|
Post by privyprincess on Sept 30, 2011 14:44:10 GMT -5
No really, I mean this is just totally insane. It makes conventional PID seem staid and solid card-carrying establishment, by comparison. It almost makes 911 conspiracy theories seem common-sensical by comparison. Reclaim WHAT? If this song or some sort of variant of it had been written before 1948 -- or even before 1968 -- this theory would make just a little more sense than it does now. Just a little. Just a little. But in 1948, the state of Israel was officially established, and, of course, in 1967, the Israelis absolutely crushed the Arab armies in the Six-Day War. This song was apparently written and released in 1968, a year afterward. What need could possibly have been perceived to bolster Jewish/Israeli morale at that time?[/quote] 1. Reclaim the holy land, Israel, from the Zionists. Or were you of the impression that Zionists were actually practicing Jews? Lol, silly you! I think we all know that claiming to be something is not the same as actually being it. 2. Need? Since when does there have to be an inherent "need" to speak on world issues? People still talk feveredly about many old issues' I'm sure they won't stop talking just because the issues are ancient. The topic of the Holy Land will continue to be a topic of interest as it has for years to come, until the Jews "go out and get her" (back) once and for all. That's just my opinion, though. We all have them. I respect yours, is it wrong of me to expect the same courtesy from others?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Sept 28, 2011 11:28:47 GMT -5
No really, I mean this is just totally insane. It makes conventional PID seem staid and solid card-carrying establishment, by comparison. It almost makes 911 conspiracy theories seem common-sensical by comparison. Reclaim WHAT? If this song or some sort of variant of it had been written before 1948 -- or even before 1968 -- this theory would make just a little more sense than it does now. Just a little. Just a little. But in 1948, the state of Israel was officially established, and, of course, in 1967, the Israelis absolutely crushed the Arab armies in the Six-Day War. This song was apparently written and released in 1968, a year afterward. What need could possibly have been perceived to bolster Jewish/Israeli morale at that time? You seem just a little ticked off. Just a little.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Sept 10, 2011 15:02:51 GMT -5
Nice! I would love to read what you've written concerning this topic. Can you point in the direction of this info please? I did my work, it's up to you to do yours. You were made to go out and get her ("get her" as in reclaim the holy land)
yes, it's all about the reclaim. You're right, Iameye. Let me go and see what I can find! Oh and thanks for the heads up about the reclaim. Do you think this type of action would start ww3? I feel like it will come to that.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Sept 10, 2011 13:29:25 GMT -5
I have written extensively on this subject because I am the leading expert. You have found her. All you have to do is look. Nice! I would love to read what you've written concerning this topic. Can you point in the direction of this info please?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Sept 10, 2011 12:59:57 GMT -5
Is anyone else here(besides myself) of the impression that Hey Jude is actually targeted to the Jewish people, not Julian? I've always known in the back of my mind that this song was not written for Julian. The revelation that this song was targeted at Jewish people came to me recently while watching a documentary on the Holocaust. At one point they were showing footage of Nazi Germany and the oppression of the Jewish population. There were shops with the name "Jude" written on them. I looked it up and "Jude" is German for "Jew". So, I took this theory and I looked at the lyrics. Here's the lyrics: My added commentary is italicized. From www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/hey-jude-lyrics-the-beatles/f3b4903642591f7748256bc2001d1579
Hey Jude don't make it bad Take a sad song (sad song=years of oppression) and make it better Remember to let her ("her" is not necessarily a woman - maybe a land? The holy land?) into your heart Then you can start to make it better
Hey Jude don't be afraid You were made to go out and get her ("get her" as in reclaim the holy land) The minute you let her under your skin Then you begin to make it better
And any time you feel the pain, Hey Jude, refrain Don't carry the world upon your shoulders For well you know that it's a fool who plays it cool By making his world a little colder (don't sorry for yourself, stop complaining and do something) Da da da da da da da da da
Hey Jude don't let me down (who is "me"? Who would the Jewish people let down? GOD?) You have found her now go and get her Remember to let her into your heart Then you can start to make it better
So let it out and let it in Hey Jude begin You're waiting for someone to perform with (some Jews are waiting for their messiah to arrive) And don't you know that it's just you Hey Jude you'll do (stop waiting for the messiah and do it yourself) The movement you need is on your shoulder (in Nazi Germany, Jewish people had to wear the star of David patch on their shoulder to signify they were Jewish. The movement they need is the star? The pentagram? Magick?)
Da da da da da da da da da Yeah
Hey Jude don't make it bad Take a sad song and make it better Remember to let her under your skin Then you'll begin to make it better Better, better, better, better, better, Yeah,Yeah,Yeah
1, 2, 3, 4, (Jude, Jude, Judey, Judey, Judey, Judey, Waaa!) 5, (Jude, Jude, Jude, Jude, Jude) 6, (Yah, Yah, Yah) 7, (Jude, HEY JUDE! WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!) 8, (OH, JUDE!) 9, 10 (Jude, Jude, Jude, Jude, Jude, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH!) 11, 12, (Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, OOOOH, WHAAAAAAAAAAA!) 13, 14, 15, (YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAH, YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA!) 16, (JUDE, MAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAAHAAAAHH!) 17, 18, (Woooooo!) 19, (Well then a Nah Nah...) 20... Ok, so am I off my rocker or is there something there?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Aug 25, 2011 21:28:23 GMT -5
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_ZMD4McgEQ&feature=related [/youtube] Hint?
BTW Dhani looks just like his father! Wow.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Aug 3, 2011 19:04:53 GMT -5
Thank you IamEye and PhoneyProphet for the encouragement! The search continues (as it does for all of us)!
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Aug 3, 2011 18:19:05 GMT -5
Yes, talk about it! If Iamaphoney can make youtube vids for over 5 years about the Beatles being Lion-headed beasts and Paul himself being the reincarnation of Crowley and possibly Lucifer (him?)self with no threat to himself, then I'm kinda thinking you'll be fine by just opening up dialogue. Now, of course, if people look at you like you are insane and start shapeshifting then you need to get out of there.
Good luck!
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Aug 3, 2011 17:15:24 GMT -5
I received a very interesting private message on another messageboard I frequent from a poster who asked me if I had heard about John and his mother having an incestual relationship. This poster heard from their source(s) that it was actually his mother who was the pursuer of the relationship, not the young John. I told the poster that this was all news to me, and they asked if I would present the question to you all here:
With so many insiders here, is anyone at liberty to confirm if this is true or just bs? I can't speak for everyone, but I know it doesn't change my opinion of the man. He was a genius with a great talent and was able to share much of it, as well as his message of LOVE to the whole world.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 16, 2011 15:41:52 GMT -5
I've got it, I think. The Lily symbolizes rebirth, triumph over death, resurrection.
In the Bible, lilies are referred to as "white-robed apostles of hope", and were found growing in the Garden of Gethsemane after Christ's crucifixion. White lilies were said to have grown on the ground where drops of Christ's sweat fell to the ground while on the cross.
"By 2012 the masses will be where we are today, and Paul should be Jesus by then." -- quote from an Iamaphoney video.
Meaning: Paul's fate has similarities to Jesus's. He died, but then (with a little help of his "friend" the Lily) he was reborn.
Well.....am I close?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 13, 2011 13:27:16 GMT -5
I agree the ninth gate is full of symbolism. Actually, all Polanski movies are. He really makes it quite clear which side he's on, doesn't he? LOL
I just have one, slightly off-topic question. Why is it that when Polanski creates his movies full of occult symbolism, he is praised for it, yet after Kubrick released Eyes Wide Shut, he was offed?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 11, 2011 22:03:10 GMT -5
How many of you have seen the movie, The Rite? Here is the summary from www.imdb.comMichael, the son of a funeral director grows indifferent to his father and joins a Seminary. On his way to the course completion, he is overwhelmed by a strong lack of faith. His religious beliefs are further jolted when he sees a young girl haplessly dying in a road accident for whom he reluctantly performs the ritual to absolve her sins. His mentor still believes in him and urges him to go to Italy to take an exorcism course hoping that he it would strengthen his faith in Christianity. In Italy he attends a session from Father Xavier who soon becomes aware of his skepticism. As a result he sends him to an eminent Jesuit exorcist, Father Lucas, whose ways though questionable are quite effective. He witnesses the exorcism of a sixteen year old girl but still seems unconvinced. Father Lucas explains him that it takes multiple sessions over a long stretch of time to completely free a victim from the omen. Despite witnessing some supernatural occurrences during the aforesaid exorcism, Michael is as skeptical as ever. After the second exorcism, the girls condition becomes quite critical as she is moved to a hospital. She soon dies and the omen finds a new victim. As the moment of reckoning draws near, Micheal may be the only hope left but first he must overcome his own doubts and apprehensions in order to fight and destroy the ominous forces. Now, onto the clues I spotted. They were overt, nothing that will boggle the mind. This scene is near the end of the movie where Michael is performing an exorcist on father Trevant. He orders the demon to speak it's name. I know most will say he says Baal, but I definitely here a distinct "P" sound during the third utterance. Look: Also, this scene here where the posessed father is standing outside.......wait for it.........barefoot. He also slaps a poor little girl. Is this a valid clue? That evildoers don't like wearing shoes? Heaven must be a massive shoe store. lol
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 11, 2011 21:32:42 GMT -5
I found an interesting video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEfnf2oDJlA&feature=related [/youtube] For those of you who are not familiar with the Harry Potter series, a Horcrux is an item or trinket that Voldemort uses to hide parts of his soul into, in his effort to become and remain immortal. The act of killing an innocent person is what causes a soul to split, so Voldemort goes around killing innocent victims, shredding his soul into bits and pieces, and putting those pieces into these inanimate items, which are now his horcruxes. Because these items now contain pieces of Voldemort's soul, he puts curses and enchantments around them which keep them from being easily destroyed, as well as hiding them in far off, hidden places.
Well, according to the creator of this video, (who professes to be a 20th degree Mason and a high ranking Lemurian), the horcrux in the movie is analogous to Crowley's magickal practice in which a child (boy or girl) is defiled (molested, probably) and from then on, the magician is able to steal the victim's life force from them at will. Sounds like being a psychic vampire of sorts.
I just thought someone here may have heard a bit more of this practice.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 2, 2011 23:47:52 GMT -5
Hmm that's weird. I thought maybe someone here would know. I hope he's alright.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jul 2, 2011 13:34:31 GMT -5
There hasn't been an update since February. I found it very insightful. I'm asking here because I think Tafultong posts here, or at least someone with the same font name does.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jun 23, 2011 23:12:37 GMT -5
Why is Faul tickling that guy's beard? Coochee Coochee Coo! ;D I've seen that hand gesture before. Is Faul a Johannite? That would certainly explain a few things if true.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jun 15, 2011 15:13:00 GMT -5
I know I feel like I'm preaching to the choir when I say these things as I'm sure you all already know this, but don't really know where else to post this info. Plus, I like it here.
Ok, so on average I go from thinking IAAP is a big load of crap to thinking he/she/them/whatever is Paul himself. I'm not sure why my mind works like that, but I've finally realized that in this case, at least, truth is stranger than fiction. IAAP has obvious ties to Paul/Faul/whatever he's calling himself nowadays.
I have been watching a few videos on IAAP's youtube station, and pausing intermittently throughout the video, trying to catch a few of the fast-moving pictures to see what they are. Well, guess what? A good many of the pictures are what seem to be old writings/receipts/letters/invoices and whatnot that are addressed directly to Paul or have been written by one of the Beatles themselves (supposedly).
If these documents are legit, what exactly are they in the video for? Do they further the plot or aid in solving the mystery? Or are they just there to establish credibility? I don't know. I just think it's odd for them to be just in the video for no reason other than to say "Look, this is a document that belongs to Paul. Take us seriously!"
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jun 7, 2011 18:55:23 GMT -5
Thank you, LetterB and IPuffin. I should have known there would have already been a thread on this topic. You guys are so thorough over here!
*goes to check out thread I should have searched for*
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Jun 7, 2011 16:11:11 GMT -5
So I was browsing another forum today, and I came across something I had never heard about: A Pepper's Ghost. According to wikipedia: Pepper's ghost is an illusionary technique used in theater and in some magic tricks. Using a plate glass and special lighting techniques, it can make objects seem to appear or disappear, or make one object seem to morph into another. It is named after John Henry Pepper, who first demonstrated the technique in the 1860s. I was just wondering if there was any significance in the naming of the album St Pepper with this illusionary technique. If there is a relation, does it symbolize the Beatles attempt to morph the new Paul (Faul or Bill) into the already well known persona of Paul McCartney? I dunno just thinking out loud.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 23, 2011 18:26:58 GMT -5
Looks like: Not so much like: Am I right, or am I right? As always, I am on the fence about whether there was ever a McCartney substitution. But the similarity between Crowley's appearance and McCartney's seems more pronounced with the later McCartney than the earlier one. I think that this is the Crowley picture that's usually used for that purpose: Oh yeah I've seen that picture many times on IAAP's videos. Very similar. "Son of the magickian" certainly seems to ring true.
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 23, 2011 18:21:56 GMT -5
Looks like: Not so much like: Am I right, or am I right? YOU ARE RIGHT Thank you! It's something about the mouth area. It's the subtle smirk that you can see around the mouth area that is really similar. Also, the bags under the eyes. Young men in their 20's typically don't have really pronounced bags yet, unless it's genetic. I dunno. Maybe I'm reaching. I've been known to do that at times. I really do appreciate the confirmation that you feel the same though :-)
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 23, 2011 18:16:28 GMT -5
Ok, your .02 is duly noted. Obviously we differ in opinion, but that's fine by me. Anyone else see a resemblance/non resemblance? Please forgive me privyprincess, I mean no disrespect, but every time I see your user name I get this vision in my mind's eye, and it makes me giggle. -j LOL! No offense taken. I realize my font moniker is a bit vainglorious. I'm not in any way conceited, though. I just liked the way it sounded. It gives people the feeling that I know something important :-)
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 18, 2011 15:50:38 GMT -5
Ok, your .02 is duly noted. Obviously we differ in opinion, but that's fine by me.
Anyone else see a resemblance/non resemblance?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 13, 2011 13:09:36 GMT -5
Looks like: Not so much like: Am I right, or am I right?
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on May 5, 2011 19:58:18 GMT -5
The modest Rose puts forth a thorn, The humble sheep a threat'ning horn: While the Lily white shall in love delight, Nor a thorn nor a threat stain her beauty bright. [/i][/quote] Is this a riddle, or just a pretty little poem? It reminds me of the riddles in the DaVinci Code.
|
|