (Ram's?) Horns and the eye Don't know.. looks like a dagger, with (presumably) Mr P on Abbey Road Hieroglyphic looking things, with what looks like a guitar and a collection of 666 spirals, n's (or u's) and III's I'm sure you guys will have a lot to talk about in the morning ;D
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 9, 2007 19:39:23 GMT -5
A new one! Rotten Apple 56 o Another good one. Dennis Kucinich is freaky there. John chuckling that Paul is alive and in London... Jude, nice job on yours, too. I never saw that 'I'm thirty' before. ...working on the post-hypnotic stills as we speak... christ, there's a whole bunch of them in this one!!
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 4, 2007 10:23:32 GMT -5
Like Donovan, you just blew my mind... again!! For whatever reason, the real devise - which was, oddly enough, something like the "egg" that the aliens alledgedly gave John Lennon - was removed, and a replica, which didn't work, was put in its place. I suspect that this was actually done by extra-terrestrials, who knew what would inevitably happen: someone would try to steal the devise. I am surmising that this is what happened, and the original face damaged in the process. In order that the Sphynx have a face undamaged, the current one was put in place, I suspect. Wouldn't it be something if the "egg" given John Lennon was the actual devise? If that made him "the egg man", it would certainly have been an honor (that they entrusted himwith the egg. The incident took place long after "I am the Walrus" had come out, but perhaps the aliens had heard the song, and decided he ought to be the "egg man". ) What what whaat?? I've not heard this 'egg' story before.. is there a thread here already that describes this in more detail?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 3, 2007 19:49:12 GMT -5
"caught the bug" is what I was worried about. *sends the playboy bunnies round to the LB Estate with lots of hugs* From Me To You lol
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 3, 2007 19:33:21 GMT -5
Hugs Ughs! Not from those mugs! Tryin' to start a "Love-In", Mr. DE ? That's so passe! But in fact, "Everybody Get Together" is a favorite of mine, and I think the Youngbloods may have been on the Beatle "love" bandwagon. Next to 'All You Need Is Love' thats my favourite 'Love' song of all time. I prefer Jefferson Airplane's rendition of it, but yeah - 'Love-in' all the way; I noticed that loads of people on my myspace friends list were moaning about being down [autumn blues I guess] - so I felt the need to remind them that they're all unconditionally Loved.. and then I spread my insidious Loving to here as well - just in case any of you have caught the bug. If you don't want free hugs from them then I can send you all a free e-hug from my own personal stash <-- Freakin' nut-job ;D
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 3, 2007 15:06:22 GMT -5
I think it's Victor Spinitti and an interviewer...... arr! you beat me to it lol
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 3, 2007 15:03:13 GMT -5
Is it IAAP interviewing Victor Spinetti? ...do I get a cookie? P.S. this next bit is a little off-topic, but I'm in the mood... and I Love you all, so pass on this message of Love, give out some free hugs and enjoy whats left of your day <3
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 3, 2007 11:59:53 GMT -5
Also; anyone who has been contacting iama; please speak up... I did send him a message following the 'EMI stairs' debate; although he didn't really address everything I mentioned, he did reply. The bits in green are mine, and the red is his words: Hello Mr D
I realise we haven't spoken directly before and I also realise that it may appear that I am trying to debunk your work and turn people off from your cause. I just wanted to send you this message to say: 'au contraire' - I respect what you have been doing and I have enjoyed the RA series very much.
I do respect you too, but there IS something in that picture,
same building different level
theres the obvious LEVEL level and then there is the other......
However, I do have a few issues with what I can only describe as 'deliberately misleading' videos [you know the ones I mean]. In the words of John Lennon 'Just gimme some truth!' - I don't know if you are just running low on material waiting for your end-date to come or if this whole thing is just an exercise in mass public misdirection/hysteria/stupidity. I guess what I'm really trying to say is 'what are you playing at?'
I am out there making the movie, talking to the right people getting the story right, and , man, this is mindblowing I promise you The Rotten Apple Serie is only a thin slice of the story..
Undoubtedly I will receive some enigmatic Publius-esque reply telling me to wait until 12/11 for the Magickian to reveal himself, or something to that effect - but I just wanted to make a request, from one truth-seeker to another:
LOL now thats fun really!
The sheeple who unavoidably end up watching this on the tube are easily lead and will believe anything you say [you and I both know that they ARE that stupid - RA55 and its comments are proof enough of that], my only request is that you perhaps include the byline 'QUESTION EVERYTHING' or more appropriately 'THINK FOR YOURSELF' from time to time to keep them in check.
Thats what we are doing, isnt it? if they don´t see, they won`t understand, what they are about to discover.
It's one thing to hunt for clues, verify them and let the jaw drop; it's quite another to make an assertion, use some clever editing and never draw the conclusion - allowing the audience to make the answer themselves - which, as I'm sure you're aware, makes for some bizarre and ridiculous theories that you may never have even intended in the first place - but perhaps that is what your game is? I don't know.
Well, thats it - thats all I had to say; keep up the good work and good luck to you in all you do, Mr Phoney.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Lots of respect to you, man let me hear from you again.
Peace to you and yours,
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 2, 2007 14:00:36 GMT -5
If he is it would be an extremely advance viewing, as it doesn't open to the public until 15/11. And as the photograph of Anubis was taken on 1/10 [before the exhibit reached the O2 bubble, or whatever they're calling it now] he would have had to have viewed it in-transit... is there any way of knowing where the exhibition was two days prior to the Thames voyage?
According to PaulMcCartney.com he appeared on T4 (british daytime pop-culture programming) on the 30th
From the Paul McCartney message board
So whatever he did, it was between promoting Liverpool, European city of Culture; being interviewed by a recovering smack-head and teaching Alex Zane to play Ever Present Past.. and it somehow relates to Anubis. Hmmmm
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 2, 2007 13:36:00 GMT -5
I couldn't find any info on where he was or what he was doing after 27/09 .. So whatever it is, it slots right between being interviewed by Pete Doherty and Traveling to Iceland.. assuming the press are correct in stating that his arrival will be on the 5th. So can we also assume that whatever he's doing - or was doing on the 29th - was connected to Anubis? Looks like Paul was a busy busy bee on the 27th: is he wearing a wig?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 2, 2007 12:54:57 GMT -5
I've got a Feeling... mit Komm Gib Mir Deine Hand/I Want To Hold Your Hand..? I am beyond confused right now lol. Have you been drinking the funky kool-aid from the big vat, Mike? Does this relate to this thread at all? [hmm.. I need a squinting emoticon really] Okay, so - what have we got? - Paul McCartney's gone somewhere - where? He only has three days 'til he's due in Iceland...
- There is a connection to Anubis - are we talking like a literal connection to the traveling Anubis statue? Or a looser metaphorical connection..?
- Multi-lingual Beatles performing from the roof of Apple Studios
Does this relate to the eye? Anubis at the eye? While Paul gives a surprise [but intricately planned] performance from a pod? Doing multi-lingual numbers..? An international McCartney performance during the Anubis statue's stay at the eye? Now I'm even more confused than I was before...
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 2, 2007 5:18:57 GMT -5
do you guys know where mccartney went on september 29? www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1501119/story.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10467042 Pete Doherty has 'heart to heart' with Paul McCartney
Pete Doherty and Sir Paul McCartney got on "like father and son" when they met for a heart to heart.
The troubled Babyshambles singer - who has spent the last month fighting his drug addiction at Wiltshire's Clouds rehab centre - promised the Beatles legend he is serious about cleaning up his act.
A friend of Pete's told Britain's Daily Mirror newspaper: "He was overwhelmed by meeting Paul. They had a real heart to heart - at times it was like a father talking to his son. Pete promised Paul he was serious about getting clean, was through with the drugs, and said he never wanted to fall back into his dark days again."
Pete, who was allowed to leave rehab to interview Paul for the Observer Music Monthly magazine received some much needed advice from the musician.
The source added: "They spoke about everything from music, other singers and even touched on the subject of women - but that was strictly between the two of them.
"Pete didn't sleep the night before just thinking about what he would say to the legend when they actually came face to face. But they got on really well, and Pete found Paul very supportive."It doesn't give a date for their meeting here, but in another article... fametastic.co.uk/archive/20070928/7842/pete-doherty-tells-paul-mccartney-im-keen-to-get-clean/...it reports that it took place on Thursday 27/09. Since then there has been no current news on Paul anywhere
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 1, 2007 21:05:32 GMT -5
Is that the guy who came up with Tiamat? Its unbelievable what lengths they'll go to to keep a man down I have half a mind to write a song for Mr. Icke and divert all the proceeds to his legal fund - not that there would be much 'proceeds' - but every little helps, as Tescos say
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 1, 2007 20:28:22 GMT -5
ah, dont worry - I found it. Man, thats screwed up. How the hell can something like that happen in this day and age!? Copyright law is all fucked up (c) = My Arch-Nemesis. Down with copyright law in its current form - BOO!! And down with Royal Adams - what a w**ker!
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Oct 1, 2007 20:24:38 GMT -5
!?!?!?!? WTF! What are they prosecuting him for?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 29, 2007 21:59:07 GMT -5
I'm thoroughly satisfied that when IAAP says different levels he is certainly not talking about how many floors there were at EMI. Took me a while to work out why he didn't mean it though lol
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 26, 2007 7:48:19 GMT -5
oh, and here's a reversal of today's EMI stairwell paradigm Don't you mean THIS is a reversal? [pic] Thanks for the link, by the way! I never thought I'd see such hi-res Beatles photos! lol yes, sorry - it was a long day yesterday. its a bit easier to see the 5 floors with these pictures, too
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 19:02:14 GMT -5
www.beatlefans.com/film/Beatles%20Get%20back%20Photo%20Session%20Page.htma fella [it might not have been a fella] from the BZ forum also directed me to this link which shows John and George in different suits. Apparently EMI had built a porch where the original photographer had stood, so they couldn't replicate the picture exactly. So they took some pictures from a different angle and then EMI had the porch taken down so they could re-shoot on a different day, from the correct angle - although they were still out slightly in the final prints. Notice Paul's chin is covered in EVERY photo taken on both days. oh, and here's a reversal of today's EMI stairwell paradigm
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 16:00:09 GMT -5
Wow, this is getting complicated. Where did the Michael Jackson/Beatles picture originate, then? As you pointed out, the stairwells line up differently than in the bootleg cover. So the question is, did iamaphoney make this version of the image himself? Probably not, but why would someone make their own version of the stairwell image rather than use the pre-existing one from the bootleg? I'm confused... Whatever the source of the Michael Jackson edit, the actual bootleg cover is such an amazing work of Photoshoppery that I am beginning to wonder if it's photoshopped at all! To me, it doesn't look like they were "pasted" in there. Ok.. to me it seems an obvious parody to come up with. Some clever soul, most likely a Beatle fan, made the link between having not only both eras of the Beatles looking down at the viewer but Jacko and his kid, too. So its possible that this could even be a couple of years old. With regards to why they didn't just use the original... I don't know - maybe they got a bit more satisfaction knowing they did all the work themselves. As far as photoshop trickery goes, this isn't too difficult a feat to achieve. Simply lasso the '63 bodies from the original, resize accordingly, perhaps alter the levels, contrast etc and then just paste over the '69 version. However, the way the Jacko one works is that they lassoed the bodies of the '63 pic upwards, not including the bannister they're leaning on, and again just pasted it onto the '69 shot. Unfortunately, the resolution this picture is in makes it hard to tell how many floors are above them - take a blurry image and shrink it and you're left with: an ambiguous picture - but I am quite satisfied, in my mind at least, that in both instances they were standing on the same floor. Close, IAAP - but no cigar The actual bootleg cover may be old enough for it to have been done by hand - in which case you pretty much just do the same thing, only with a craft knife or pair of scissors and a colour copier. P.S. I just watched that Star Wars special. I haven't laughed out loud at a cartoon like that in ages lol. Such a precise and perfect parody. Only now I'm looking for the Robot Chicken one, too hehe.
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 14:21:10 GMT -5
ok... it appears the elusive figure on the left IS Michael Jackson, so the picture IAAP is using has undoubtedly been doing the rounds on the internet for a while from the BZ forum: in fact, I now have the picture in question... its a bit of a moot point now really...
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 14:12:43 GMT -5
That was hilarious. ;D Did you see the Family Guy Star Wars special? I just watched it. Very funny stuff. lol I couldn't resist Star Wars special eh? I haven't seen any new ones since Meet the Quagmires, so if its newer than that I'll have to go look-see and if its older than that - then I'll have to rack my memory and look on my hard-drive.. either way, it sounds like something that will provide quotes abound lol
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 13:20:14 GMT -5
update: After browsing the BZ forum I have indeed come across someone with this ... ...as their avatar. I sent them a PM, so I should be able to find a) what bootleg this features in and b) a bigger version of the picture - minus the black area we see in RA55 Et Voila... Just a clever bit of image manipulation; the picture is from a record titled: 'Selections From The Beatles 1962-1966 & 1967-1970 - US - CD ALBUM - Promo'. eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=22833In this picture you can clearly see that they use the '69 background and just paste the '63 bodies onto the level above. I don't know where the extra person on the left came from in the RA55 version yet. Perhaps just another bit of IAAP image trickery? Compare with.. Looking at this its apparent that IAAP didn't use the 'Selections' image above [note the position of '63 John Lennon's hands] but he almost certainly took his inspiration from it. In fact, looking closer at the small avatar at the top of this post it doesn't look like that person used the 'Selections' picture either. I'm still waiting on a reply from them, so I will keep you all informed as it develops... EDIT: Hold a ruler along the left corner of the stairwell [ie running from where Ringo's right arm is to the top] on the 'selections' version and you will see that the perspective is correct and that it doesn't falter from this straight line. However, looking at the smaller avatar picture and IAAP's version it appears that they have the [noticeably lighter] roof of the '63 shot and that the perspective goes off-line from where they pasted the '63 picture in - like I said, the photographer was stood at a slightly different angle in the two photo-shoots.
|
|