|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Jan 31, 2013 11:00:24 GMT -5
Thanks Beacon That Richard Asher/Tavistock thing. I have been looking and looking for ages tying that all in together, but have yet to find anything definitive or concrete. Your mention of it reminds me again, to find that link between the two. It's completely easy to get distracted by some other anomaly in the story, one such distraction are the deaths of Jimmy McCulloch, Tara Browne and Brian Epstein. All 3 share the curious case of not having what supposedly killed them in their premises, or in their systems. This is true in the case of McCulloch, where none of what was in his system was found in his flat, and that the lock on his door appeared broken. With Browne, the coroner's report said there was nothing in his system that would cause him to crash into a parked lorry. Nothing. With Epstein, yes what killed him was found in his system, but no alcohol was found in his house. This isn't "unexplainable" but there's some funny things about that. Have a read of the Beatles Bible entry on Epstein's death, and the strange reactions/behaviour of Peter Brown in this circumstance. I get distracted by stuff like that, and Richard Asher's background and suicide goes back on the shelf for another day!
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jan 31, 2013 15:13:53 GMT -5
What is this MAD you speak of? It is new to me, unless you're referring to the comic publication. Update: Ah, read your blog. Miles, Asher, Dunbar.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 1, 2013 13:28:34 GMT -5
THE CIA DISAPPEARING FROM LONDON
That is a very interesting article above Ono's Exhibition Advertisment. Let's see who wrote it.
Harvey Matusow (aka Harvey Job Matusow) (October 3, 1926 – January 17, 2002) was a U.S. Communist who protected himself from the House Un-American Activities Committee by providing evidence against his former left-wing colleagues. His false accusations led to his own perjury conviction and to being blacklisted. His McCarthy era activities overshadowed his later work as an artist, actor and producer.
Expatriate producer Unable to find work in the United States, he moved to England. In 1966, he established the London Film Makers Cooperative and worked with the composer Annea Lockwood who appeared on record under the name Anna Lockwood. In 1972, he produced a festival of contemporary music called the International Carnival of Experimental Sound. The event's highlights included performances by Charlotte Moorman (in the Roundhouse and in the Richard Demarco Gallery in Edinburgh) and John Cage's HPSCHD, for eight harpsichords and projections of the American space program. A train was hired to take participants and public to Edinburgh, to link with the Edinburgh festival; Charlotte Moorman performed Nam June Paik's TV Bra in the Richard Demarco Gallery.
There is of course more about him regarding the McCarthy era, but I just posted the relevant to England 1966.
The Embassy of the United States of America to the Court of St. James's has been located since 1960 in the American Embassy London Chancery Building, in Grosvenor Square, Westminster, London. The London embassy is the largest American embassy in Western Europe, and is the focal point for events relating to the United States held in the United Kingdom. The first American Embassy in London was situated in Great Cumberland Place, later moving to Piccadilly, Portland Place and Grosvenor Gardens. In 1938, the embassy was moved to 1 Grosvenor Square (which now hosts part of the Canadian High Commission).
So of course, the CIA were still in London much to Matusow's surprise.
The proximity between the American Embassy, the Indica Gallery, Abbey Road studios, and Dr.Richard Asher's address, place them all within 1.0 to 2.2 miles. You could easily walk it. I've walked it a number of times just tooling around central London. Not saying there's a link. I'm just saying, Indica, CIA, Abbey Road (and McCartney's residence), the Ashers, all live within walking distance, or easy public transportation to one another. You could walk it.
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 1, 2013 13:42:41 GMT -5
Just intuitively, I feel like Mr. Asher was part of Tavistock. Also, it's been reported that George Martin took oboe lessons from Mrs. Asher, Jane's mum. So, let's speculate --- both of Jane's parents were Tavistock researchers or handlers, as such they may have been in some secret society, George Martin wasn't there for oboe lessons but was on the team as a research associate and/or handler, "Paul McCartney" was at the Asher house as a Tavistock mind control subject or participant. So now, Jane, what was her role in all of this? Surely not as an innocent.
This is all a very tangled web or not, maybe it is simple and we just think it's a complicated, tangled web of associations. All the official story explanations of this set up at the Asher's home are woefully insulting our intelligence --- c'mon, something was definitley going on! Yeah sure, oboe lessons, right, wink, wink.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 1, 2013 13:51:31 GMT -5
Just intuitively, I feel like Mr. Asher was part of Tavistock. Also, it's been reported that George Martin took oboe lessons from Mrs. Asher, Jane's mum. So, let's speculate --- both of Jane's parents were Tavistock researchers or handlers, as such they may have been in some secret society, George Martin wasn't there for oboe lessons but was on the team as a research associate and/or handler, "Paul McCartney" was at the Asher house as a Tavistock mind control subject or participant. So now, Jane, what was her role in all of this? Surely not as an innocent. This is all a very tangled web or not, maybe it is simple and we just think it's a complicated, tangled web of associations. All the official story explanations of this set up at the Asher's home are woefully insulting our intelligence --- c'mon, something was definitley going on! Yeah sure, oboe lessons, right, wink, wink. When first reading a little bit ago that George Martin was taught by Jane Asher's Mum, I thought ... "well look at that." I found it intriguing, that years later, George Martin would be producing the boyfriend of her daughter, and that this boyfriend would also provide a hit for her son. Isn't that cool? Little ties and binds. To me it just struck, intriguing. And when reading it alongside the history of John Dunbar's Father, I thought ... hmmm. This all ties together quite nicely by 1966. Too nicely. Sure, people can know eachother in youth and adulthood, and this person knows that person. You can make as little of it, as you can make a lot of it. Simple & Complicated as multiverser says. I think it's time I read into Richard Asher's research into Myxedema psychosis, Munchausen syndrome and the 1951 article in The Lancet, alongside looking at the London Film-Makers' Co-op (Matusow), Group III, a film unit closely linked to the Association of Cinematographic Technicians (ACT), the then trade union of the industry, to which Robert Dunbar belonged.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 1, 2013 14:56:01 GMT -5
In my research into the International Times, sometimes they would use articles provided by other underground papers, mostly based in the USA. Which is why I checked Harvey Matusow to see where he was in 1966, and if this was an article the IT got from one of these underground publications. There was a list of these ... somewhere. I'll find it again, as I usually do at some point (often regretting never saving that info because it always comes up later.)
So you have Matusow in England, a guy who was informant to McCarthy, and provided info on folksingers like Pete Seeger (!!!) and turning in as many communists as he could. Even though he was a member of the American Communist party.
He's writing columns for the paper run by John Dunbar. Whose dad was a cultural attache in Moscow in 1944. He also got kicked out of Germany when Hitler began coming to power.
Yeah.
You have Timothy Leary, witting worker for the CIA in a battle for the consciousness of America, "working for the right side" as he put it. Whatever side that is he was battling for, because WWIII was going to be fought not with weapons, but with controlling the very minds and reality of the world's population.
You have Lennon getting assassinated after a Playboy interview announcing what LSD was all about .. for some.
You have Paul McCartney announcing to the press that LSD enabled that untapped potential in the human brain to be tapped. He then goes on television and admits to taking it. (Whereas his partners Harrison and Lennon, had taken it far more, and never said a thing about it. They promoted Transcendental Meditation whenever possible.)
He also serves as board of directors with Terry Melcher on the Monterey Pop Festival, concert, or dispersement of LSD to a multitude (Orange Sunshine / Monterey Purple et al)
Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 2, 2013 0:59:08 GMT -5
Excellent research! They're all intelligence agents, I suppose. I think they promoted LSD as part of their grand social experiment. All that acid had to be manufactured and distributed. After "Paul" made his famous confession to the media, lo and behold it was instantly, readily available on just about every American and UK college campus like a product roll out.
Even when I was a teenager, years ago, I thought George Martin just looks like a British intelligence agent. He just always had that suave, debonair coolness. I think he was one of the main handlers.
Yoko seems to have been some kind of handler agent but also she seems to have been from a bizarre witches coven (or is it just me thinking that?). Funny she ends up super-rich, owning a whole floor of the Dakota (Witch Headquarters, Inc.?).
Linda could have been a CIA handler, as well. No doubt, the 'boys' were mothered over by these women to an extreme --- like almost never letting them out of their sight on a 24-hr basis. That isn't love, that's either a bad case of obsessive/compulsive or agents required to handle their subjects to that extreme extent --- like, to monitor who they talk with and what they say, what phone calls they make and to whom and what they say, etc. May Pang doesn't seem like an agent, but that's the kind they like, the ones who don't seem like agents! George Martin could hide behind the record producer cover and I don't doubt that he was indeed a brilliant record producer --- I just see him in a dual role.
I hate to be so paranoid, but I have come to be open-minded about all the tragic deaths in the entire Beatles story. Which ones really died the way 'history' tells it? Which ones didn't actually die, but the press and the 'Beatles' and their entourage told us they died? Witness protection program? I'm talking about ALL of the deaths. I'm open-minded to all of them being real, some of them real, or all who they say died, are still alive today. That includes everybody. I didn't personally see the dead bodies and check fingerprint evidence on them, so how do I know if all the legendary deaths were real or not? I've even mentioned before on a forum, maybe this one, that for all we know, 'John Lennon' or Fohn or whomever it was, could have been wired with squibs like they use in Hollywood movies. Yes, the cops say he died, but the CIA can have them say that. The 'body' was cremated within 24 hours on Yoko's orders. Anyway, Stu, Brian, Mal, John, George, Linda, and others --- how do we really know if they died or were phased out of the program? I keep my mind wide open.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 4:28:42 GMT -5
As mentioned in another thread (Probability) when I was looking at all the deaths associated with the JFK assassination, those of unnatural cause that happened within a 5 year period after the event, there was a high number against all laws of probability that many people should be dying.
So I figured, okay I'll try and find as many people as possible ( the ratio in the JFK case was a random 2000 people) in Beatle Land and see if anything happens.
I hadn't even gotten to 700 when it did. And that's after September 1966. That's when people start dying left and right, who all had association with The Beatles in some way some how, whether through business, friendship, peers etc. By 1969 I already had found 10 people who died of unnatural cause. That's a lot. Especially with the odds of such things happening being trillions to one, and the number a far sight lower than 2000 random people.
If there's one person I look at that I think is extremely dodgy, is Derek Taylor. Derek Taylor looks to me like some espionage agent from the Arctic. I swear. Watching how that man acts and speaks, especially in situations requiring information, is like watching a James Bond villain stroking a cat about to blow up the world. And having him leave The Beatles, to go work for Terry Melcher, and then back to The Beatles right in time for Helter Skelter. It's just convenient he's in two key places at the right times. And makes that six degrees of separation between The Beatles and Charles Manson that Vincent Bugliosi would try and convince there was, more like 1 degree. 2 at best. Derek Taylor. My candidate for intelligence agent of the year.
Did some research into Yoko Ono's past as well awhile back, and learning of her time in a mental institution (I believe somewhere around 1962) - where I also believe Tony Cox said they put her on way too much medication. (It's where they both met I think.) A patient, way too doped up on medication, and not be a "Handler"? Right there reading that about her time institutionalised, and the suggestion Cox made that they had her completely medicated ... made me think, there may be some truth in her being a handler. If her family wasn't a powerful entity in Japan, I might not think that.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 5:58:40 GMT -5
Then of course you go to Dennis Hopper's comments about Tate/Polanski: "They had fallen into sadism and masochism and bestiality - and they recorded it all on videotape too. The L.A. police told me this. I know that three days before they were killed twenty five people were invited to that house for a mass whipping of a dealer from Sunset Strip who'd given them bad dope."
Bobby Beausoleil had stated the same thing. Now considering Hopper's state of mind at the time, and his brief marriage to Michelle Phillips (which doesn't make him look all that sweet either!!!) - along with the Sammy Davis Jr. biography that stated Jay Sebring had acted as High Priest at a simulated Satanic sacrifice -- Helter Skelter does not look all that odd someone would get "messages" from it. Not at all to me. And when you have Derek Taylor based in California associated with the very people who would later GET these messages, and return to the people just in time to SEND those messages -- it makes me look at Derek Taylor awfully suspiciously. Awfully so. Add to it the people sending the message are actually supplying clues left and right that one of them is Dead.
I'm still flabbergasted about that Finian's Rainbow clip with Keenan Wynn. Rainbow of course directed by Coppola, who would direct Hopper in Apocalypse Now less than a decade later after Hopper's return from the wilderness.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 6:10:30 GMT -5
A sampling from Mind Control, World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control by Jim Keith © 1997. In it many mentions of The Process, Esalen Institute, Tavistock etc. One thing that intrigued me was the statements of an ex-Processean who wanted to clear up the misnomer they were a Fascist group. He said it was partly true. They were founded by the German Democratic Party, as a front to raise money in the United States. And that book by Ed Sanders, where he believed with the Process's name showing up so many times in different investigations, that he began to be convinced The Process were an intelligence organisation ... Add to that Marianne Faithfull's assertion that she found The Process far too Fascist for her liking. Now my understanding of The Process' origins comes from its founding out of Scientology. The German Democratic Party I've not seen mentioned before. But now that I have, off on that trail. The excerpts I can see from Mind Control, World Control are all intriguing. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 6:37:43 GMT -5
And in argument with Paulbots: These are people who are fully indoctrinated into Jesus Is Paul, and gladly endorse his constant re-writing of history, and give him claim to the invention of the orchestra to the ukelele if they could.
It's always been my contention that Paul's gift is truly melody. Not lyric, not arrangement. And in learning some of his songs over the years, I found the actual musicality of the song itself was ... boring. It was simply a repeated riff or hook, hammered down into the ground. Which struck me as, no wonder his songs stay in your head, even if he's got you singing about Bip Bopping or Big Barn Beds. Or Eating at Home. The most mundane of things stick in your head listening to a McCartney song. Because he hammers that hook into the ground and makes sure it doesn't move.
Now, looking at all these curious ties and associations, and the possibility that Paul was replaced by an intelligence programmed/trained Op, and looking at that almost Chinese Water Torture approach to songwriting (how many times must one state they are a Bluebird? How many?) I'm starting to think there's a lot more to this than I previously thought. Especially with that contingent of Paulbot that insists he was avant garde because he namedropped a bunch of people to Barry Miles, yet when you look at his recorded output, you'd find music comparable to Mrs.Mills in it. And it's Harrison and Lennon actually wandering around mumbling about Walruses, and Blue Jay Ways and all those things that state they were on something, but they never say what it is. McCartney while cheerily singing about Penny Lanes and saying Hello Goodbye is as safe as rain to a record buying public. No trouble here, and I can singalong gratuitously to it.
Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 6:39:53 GMT -5
Which makes me go back AGAIN to the non-inclusion of a Harrisong in the iamaphoney project. There's something to that. What I don't know, but it's saying something.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 7:40:11 GMT -5
And I feel I must give an example of a PAULBOT. These were actually comments on Youtube, in sequential order about a Beatles Christmas Album, but it's not the only example of a Paulbot. The internet is full of them. I find them creepy. I find them the equivalent of the Fembots in the Six Million Dollar Man series, or the Stepford Wives. Or a modern version of Blade Runner.
USER1 that may have been paul imitating tiny tim, he is pretty good, the man of 1000 voices.
USER 2 omg Tiny Tim XD (this person knows the truth)
USER 3 LOL Great recording! Like everyone else, I was surprised about Tiny Tim showing up. The connection between Tim and George (Harrison) is that they are both play the ukulele, that's probably how Tim came to be on a Beatles Christmas album and why George responds to Tim during his segment, they must be friends. (this person has an idea of what the truth is.)
USER 4 Paul also plays ukelele
USER 5 Paul plays a ton of instruments.
I find Paulbots scary. It's almost like watching programming come to life and in your face. If you mention Kazoo, someone will say Paul played Kazoo! It's that scary.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 16:00:38 GMT -5
Multiverser, you may appreciate this extract. It comes froma blog about the work of Marvel Comics artist Jack Kirby, and the "sudden" leap his art took in 1965/1966, and exploring interdimensional gateways and cosmic realms (and such) Andrew Collins in his book Lightquest. From an interview with Collins:I propose that during UFO close encounters we enter what might be described as isolated bubble universes, or drive-through universes, where the interaction between human consciousness and plasma-based environments come together to create virtual worlds of our own making, based on our present conception of what we expect to experience under such traumatic and otherworldly circumstances.
If this truly is what happens, then the only good explanation would have to involve a progressive understanding of quantum entanglement, i.e. non-local communication, in which whole systems of twinned particles are able to transfer information back and forth in an instant of time. Under such conditions a shifted reality that might present itself as the interior of a spacecraft, the realm of faerie or even the heavenly paradise, might come into being, and be very real indeed. Yet in fact it is a mental projection existing temporarily within a higher dimensional reality attached to highly energetic light forms.This blog is worthwhile reading. Many references to Magick, Crowley, and Kirby's knack for predicting alien abductions (see the Betty & Barney Hill Abduction case - somewhere in New Hampshire, hey pretty close to where Crowley lived too at one time!) secretsun.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/wizards-workings-and-walk-ins-watchers.html
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 2, 2013 17:42:01 GMT -5
38 times he says he's a bluebird, or you're a bluebird, or we're bluebirds. 38. Hammered into the head like a nail.
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 2, 2013 22:43:52 GMT -5
Yeah, vOOdOOgurU, I agree on all you're saying. Many thanks for sharing the goldmine of information your research has uncovered. Many gems to pour over and study.
I couldn't agree more about the Paulbots. I've got almost all the music in my collection. I don't deny that I have a strange affinity for, as you say, the hooks nailed to the ground. But yeah, there are these devotees who are so sickly Paul fanatics that it really is a mental disorder. What creeps me out are the concert videos in which the camera shows middle aged people in the audience so in awe that they have tears of joy or rapture and seem as emotionally orgasmic as the adolescent girls of Beatlemania. That video of his staff in the audience holding "We love you" signs and his voice cracks, and the audience is all so goo goo, makes my skin crawl. It's such a big act and these people in the audience are slobbering themselves. Pathetic. Like I've always said, the trance state that Tavistock's Beatles got out of kids and now Sir gets it out of middle aged people --- look at the Hitler speeches and how the audience are in that trance state. It just isn't healthy, to put it mildly.
The other thing, not to get too lurid, but I've read about Yoko being something of a sex addict prior to her 'discovery' of John Lennon as a member of a band she'd never heard of (one of the biggest jokes ever). The sex addiction or sex party thing has to be at least a sideshow in the Beatles mystery circus. The Beatles themselves in Hamburg, on tour when they were famous, swinging London, other people in their circle, the friends in L.A., the Manson Family, etcetera, etcetera --- sex maniacs. I think maybe it does play some kind of part in the whole mystery. I'm talking about something more than just you know, rock stars have groupies.
The other interesting angle is what you mentioned about the mental institution. Seems as if James Taylor and some of the other recording artists on the Apple label had spent some time in mental hospitals and were 'fragile' mentally. There's a whole line of inquiry there for someone to research. Then, of course, there's Syd Barrett's story, Brian Jones, later Brian Wilson, and all the others who 'lost it' and did too many trips really mess them up that badly or was it something else more sinister?
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 2, 2013 22:53:37 GMT -5
beacon, your posts are brilliant and your videos I view repeatedly. You're a major researcher we all owe a debt of gratitude to and please keep them coming! That about the Indica show dates moving around and the synchronicity with the magic death date, also the Mad axis, BRILLIANT!
I read the Miles biography of Paul and I have to say it reads like propaganda with so many holes and gaps it's like swiss cheese.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 3, 2013 14:59:12 GMT -5
You would think one of the easiest things to find in the world would either the transcript or the article itself printed by LIFE magazine on 17th June, 1967, which was in actuality a reprint of an article in QUEEN magazine (date uncertain) where we get paul McCartney's admission of taking LSD.
You would think. Of all the "historic" moments in rock, of all the pivotal points in just The Beatles career, you would find this article in its entirety, and his statements in all their glorious .. um glory.
Salvador Astucia, the guy who wrote Rethinking John Lennon’s Assassination The FBI’s War on Rock Stars, he was asking where is this article all the way back in 2004. What reporter did McCartney talk to? What magazine? Where was it printed?
We learn it was QUEEN magazine that originally printed it. Can we find it? No. The magazine is now defunct. We can presume it's in a May or June issue in 1967 it appeared. At best. I do not know if it ran monthly, fortnightly or what. LIFE ran the article on the 17th. So either they picked up on it really fast, or like the "We are bigger than Jesus" statement, it took some time. But the impression one gets from McCartney's televised statement on the 19th June, 1967, was that the article had just been recent. His statement "Well the thing is, you know, that I was asked a question by a newspaper and the decision was whether to tell a lie or to tell the truth, you know." So that's QUEEN. When did it run? Who knows. LIFE reprints it on the 17th. TV statement the 19th.
16th June, Monterey Pop Festival is held. McCartney is on the board of directors. The day after, LIFE runs McCartney's statements about LSD.
We (well I say we, but in this case I) have only seen "excerpts" from this. A sentence here. A statement there. He called LSD the universal cure-all. He said it tapped into that part of the brain we don't use. He said .....
What else did he say??? Where is this article??? Why after 45 years is it so difficult to find out what his exact statements were, and the content of the piece that got him to make a statement on television?
The BBC sought to ban A Day in the Life because it made drug references. But in all honesty, you and I know that song is tame in any reference. Turn you on, smoke, very tame. Well these LSD statements gave BBC license to say SEE we told you so!
So where are they? Why can you not enter into google 17th June 1967 + LIFE + Paul McCartney + LSD + transcript
And get an instant result. With a scan even of the article! Or just what words appeared? This whole article was the basis for the national and then international coverage of McCartney's admission to taking LSD. And by proxy, the other Beatles.
SO WHERE IS IT
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 3, 2013 15:46:44 GMT -5
www.amazon.co.uk/The-Beatles-Diary-Volume-ebook/dp/B002UK6NOKThis is what it says, according to Barry. November 6 The Beatles turned down a request to appear on a TV special in aid of victims of the disaster in Aberfan, where dozens of school children had been killed or injured when a wave of mud and coal slurry had demolished their school. Paul put his Aston Martin DB5 on the plane-ferry at Lydd, Kent, and flew to France. Wearing a disguise (though his car was hardly inconspicuous), he spent a week driving slowly through the chateaux of the Loire, before he met up with Beatles roadie Mal Evans under the grand clock in Bordeaux. He kept a journal during his trip, and also shot a quantity of film. ( no mention of John & Cynthia's return from Spain on this date.) November 7 John celebrated his return from his film duties in Spain by indulging in a three-day orgy of LSD, during which he made several avant-garde recordings with the Mellotron that had recently been installed in his home studio at Kenwood. A 3 day orgy of LSD. How he made it out of the house who knows!!!! That takes him right up to the 10th November, 1966. Supposing he started at midnight, straight away!!!November 9 John met Yoko Ono at the Indica Gallery, Mason's Yard, London. Okay.YOKO The day before the opening of her show. Unfinished Paintings And Objects, Yoko was introduced to John by the co-owner of the gallery, John Dunbar. John: "I got the word that this amazing woman was putting on a show next week and there was going to be something about people in bags, black bags, and it was going to be a bit of a happening and all that. So I went down to a preview of the show, I got there the night before it opened. I went in - she didn't know who I was or anything - I was wandering around, there was a couple of artsy type students that had been helping lying around there in the gallery, and I was looking at it and I was astounded. There was an apple on sale there for 200 quid, I thought it was fantastic - I got the humour in her work immediately. I didn't have to have much knowledge about avant-garde or underground art, but the humour got me straight away. There was a fresh apple on a stand, this was before Apple - and it was 200 quid to watch the apple decompose. "But there was another piece which really decided me for-or-against the artist, a ladder which led to a painting which was hung on the ceiling. It looked like a blank canvas with a chain with a spyglass hanging on the end of it. This was near the door where you went in. I climbed the ladder, you look through the spyglass and in tiny little letters it says 'yes'. "So it was positive. I felt relieved. Ifs a great relief when you get up the ladder and you look through the spyglass and it doesn't say 'no' or 'fuck you' or something. It said 'yes'. "I was very impressed and John Dunbar sort of introduced us - neither of us knew who the hell we were, she didn't know who I was, she'd only heard of Ringo I think, it means apple in Japanese. And she came up and handed me a card which said 'Breathe' on it, one of her instructions, so I just went (pant). That was our meeting." In fact Yoko knew very well who The Beatles were. She had approached Paul several weeks before, hoping to solicit some original Lennon and McCartney manuscripts to give to John Cage for his 50th birthday celebrations as Cage collected original scores of modem music. Paul said no but told her that John might let her have one. Well we know that the exhibition opened on the 8th, and they were still setting it up very early in the morning, and Roman Polanski stopped by very early and said Let Me In! And they did. Barry Miles should know this, because the very article about it ran a week after the exhibition opened in the International Times. November 12 Paul and Mal drove from Bordeaux to Spain, making home movies en route. Paul originally intended to meet John in Almeria but John finished shooting his part early and was already home. John knows about an exhibition while he's still in Spain, but Paul doesn't know John isn't in Spain anymore. Possible. He went out the same day as John arrived on the 6th. But Mal Evans surely would know John was back, and say hey, Paul. No point driving to Spain. John's already back in England. Because Mal met Paul in France before they drove there. Maybe it slipped Mal's mind? Maybe Mal didn't know either. How much time does Mal have to get the information that John is back from Spain already, and to tell Paul, don't bother going there, he's home already. drtomoculus.blogspot.co.uk/2012_10_01_archive.html
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 3, 2013 16:15:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 3, 2013 16:18:01 GMT -5
Thomas Thompson (1933–1982) was a journalist and author. He was born in Texas and graduated from the University of Texas in 1955. He then worked as a reporter and editor at the Houston Press.[1] Thompson joined Life Magazine in 1961 and became an editor and staff writer. While at Life he covered the JFK assassination and was the first writer to locate Lee Harvey Oswald's home and wife. Among his stories were coverage of the making of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band by the Beatles, in which he revealed the group's extensive drug use; an in-depth look at Frank Sinatra and his alleged Mafia ties; and the 40th and 50th birthdays of Elizabeth Taylor. His book Hearts (1971) concerned the rivalry between Houston surgeons Michael DeBakey and Denton Cooley at the dawn of the heart transplant era. Richie: The Ultimate Tragedy Between One Decent Man and the Son He Loved (1973) was the story of a Long Island man who killed his drug-addicted son. This was made into a TV-movie called The Death of Richie. Thompson's most successful book was Blood and Money (1976). It was based on a true story of scandal and murder. The book sold four million copies in fourteen languages. Thompson also wrote Serpentine (1979), the story of convicted murderer Charles Sobhraj. Thompson wrote one novel, Celebrity (1982), which was on the national best-seller list for six months. That novel became the basis for a five hour mini series in 1984. Thompson received the National Headliner Award for investigative reporting. He was also the 1977 Edgar Award winner for Blood and Money. Thompson's family believed that the liver disease that caused his death was contracted in the Far East while investigating the Charles Sobhraj saga. When he became ill, Thomas was teaching writing at the University of Southern California.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Feb 3, 2013 16:46:55 GMT -5
Nope. Fury unabated. I want that original QUEEN article that Thompson cut and pasted from. I want to see if what was said was another "We're bigger than Jesus Christ" statement taken out of context. Cuz Thompson was good at finding stuff. And the backlash from this QUEEN article seemed by accounts fairly strong.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Feb 4, 2013 5:57:21 GMT -5
November 12 Paul and Mal drove from Bordeaux to Spain, making home movies en route. Paul originally intended to meet John in Almeria but John finished shooting his part early and was already home. John knows about an exhibition while he's still in Spain, but Paul doesn't know John isn't in Spain anymore. Possible. He went out the same day as John arrived on the 6th. But Mal Evans surely would know John was back, and say hey, Paul. No point driving to Spain. John's already back in England. Because Mal met Paul in France before they drove there. Maybe it slipped Mal's mind? Maybe Mal didn't know either. How much time does Mal have to get the information that John is back from Spain already, and to tell Paul, don't bother going there, he's home already. drtomoculus.blogspot.co.uk/2012_10_01_archive.html Paul initially, I believe, was on his own in France which just adds to the confusion over why Mal didn't know that John was back in London when he (Mal) met Paul on the 12th. They then contact 'the office' to arrange for the DB5 to be sent home. Surely they would mention that John was back in London! We need to also consider that Neil Aspinall was with John whilst he was in Spain. It is almost as if Aspinall is baby-sitting John and Mal the same for Paul. Could it be that Paul is being deliberately kept out of the country to facilitate the meeting between John and Yoko?
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 4, 2013 9:12:46 GMT -5
Yeah. Youv'e got the perfect term for precisely this crucial time period... "baby-sitting." Everything was under control and being choreographed. If anyone still alive (Cyn, for example) tells what they know or suspect was really going on, the person would probably be "topped off." Such is the serious nature of the control. Here are the latest 2656alquimia video for your viewing pleasure. I can't read spanish, but you can get the gist of it anyway just looking at the pictures. I was on a litleneutrino kick, then I got onto watching all the 2656alquimia. The earlier ones with the clips of the John Halliday Forthlin Road custodian really got me onto watching 2656alquimia's videos. "John Halliday" reminds me of the sad BeeGees single "you're a holiday." Anyway, in the new longer one, I guess (can't read spanish) the message is sort of Germany lost the war, but the Nazis didn't as they only morphed into the 'Illuminati' or some such message... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUDszDp7zHswww.youtube.com/watch?v=7fdyUIbKOmYwww.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZhFNlw5bjQHere's our fave sorcerer 'rammin' it down the naive public's throats... www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsQ3kIMdrAQ
|
|
|
Post by multiverser on Feb 4, 2013 9:55:07 GMT -5
I'd love to see a video of the John Halliday Forthlin Road Custodian footage with BeeGees "You're a Holiday" soundtrack! I mean, here you have a dude who looks like an aged Paul McCartney in Forthlin Road having his "pint a day" and for all the world this looks like the original Paul was extracted from The Beatles, replaced, put through some kind of hellish brainwashing until he knows not who he is and then they place him in his own childhood home to finish their total screwing of what's left of his mind. The guy comes off like he's been through the most hellish brainwashing. And there he is blubbering about his telly license and having his pint and explaining "I'm off work now, so it's O.K." and the English tourists taunting him about how his being there has made him look like Paul. God, what a sick joke if that's what they did to the real Paul. Were Tavistock, the real Blue Meanies, saying to their evil selves, "Why don't we do it in the (Forthlin) road"
|
|