|
Post by ramone on May 28, 2012 9:11:22 GMT -5
Elvis? The King who lived in Graceland? I Hear tell of a jungle room. Watch out for the lion! ringo? ringo was always my favorite beatle. Was he the apple of your eye (or some body's eye)?
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 27, 2012 7:35:49 GMT -5
Kicking in the door storming the castle. Will it keep?
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 27, 2012 7:34:03 GMT -5
Whose that guy in the front of John? He's got a suitcase and a mean kick. Well, if it isn't the Ministry of Silly Walks!. John leading John I do believe.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 26, 2012 22:32:04 GMT -5
Whose that guy in the front of John? He's got a suitcase and a mean kick. Well, if it isn't the Ministry of Silly Walks!.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 26, 2012 15:10:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 24, 2012 21:27:06 GMT -5
Two songs in one sentence - pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 24, 2012 18:48:08 GMT -5
Some good advice.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 22, 2012 12:32:02 GMT -5
Not sure if this is the lads. Prob the guys mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 12, 2012 10:11:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 11, 2012 7:47:21 GMT -5
I'm Happy Just To Dance With You
|
|
|
Post by ramone on May 4, 2012 18:15:14 GMT -5
Starring Vic(tor) Morrow (Hi I)
Combat:
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 22, 2012 22:31:58 GMT -5
a 'dia na vida'
Define 'earth'.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 21, 2012 9:51:04 GMT -5
Now It Is back to our regularly scheduled haze.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 4, 2012 22:51:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 4, 2012 10:04:17 GMT -5
plasticpaul wrote: can anyone point me in the right direction?invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=ra&action=display&thread=4922&page=1It was grandfather aleister. thisone wrote: I dont agree with the "third position" which the author adopts, that the USA actually did go to the moon but faked the TV footage. Well they certainly faked the TV footage, but it seems that the scenario you have rejected may be the case, as the mirrors that the astronauts alledgedly set up for laser measurements are there, as well as the moonquake-measuring devices (which, for all I know, may be one and the same). The astronauts may have been taken up to the moon with the help of aliens or by the use of "black ops" craft that the public is not aware of. But what we were shown at the time has now been clearly debunked; that is for sure. Some 2 years later I walked by chance onto a lecture by man who claimed to have brought us new pictures and facts released by NASA recently. It was large community college but only about 10 people showed up. He told us astronauts after walking on the Moon surface had small sharp rocks gotten inside of their space suits and were forced to remove space suits inside space ship and fly back naked. ( No wind or water means razor sharp rocks). Under his breath after lecture he said people don't understand corrosive power of solar wind and maybe nothing is left from objects like flags installed on the Moon. FWIW What was the point of removing their suits after they were back inside the safety of the pressurized LM? At least they didn't break their leg walking on the moon.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 2, 2012 22:12:52 GMT -5
- will you still need me - when I'm a 64. boomp boomp
|
|
|
Madman
Mar 26, 2012 14:58:52 GMT -5
Post by ramone on Mar 26, 2012 14:58:52 GMT -5
Messrs M and S got around - didn't they? Sex pot peppery number hey Bill?
|
|
|
Madman
Mar 26, 2012 14:45:49 GMT -5
Post by ramone on Mar 26, 2012 14:45:49 GMT -5
news.yahoo.com/zou-bisou-bisou-scoop-bizarre-french-song-mad-142500671.html Draper's new wife performs a competely unexpected burlesque routine, immediately earworming a '60s French song into fans' heads. What was that ditty, anyway? The long-awaited fifth season premiere of Mad Men on Sunday arrived with both hearty critical approval and a veritable theme song of its own. (Warning: Spoiler alert.) Fans and reviewers are buzzing about the "bizarre, come-hither burlesque" routine that Don Draper's new wife, Megan, delivers at the surprise 40th birthday party she throws for him in circa-1966 Manhattan. The lithe young bride, played by Jessica Pare, performed a sultry version of "Zou Bisou Bisou," a hitherto little-known French ditty. Here, everything you need to know about the strangely indelible song: What was the scene? Though Elisabeth Moss' Peggy warns her that "men don't like surprises," Megan invites most of Don's co-workers and their significant others to the Drapers' swanky new highrise apartment. After some strained chit-chat between the Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce contingent and other cutting-edge party guests (a black homosexual!), Megan announces that she's sufficiently drunk to offer Don her gift of song and dance, and launches into "Zou Bisou Bisou," accompanied by the live band. Soon she's offering up "full-on sex kitten" dance moves and writhing seductively in an embarrassed Don's lap. Though the guests applaud dutifully, the next day at work, Don's co-workers begin mocking Megan's shenanigans. SEE MORE: 7 reasons Mad Men's season premiere is 'insanely riveting' What's the history of the song? Repeating the phrase "Zou Bisou Bisou" (which roughly translates as "Oh! Kiss, kiss!") no less than 15 times, it's a primo example of "yéyé," a French pop genre in which young singers exuded a faux-innocent sexuality. Megan's version is based on the 1961 recording by actress Gillian Hills, a 16-year-old "Brigitte Bardot lookalike." (Watch the video below.) The single became an international smash, particularly popular in France, Spain, and Quebec, and later showed up in the 1966 film Blow-Up, as the soundtrack to a steamy menage à trois scene co-starring Hills. The song was produced by George Martin, who later worked with The Beatles, and co-written by Bill Shepard and Alan Tew, who later composed theme music for The People's Court. An English version, known as "Zoo Be Zoo Be Zoo" was recorded by Sophia Loren as part of "an album of duets and solo songs" by Loren and Peter Sellers to capitalize on the success of their 1960 film The Millionairess, says Sean Howe at New York
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 26, 2012 11:24:57 GMT -5
Speaking of fences- I'd imagine an older JPM would look more like this guy - than this guy on the left -
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 26, 2012 11:16:49 GMT -5
Hi. I believe that Paul McCartney was replaced but did not die. I also believe that Faul was the one who married Linda and Heather. But I believe that the real Paul came back into the public eye around the beginning of the 80s. So there are two Paul Maccartneys in my oppinion. Recently I started to wondering what if one of them dies while the other is still alive?I think there are four possibilities: 1. Whoever dies last will be responsible for the official Paul McCartney death:-If Paul dies first his death will kept a secret until Faul dies. -If Faul dies first his death will kept a secret until Paul dies. 2. Paul's death will be the official McCartney death:-If Paul dies first Faul will get into hiding. Which leads to the question: Where could he go? I doubt he could return to his old life he left in the 60s. -If Faul dies first his death will be kept a secret. I don't find this possibility to be very likely. 3. Faul's death will be the official McCartney death.I find this more likely than possibility number 2 because Paul is logically the one who has an alternative life where he has been all throgh the 70s and where he probably still lives for most of his time. 4. Whoever dies first will be responsible for the official Paul McCartney death:I find this to be the most unlikely possibility. What do you think? I agree, I think BPF is the one that married Linda. True there are some pics where he looks a lot like JPM, but overall there are numerous ones where he looks really really different. Sorry, I just don't think this guy: is this guy: I really doubt if the family man Bill had JPM pop into that family scene to replace him (the replacement) at times. What for? And wouldn't the kids catch on that this is a different guy? I would. Is it realistic to think little Heather - say around the Let It Be shooting - would be fooled into thinking that dad with a beard is her dad when he wasn't - just 'cause he has facial hair? Probably even less likely all those other years when he didn't have a beard. I think it very rare JPM would peek his head above the fence.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 26, 2012 10:50:52 GMT -5
"Hi. I believe that Paul McCartney was replaced but did not die. I also believe that Faul was the one who married Linda and Heather. But I believe that the real Paul came back into the public eye around the beginning of the 80s. So there are two Paul Maccartneys in my oppinion.
Recently I started to wondering what if one of them dies while the other is still alive?
I think there are four possibilities:
1. Whoever dies last will be responsible for the official Paul McCartney death: -If Paul dies first his death will kept a secret until Faul dies. -If Faul dies first his death will kept a secret until Paul dies."
Yeah, I think JPM is probably still around but if he's surfaced it's been very sporadic. BPF (BillyPaulFaul) has been the front man for years and I think there's no reason to alter that. It's worked and works.
If JPM died it would probably stay under the radar. But you never know with this whole thing. If BPF died that might be the official deal - but JPM could come forward - at some point. That would blow a few minds.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 24, 2012 10:14:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 21, 2012 23:59:45 GMT -5
As a long time lurker, I have noticed there has been an occasional "uprising" on this forum between long time members which goes off topic or off a . I have this distinct sense that some of these members are the same entity. More like MPD than PWR/PID. Is this to confuse newcomers or regulars to no end? This forum represents the spirit of what exactly? judging whose terribly right or whose terribly wrong, stupid or lost and deflect any reasoning whatsoever to the real truth. It is all disheartening and far from enlightening. There is an agenda/psyops to all this. ''a radical cliff dive'' As Jack N. might say - 'is there any other kind?' "I have this distinct sense that some of these members are the same entity." Well, some might pop in with another name from time to time. Maybe just for the heck of it. Look at this as school. A place of learning (hopefully). But have some fun too as long as you're here. There are quite an array of kids running thru the halls. And they all come from different neighborhoods. (dig it?) (see ya in the cafeteria)
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 21, 2012 23:42:28 GMT -5
As a long time lurker, I have noticed there has been an occasional "uprising" on this forum between long time members which goes off topic or off a radical cliff dive. I have this distinct sense that some of these members are the same entity. More like MPD than PWR/PID. Is this to confuse newcomers or regulars to no end? This forum represents the spirit of what exactly? judging whose terribly right or whose terribly wrong, stupid or lost and deflect any reasoning whatsoever to the real truth. It is all disheartening and far from enlightening. There is an agenda/psyops to all this. Oh, that's it. I must have missed the memo. Thanks a lot everybody. See what happens when you run into China Town to get pork buns for everyone? You're late for the meeting. Next time I'm gonna go and get a dozen degrees of DIM SUM and just have a good time and relax. (now that would be a Pepper Jarv clue for you all)
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 21, 2012 23:39:59 GMT -5
I had an actual lol - not to mention almost falling off my perch.
|
|