|
Post by linus on Sept 11, 2014 15:41:23 GMT -5
'Mick Jagger is dead' rumors circulating in December 1966 - January 1967. January 28th, 1967 - KRLA BEAT.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Sept 11, 2014 0:29:33 GMT -5
Context. reelchangefilms.com/portfolio/why-not-bobby/dana-carvey/The topic of this interview is Bobby Slayton. It is part of a documentary on the comedian Bobby Slayton, titled Why Not Bobby? reelchangefilms.com/portfolio/why-not-bobby/I emailed this question to the director of the documentary, J. Scholder: Is Why Not Bobby complete? If so, where can we see the entire documentary? I would love to see the whole film. I am curious as to who the Billy is that Dana refers to after mentioning McCartney. Do you remember? and he replied: Thank you for writing and I'm glad you are enjoying the clips. Dana meant Bobby but he said Billy. It was pretty funny and of course made the clip unusable for the movie but we loved it as an outtake which is why it's on our website. All the clips on our website from "Way not Bobby?" are clips that we love from these incredibly talented people but they are not really related to the film.
As for a projected date of completion, I wish we had one. We will make every effort to let you know when and if the film is available for release. In the meantime I hope you enjoy the many outtakes the many talented people we interviewed so far.- Dana is telling a story about Bobby Slayton. The Paul McCartney part is a quick tangent; he says, “It’s kinda like when I met Paul McCartney…” and at the end of the tangent, he says, “So… I think with Billy…” but, as we see, he meant Bobby.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Sept 1, 2014 20:20:47 GMT -5
plus, it is printed by Peppers Press a Subsidiary of MACCA Corp. That surely could not have appeared without Sir Paul’s approval. Sir Paul McCartney (or whom ever one thinks McCartney is) is in no way affiliated with Macca Corp., nor therefore Peppers Press. From what I can gather, the only manner in which Macca Corp. and Peppers Press exist are either as Tom Uharriet's publishing company, or are fictional companies used in the presentation of the book. I've talked with Tom Uharriet a few times over the last year and he has openly stated a number of times that his Billy series is fiction.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 26, 2014 2:33:05 GMT -5
Whenever people bring up "Paul is Dead" in connection with Crowley they imply that PID is "Satanic" without ever explaining what "Satanic" means ! Of course "Satanist" (including Clowley) never explain what Satanism actually is (at least very well). I read books about Crowley and researched on the internet trying to find out what Satanism was and nobody seemed to know! Anarchism is very similier in that know one seems to know what it is. THEN I realised that God was a woman! Of course that means the Devil is a man. So "Satanism" is the worship of God as a man! IRONICALLY Christianity, Judism, Islam and other religions ALSO worship God has man ! So all these people that go around criticising Satanism are often the pot calling the kettle black. That video does not mention or even imply anything involving satanism.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 18, 2014 2:00:40 GMT -5
Awakenings is interesting on many levels. Robin Williams' character sees that some of his patients are not completely catatonic when they are able to, as he describes it, "follow the will" of an object or person. He first takes notice when his patient Lucy catches her round granny glasses in mid-air when Williams attempts to drop them in her lap. His first real breakthrough comes when Lucy walks across the black/white tiled floor on her own. Very interesting that Williams cures his patients by giving them medication designed for Parkinson's sufferers; L-Dopa. His biggest success is DeNiro's character, Leonard Lowe. Leonard's love interest if Paula. If by association, Leonard resonates as a Paul figure, and Lucy, with her round glasses resonates as a Lennon figure, we could have something. Williams' patients are relieved of their symptoms for only a few weeks. This closely parallels the premise of the new movie Lucy, in that she has extraordinary mental abilities for only the one day that the drug is in her system. Oliver Sacks (Dr Richard Asher's student) was the doctor played by Robin Williams in the film AwakeningsSacks is the cousin of Abba Eban, Israeli diplomat who had worked for Chaim Weizmann. Eban worked for British Intelligence in WWII and later Israeli intelligence after the 1948 mandate. Awakenings features characters named Paula, Eleanor, Lucy, and an actor named George Martin plays a character named Frank.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 28, 2014 13:59:14 GMT -5
Polanski's film Frantic has a lot in common with The Ninth Gate. And even more so with Knight & Day starring Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz; no not Vanilla Sky, although they do get involved with a Spanish arms-dealer; no not Penelope Cruz from Vanilla Sky.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 24, 2014 2:35:10 GMT -5
Johnny Depp's third McCartney video appearance. Early Days
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 24, 2014 2:33:18 GMT -5
Awakenings features characters named Paula, Eleanor, Lucy, and an actor named George Martin plays a character named Frank.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 15, 2014 1:25:49 GMT -5
No walk-ins or body swapping in Help!, but it is about a human sacrifice cult.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 13, 2014 20:33:42 GMT -5
It is a fan-fiction. You can find Tom and the page for his book on Facebook.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 13, 2014 17:12:25 GMT -5
McCartney has been paying piano on stage and in the studio since his teen years. We even see him playing piano in AHDN and Help. He didn't play piano during live concerts during the Beatlemania years, because the compositions didn't call for it. Not pictured is the scene during You’re Going To Lose That Girl where it cuts to Paul suddenly playing piano when he was previously playing bass. Also in Help! we see Paul riding a horse. And on this album cover. More gun toting, too, as per usual. We also see photos of Paul on drums before 1967 Again, Denny Laine was a short, petite man. He appears to be between 5’5” and 5’7”. Not 5’11” or 6’2” Also note that he has attached earlobes and flat eyebrows. Speaking of 6’2”, it would be nice if evidence could be supplied that there was a 6’2” Paul. It would also be nice to have evidence that Paul was ill, and wrote Yesterday due to the illness. And that Your Mother Should Know was written & demoed before 1967. The only time George Martin was not around to produce Beatles records, that I know of, was during the Let It Be era. But they asked him back for Abbey Road. Martin was very much present on their albums other than LIB, and part of the White Album from what I understand. Also, if one is attributing their consistency to George Martin, who is to say they didn't have ghost writers? The Paul in AHDN has detached earlobes, and during the concert footage he has a large pock-mark on his left jaw that is not seen any other time. no pock-mark. Also, during the outro to the Strawberry Fields Forever promo film, they are walking at normal speed. vimeo.com/11042052This is a psychedelic video, hence the sped-up and backwards footage. Besides, why would they speed up the walking to disguise the impostor, but have multiple close-ups of his face? And what of all the other times he's not sped up? Penny Lane promo, MMT film, etc.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 12, 2014 0:45:39 GMT -5
Eleanor Rigby is depressing and gloomy. It's about death, loneliness and detachment. Eleanor Rigby is also a one-of-a-kind song that stands apart from the rest of the Beatlemania catalogue, intense with an anxious tension. Musicologist Alan W. Pollack asks, “Where does the inspiration for something like this song come from, and whatever happened to the cute Beatle who wrote it?”
Revolver is abundant with themes of death and loneliness. For No One was even originally titled Why Did It Die?
Authors Guy Cook and Neil Mercer did a grammatical & musical analysis of all the Beatles records and found the biggest, most sudden change occurred with Revolver. They put Rubber Soul as the end of the Beatles’ early period and Revolver at the beginning of their later period.
Another thing to take into consideration is that Lennon & McCartney co-wrote many of their '63-'65 songs, putting their heads together to make the product stronger than it would've been otherwise. By '66 they were going different directions, and by '68 were writing most of their own songs exclusively. Plus, their solo records did not have the Beatles 'recipe'. There was no longer that specific group dynamic and they weren't produced by George Martin.
Of all the things that have been mentioned in this thread, one of the ones that is the most reasonable is that the Beatles wouldn't have had time to write the amount of hits they did in the short amount of time they did; while also touring, recording, making films, conducting interviews & press conferences, photo shoots, etc. To say that is pure speculation, while jumping to all the other conclusions that have been jumped to here is a double standard. It's definitely worth considering. It would also give reason for a need for extras. All of those busy schedules and no fatigue?
The most reasonable thing said here is that there is no hard evidence that anybody died. Even though there is a death theme in their work from '64 onward. After '66 it is more in earnest, albeit more subliminal.
(Also, Denny was a short, petite man, about the same height as Ringo, he also had distinctly wonky teeth. Isn't the complaint that the Paul in Kenya was tall & lanky?)
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 9, 2014 14:53:14 GMT -5
The only other thing I have on Debbie is this picture, and of course the Helter Skelter Terry Melcher connection. Are you confusing Debbie Reynolds with Doris Day? This is Doris Day, the mother of Terry Melcher. Debbie Reynolds is the mother of Carrie Fisher.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 9, 2014 14:52:11 GMT -5
Debbie Reynolds sings a lounge version of Sgt. Pepper's in Fear & Loathing in La Vegas.
Where Christina Ricci's character is introduced as "Lucy in the sky with diamonds".
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jul 9, 2014 14:42:05 GMT -5
111 In Polanski's Rosemary's Baby, she writes "blood" on November 1st on her calendar. 11/1 Aleph = 111 ADAM means Aleph in Blood, and has the Gematrical value of 45. Rosemary puts an X on the 4th and 5th of October.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 18, 2014 17:47:11 GMT -5
Reading forums/blogs/sites doesn't necessarily count as "research".
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 17, 2014 23:56:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 16, 2014 16:19:57 GMT -5
The one thing that interests me about this, given that no matter what brand of 'investigation' we're all on (mine being that Paul and possibly Neil were developing PID autonomously at this time), the issue with that famous 'FALSE RUMOUR' report has been flagged as suspicious and Neil Aspinall has been known to write for the magazine under pseudonyms. It was most likely Neil who was writing under the name Billy Shepherd. The name Billy Shepherd has been associated with the Beatles as far back as 1964, as a writer of articles in Beatles Monthly Magazine. The magazine was launched with the permission of Epstein & The Beatles. Some claim Billy Shepherd was the pen-name for Neil Aspinall. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_Book He also wrote the 1964 book, The True Story of the Beatles.
|
|
|
Hello all
Jun 12, 2014 0:48:40 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by linus on Jun 12, 2014 0:48:40 GMT -5
I'm for lack of a better term a 'conspiracy theorist.' I find JFK, RFK, MLK, OKC, 9/11 etc. easy compared to PID or PWR. “How is a raven like a writing desk?” Lewis Carroll created this riddle with the intent of there being no solution to it. Lewis Carroll was an enormous influence on The Beatles work in 1967-1968. We all know of the doll wearing the Rolling Stones sweater on the Sgt. Pepper cover. On 12/8/67 The Rolling Stones released their answer to Sgt. Pepper, Their Satanic Majesties Request. Images of all four Beatles on the cover. On the inside of the jacket, on the right side there is a maze. There is no way to get to the center of the maze. Is this a way of saying that PID is an unsolvable riddle?
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 12, 2014 0:03:08 GMT -5
All I was bascially saying was, "Yes, you're right, he's holding the stand of the picture frame." Then you thought I photoshopped it. Wouldn't that be considered something like theorizing before you have data - twisting facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts?
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 11, 2014 21:38:18 GMT -5
Or you can google "McCartney Melody Maker 1966" like I did and find the same photos I did As I suggested on page one. I'm literally saying the same thing your saying in regards to the picture frames. A minute ago you called me a genius. Then deleted it. Now you call me a mindfuck. I just post what I find. If anyone's a mindfuck, it's the Beatles.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 11, 2014 21:23:06 GMT -5
Seems he's holding the glass in his right hand with the cig in the fingers, and holding the leg of the frame in his left hand. Dusty is holding the stand, too. footage with Mathis.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 11, 2014 1:08:44 GMT -5
(and then denies telling us he buried Paul).
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 7, 2014 14:23:45 GMT -5
The link you provided is for footage from the 1963 Melody Maker Awards. (Also notice Paul is drinking right-handed as usual). The video I embedded above is from the 1966 Melody Maker Awards. At the end of the clip there is a quick shot of the tower, but that's where the video ends.
|
|
|
Post by linus on May 31, 2014 15:35:20 GMT -5
Here’s film footage of the 1966 Meldody Maker Awards. The picture shows a vacant-looking Paul McCartney lookalike not even making eye contact while shaking hands with Johnny Mathis. The same could be said of Mathis. This picture needs captions. Mathis is saying “Huh, who’s this wax dummy supposed to be?” and Ringo is saying “Don’t worry, I’m a real Beatle!” See the excess plastic by Ringo's sideburn. The above is from the Sept. 1966 Melody Maker Award ceremony. This is not, but we see the same anomaly near his ear. Here's another magazine article on the event. There are many photos to be found of this event, googling "Melody Maker Awards 1966" brings up quite a few. That’s the only published picture - finally, two months later. I suggest the person in it is not Faul – just a quickly-acquired look alike stand-in. From this, I suggest one should conclude: the catastrophe had taken place. But, the show had to go on…. May I ask; if he seemingly looks more like Paul than most PIDers would likely say 'Faul' does, why didn't they keep him? I say that because every time this event is brought up, it seems about half of the people say it's Paul and the other say it's not. If it's not, shouldn't it be unanimous?PS Going back to that Getty 'Express' image, we notice that the four characters are all staring in quite different directions, none of them looking at each other; the guy supposed to be Paul McCartney holds a cigarette and a glass of wine, and its not clear how he is holding his MM award. Seems he's holding the glass in his right hand with the cig in the fingers, and holding the leg of the frame in his left hand. It should also be noted that some PIDers say that this is Paul at the ceremony. Can you point out how this Paul is different from before this point?
|
|